MFC Agent ??banned?

[Lydia_Deetz]

Because this thread is an AGENT 99 thread not other girls who copycat thread.

I love that you keep bitching about US bitching :lol:

 

[Paulie Walnuts]

I don't want to see her banned. Any chick who has the balls to get on cam nekkid deserves some credit.

Ive been thinking, and ya know if your underage kid is sitting at home watching MFC it's kinda only your own fault for not properly supervising your kid.

But they're gonna see it whatever you do, the world is a wireless connection. Look at it in a positive light; IF they are watching it, at least a majority of the models are real women, who talk and respond in normal ways. Would you rather them be soaking in that, or staged porn with artificial perfect women performing staged acts that horrify most sane adults?

At least chatting with a naked MFC model, they won't come away with an industry designed idea of what women are, how they act or what is sexually "normal".

They get hammered enough every day with unrealistic models of perfection shoved at them by marketing.

I've sort of changed my mind somewhat.... MFC, a preferable form of sex education for those parents to lazy to do it themselves.

 

[Bocefish]

MFC, a preferable form of sex education for those parents to lazy to do it themselves.

If you want little Johnny going to school with a bag of nickels saying "Show tits BB" thinking girls will do anything for money, or little Susie charging the boys to look at her hooha.

 

[Jupiter551]

Any model who does countdown cum shows in free chat is risking the eyes of unsupervised children just as much as A99.

I don't think that a child seeing a woman masturbating on the internet (though that is unfortunate enough) and stumbling across a woman masturbating in a bookstore are the same thing.

For one thing, it's in person and not on a screen - children I think treat stuff on a screen differently to stuff happening right in front of them.

Secondly, it's up to parents to make sure that doesn't happen- a parent shouldn't be allowing their child so much unsupervised internet access that they can check out MFC. On the other hand, it's hardly a parent's fault if their child stumbles across a 45 year old rubbing one out in barnes & noble.

 

[Bocefish]

Speaking of...just stumbled across this: http://xhamster.com/movies/731908/meat_flaps.html

Rating: (15 votes)
Views: 6,719
Runtime: 23m6s
Channels: Grannies Masturbation Webcams
Added on: 2011-06-30
Added by: masarap

 

[JickyJuly]

Any model who does countdown cum shows in free chat is risking the eyes of unsupervised children just as much as A99.

I don't think that a child seeing a woman masturbating on the internet (though that is unfortunate enough) and stumbling across a woman masturbating in a bookstore are the same thing.

For one thing, it's in person and not on a screen - children I think treat stuff on a screen differently to stuff happening right in front of them.
Secondly, it's up to parents to make sure that doesn't happen- a parent shouldn't be allowing their child so much unsupervised internet access that they can check out MFC. On the other hand, it's hardly a parent's fault if their child stumbles across a 45 year old rubbing one out in barnes & noble.

I didn't say they were the same thing. I was just pointing out that "the girl on the screen" who's willing to probe herself in free chat where there is NO age verification should probably not be the quickest to judge. How is that not reasonable?

 

[Paulie Walnuts]

MFC, a preferable form of sex education for those parents to lazy to do it themselves.

If you want little Johnny going to school with a bag of nickels saying "Show tits BB" thinking girls will do anything for money, or little Susie charging the boys to look at her hooha.

Don't be silly.
Little johnny will have to offer them at least a $5 for tits.

And if little suzie is charging for hooha views, at least she was paying attention in economics class.

 

[AngelAndrea]

So why aren't people having a pop at the "copy cat models" and only Agent 99 then? The others are equally as guilty in that case, yet no attention is directed upon them :whistle:

You're so right! We should find other girls who do that and give them this attention! That way they know that it will at least get them attention! Brilliant!

 

[Jupiter551]

Speaking of...just stumbled across this: http://xhamster.com/movies/731908/meat_flaps.html

Rating: (15 votes)
Views: 6,719
Runtime: 23m6s
Channels: Grannies Masturbation Webcams
Added on: 2011-06-30
Added by: masarap

Grannies HAHAHA

 

[AlexLady]

It's a good discussion. I do agree that if 99 was intentionally masturbating directly at children, I'd be offended for a number of reasons, but as has been said, this isn't what she does. Neither kids nor adults actually see what she's doing (except on those occasions when they are willing, semi-participants, like the time she allowed a hotel employee to sit in the room she was occupying during a show.)

