Man-on-cam sightings thread

[MrRodry]

:naughty:

 

[countrygirl84]

 

[AngelicTease]

I hope this doesn't count as man on cam and get me banned, eeek. :shhh:

 

[Jupiter551]

I hope this doesn't count as man on cam and get me banned, eeek. :shhh:

that's at least two men - snowman is debateable

 

[countrygirl84]

lol

 

[Shaun__]

Topic: we are 2 girls and 1 guy we suck him ,we fuck him lick pusssy all you want hmm cum squirt

 

[Jupiter551]

Topic: we are 2 girls and 1 guy we suck him ,we fuck him lick pusssy all you want hmmcum squirt

I wonder why there's a "hmm" in this statement lol

 

[MrRodry]

:naughty:

 

[JoleneBrody]

Show slippers BB!!!!

 

[Jupiter551]

Show slippers BB!!!!

one of my longtime favourites routinely wears fuzzy slippers to keep her footsies warm (unseen on cam) but it does bring some hilarity when the "show feet bb" people arrive.

 

[nzhere]

:naughty:

 

[Jupiter551]

nz how the hell do you always catch all these :lol:

 

[LaceyRoyce]

Can I post caps from my own room here?

http://misslollipoptumbles.tumblr.com/post/11360098191 - this post explains what happened last night. I'm SO GOING TO GET MY ASS KICKED IF HE FINDS OUT I POSTED THIS SO SHHHH!!!

 

[nzhere]

:naughty: and btw she said her fine was $200

 

[Jupiter551]

:naughty: and btw she said her fine was $200

If I were her I'd make the dude pay it lol, he's the one getting his dick sucked :lol:

I've always kind of objected to the principle of PAYING for a camgirl to some some other dude's dick! I once saw two columbian girls and a guy, Topic: we fuck, suck, anal, anything in group or pvt.

I asked how much to kick him hard in the nuts, they banned me. Hey...if they expect people to pay for the dude's pleasure, why can't we pay for his pain?

 

[VinnyGoGo]

The following is a demonstration of how to get everyone to hate you in under 2 minutes.

Why so much outrage about models breaking MFC rules against having men on cam?? Does anybody else remember a hot topic of a few months ago regarding explicit, penetrative, shows done by many models in public chat? Consensus at that time seemed to be that RULES didn't matter because the shows made $$, and with so many models doing them, MFC methods of operation had simply changed (by default). Well guess what folks, here is another change! Hope everyone that defended the first one likes this one too.

MFC continues to slide down the slippery slope as models, who dare to, seek out more extreme sex shows to thrill their fans. The addition of men is simply a natural and expected progression from current one person penetrative sex shows, to two person penetrative sex shows. (We all know that men are a natural part of sex, right?) Some will embrace the change & make $$. Other's, who are unable or unwilling to keep up, will again be told to stop bitching, pay more attention to THEIR OWN shows, find a new site, or just quit the business.

As shows with men become more popular, MFC will doubtless pay less & less attention to enforcing the rule against them. Eventually, admins will completely ignore them as they do now with public penetration shows.

 

[Mikeythegeek]

The following is a demonstration of how to get everyone to hate you in under 2 minutes.

Why so much outrage about models breaking MFC rules against having men on cam?? Does anybody else remember a hot topic of a few months ago regarding explicit, penetrative, shows done by many models in public chat? Consensus at that time seemed to be that RULES didn't matter because the shows made $$, and with so many models doing them, MFC methods of operation had simply changed (by default). Well guess what folks, here is another change! Hope everyone that defended the first one likes this one too.

MFC continues to slide down the slippery slope as models, who dare to, seek out more extreme sex shows to thrill their fans. The addition of men is simply a natural and expected progression from current one person penetrative sex shows, to two person penetrative sex shows. (We all know that men are a natural part of sex, right?) Some will embrace the change & make $$. Other's, who are unable or unwilling to keep up, will again be told to stop bitching, pay more attention to THEIR OWN shows, find a new site, or just quit the business.

As shows with men become more popular, MFC will doubtless pay less & less attention to enforcing the rule against them. Eventually, admins will completely ignore them as they do now with public penetration shows.

If there's one thing that MFC has been very consistent on, it's not having sexual acts on cam with men visible (whether they're involved in the act or not). MFC does not consider itself to be a porn site (we know better, but we'll humor them) and having men on cam brings the site into that category, in Leo's opinion. Frankly, I think that if MFC allowed guys on cam; it would not improve business any. Plus, MFC would probably be forced to enforce all the other rules because of that. So I think MFC would rather enforce 1 rule heavily than enforce all of them.

 

[FifthElephant]

Not even trying.

 

[LiLredhairedgrl]

I don't know if this qualifies for a man-on-cam "sighting", but I shall post it regardless.
:hello2:


Camgirl or not, she certainly is QUITE the dancer...
I am sure the gardeners were entertained!

:lol:​

 

[Jupiter551]

The following is a demonstration of how to get everyone to hate you in under 2 minutes.

Why so much outrage about models breaking MFC rules against having men on cam?? Does anybody else remember a hot topic of a few months ago regarding explicit, penetrative, shows done by many models in public chat? Consensus at that time seemed to be that RULES didn't matter because the shows made $$, and with so many models doing them, MFC methods of operation had simply changed (by default). Well guess what folks, here is another change! Hope everyone that defended the first one likes this one too.

