sorrowfool said:
Harvrath said:
sorrowfool said:
There's no question that Zimmerman was at least partially responsible for what happened here. Even in the scenario where Trayvon was beating him to death and he killed him to protect himself, Zimmerman shares blame. As far as most people seem to be concerned, Stand Your Ground is off the table for him. He lost the right to claim that when he pursued Trayvon. That situation could have been completely avoided, but Zimmerman made it happen. Regardless of what you believe happened, that much is known, so he bears at least a part of the blame. It would be wrong for him to get away with this scott-free, as many others who have claimed Stand Your Ground have. It would reinforce scary precedent.
We honestly do not know. Zimmerman could have been walking away when Trayvon assaulted him, in which case Trayvon is completely at fault.
So you're giving the benefit of the doubt to Zimmerman who followed a teenager against advice, armed, with an obvious preconceived idea of guilt, and a history of violence, against Trayvon with a clean record, who just left the house to buy some candy, and is too dead to defend himself? Ask yourself why that is. How does that make sense? What makes Zimmerman's account so credible?
Because I have a police report backing up Zimmerman's account. You got neighbors stating that Zimmerman sustained injuries. You got the Funeral Director stating that Trayvon had no injuries other than the single gun-shot wound which is consistent with Zimmerman's account, it would also be consistent with Zimmerman simply walking upto Trayvon and firing a shot, but would be inconsistent with Zimmerman's injuries and eye-witness accounts, one of which says he saw Zimmerman on the ground and Trayvon on top.
Am I supposed to suspend reason and assume that the PD, the State Attorney, the eye-witnesses and neighbors who corroborate Zimmerman are all lying and/or corrupt?