Is there a CHANCE a child may see her naughty bits? Yes. But there's also a chance a child might see something if a random woman bends over to pick something up and forgot to wear panties. (yeah, that may be a lame argument; I'm willing to admit I may be full of crap here.

yeah, maybe I am a retard. lol But I just can't see myself being offended if I happen to walk across the scene while a video is being shot. And I'm almost neurotically camera-shy. In fact, more than being offended at what 99 does, I'm offended when a model INSISTS that I turn my cam on with my stuff hanging out during a private. Gee, I'm not here to perform; that's why I spend tokens--so I don't have to.

She is knowingly masturbating where children can easily see her.
Yes, they've seen what she's done without consenting.
A woman accidentally exposing herself is far different than one intentionally masturbating in public. <-
Just because you weren't offended, doesn't mean she didn't fuck with your rights.

Our whole problem with this is that her shows break the rights of others. Those rights are the reasons we have laws.

If you don't like models who don't want to see some stranger's useless, hideous cock, then why the fuck didn't you ask if she watched cams before you went private? Just because you paid her doesn't mean she should suck it up and suffer viewing your dick. Why the fuck didn't you do the right thing and find a girl who would actually like it? Oh I get it, you're convinced we're all about money.


I think you're just a rebel who wants to be on the loosing side.

 

[Sevrin]

If you don't like models who don't want to see some stranger's useless, hideous cock, then why the fuck didn't you ask if she watched cams before you went private? Just because you paid her doesn't mean she should suck it up and suffer viewing your dick. Why the fuck didn't you do the right thing and find a girl who would actually like it? Oh I get it, you're convinced we're all about money.

You misread his post. He was speaking of models who wanted to see his junk.

 

[Nordling]

If you don't like models who don't want to see some stranger's useless, hideous cock, then why the fuck didn't you ask if she watched cams before you went private? Just because you paid her doesn't mean she should suck it up and suffer viewing your dick. Why the fuck didn't you do the right thing and find a girl who would actually like it? Oh I get it, you're convinced we're all about money.

You misread his post. He was speaking of models who wanted to see his junk.

Exactly. And I didn't say I didn't LIKE them. I said I was "offended." But yeah, that's not the right word...more like I felt like I was put on the spot to be a performer when actually I'm the customer. lol In fact, the model in question I like a lot--heck no one is perfect, especially myself.

As far as 99 I realize I came off as being part of her fan base and obsessing on her in some way. I'm not...in fact, I rarely go into her room, but occasionally do simply because it's like watching a whodunit...huge tension...which I enjoy in small doses.

I'm also one who believes that the only way bad laws are changed is to break them, this is how laws are tested. If someone hadn't broken several laws, then the entire cam site meme would be illegal now. And as I implied in my last post, I ADMIT I may be wrong about 99 and "children seeing her wank." I'm not in favor of children watching her wank but I just don't think it happens. Once again, I may very well be wrong.

lol Now, I hope I've qualified my comments enough so they're now totally meaningless.

 

[Nordling]

Oh, and AlexLady, I do NOT think you're all about money...why would you say that. Almost everything I've said about models in this forum was PRO model...and you are one who's comments I generally agree with...not sure why you went on the attack on this one issue. Can we discuss and sometimes disagree? Maybe you'll change my mind!

Laws are an important way to keep a civilized society civil and I am not an anarchist in any way. But I do think that our society, because of our history, is still very prudish. Many societies in the world do not have our stigmas about public nudity and children don't tend to be scarred by it. How do we change this? Well...since laws sometime reflect our social stigmas, the only way to start is by breaking some laws...those that do not support progress as a society.

Read some Henry David Thoreau...one of our greatest writers, a strong abolitionist, and someone who believed that Civil Disobedience was the only way to create positive change.

We probably disagree on this, and that's ok. But I don't think I have a "natural right to not see naked people in public." To me it's silly. Which is strange, since I'm extremely modest myself, as you may have gathered from my early comments.

