AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

Camgirl Pleads Guilty to Sex Show in Library

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I dont agree with the judge telling her to have some respect for herself but I agree she should have some for others and the community doing what she did. The fine and probation seem fair enough I guess.
 
I really don't like the chastising she got from the judge. I absolutely think that camming in public places is a crime and should be treated as such, but the judge's statement was something that would only ever be aimed at a young woman. It's too bad that she didn't speak up when given the chance. The end there sounded like regret for camming at all instead of just camming without regard for places that do not belong to us. Another poor, young girl roped into internet porn blah blah blah. Cliche.
 
The video of her on that page. 27 seconds of her walking from the door to a car past all the press taking pictures. Did anyone else think Game of Thrones with Cersei's walk?
We still have a modern day version of that.

:watching:
 
I really don't like the chastising she got from the judge. I absolutely think that camming in public places is a crime and should be treated as such, but the judge's statement was something that would only ever be aimed at a young woman. It's too bad that she didn't speak up when given the chance. The end there sounded like regret for camming at all instead of just camming without regard for places that do not belong to us. Another poor, young girl roped into internet porn blah blah blah. Cliche.

I doubt that the judge would have been any kinder to a man doing a cam show in a library.
 
I doubt that the judge would have been any kinder to a man doing a cam show in a library.
I suspect that man would have been forced to register as a sex offender, and at the very least given lots of community service if not some jail time. At least in the US may the sex offender laws aren't as tough in Canada.
 
I don't watch cams on MFC anymore since I stopped working on that site, but when I did I saw SO many girls doing library/coffee shop shows. Always blew my mind. I would never have the balls to cam from a public place like that, that'd give me one hell of a panic attack. :bag:

Bummer she got caught and put on blast like this, but she did set herself up for it nonetheless.
 
I doubt that the judge would have been any kinder to a man doing a cam show in a library.
Agreed. I don't think he needed to be kinder. What he said about respecting herself was just very girl oriented and at the end where they seemed to say camming at all was the problem makes her sound victimized.
 
They say $250 is the penalty, but realistically, her fee to the lawyers is $3000+ not to mention the cost of whatever it is to take sites down that contain her actual name. Not to mention the cost of her not being able to get another job because of this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yummybrownfox
They say $250 is the penalty, but realistically, her fee to the lawyers is $3000+ not to mention the cost of whatever it is to take sites down that contain her actual name. Not to mention the cost of her not being able to get another job because of this.
She will never be able to get her real name down off of sites. Its public info and therefore places have a right to print it and write about it. All she can do is try to get the actual videos of her on MFC down from porn sites and such or try to get google to block the results. Really at this point it will be a fruitless effort cause everyone is gonna keep uploading stuff like this.
 
She could just go the same way as Kendra and audition for NakedNews and get a contract with Vivid.
 
She will never be able to get her real name down off of sites. Its public info and therefore places have a right to print it and write about it. All she can do is try to get the actual videos of her on MFC down from porn sites and such or try to get google to block the results. Really at this point it will be a fruitless effort cause everyone is gonna keep uploading stuff like this.

I heard a few years ago about companies that handle such things: instead of trying to take down real names off websites, they create tons of random websites, fake profiles, and so on, to overflow Google with references with that name that lead nowhere, in order to push the problematic websites down in the pagerank.
 
I heard a few years ago about companies that handle such things: instead of trying to take down real names off websites, they create tons of random websites, fake profiles, and so on, to overflow Google with references with that name that lead nowhere, in order to push the problematic websites down in the pagerank.
You can actually do this yourself. Google has certain sites that will come first when you google a name. Pinterest, fb, etc will come before news articles usually. So creating accounts like these will push back other stuff. And since usually people dont go past page 1 of google it works pretty well. No need for these companies to do it for you at all.

Google soon will start removing page results for revenge porn as well as your real name when it's used in other bad ways (like on porn sites) and even company names too. In Europe google actually is being forced now to remove results any person requests to have removed. So far they just did it to sites like google.fr results instead of google.com however that is now being fought as well. I expect soon it will become a fight in the US as well to be able to do. (And by soon I mean like 10-15 years cause that's how slow the US is with these things.)
 
I still stand by what I said in the previous thread. I don't think this was that all that bad and even if it was, being publicly exposed is more than enough punishment anyway.
 
I still stand by what I said in the previous thread. I don't think this was that all that bad and even if it was, being publicly exposed is more than enough punishment anyway.

Every single one of us (cam models/sex workers in general) has put ourselves at risk of being publicly exposed. That's just something that comes with the job. Caming in your college library just increases that risk by a fucking billion. Caming in public places, especially one like that, shouldn't be allowed at all. It's totally fucked, that's public indecency at it's maximum basically. You can never know if someone under 18 is going to be around. How is that not all that bad?

She just got probation anyways. It's not like she actually served jail time or anything. She made an incredibly stupid decision and it's no surprise it compromised her ability to be incognito.
 
Apparently she's migrated to Chaturbate where she has 34k(!) followers as we speak. All's well that ends well I suppose. I only wonder how she gained those followers, since she's camming under a different, non-descript nick, as if in an attempt to stay incognito. Well, with her looks (superhot nerd with XXXXL boobs -- impossible to resist for the strereotypical online show client) I doubt that she needs her newfound notoriety to rake in the dough, although it wouldn't hurt for sure.

I also wonder what the sentence would've been if the remorseful lady would've been known to have stuffed her every hole with various dildoes in front of paying customers a mere day before and after attending the trial, lolz!^^ Or perhaps the judge did know... :angelic::eek:
 
I also wonder what the sentence would've been if the remorseful lady would've been known to have stuffed her every hole with various dildoes in front of paying customers a mere day before and after attending the trial, lolz!^^ Or perhaps the judge did know... :angelic::eek:
Are people not allowed to do their job or work in their chosen profession prior to or after facing a judge? If she was not breaking any laws then what does it matter what she was doing prior too and after her trial?
 
Are people not allowed to do their job or work in their chosen profession prior to or after facing a judge? If she was not breaking any laws then what does it matter what she was doing prior too and after her trial?
While it may not have been obvious over the internet, if anything, I think she should receive a medal for the bravery of her brazen antics. I'm only wondering as to the course that the moralitans would've taken had they known of this (in their eyes) incriminating circumstance. FWIW, I wouldn't put it past some to accuse her of lying in court if she made her statement under oath (i.e. that she's retiring from the cam business altogether). But it's tenous enough that only the most asinine of the moralitans would bother (which, I'd imagine, must be a sizeable portion of them).
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACFFAN69
Status
Not open for further replies.