My point for saying that's it's rare here is if it's happening all the time then the consequences should be re-thought. Education around the subject should also be re-thought. Obviously the current system isn't working. We seem to be dealing with it in a way that prevents it somehow.
For example here something we have chronic issues with is drunk driving specific to rural areas worse than the city. So our system for that and education around it isn't working and needs to change. Maybe jail time is a good idea for drunk driving here.
If a crime is happening excessively then the current methods can be said to be ineffective.
To play devil's advocate...
If a person is driving drunk, and doesn't kill/harm anyone, how is it any different than reckless driving if it doesn't kill/harm anyone? Replacing one with the other is no different, as both are extreme lack of judgement, negligence, and thought for others. So, if your area's "punishment and rehabilitation" for drunk driving is classroom and non-jail time. What makes you think said similar corrective actions will work? As an FYI, many states mandate that a driver who's had a serious moving violation, or license revoked, have to attend a course related to the offense already.
Some of the differences between the US and Canada cultures show reflects in actions of people. Here in the US, especially around large cities, high rates of speed are very common. For example, I often comment that every time I'm in Atlanta, if you're driving the posted speed on the Interstate you're a road hazard because you're driving way too slow compared to the rest of traffic. Does it make speeding right? No. But, at the same time, do you just shut the interstate down and ticket everyone going that speed? It's a societal issue, I think because everyone is in too damn much of a hurry. Look at how fast-paced our lives have become. It's reflected in people rushing to get to work, and then get home to get the kids off to an event. Or, just rushing home to relax and eat dinner with a loved one. A little bit of irony in those last two, because they don't realize the danger they cause when they can just slow down a little and use the drive to calm a bit. I'd assume in large metro areas of Canada, or other areas of the world, have similar. At least when they aren't grid-locked with rush hour traffic.
Much of what you have said about laws such as reducing speed, moving over, etc. is state law where I live as well as many other places. Though, this isn't just about police, it's about any emergency vehicle on the roadway or even a car broken down on the side of the road. Just like we have a $300 minimum fine, double the speeding fines, as well as a reduced speed in construction zones. Most are considerate and do it whenever they can. Others, don't give a shit.
Again, some societal differences. Same here with between rural and urban areas. Which is interesting when it comes to politics since many will refer to rural people as "dumb hicks" when it's about elections and politiics. Yet, many talk about wanting to move from the city into a quieter place and "away from people". Makes one go "Hmm..."
It is sincere, but I question your sincerity. You didn't need to bring up the full cavity thing after what I said. It wasn't relevant and made me feel creepy.
It was relevant as it was in response to Charlie's comment about drugs, weapons, etc. potentially being brought into jail. It is something which may happen when being processed into jail. Though, if it does, it should be performed by a female corrections officer with at least one other to witness in case of any misconduct as well as if the person being searched attempts to resist.
But, you said you haven't been to court. Yet, you "know" you're already going to jail even though sentencing hasn't happened. So, either you're not telling the truth about court appearance and/or what the sentence is. Or, you're being over anxious and are dreading the worst that may possibly happen. I get the anxiety aspect because of having to make plans, yet not knowing what the punishment is. If there is jail time, it's usually not where they immediately whisk you away from the court room. Typically, it is sometime in the near future and they will allow you to schedule it within the next 3-6 months. Again, this is if there is any at all. Most times, the judge is lenient and will stay the jail time. Provided you don't have another traffic violation within a year or other timeline as stated by the judge. If you do have another violation, then it will be mandatory and whatever violation you have, may receive stiffer punishment as it shows you didn't really learn your lesson.
