AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

Be Online and get $2 per hour!

  • Thread starter Deleted member 19118
  • Start date
  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think the offer completely missed the target also. I also have friends that live in Ro. and are skilled and unskilled. Even a managers income over there is generally less than $1k a MONTH. To those of us here in the states, we have a hard time comprehending working at anything that would pay well below our poverty level. To me if a camgirl is really hurting, she will already be working multiple sites and adding one more for a couple of extra bucks might help, but most likely wont make a difference if they talk or not with no paying traffic.
 
AmberCutie said:
Just to be clear: I am not saying it's an insult or an awful deal to offer $2/hour. I'm saying it isn't revolutionary and a huge freakin' deal the way the verbiage in the post came across.

I'm the one who used the word "insult." Me, over here. Not Amber. And I stand by it. For almost EVERY model on these forums, this offer is not appealing. It's like they did no research into what kinds of models are on ACF/what we make/where we're coming from...

I'm not insulted that this offer exists and I'm not insulted at the amount offered. I'm insulted that they're trying to sell it to me in such a cheese-ball way.

So I'm insulted.
1. They didn't bother to learn about who they're advertising to on here
2. They require a huge investment of time on a risky deal. Even for brand new girls in low-income countries, the traffic other sites can offer would probably far outweigh the $2/hour in monetary value.
3. They presented the offer with no data to back up their flamboyant language. It seems to me they expect the people they are advertising the offer to (the models of ACF) to be too stupid to think about this stuff when we're faced with superfluous vocabulary the late Billy Mays might have used to sell us laundry detergent.

I feel like a grumpy old man.

tumblr_miov79uXtF1s3xrufo2_250.gif
 
Jillybean said:
I'm the one who used the word "insult." Me, over here. Not Amber. And I stand by it. For almost EVERY model on these forums, this offer is not appealing. It's like they did no research into what kinds of models are on ACF/what we make/where we're coming from...


*whispers* I never read Amber's post, only the one directly above mine. I never read your post either, I was ... paraphrasing? That's not quite the right word, but near enough that hopefully people would realise what I'm trying to say :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: PlayboyMegan
Status
Not open for further replies.