your emotional response has nothing to with with whether what you believe actually happened.
Actually, that is exactly wrong, my emotional response has everything to do with what I believe actually happened.
(Upon rereading, I've added an edited response to this particular question at the bottom)
You have no facts you can prove in any way shape or form.
Believing and repeating something said to you many times is not a fact or a truth and will never make it so.
You're right I don't have any facts, nor do you. I'm agnostic as fuck, I get my news feed from a huge variety of sources, ranging from Breitbart and ZeroHedge all the way to Wiki Leaks, Al Jazeera, and Anon, and a lot of shit in the middle. I try to sift through that amalgamation of news and views to get what I perceive as an approximation of what I think is the truth. I believe you get so buried in your confirmation bias that you never make it very far past Alex Jones and some white nationalist you tubers. You seem so determined to have us question our sources but seem to have no doubt about yours.
you would hit someone for having a different view? incredible hypocritical remark by you.
I concur, I believe deeply in the freedom of speech and the fact that people can't be offended unless they choose. So you got me there, I'm a hypocrite in that sense, if I had to hear someone say that shit in person, I'd want to get all Buzz Aldriny on them.
Why was the Russian aspect completely ignored?
why did they say the Nazi's were the worse in history and cover the actual worse just before it?
Was it? I grew up aware that Stalin likely killed far more of his own people than Hitler killed Jews. That doesn't belittle what Hitler did and nor should you. I'm fairly sure it was under taught because during the war as we were allies, we don't gloat much on the effects of dropping atomic bombs either.
you are personally attacking me for absolutely no reason caused by me. Just you relying on emotions to do your thinking for you.
You dont make something illegal to talk about in a country unless you are trying to cover something up you dont want people to know.
thats proof enough right there.
You seem to know what a lot of people are thinking, and believing yourself to be the only enlightened one. The above quote is why you get personally attacked, you make assumptions about the people on here without knowing a thing about most of us. I'd like to think it's transference, but I don't know. "That's proof enough right there" is not proof enough at all. When you first showed up here spouting your rhetoric I assumed you were a young kid who just got a taste of college and unforced reading, but for the love of whatever, you're an adult. As much as you'd like to believe your enlightened and educating us, you're just the super nutty guy they gave hemlock to, not because he wasn't right, but because he was super annoying. I'll read one of your responses, but after that, I'm gonna put you on ignore for the sake of my blood pressure.
PS. Before you start on the 9-5 shirt and tie rant, don't bother, I'm not that breed.
PPS. (Edit) Aaaah sorry I misunderstood what you were attempting to say. Right, I get it, history is written by the winners, blah, blah, except it did happen. If the numbers are inflated, then the only turd here would be the one who insisted in bone counting to prove it was exaggerated. And might I ask what is the agenda of the oh for lack of better terms, deniers. What do you hope to gain by "proving" that it might only have been 3 million?