Is it easy for members to overspend on Amazon wishlists?This is a situation that I believe most successful camgirls have experienced a few times in their career.
One of your top 3 tippers for the last 6 months or more, tells you that he is running out of money.
This is because he has lost his job, or because he is tipping beyond his means and going through his inheritance, kids college funds, or accident payout etc.
To your surprise, over the next month or two, you really don't notice a big decrease in tipping. He does tell you about the financial stress this is causing, huge credit card bills, falling behind on mortgage payments, tuition payments, or wife threatened divorce.
So what are the ethics in this situation?
Is it easy for members to overspend on Amazon wishlists?
I am trying to be cautious though have one model who I want to support, as she has had difficulty getting her cam score high enough and is generous with chat, snaps etc.. But I am a relatively small spender, though spending more than I should. I wish there was a way to send support directly so half or more of the value of the tokens wasn't lost to the site, instead of going to the model directly.
I would suggest this conversation be held in a private message exchange and not in the general chat room.I think it's a very good idea to give the customer a graceful "out" by assuring him that you understand and won't think any less of him if he has to reduce his spending. An example of a mature conversation of this nature might be: Him: "Hey, my job situation has changed recently, and I need to tighten my budget. I don't want you to think I adore you any less, though!" Me: "I'm sorry to hear that, but I completely understand. Thanks for letting me know that I didn't do anything wrong! I'll look forward to playing with you when you can, and I won't be offended when you can't."
Unfortunately, I've had several scenarios when guys gave me a sob story about their finances in order to angle for free stuff. For example: Him: "Bb, I've been spending so much on you that I'm going broke! I can't keep doing this anymore." Me: basically the exact same answer as the previous example. Him: "But bb, I looooove you soooo much! I neeeeed to see you!" Me: "Um, well, could you either reduce your other expenses or increase your income? Because, you know... math..." Him: Even more detailed sob story, followed by "I know I get you off the best, so maybe when you're horny we could play on Skype just for fun. You must be really wound up after faking it all night* for your other customers, so it would kinda be a favor to you." After I decline this generous offer, they usually continue their regular spending pattern with me or someone else, and I feel no need to worry about their budget.
*I very rarely fake it - only if someone is extremely insistent that I cum in a way that just isn't possible.
To the original question, do models have a moral obligation to stop their customers from ruinous spending? No, we're all grown adults, and telling someone how to manage their own budget is incredibly rude. On the other hand, insinuating that a lower level of spending is unacceptable to you isn't especially ethical and is a terrible business decision (no one wants to feel pressured and guilty in a cam room).
Yes, absolutely! This isn't a public type of conversation! I was raised to be very averse to discussion of money/income in ANY context, so I forgot that some people do not feel shame about discussing their financial situation in a group setting. (And if you are shameless about public financial disclosure, there's really nothing wrong with that. In the right context, it could even be helpful for others. Just not in a public cam room!)I would suggest this conversation be held in a private message exchange and not in the general chat room.
Unfortunately, I've had several scenarios when guys gave me a sob story about their finances in order to angle for free stuff. For example: Him: "Bb, I've been spending so much on you that I'm going broke! I can't keep doing this anymore." Me: basically the exact same answer as the previous example. Him: "But bb, I looooove you soooo much! I neeeeed to see you!" Me: "Um, well, could you either reduce your other expenses or increase your income? Because, you know... math..." Him: Even more detailed sob story, followed by "I know I get you off the best, so maybe when you're horny we could play on Skype just for fun. You must be really wound up after faking it all night* for your other customers, so it would kinda be a favor to you." After I decline this generous offer, they usually continue their regular spending pattern with me or someone else, and I feel no need to worry about their budget.
*I very rarely fake it - only if someone is extremely insistent that I cum in a way that just isn't possible.
Honest question, do you think bars have a responsibility to stop serving alcohol to someone who's drunk? Alternatively, if someone says "I'm an alcoholic and drinking here is a problematic part of my addiction", do they have a responsibility to stop?I think of it as a business transaction. Remove all "moral" aspects of it and that's all it is. If someone maxes out their credit card buying some furniture or electronics at a store, is the store responsible? NO!
If someone gets in over his / her head by going into debt buying a car, is the dealer responsible? NO!
Same situation with the "moral" aspect of "sex work" removed from it.
