Wouldn't it be awesome to be broadcasting her in YOUR background as a model. "10,000 tokens to introduce myself to Agent 99" lols "20,000 if you want me to touch her"
AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!
MFC Agent ??banned?
- Thread starter nzhere
- Start date
-
** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
- Status
Nordling
V.I.P. AmberLander
Ha ha! Masturbating is a bad thing now?Jupiter551 said:
I know I know I know what you mean, but wanted to tweak you. lol
Nordling
V.I.P. AmberLander
Very interesting point. Impossible to do, but it'd be fun to know her real reasons for asking them taken down. I mean, damn, even the negative posts are free advertising, and no money is being made posting them.Jupiter551 said:
I guess we arent allowed to post pics of her passed out naked drunk on her car in the garage eh....
Too bad. :lol:
Too bad. :lol:
Is the car running and the garage door closed?Paulie Walnuts said:
I'm not being mean here, I just want to know. I don't want to see her dead and if the answer is yes to both, well... it could happen.
I'm waiting for her to stop raving at the cam and vomit, it'll be a great addition to tonight's collection of screen caps.
:dance:
:dance:
:thumbleft: Yes, off the scale!Bocefish said:
The Lion Sleeps Tonight © Solomon Linda (finally, after one of the greatest copyright rip-offs in music).
Pat et Stanley © Pierre Coffin / TF1
Every time I see this thread I get stoked because I think she got banned. Hahah.
The difference with 99 is that she's breaking the law. She doesn't intentionally flash unwilling strangers, but she is doing lewd conduct in public. When she's in a hotel/bookstore/coffee shop there's no way she can be sure there aren't kids watching. A kid could be sitting under a table, peeking through a bookshelf, or anything.
Plus, there's the whole slippery slope argument. New models will look at the top models to see what they're doing. They see 99 getting 1000's in tips for doing these outrageous things and they will do the same. I recall seeing a recent model with a name like PublicShows where she was sitting at some outdoor cafe and her topic was something like "Flash breasts 100".
I think it would be good if MFC banned people who broke the law. If a model had a topic like "1000 to break a car window", a lot of members would pay for that. Get as outrageous as you want in your own house, but once you start to break the law a line has been crossed.
Plus, there's the whole slippery slope argument. New models will look at the top models to see what they're doing. They see 99 getting 1000's in tips for doing these outrageous things and they will do the same. I recall seeing a recent model with a name like PublicShows where she was sitting at some outdoor cafe and her topic was something like "Flash breasts 100".
I think it would be good if MFC banned people who broke the law. If a model had a topic like "1000 to break a car window", a lot of members would pay for that. Get as outrageous as you want in your own house, but once you start to break the law a line has been crossed.
Nordling
V.I.P. AmberLander
I don't look at it like this. "breaking the law." To me, it depends on the law. If it's a victimless "crime," then it's an invalid law. And the only way to get the law changed is to have people break it.
As long as 99 isn't stealing, destroying property, or assaulting people, I could not care less what she does in public.
As far as a kid peeking from under a bench, I'm sorry, but I don't believe in the myth that children are harmed by viewing the human body. Even if you disagree, isn't it better for a kid to see a boob than for them to see people killing each other on TV--which strangely, is legal?
Maybe we all need to redirect our outrage at things that really are harmful.
As long as 99 isn't stealing, destroying property, or assaulting people, I could not care less what she does in public.
As far as a kid peeking from under a bench, I'm sorry, but I don't believe in the myth that children are harmed by viewing the human body. Even if you disagree, isn't it better for a kid to see a boob than for them to see people killing each other on TV--which strangely, is legal?
Maybe we all need to redirect our outrage at things that really are harmful.
Wow I never knew that people could IGNORE laws and pretend that things AREN'T illegal if an average looking woman is the one doing them.
You're right, rubbing your pussy in front of unsuspecting inncocents who you profit off of is TOTALLY LEGAL.
If you're a fucking retard.
You're right, rubbing your pussy in front of unsuspecting inncocents who you profit off of is TOTALLY LEGAL.
If you're a fucking retard.
Nordling said:
The human body is one thing, BUT don't you think parents have a right to decide how their children are exposed to it? I can tell you now I would not want my children "learning" about the human body from a 40+ woman jacking off in a bookstore.
Lydia_Deetz said:
I forgot her show was EDUCATIONAL! I bet she'd teach our children well. That changes everything! Let's bring ALL OUR KIDS TO WHERE SHE IS! What a better way to "learn about the human body", if there is one, I don't know of it. Oh, wait... Maybe we could allow our streets and public locations to be free of nudity, then giving the parents the freedom to teach their children as they know is appropriate. But if some people think that all kids should watch a public cum show at the hotel their parents took them to during vacation, well... please tell me you had a vasectomy.
Public Indecency laws protect people from seeing things they don't want to see, and don't want their kids to see, while they are out in public. These laws are there for a reason. Whether you think they're ridiculous or not doesn't change the laws.
