AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

What is the most annoying thing a model can do?

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I feel this is an appropriate time to post a screen shot of LilahMorrigan and her Victoria's Secret HandBra... :whistle:
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot - 1_16_2014 , 8_27_46 PM.jpg
    Screenshot - 1_16_2014 , 8_27_46 PM.jpg
    348.8 KB · Views: 514
I don't see the big deal with the "handbra" thing. I don't think it creates weird angles, I think it looks hot, and when I hold my breasts together and do a hand bra type of tease I get loads of compliments about my breasts, possibly more than if I just let them be natural.

Personally it bugs me more when members get in a tiz about something that another person is doing "OH MY GOD THAT WOMAN ISN'T SHOWING HER FULL BREASTS! How fucking annoying of her!". Like Jolene said, fair enough if the woman said she was going to go topless without specifying that no nipples would be shown and you tipped for it, but if she's just doing it, then move on. You're not entitled to see her nipples/full breasts. Being able to see just that much boob is better than just seeing them in a bra, at least with this you get to see the general shape of the breast rather than just seeing a bit of cleavage.

I see you moaning about this kind of like a dude moaning about how some women go around wearing not much clothing and then they don't even sleep with them! I mean boo fucking hoo. If a woman is comfortable with showing x amount but isn't comfortable with showing it all then that's up to her, she doesn't have to show you everything, it's nice enough of her to show what she is showing!
 
Isabella_deL said:
I don't see the big deal with the "handbra" thing. I don't think it creates weird angles, I think it looks hot, and when I hold my breasts together and do a hand bra type of tease I get loads of compliments about my breasts, possibly more than if I just let them be natural.

Personally it bugs me more when members get in a tiz about something that another person is doing "OH MY GOD THAT WOMAN ISN'T SHOWING HER FULL BREASTS! How fucking annoying of her!". Like Jolene said, fair enough if the woman said she was going to go topless without specifying that no nipples would be shown and you tipped for it, but if she's just doing it, then move on. You're not entitled to see her nipples/full breasts. Being able to see just that much boob is better than just seeing them in a bra, at least with this you get to see the general shape of the breast rather than just seeing a bit of cleavage.

I see you moaning about this kind of like a dude moaning about how some women go around wearing not much clothing and then they don't even sleep with them! I mean boo fucking hoo. If a woman is comfortable with showing x amount but isn't comfortable with showing it all then that's up to her, she doesn't have to show you everything, it's nice enough of her to show what she is showing!

There seems to be a misunderstanding. Although I find hand bras unattractive in general, I wouldn't be mentioning it in this thread if the model wasn't tipped enough (or met her goal) to be topless/nude in the first place.
 
Bocefish said:
There seems to be a misunderstanding. Although I find hand bras unattractive in general, I wouldn't be mentioning it in this thread if the model wasn't tipped enough (or met her goal) to be topless/nude in the first place.

Yes but did you tip to meet that goal? And did she clearly specify they'd be nudity? I mean I can understand if a nude model did a topless countdown and then maybe did a few seconds occasionally of nipple showing and the rest covering her breasts with her hands, but if she's a non nude/non breast showing model who had a topless/naked countdown, kind of like I've seen Kickaz doing, and then does a whole show of teasing with hands then I think that's completely acceptable and I don't think dudes were ripped off. It says pretty clearly all over hers and many models profiles that they don't show xyz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kickaz
Isabella_deL said:
Bocefish said:
There seems to be a misunderstanding. Although I find hand bras unattractive in general, I wouldn't be mentioning it in this thread if the model wasn't tipped enough (or met her goal) to be topless/nude in the first place.

Yes but did you tip to meet that goal?

Yes, but that shouldn't really matter if the goal was met. When a model meets her stated goal for topless in public chat, that's her choice. She is doing it for tipping members. Topless does not mean hands covering breasts and other prems who would normally tip can get as annoyed by hand bras, they just don't feel as ripped off.

Isabella_deL said:
And did she clearly specify they'd be nudity?

