Nordling said:It wasn't a case of "relying on a lawyer;" it was a case of a state attorney OVERRULING the decision of a peace officer.Bocefish said:Nordling said:You're still ignoring the question. WHY DID A STATE ATTORNEY GET UP IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT AND DRIVE 50 MILES TO STOP A NOBODY FROM BEING ARRESTED?!
I also never said the arresting officer was taking a shot in the dark. He felt he had cause to arrest; someone who was NOT there during the arrest vetoed his decision. This happens...but rarely in the middle of the night.
I dunno why he did or even if he did. Ask Him.
Feeling you have cause to arrest and going by the facts and circumstances at the time are 2 different things. That's why law enforcement officers rely on actual lawyers sometimes.
Why do you think the officer was going on "feelings" alone? How do you know the facts he went on were not sufficient?
LOL, you're the one that said
He felt he had cause to arrest