What wigs me out beyond the public indecency is the way she gets the innocent bystanders so involved in her shows. They may think something is odd about what she's doing, but she's not forthcoming with her intentions. She doesn't warn them they are being broadcast. If a film crew was to walk up and film/interview you on the street, you'd need to sign a release for them to use the actual footage. These rules are there for a reason.
See where I'm going with this?
It's about being unwilling to watch/see/participate in certain things while you are out in public. These rules and laws are there to give people at least some sense of privacy and security while they are out in the world.
What wigs me out beyond the public indecency is the way she gets the innocent bystanders so involved in her shows. They may think something is odd about what she's doing, but she's not forthcoming with her intentions. She doesn't warn them they are being broadcast. If a film crew was to walk up and film/interview you on the street, you'd need to sign a release for them to use the actual footage. These rules are there for a reason.
See where I'm going with this?
It's about being unwilling to watch/see/participate in certain things while you are out in public. These rules and laws are there to give people at least some sense of privacy and security while they are out in the world.
Entirely true.
But as I said, moaning about it in a thread is irrelevant. Either moan to the authorities, or maybe complain to MFC pointing out she's breaking the law. But moaning on and people debating legalities is utterly pointless...
Obviously there is some form of cathartic value though
p.s. The last place I'd want my child (if I had one) to learn about sex is via watching Agent99 in public! Hell, I'd rather shell out for a 30 min cam2cam for them on their 16th birthday :lol: :thumbleft:
But as I said, moaning about it in a thread is irrelevant. Either moan to the authorities, or maybe complain to MFC pointing out she's breaking the law. But moaning on and people debating legalities is utterly pointless...
Obviously there is some form of cathartic value though
p.s. The last place I'd want my child (if I had one) to learn about sex is via watching Agent99 in public! Hell, I'd rather shell out for a 30 min cam2cam for them on their 16th birthday :lol: :thumbleft:
It's not irrelevant to discuss this. Regardless of what MFC does, the people reading this thread can change their behavior. The models reading this thread will consider these issues if they ever decide to do a public show. The members reading this thread may change how they contribute tokens to similar shows.
I agree that a thread is not pointless. Discussion is never pointless unless you are expecting more from it than can be achieved. I don't think anyone here really expects anything to happen, they simply want to find a way to come to terms with it or share frustration with others.
As for Agent, as I've said before, I have nothing for nor against her. I do think that her shows are not fully thought out and I don't care for the way she asks for tokens as a countdown and then demands more tips when 9/10 times she chickens out on what she is doing, but that's her show and her business. If people like it then so be it and good for her to capitalize off it.
I will give her credit for leaving a place when she realized there were children there, but had the situation been planned better she never would have ended up in a place with children anyway.
I know that because I am an exhibitionist. Now, I'm not going to walk around in a trench coat and flash old women in the park, and you could be DAMN sure I'd never even be thinking sexy when kids are around, but I do like to show myself and a true exhibitionist knows how to get the thrill without involving innocent bi-standers.
I've never managed to put this part of myself onto the cam, however, and I'm really not sure if I ever will. If I did, I would not go to random public places and put strangers on cam. It simply doesn't work that way. Laws are there for a reason. Besides, figuring out how to legally get the thrill is part of the fun.
Honestly, she kinda just reminds me of those girls who say their financial Doms but aren't actually into the fetish. They just know it makes good money and the guys that are really into it will avoid them like the plague. I'm willing to bet most of her watchers aren't so much voyeurs as fans of Jackass who think it would be great with a little more sex.
My only problem is that if I ever decided to share that side of me on cam I'm afraid all the viewers would expect me to do the things she does and that's not going to happen.
As for Agent, as I've said before, I have nothing for nor against her. I do think that her shows are not fully thought out and I don't care for the way she asks for tokens as a countdown and then demands more tips when 9/10 times she chickens out on what she is doing, but that's her show and her business. If people like it then so be it and good for her to capitalize off it.
I will give her credit for leaving a place when she realized there were children there, but had the situation been planned better she never would have ended up in a place with children anyway.
I know that because I am an exhibitionist. Now, I'm not going to walk around in a trench coat and flash old women in the park, and you could be DAMN sure I'd never even be thinking sexy when kids are around, but I do like to show myself and a true exhibitionist knows how to get the thrill without involving innocent bi-standers.
I've never managed to put this part of myself onto the cam, however, and I'm really not sure if I ever will. If I did, I would not go to random public places and put strangers on cam. It simply doesn't work that way. Laws are there for a reason. Besides, figuring out how to legally get the thrill is part of the fun.
Honestly, she kinda just reminds me of those girls who say their financial Doms but aren't actually into the fetish. They just know it makes good money and the guys that are really into it will avoid them like the plague. I'm willing to bet most of her watchers aren't so much voyeurs as fans of Jackass who think it would be great with a little more sex.
My only problem is that if I ever decided to share that side of me on cam I'm afraid all the viewers would expect me to do the things she does and that's not going to happen.