No, it was a topless goal met this time that annoyed me enough to write about hand bras here.

Isabella_deL said:
I mean I can understand if a nude model did a topless countdown and then maybe did a few seconds occasionally of nipple showing and the rest covering her breasts with her hands
Bingo, you've won the booby prize. :downtown:

I wouldn't be griping about it here if it was a non-nude model or the goal wasn't met. If a model doesn't feel comfortable showing her breasts uncovered continuously, she should stick to flashes for tips.

:twocents-02cents:
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyLuna
Hand bras have their place on the glorious continuum of boob presentation methods, but I probably wouldn't stick around for long if it was all I could expect to look forward to, unless it was a special event for a (mostly) non-nude model I've discretely been lusting after. Anyway, I rarely tip toward a model's show unless I've gotten an idea of what to expect, even if it's "nothing", so I don't find myself being disappointed by whatever happens very often.

I'm a big fan of hand thongs though! :thumbleft:
 
Sevrin said:
I'm a big fan of hand thongs though! :thumbleft:

:shifty: please tell me I'm not the only one desperately positioning in front of the mirror to try and understand how this works.
 
Bocefish said:
JoleneBrody said:
Sevrin said:
I'm a big fan of hand thongs though! :thumbleft:

:shifty: please tell me I'm not the only one desperately positioning in front of the mirror to try and understand how this works.

I like toe thongs better. :mrgreen:

:think: ...
:handgestures-thumbdown:
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyLuna
JoleneBrody said:
Bocefish said:
JoleneBrody said:
Sevrin said:
I'm a big fan of hand thongs though! :thumbleft:

:shifty: please tell me I'm not the only one desperately positioning in front of the mirror to try and understand how this works.

I like toe thongs better. :mrgreen:

:think: ...
:handgestures-thumbdown:
Toe thongs A.K.A. barefoot sandals or foot thongs

5WB4myO.jpg
 
Sevrin said:
Hand bras have their place on the glorious continuum of boob presentation methods, but I probably wouldn't stick around for long if it was all I could expect to look forward to, unless it was a special event for a (mostly) non-nude model I've discretely been lusting after. Anyway, I rarely tip toward a model's show unless I've gotten an idea of what to expect, even if it's "nothing", so I don't find myself being disappointed by whatever happens very often.

I'm a big fan of hand thongs though! :thumbleft:

"the glorious continuum of boob presentation methods"

Someone really needs to make a Soviet realism propaganda poster with that as the text!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aurora and Starling
yossarian said:
I think another factor not being mentioned is that, in my experience, many (maybe most; maybe all) single men tend to look at all attractive women whom they befriend as potential mates. I actually had this discussion with a close friend recently--she remarked that she didn't understand why practically EVERY male friend of hers has, at one point or another, asked her out. "Why can't men just be friends?" she said, and I nodded in agreement, while silently thanking my lucky stars that I had resisted the urge to ask her out because, let's be honest, I had thought about it when we first met.
Ahhh the dreaded *friend-zone*.

I wonder if women realize that once a guy is in the *friend-zone* and if the guy sticks around she is now in the guys *holding-pattern*?
 
bakersman said:
Sevrin said:
Hand bras have their place on the glorious continuum of boob presentation methods, but I probably wouldn't stick around for long if it was all I could expect to look forward to, unless it was a special event for a (mostly) non-nude model I've discretely been lusting after. Anyway, I rarely tip toward a model's show unless I've gotten an idea of what to expect, even if it's "nothing", so I don't find myself being disappointed by whatever happens very often.

I'm a big fan of hand thongs though! :thumbleft:

"the glorious continuum of boob presentation methods"

Someone really needs to make a Soviet realism propaganda poster with that as the text!

*Ahem* This feels mildly offensive...
 

Attachments

  • handbra1.jpg
    handbra1.jpg
    135.2 KB · Views: 272
  • comradeside.jpg
    comradeside.jpg
    145.6 KB · Views: 271
  • gloriouscont copy.jpg
    gloriouscont copy.jpg
    103.2 KB · Views: 271
Bocefish said:
LilyMarie said:
So because she looks different with make-up than without, she has a 'fake' avatar...?