 

[AshleyMarks]

Agent_99 has officially crossed the line. I saw a kid on cam in a public place. I did not catch a screenshot because she turned the cam too fast, but had Leo seen it, she would be banned almost instantaneously. WTF is wrong with MFC? Why do they keep letting her be on cam? She is the number 1 room breaker.

 

[Zoomer]

Uhhhh, because this topic is about Agent99.

Yes, indeed that is the name of the topic. However, I would point out that the largest part of the continued discussion is regarding the relevance of the law, and the moral rights/wrongs with regards to the type of show being conducted. Surely this is entirely independent of the individuals who conduct that type of show, at which point I felt it is entirely valid to question why other models do not receive said focus of attention in quite the same manner. The obvious counter was to say popularity, but meh.

Because this thread is an AGENT 99 thread not other girls who copycat thread.

I love that you keep bitching about US bitching :lol:

I'm not bitching about bitching per se, in my eyes I'm pointing out what I perceived to be inconsistencies with regards to discussion - specifically focussing upon certain aspects of the type of show being conducted and the moral right of it whilst maintaining an independence from the models personality. The difference between discussion and bitching in other words I have nothing against bitching whatsoever - by all means, unite and bitch! I just felt there was an interesting discussion about the type of show which should be independent of the personality of the person conducting said show. It was, obviously, an error of judgement on my part to question that.

You're so right! We should find other girls who do that and give them this attention! That way they know that it will at least get them attention! Brilliant!

When the discussion was pertaining to the type of show being conducted that is causing moral outrage, then yes, I thought it was fair to make clear the distinction as to what exactly is the issue. Is it entirely the type of show, or is it partially fuelled by intense dislike for the personality she portrays. Is that such an unfair question to ask?

Of course, cheap sarcasm shots to undermine and dismiss such questions are a brilliant counter to it :thumbleft:

However, aside from all that - this thread is proving far too volatile for me to post in :lol:

 

[AlexLady]

Oh, and AlexLady, I do NOT think you're all about money...why would you say that. Almost everything I've said about models in this forum was PRO model...and you are one who's comments I generally agree with...not sure why you went on the attack on this one issue. Can we discuss and sometimes disagree? Maybe you'll change my mind!

Laws are an important way to keep a civilized society civil and I am not an anarchist in any way. But I do think that our society, because of our history, is still very prudish. Many societies in the world do not have our stigmas about public nudity and children don't tend to be scarred by it. How do we change this? Well...since laws sometime reflect our social stigmas, the only way to start is by breaking some laws...those that do not support progress as a society.

Read some Henry David Thoreau...one of our greatest writers, a strong abolitionist, and someone who believed that Civil Disobedience was the only way to create positive change.

We probably disagree on this, and that's ok. But I don't think I have a "natural right to not see naked people in public." To me it's silly. Which is strange, since I'm extremely modest myself, as you may have gathered from my early comments.

Eh ok, but it's just that we believe you have a right to not see people naked without consent. Hell, I'm a nudest but I still respect other people's rights.

If she wants to be pro-exhibitionist, she should do it in an area meant for that, if they exist. Sort of how there are nudest areas. The whole point of places like that are for people who agree that the "freedom to be naked" has more value than the "freedom to not see some random ass in your face."

I'm all for women being topless to be legal, but it's different when you turn it into something sexual.

It doesn't matter if we agree with a law or not (when most everyone here posting does, and hell, even I do,) but it's still a law. It's not just a law we ignore either like other silly laws we disagree with; this is a major offense.

 

[Nordling]

Thanks! And I do understand where you're coming from, and mostly agree. I guess I just don't think it's as major as you.

oh, and as far as exhibitionists... You really can't set aside an area for them, since, from my limited understanding of what an exhibitionists is, that would defeat the whole purpose.

 

[Bocefish]

Also, it's the internet; you are supposed to expect horse porn with every link you click.

Seriously...

It doesn't do any good to bitch about her antics here, but Leo might appreciate some screencaps or vids since he will probably be the one getting sued and has the juice to do something about her.

 

[Lydia_Deetz]

I think if you fella's don't like us bitching in this thread then why not just ignore it?