I'm not sure the physical addiction to alcohol / drugs would be equivalent to an emotional addiction like a sex addiction would be. However, I do think if someone is drunk the bartender has a responsibility to stop serving them if nothing else to avoid possible liability from what may result from it. A person that is an alcoholic or drug addict has a personal responsibility to avoid situations where they can relapse.Honest question, do you think bars have a responsibility to stop serving alcohol to someone who's drunk? Alternatively, if someone says "I'm an alcoholic and drinking here is a problematic part of my addiction", do they have a responsibility to stop?
Either way, I think a key point of @HiGirlsRHot's argument is that the camgirl is made aware of the issue. That doesn't seem to be the case in your example @MrSwoob as far as I could tell?
For my opinion, I guess if I strip it down to really basic argument of responsibility, nobody has any responsibility to anyone but themselves. It reminds me of the argument that if your husband cheats on you, you can't be mad at the woman he's sleeping with because *technically* she has no responsibility to you. Like, yeah I guess she didn't marry me, but if she's doing it knowingly I can still think she's a cunt. It's still icky, questionable behaviour and I have no responsibility to not be judgmental, lol. I wouldn't want money from someone who's told me it's affecting them negatively.
That said, like Jolene, I'd likely ban them if they kept saying that and then tipping. Too much drama and I have no interest in playing the scolding nanny to someone who clearly enjoys the back-and-forth. And if you're addicted to tipping, get off the camsites. I wouldn't want that person in my room.
This is an interesting topic. My initial feeling would be that they were looking for a domme thing. If that weren't the case, I would personally ban. I do not, however, think it would be ethically my job to ban or really helpful to the member for me to do so. If we're talking about an actual addict, infantilizing them or removing all personal responsibility by blaming whatever they've become addicted to will not help them long term.
Last time my husband fell off the wagon (it's off right?), I spent a couple of weeks trying to fight the drugs, the drug dealers, anyone who was giving him money. I just wanted to insulate him from all of it until he went back to wanting sobriety...until he went back to the person I wanted. But, that's not how it works. He cleaned me out while I worried and fought for him. He didn't get back to reality until he wanted to. Once I did everything I needed to to insulate myself from the nonsense, he owned all of his choices and I was safe. That's how I see banning a member who is acting squirrely. It is in MY best interest. I hope they make better choices, but I'm not going to be drained by the drama.
Counter question: If you know that a camgirl is addicted to money, food, shopping or substances, do you, as a member, feel personal responsibility for spending tokens on her?
either way, I think a key point of @HiGirlsRHot's argument is that the camgirl is made aware of the issue. That doesn't seem to be the case in your example @MrSwoob as far as I could tell?
For my opinion, I guess if I strip it down to really basic argument of responsibility, nobody has any responsibility to anyone but themselves. It reminds me of the argument that if your husband cheats on you, you can't be mad at the woman he's sleeping with because *technically* she has no responsibility to you. Like, yeah I guess she didn't marry me, but if she's doing it knowingly I can still think she's a cunt. It's still icky, questionable behaviour and I have no responsibility to not be judgmental, lol. I wouldn't want money from someone who's told me it's affecting them negatively.
Do you all think addiction to camsites/tipping can be a real thing?
Regarding your question. I'm not sure how you become addicted to food, or money.
http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/...ating-disorder/mental-health-food-addiction#1
Food addiction is an eating disorder. You get an emotional rush, compulsions to eat past the point of hunger etc. Negative consequences in your life but you can't stop yourself.
I'm a bit confused that you're asking this?
People can definitely be addicted to food or money. Those are just acceptable addictions in our culture, and a lot of addicts move from something less acceptable to something like food or even work. I didn't mean to come off cold. I definitely believe that loved ones can assist an addict along with medical help. My husband moved across the country with me a couple of months after we met and was able to stay sober because it gave him a new start without contacts, he had a doctor, he had my support and HE wanted to be sober. I just disagree with climbing on the moral high horse and acting like some naked girl on the internet is changing an addict's behavior by cutting him off. It might be tempting to feel good about yourself for turning down money, and turning down money is certainly the right thing to do for your own self, but it's not saving anyone from anything. I guess the approach that Jolene and I are taking feels more respectful to me. If I ban someone because their problems are too much for me to carry, I'm treating them as an equal. If I say "hey, dude. you're addicted to me, and I need to save you from yourself!" I'm not.Regarding your question. I'm not sure how you become addicted to food, or money. I have on a few occasion felt responsible (or fall victim to a sob story) to bail a model out who through a combination of bad luck/lack of camming, said they were broke and need money for "rent". In one of the cases after doing this a couple of times only to find the model went out a bought luxury items (expensive concert tickets and clothes, etc) instead of paying off her credit cards. I did stop tipping her.
