Sevrin said:
mutantdonut said:
I think it's only a matter of time before this happens.
Anyway, the OP made clear she's not doing, or planning to do cum shows in the library. Just a little nudge-nudge, wink-wink like Kickaz does. The thing with Kick's shows is that it's not about getting naked, but about how much fun she has engaging her room and reacting to her environment. Also, she's super cute and has an awesome smile. Personally, I find her shows more enjoyable when she's at home and is more talky, but there's definitely nothing pornographic about her library shows.
The church one has already been done, on Christmas Eve no less.
ray:
LilahMorrigan said:
Wow. I don't usually get riled up about things on the forum, but this is some bullshit. Good to know that to some people, taking off items of clothing, doing silly dances, and flashing the camera while at a university library is "classless and disrespectful," whilst half the girls on MFC shove giant toys in various orifices several times a day. I'm not judging those girls or what they do, mind you- my point is that you've got some really weird standards for "classy."
Actually you are judging them and letting us know what you think is classy or not. Can't make a statement like that then go with the "just saying" card to try and make it not judgmental. As Amber pointed out, there is a big difference between the two. One is in public where anyone could see the other is in private and being viewed by those who agreed to it.
It is really simple. Even if someone doesn't have a problem with random public nudity, other people do. What is acceptable in public stops when it encroaches on other peoples rights. Somehow, I doubt the people doing public shows would be ok or happy with the stereotypical perv in the trench coat flashing them or jerking off in front of them, so why do they think it is fine for them to do?