 

[Jupiter551]

So why aren't people having a pop at the "copy cat models" and only Agent 99 then? The others are equally as guilty in that case, yet no attention is directed upon them :whistle:

popularity?

 

[Bocefish]

I think if you fella's don't like us bitching in this thread then why not just ignore it?

By all means... bitch away! :lol: I was just trying to help point out that the proverbial horse is dead.

 

[MadisonLeigh]

So why aren't people having a pop at the "copy cat models" and only Agent 99 then? The others are equally as guilty in that case, yet no attention is directed upon them :whistle:

I don't doubt that many models are trying to capitalize on A99's success. But I'm unaware of who these copycat models are, because they're either not popular enough for me to be aware of them or they aren't doing these types of shows with the same frequency as A99. The public shows are basically her only shtick and I have personally viewed them and seen screenshots of them. If I see another model exposing herself to random people in public, showing people on cam in a public bathroom, etc, I'll certainly "have a pop" at her as well. But until I actually see it, it's hearsay. I don't even know the names of these copycat models. So how am I supposed to condemn them?

 

[AngelAndrea]

Uhhhh, because this topic is about Agent99.

Yes, indeed that is the name of the topic. However, I would point out that the largest part of the continued discussion is regarding the relevance of the law, and the moral rights/wrongs with regards to the type of show being conducted. Surely this is entirely independent of the individuals who conduct that type of show, at which point I felt it is entirely valid to question why other models do not receive said focus of attention in quite the same manner. The obvious counter was to say popularity, but meh.

Because this thread is an AGENT 99 thread not other girls who copycat thread.

I love that you keep bitching about US bitching :lol:

I'm not bitching about bitching per se, in my eyes I'm pointing out what I perceived to be inconsistencies with regards to discussion - specifically focussing upon certain aspects of the type of show being conducted and the moral right of it whilst maintaining an independence from the models personality. The difference between discussion and bitching in other words I have nothing against bitching whatsoever - by all means, unite and bitch! I just felt there was an interesting discussion about the type of show which should be independent of the personality of the person conducting said show. It was, obviously, an error of judgement on my part to question that.

You're so right! We should find other girls who do that and give them this attention! That way they know that it will at least get them attention! Brilliant!

When the discussion was pertaining to the type of show being conducted that is causing moral outrage, then yes, I thought it was fair to make clear the distinction as to what exactly is the issue. Is it entirely the type of show, or is it partially fuelled by intense dislike for the personality she portrays. Is that such an unfair question to ask?

Of course, cheap sarcasm shots to undermine and dismiss such questions are a brilliant counter to it :thumbleft:

However, aside from all that - this thread is proving far too volatile for me to post in :lol:

My apologies. Fuck the sarcasm. It's fucking stupid to think that we shoul talk about Agent99 copycats in this room because of the fear that would somehow increase their popularity. If this were title MFC People Who Show Shit In Public??? banned??? I'd have skipped the sarcasm. Soooooooooo sorry you didn't appreciate it.

Again straight to the point: That's a fucking stupid thing to say.

I like me better with the sarcasm but I'll skip it for you, doll.

 

[Bocefish]

Wouldn't it be awesome to be broadcasting her in YOUR background as a model. "10,000 tokens to introduce myself to Agent 99" lols "20,000 if you want me to touch her"

Haha yeah no kidding!!

I've also wondered at the irony of her asking for HER images to be taken down from here and not posted, but she's fine with broadcasting unsuspecting people on a "porn" site.

After reading back a bit and for her supporters...who read this.

How do you think agent hypocrite would react if she found out that her daughter and young grand daughter (while enjoying the day out together) were being broadcast over some porn site while the dude is pulling his pud with them in the background, and he was making money off it?

Do you think she'd still think it was as funny??