Nordling
V.I.P. AmberLander
It's a good discussion. I do agree that if 99 was intentionally masturbating directly at children, I'd be offended for a number of reasons, but as has been said, this isn't what she does. Neither kids nor adults actually see what she's doing (except on those occasions when they are willing, semi-participants, like the time she allowed a hotel employee to sit in the room she was occupying during a show.)
Is there a CHANCE a child may see her naughty bits? Yes. But there's also a chance a child might see something if a random woman bends over to pick something up and forgot to wear panties. (yeah, that may be a lame argument; I'm willing to admit I may be full of crap here.
yeah, maybe I am a retard. lol But I just can't see myself being offended if I happen to walk across the scene while a video is being shot. And I'm almost neurotically camera-shy. In fact, more than being offended at what 99 does, I'm offended when a model INSISTS that I turn my cam on with my stuff hanging out during a private. Gee, I'm not here to perform; that's why I spend tokens--so I don't have to.
Is there a CHANCE a child may see her naughty bits? Yes. But there's also a chance a child might see something if a random woman bends over to pick something up and forgot to wear panties.
(yeah, that may be a lame argument; I'm willing to admit I may be full of crap here. yeah, maybe I am a retard. lol But I just can't see myself being offended if I happen to walk across the scene while a video is being shot. And I'm almost neurotically camera-shy. In fact, more than being offended at what 99 does, I'm offended when a model INSISTS that I turn my cam on with my stuff hanging out during a private. Gee, I'm not here to perform; that's why I spend tokens--so I don't have to.
I wonder if the 3 women neighbors who came to the garage yesterday knew they were the stars of the afternoon.
Apparently one of them thought 99 was doing her husband or something.
They should have came by last night when she was staggering around drunk and naked, that would have been epic.
Apparently one of them thought 99 was doing her husband or something.
They should have came by last night when she was staggering around drunk and naked, that would have been epic.
Lydia_Deetz said:
HAHAHAH, word!
About the slippery slope argument...actually I've seen a number of models "adopt" 99's public roadshow thing to make money. So I guess it's true - her success at getting tips doing crazy shit inspires others to take risks and break laws that they otherwise wouldn't have. At some point I think you have to ask yourself if they're paying for a camgirl or paying to watch Jackass live, or a combo of both.
In the case of "copy-cats", they are aware of the laws and the risks, and are fuelled by greed (think they will make more by doing what she does).
They are adults capable of making their own decisions. They exercise bad judgement, it is their own fault.
I get the feeling people think I think this shouldn't be discussed. No, not at all. Just that I feel the majority of the thread is to bitch about her, with legality as being a justification for it - but there's another thread which was that so maybe I get the two mixed up
As for the 3 women neighbours, are they all friends or something? It immediately sounds like 3 women is "safety in numbers" when investigating something where they don't know who is there
They are adults capable of making their own decisions. They exercise bad judgement, it is their own fault.
I get the feeling people think I think this shouldn't be discussed. No, not at all. Just that I feel the majority of the thread is to bitch about her, with legality as being a justification for it - but there's another thread which was that so maybe I get the two mixed up
As for the 3 women neighbours, are they all friends or something? It immediately sounds like 3 women is "safety in numbers" when investigating something where they don't know who is there
Paulie Walnuts said:
I was watching for awhile and must have missed that part. What did they say?
I couldnt understand what they were saying but they seemed pissed.
She said the one lady said her husband was having an affair or wanted to with her.... or something.
They werent happy.
She said the one lady said her husband was having an affair or wanted to with her.... or something.
They werent happy.
JickyJuly
Inactive Cam Model
- Apr 13, 2011
- 5,442
- 35,009
- 293
- Twitter Username
- @JickyJuly
- MFC Username
- JickyJuly
- Streamate Username
- Jicky
- ManyVids URL
- https://www.manyvids.com/Profile/461355/JickyJ/
- Clips4Sale URL
- http://www.clips4sale.com/store/99705/jicky
Any model who does countdown cum shows in free chat is risking the eyes of unsupervised children just as much as A99. I think it's better to look at someone's intentions than to cast stones. It's clear that some of our houses are glass in this situation. Since none of us knows her personally enough to clarify why the $ is worth the risk to her, it's really not fair to judge. This whole thread has gotten sort of ugly and mean spirited with people hoping to see her shut down. :?
As a page late sidenote, am I the only one that would totally still ravage Sly Stallone? He was Rambo and Rocky for gosh sakes! Hehehe.
As a page late sidenote, am I the only one that would totally still ravage Sly Stallone? He was Rambo and Rocky for gosh sakes! Hehehe.
I don't think it's mean spirited to want to see her account closed down. She is intentionally going in public places and exposing herself to people - that is against the law. Making innocent bystanders a part of something they don't necessarily want to be involved in. While exposure to children does suck - if children come to MFC they are CHOOSING to see that vs her shows in a public place where a child doesn't really have a choice. She needs to be shut down. And, I really hope it happens. I'm not saying that in a malicious way, I'm saying it because it just really needs to happen & I'd be happy to see MFC take some action in this situation.
- Status
Similar threads