If one of my favorite models developed a substance abuse addiction, I'd urge her to get help but if they didn't work I won't hesitate to cut her off. I don't want to contribute to the epidemic of drug ODs in the country.
While you are right that ultimately only the addict can fix the problem, don't underestimate the impact that family and loved ones can do to help the addict. A good friend of mine's son become an Ice addict in high school, she did everything you did and more including telling his friend that she was holding them responsible if he got high and they didn't tell her. The family consensus is he'd be dead if she didn't do this stuff and dozen years later he has a lovely wife, good job, adorable kid and one of the gentlest giants (6' 5") I know.
Both your and Jolene approach from practical level makes sense, but I suspect there is an element of it doesn't feel right either.
Gosh I love hearing thisGen is exactly right.
Honest question, do you think bars have a responsibility to stop serving alcohol to someone who's drunk? Alternatively, if someone says "I'm an alcoholic and drinking here is a problematic part of my addiction", do they have a responsibility to stop?
Either way, I think a key point of @HiGirlsRHot's argument is that the camgirl is made aware of the issue. That doesn't seem to be the case in your example @MrSwoob as far as I could tell?
For my opinion, I guess if I strip it down to really basic argument of responsibility, nobody has any responsibility to anyone but themselves. It reminds me of the argument that if your husband cheats on you, you can't be mad at the woman he's sleeping with because *technically* she has no responsibility to you. Like, yeah I guess she didn't marry me, but if she's doing it knowingly I can still think she's a cunt. It's still icky, questionable behaviour and I have no responsibility to not be judgmental, lol. I wouldn't want money from someone who's told me it's affecting them negatively.
That said, like Jolene, I'd likely ban them if they kept saying that and then tipping. Too much drama and I have no interest in playing the scolding nanny to someone who clearly enjoys the back-and-forth. And if you're addicted to tipping, get off the camsites. I wouldn't want that person in my room.
One thing i sometimes wonder: what about findommes? They, I think, are in somewhat of a different financial relationship with members than the average camgirl. Do they have a responsibility?
I had to tell a guy to fuck off until he got paid because he kept trying to come back for more blackmail fantasy role play when he was in between paychecks. It's not my job to control how much they spend. No, I don't want anyone to actually go in financial ruin, I just like the fantasy. But I am providing a service and 100% believe any dude who brings up his sob story is just trying to be manipulative.I've been contemplating this, because part of the fetish of femdom, for some men, is the Domme saying "Go broke for Me, ruin your finances for Me, give Me everything". Do the Dommes mean it? Personally, I'd rather have a sub who steadily tributes a more modest amount than one who drops a huge amount and can't continue.
Yeah, that's straight up manipulative.They're trying to get free shit. They know what they're doing. This is exactly why I don't believe sob stories.Unfortunately, I've had several scenarios when guys gave me a sob story about their finances in order to angle for free stuff. For example: Him: "Bb, I've been spending so much on you that I'm going broke! I can't keep doing this anymore." Me: basically the exact same answer as the previous example. Him: "But bb, I looooove you soooo much! I neeeeed to see you!" Me: "Um, well, could you either reduce your other expenses or increase your income? Because, you know... math..." Him: Even more detailed sob story, followed by "I know I get you off the best, so maybe when you're horny we could play on Skype just for fun. You must be really wound up after faking it all night* for your other customers, so it would kinda be a favor to you." After I decline this generous offer, they usually continue their regular spending pattern with me or someone else, and I feel no need to worry about their budget.
What do you think of this article? https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140212153252.htmAbsolutely this is an issue. I see guys who are working very middle class jobs dumping their entire paychecks into tipping their favorite models. These guys seem to fall in love and lose a healthy perspective on where the limits are. So you get the feeling that there is some kind of delusional element to it, on top of some kind of real love addiction issue.
You do feel bad for such people, but I never feel it is my place to talk to them about it. It is sad though. For the model, I agree with Ms Lollipop that it falls under personal ethics, rather than a moral duty.
What do you think of this article? https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140212153252.htm