Not even close to the same person. Click on the images to enlarge. The eyes and mouth are different and so are the eyebrows.
Yeah, that's called make-up. :-D
I'm 100% sure it's the same person. You can do A LOT with make-up. Look at her nose, it's the same.
Her avatar is tiny of course but her brows look like they're thinner there than they are now. That's because she's going with the trend of fuller eyebrows. You can change your eyebrows' shape drastically if you want to. For all you know her avatar might be 2 or 3 years old, that's more than enough time to grow out your eyebrows even after years of dramatic plucking/tweezing.
 
LilyMarie said:
Bocefish said:
LilyMarie said:
So because she looks different with make-up than without, she has a 'fake' avatar...?

Not even close to the same person. Click on the images to enlarge. The eyes and mouth are different and so are the eyebrows.
Yeah, that's called make-up. :-D
I'm 100% sure it's the same person. You can do A LOT with make-up. Look at her nose, it's the same.
Her avatar is tiny of course but her brows look like they're thinner there than they are now. That's because she's going with the trend of fuller eyebrows. You can change your eyebrows' shape drastically if you want to. For all you know her avatar might be 2 or 3 years old, that's more than enough time to grow out your eyebrows even after years of dramatic plucking/tweezing.

Bullshit. How does her avatar with all the make-up show smile lines of a late 20s to mid 30 year old woman?
 
Polite as usual...
I'm done here.
 
I mean...this is Zooey Deschanel with different hair and makeup. Just sayin'.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    35.1 KB · Views: 170
LilyMarie said:
Polite as usual...
I'm done here.

:lol:

LilyMarie said:
For all you know her avatar might be 2 or 3 years old, that's more than enough time to grow out your eyebrows even after years of dramatic plucking/tweezing.

She says she's 18 now, so that avatar was taken when she was 15?
sdwriNi.gif


The avatar looks like it could her mother FFS, but with blue eyes.
 
Bocefish said:
LilyMarie said:
Polite as usual...
I'm done here.

:lol:

LilyMarie said:
For all you know her avatar might be 2 or 3 years old, that's more than enough time to grow out your eyebrows even after years of dramatic plucking/tweezing.

She says she's 18 now, so that avatar was taken when she was 15?
sdwriNi.gif


The avatar looks like it could her mother FFS, but with blue eyes.

Not to stir the pot but do you really believe every model who says she's 18? Do you also believe she is a natural blonde? :lol:

But seriously, whether it is her or not in the avi it is super weird when a model has a misleading picture up.
 
LilyEvans said:
Not to stir the pot but do you really believe every model who says she's 18? Do you also believe she is a natural blonde? :lol:

That's why I said "She says she's 18" and the girl in the avatar is definitely not a natural blonde, not 100% sure about the actual model though.

LilyEvans said:
But seriously, whether it is her or not in the avi it is super weird when a model has a misleading picture up.

Yep, but I consider more than super weird, hence the thread. ;)
 
Bocefish said:
LilyMarie said:
So because she looks different with make-up than without, she has a 'fake' avatar...?

Not even close to the same person. Click on the images to enlarge. The eyes and mouth are different and so are the eyebrows.
I agree that her profile images and her live image look like completely different people and the avatar is misleading.
 
AmberCutie said:
Bocefish said:
LilyMarie said:
So because she looks different with make-up than without, she has a 'fake' avatar...?

Not even close to the same person. Click on the images to enlarge. The eyes and mouth are different and so are the eyebrows.
I agree that her profile images and her live image look like completely different people and the avatar is misleading.

