It gives me a warm fuzzy that you think LEOs would risk responding on this site.
Possibly there are some here with significant others or friends that are LEOs who could post on their behalf....
It gives me a warm fuzzy that you think LEOs would risk responding on this site.
Possibly there are some here with significant others or friends that are LEOs who could post on their behalf....
I think what @Bocefish meant is given the animosity towards cops most people on this thread have expressed nobody who is a LEO would want to post here.
As for SOs and families of LEOs, I think @LuckySmiles stated she comes from an LEO family.
Never been much of an Apple fan aside from the ones that can help keep doctors away with daily doses, but it's apparently newsworthy they have recently replaced their so-called realistic silver .357 gun emoji with a plastic green squirt gun emoji.
That is all.
There was, in Obama’s manner of carrying himself, something that upended traditional status relations. An early sign of this came while Obama was on the campaign trail. At a meeting with wealthy Democratic donors, he described the plight of the white working class in Midwestern small towns, where “the jobs have been gone now for twenty-five years and nothing’s replaced them,” and remarked, “It’s not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” This certainly wasn’t the first time an authority figure had spoken patronizingly of the white working class. But now the authority figure was black, and had spoken with the confidence that the future belonged to people like him.
Obama, in essence, had given poor and working-class white people the language to think of themselves as outsiders. After all, they weren’t the kind of people who would have been in the room with him that day. Within the more responsive spheres of media and entertainment, of course, Obama’s rise has helped us imagine how America will see itself once “white” and mainstream are no longer synonymous.
. . . .
There is certainly a kind of everyday snobbery toward what Isenberg calls “white trash” which has become routine and reflexive, a condescension that, for example, makes poor-white subcultures on reality television seem so exotic and fascinating. But does the fact that whiteness is no longer an unequivocal badge of privilege have any consequences for the systemic persistence of black disadvantage?
. . . .
Already, we’ve seen that, in the absence of a political system run by people “no different from the rest of us,” many working-class whites feel abandoned, realizing that the system has always thrived on inequality. One result was the Tea Party, which emerged in 2009. Another has been the rise of Donald Trump, who, though opposed by many Tea Party activists, has drawn on the same loose energies that sustained that movement. He has shown that “white rage” and the nostalgia that underwrites feelings of racial resentment are renewable resources, and a cross-applicable rationale for xenophobia. As whiteness becomes a badge of dispossession, earned or not, it’s likely that future elections will only grow more hostile, each one a referendum on our constantly shifting triangulations of identity and power.
....Flash forward 21 years, and he is counting down the years he has left before he can retire. He has moved up high in the ranks and he says he may go in the drop, but with the current climate of law enforcement, I doubt he will. He HATES the politics of it, and the higher the rank, the worse the politics are. There are lots of other reasons he is anxious to retire, but that is probably number one on his list.
....He used to be proud to share what he did for a living. Now he keeps a MUCH lower profile. When asked what he does for a living he is much more vague until he really gets to know someone. Now when he is in uniform he gets snares, people whisper, and all eyes are on him....
What does "politics" mean in this context?
Does he (or you) have any idea why this is? I generally agree, and I know that my own attitude toward the police is somewhat less favorable than it was, say, 25 years ago. I can't put my finger on why that is, though.
We live in Florida.Currently, I live in a conservative, fairly traditional area, and I've never seen the type of reaction to wearing the uniform that you describe (I'm not disputing your experience, though.).
Well yeah. Why would you not?So basically we should respect their job and by respecting the job we should just naturally respect them?
Are you asking me why he does not advertise is profession, or why there is such a negative opinion of police?
Well yeah. Why would you not?
when secretay clinton is first woman to be nominated,
Idk if you've read previous pages of this thread or not but on page 9 there's plenty of posts that explains why a person wouldn't respect an officer just because they are an officer. This post, describes it best, imo :Well yeah. Why would you not?
Here's where i draw the line of respect for police. I can be thankful that there's enough police presence preventing crime from spiraling out of control in my town, but being thankful isn't the same as respect in my book, and that's where respect for my town's (and neighboring areas') police force stops short. There were local articles regarding accountability, including personal accounts of former officers stating how plenty of fellow officers take the job as just a paycheck rather than serving the law with any real passion. I can be thankful of a patrol car circling the block once in a while to keep burglars out of my home, but that's about it.
I can appreciate a cop's duties as inherently and potentially dangerous. It's simply respect for the job itself. What the job naturally is, and what actual police have often been documented as; are conflicting of one another. And that's where respect for the actual police isn't always there.
{other quote}
Given that not every police action serves with the best judgment or moral/ethical standards, then yea... i'd find it perfectly acceptable to question the methods of law enforcement (short of resisting arrest)(whenever the situation warrants questioning) as it is our given right to challenge authority when we notice something might be unjust (don't get this mixed up with threatening or harming cops though). Among a certain percentage of the public, there is a trust issue with police that speaks to how the law is served, whether there's racial bias or what have you. Just accepting all law enforcement actions as justified or believing every officer is all about upholding the law with the greatest sense of morality is too naive imho. My thankfulness for law enforcement only goes so far.
Idk if you've read previous pages of this thread or not but on page 9 there's plenty of posts that explains why a person wouldn't respect an officer just because they are an officer. This post, describes it best, imo :
I guess it really boils down to how you define & value the word respect.
Regardless of how one feels in general about the police, I think it makes sense to show them respect (or whatever one wants to call it) when you're actually having to deal with them, such as when you're pulled over. They have the power to make your life miserable and turn your world upside down, or worse, depending on the circumstances and their interpretation of your actions. Whenever I get pulled over, my goal is to not make things any worse than they already are, and to get out of that situation ASAP.
The DOJ released an interesting report on the Baltimore police dept. yesterday. Seems like that should give some insight into why some people do what they need to, to make interactions with the police as short as possible, including feigning respect.
Here's a couple of links that review the report, or some of it anyway -
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/09/us/baltimore-justice-department-report/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ore-police-department/?utm_term=.c045a0e073ea
Not escalating a situation has nothing to do with how much I respect someone. Those don't go hand in hand. There's common decency which is just a general natural respect for people that comes with acknowledging that a person is a person and they have their own ups & downs and whatever. If a person addresses me in a "i see you as a person, i'm going to calmly talk to you & to handle this situation" there's no issues. We are both calm & the issue is handled properly.
But if a person approaches me in a way that disregards that I am a person, or if an officer comes accusing me and screaming at me that I did something, or starts to demand me to do things without explanation. I have no respect for that. I am an adult, you can address me as an adult. Not pull, or push me around, not call me out of my name or start cursing, especially in an authoritative position. Because it shows that you are a) abusing your power or b) using this position to take out frustrations that have nothing to do with me.
And this is where I disagree with people who say "Respect the police." Often times they mean, respect them regardless of how they are approaching you/ acting towards you. Meaning, if a cop is threatening you, you need to just "take it" so you can just get out of there safely. But why should the public be expected to act this way? If John Smith, came up to me like that, I would fight him but because John is in uniform, I should just accept everything that he could possibly do to harm me, because he's a cop & that's within his power? Like yes, currently that how you have to handle dealing with a cop, but it shouldn't be that way. It shouldn't be that a person in a uniform can mistreat people however they want while also demanding to be given the highest level of respect.