 

[AshleyMarks]

This thread is like that Lamb Chop song. It keeps on going on and on...... I am thinking that nothing will ever be done about her doing these obscene activities. I have reported her personally, and not a damn thing has been done..... And God forbid us posting any pictures of her because her spies go tell her. ..... I have numerous screencaps of her with men on cam...Also the accidental shot of a kid's face today.... What does Leo do??? Not a motherfucking cocksucking thing. Not to mention, these people she puts on the spot have no idea that they are being used for her financial gain.... I also thought public nudity was obscene in almost all cities, towns, provinces,states..... If this is not enough, then what the hell is? Maybe if we stop talking about her, and put some plans into action, we will get her permanently removed. Hell, this is free advertisement for her. Why advertise a model that acts the way she does and treats members the way that she does? OMG!!!!! If I don't get ten new tippers by the time I count to ten, i will do some banning. Geez and people tip her like 1000 tokens, and can't get a tit shot or pussy shot? Then, if the tip is not high enough for her standards, she will bitch about it. Oh, and thanks Amber for removing those pictures too, that was free advertising.

 

[Paulie Walnuts]

Imagine how those hotel patrons will feel when they step out into that stairwell and step in the puddle of pussy drool she left on the concrete floor today.

I lol'd.

 

[PunkInDrublic]

She reminds me of that Steve-O guy that people use to like for doing dumb stuff

 

[Anonymous]

Good afternoon, ladies and gents! :hello2: This is MFC model yummybrownfox, and I wanted to comment on the very popular Agent_99.

Though I agree that it's totally wrong to show people on a cam site without their consent, I do enjoy watching her on cam. I think she's hilarious, entertaining, far from boring, and she doesn't do that "Mmmm, yeah" fake moaning. :lol:

What I find comical - and she does too - is that some of the trolls who come to her room to talk shit end up STAYING in there for long periods of time. Even the people who come in there to talk shit just can't stay away. I've even seen one dude on there talking about how he should be getting ready for his date, but he couldn't bring himself to leave her room. HAHA!

It's just funny to me that with hundreds of other models online at any given time, there are trolls who choose to camp out in the room of the model they CLAIM to hate, trying to be all funny with their lame insults. And I see guys making nasty comments when other premiums drop large tips (not just in her room, but in other models' rooms also). Comments like "Why would you tip that much? What a fucking waste of money!" Well, if she's a "waste of money," then why continue to camp out in her room, talking trash, while waiting for her show to begin? Because in that case, shouldn't ya be THANKING the guy who dropped that large tip?

I recently went into her room under my model name, and she was so sweet to me and interacting with the people in the room. She said she was flattered to have so many beautiful models in her room, and yes, she had quite a few of them in her room. I'm sure that some of the guests and basics watching her were models too.

I've read - from other models - about other fucked-up stuff that's taken place (I didn't see any of it, but I did see people shown on cam). But she is one of my favorite models to watch when I'm online, so I'm hoping she wises up and does what needs to be done to prevent any more trouble. Being known for "crossing the line" may get people interested and talking for a while, but if it could lead to termination, legal issues, and etc......definitely not worth the risk.

 

[Paulie Walnuts]

What she does is nothing new, I've seen other models do it, and far better. She seems to think she's the inventor of the idea. I can think of at LEAST a half dozen who used to do that all the time... even up to doing long shows in changing stalls at the store or occasionally in bathrooms in places... or driving around buck nekkid.

She's the only one I ever saw sit in public, exposing herself where you could actually see and hear kids and other people around. At least the first I ever saw on MFC.

I'd tell her she's not the first when she claims to be a pioneer in camming but.... I'd get banned and then where would I get my daily lulz?
:dance:

 

[Bocefish]

She is by no means a pioneer of those type of shows... but if she continues broadcasting unwitting and under aged participants, it's only a matter of time before it catches up to her and she gets busted.

She must think that she can't succeed without doing illegal and immoral things which is pretty damn sad.

I used to tolerate watching her for a little while, just to see what stupid chit she was up to... but now I find her so repulsive that I had to actually hide her because even the mere sight of her avatar was turning me off.

There is a model on this site (ACF) that goes by the name of JunesDorm who did awesome late night shows on MFC from her workplace office. She ran the risk of adults walking in on her at any given moment and sometimes did. However, she immediately shut down or covered her cam so we could not see who it was. The risks she was taking made her shows that much hawwwter and I miss her shows.

My point is that there are ways to do it without breaking laws and running the risk of being on the sex offenders list forever. Who knows... maybe somebody sent Chris Hansen Agent99's link and she will be on his show one of these days.