They are the same person though. She's very tanned in the other picture and her hair is blonder, she's also got very different make-up on and the lighting is very different. You can tell it's the same person if you zoom in and look at the shape of the face/lips and it's definitely the same nose. Sometimes photos don't look much like the person, sometimes it's hard to believe it is the same person, but it is. I agree that avatars at least should show an up to date picture, for example I would never have a blonde picture of me as my avatar, I have a few on my profile due to popular request. I also would not believe that photos on a model's profile are necessarily of her when she's over 18. A few of my blonde pictures I think I'm 17 in, they're not remotely sexual and are just of my face which looks exactly the same as now, but even so, they're showing a fairly wide age range.

I've actually had a dude once accuse my profile photos of not being me because apparently I looked different at the current time on cam... It was really fucking annoying as he simply wouldn't believe me or my regulars. How on earth would he know? Unless you've known someone for ages it's often hard to identify who they are in pictures. Because of being an artist I'm pretty practised at matching up lines and proportions on a face which help me tell things like that, but even I can't always tell when looking at people's photos.

I've had lines on my face since I was 14. Not wrinkles, but small creases that don't fade, they haven't got worse since then though, I actually have learned to smile a certain way on camera so my eyes don't smile like they usually would. As far as wrinkles go a lot of women's faces aren't really all that different from the age of 16 to their late 20s, what changes are the amount of fat on a face and definition. Of course if you have bad genes/smoke, drink, work outside or any other things that cause skin to wrinkle quicker all the time then yeah you'll age faster, but people really don't suddenly become wrinkled old sacks when they're in their late 20s unless they're really unlucky or have an unhealthy lifestyle.

So yes the photo is misleading to how she currently looks, which is probably mainly because it currently is winter in most places meaning she's pale and her hair is darker, rather than being tanned and having bright blonde hair, but the photo is still her. You also don't have to be so rude about this stuff. I don't know if you're having your male version of pms or something, but I don't really see the need to actually post caps and names of models up here moaning about little things they do. Maybe these things are annoying, but maybe you're just getting annoyed because you're in an irritable mood. As much as I understand needing to rant about annoying people, it'd be nicer if on the public forum where these girls can actually see what you post you'd keep your cool and hold off the bitching for pm's with those who understand. If not then don't get even more annoyed when girls rise to defend someone else in their profession, because we could also be at fault for these tiny things so really we're defending ourselves.
 
Isabella_deL said:
AmberCutie said:
Bocefish said:
LilyMarie said:
So because she looks different with make-up than without, she has a 'fake' avatar...?

Not even close to the same person. Click on the images to enlarge. The eyes and mouth are different and so are the eyebrows.
I agree that her profile images and her live image look like completely different people and the avatar is misleading.

They are the same person though.
:lol: Can you explain why the smile lines are so prevalent in the avatar, yet don't exist on her actual no make-up live image? Those type of deep smile lines only happen over time.

I agree there are similarities, like her nose, and they might even be related but are no way the same person.

In addition to the other features I mentioned earlier, her chin is also different.

As to posting her model name on here, that was to prove I wasn't posting different models.

Whether you agree they are the same person or not, the gripe is about misleading avatars.
 
Bocefish said:
Isabella_deL said:
AmberCutie said:
Bocefish said:
LilyMarie said:
So because she looks different with make-up than without, she has a 'fake' avatar...?

Not even close to the same person. Click on the images to enlarge. The eyes and mouth are different and so are the eyebrows.
I agree that her profile images and her live image look like completely different people and the avatar is misleading.

They are the same person though.
:lol: Can you explain why the smile lines are so prevalent in the avatar, yet don't exist on her actual no make-up live image? Those type of deep smile lines only happen over time.

I agree there are similarities, like her nose, and they might even be related but are no way the same person.

In addition to the other features I mentioned earlier, her chin is also different.

As to posting her model name on here, that was to prove I wasn't posting different models.

Whether you agree they are the same person or not, the gripe is about misleading avatars.

Any type of wrinkle can be easily exaggerated or hidden depending on the lighting conditions....personally there are many models who look nothing like there avatars, until a few days later I see them again and they look very similar....makeup can really do a lot, and sometimes it is not always fair to judge someone on their looks on a couple days.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.