MFC continues to slide down the slippery slope as models, who dare to, seek out more extreme sex shows to thrill their fans. The addition of men is simply a natural and expected progression from current one person penetrative sex shows, to two person penetrative sex shows. (We all know that men are a natural part of sex, right?) Some will embrace the change & make $$. Other's, who are unable or unwilling to keep up, will again be told to stop bitching, pay more attention to THEIR OWN shows, find a new site, or just quit the business.

As shows with men become more popular, MFC will doubtless pay less & less attention to enforcing the rule against them. Eventually, admins will completely ignore them as they do now with public penetration shows.

The only models I've seen with men on cam, and thanks to this thread it's a lot, have been (with as little offense to the model as possible) really desperate models or noob models who swiftly get banned and probably earn absolutely nothing from it.

There don't seem to be more men on cam on MFC than there were a year ago so it seems more like a slippery plateau, and the largely unknown and never-to-be-heard-of-again models who do this don't seem to be much competition for the likes of the top earning girls.

I think your views on the principle of it are skewing your facts about the money they make.

 

[nzhere]

:naughty: another "1000 camscore model" that didn't read the rules

 

[sxycherrypie]

Lilredhead I fell of of my chair laughing on this. What do I chose the bush or the woman in her underwear hmmmm *looks back and forth* the woman. Man 2 comes in: hey man what about that bush ? Man 1: fuck the bush look at the girl! LOL. The girl: *turns around* holy shit. Men: Run!

 

[BullFrogBlues]

:naughty:

 

[VinnyGoGo]

The only models I've seen with men on cam, and thanks to this thread it's a lot, have been (with as little offense to the model as possible) really desperate models or noob models who swiftly get banned and probably earn absolutely nothing from it.

There don't seem to be more men on cam on MFC than there were a year ago so it seems more like a slippery plateau, and the largely unknown and never-to-be-heard-of-again models who do this don't seem to be much competition for the likes of the top earning girls.

I think your views on the principle of it are skewing your facts about the money they make.

Jupiter, I think you're missing the point as well as misinterpreting some of my statements.
Read carefully, I never said that models currently doing shows with men are making huge money NOW. Every trend seems to have humble beginnings. Anyway...The BIG idea in what I said was to identify Men-On-Cam as a possible new trend.

I agree, models who have men on cam are currently NO match for the powerhouses at the top. These top models, I might point out, have by and large built their empires on the violation of an MFC rule. *+* I think it a fair topic to discuss, therefore, if there is another MFC rule violation that promises to be the next big thing. I think Men-On-Cam shows potential.

I disagree with you that Men-On-Cam's are not increasing. A year ago it seemed to be virtually unheard of, but today...well we're on page 22 of this thread. Feels a little increase-ish to me. All of this doesn't represent stagnation, it's a decline. A slope, even a gentle one, is still a slope.

*+* I'll save everyone the trouble of posting replies. Yes, I know. Amber is a top model & Amber doesn't violate rules.

 

[AmberCutie]

I don't know if this qualifies for a man-on-cam "sighting", but I shall post it regardless.
:hello2:


Camgirl or not, she certainly is QUITE the dancer...
I am sure the gardeners were entertained!

:lol:​

Very staged/fake. But this thread is mainly for MFC model accounts found with a guy on them.

 

[AmberCutie]

The only models I've seen with men on cam, and thanks to this thread it's a lot, have been (with as little offense to the model as possible) really desperate models or noob models who swiftly get banned and probably earn absolutely nothing from it.

There don't seem to be more men on cam on MFC than there were a year ago so it seems more like a slippery plateau, and the largely unknown and never-to-be-heard-of-again models who do this don't seem to be much competition for the likes of the top earning girls.

I think your views on the principle of it are skewing your facts about the money they make.

Jupiter, I think you're missing the point as well as misinterpreting some of my statements.
Read carefully, I never said that models currently doing shows with men are making huge money NOW. Every trend seems to have humble beginnings. Anyway...The BIG idea in what I said was to identify Men-On-Cam as a possible new trend.

I agree, models who have men on cam are currently NO match for the powerhouses at the top. These top models, I might point out, have by and large built their empires on the violation of an MFC rule. *+* I think it a fair topic to discuss, therefore, if there is another MFC rule violation that promises to be the next big thing. I think Men-On-Cam shows potential.

I disagree with you that Men-On-Cam's are not increasing. A year ago it seemed to be virtually unheard of, but today...well we're on page 22 of this thread. Feels a little increase-ish to me. All of this doesn't represent stagnation, it's a decline. A slope, even a gentle one, is still a slope.

*+* I'll save everyone the trouble of posting replies. Yes, I know. Amber is a top model & Amber doesn't violate rules.

I actually do agree that as the months go by, there seem to be more men-on-cam attempts. Desperate times/models call for desperate measures to get a quick buck or more attention in hopes of more quick bucks.

I think the reason it's the most frowned upon by those of us at ACF is we (as viewers, and yes I count myself as a viewer just as much as a model) don't want to tune into MFC and see cock. I LOVE the fact that MFC doesn't allow men. I love watching hot ladies without the distraction of cock cams popping up on a homepage or room list. I sincerely hope that MFC keeps fining and banning accounts that feature men on cam due to this.

 

[nzhere]

For a while I was seeing 2 or 3 a day. They seem to have slowed down a lot except for on weekends and near cutoff day.

Other than that you still see the odd 1st day 1000 score model totally unaware of the no man on cam rule.

 

[ThePioneer]

My first man-on-cam sighting

 

[bawksy]

Catch of the day. At first I was like LOL his penis is poking out a little. And then he took out his penis and there was nothing little about it.

 

[bawksy]

Gender - male? I wonder why MFC even lets models select "Male" as an option.