Yeah that's what I mean. Whatever it is, I applaud her for it.AlexLady said:I wish I knew what lighting and software she was using.
Yeah that's what I mean. Whatever it is, I applaud her for it.AlexLady said:I wish I knew what lighting and software she was using.
FayeValentine said:That, and her sweet little pussyburger.
bawksy said:The colors got better but I'm not sure about the clarity. The new cam seems to drop frames a lot - it'll be smooth and then it gets choppy on and off. Maybe the configuration needs to be played with. Or your computer/internet might not be keeping up.
Old cam:
New cam:
P.S. Get rid of the damn banner.
Odd, her lighting is usually very good, maybe it's coincidence more than planned.AmberCutie said:I've heard about Carmen from many sources, saying she was such a camgirl pro and fantastic and lots of other good stuff. And with a rockin' camscore, I was surprised to see such dark lighting when I popped in to see her tonight. I was all primed up to be enamored and stay for a while...
She looks like she's stunning, just wish I could see her better.
I certainly don't get offended if someone politely points out that something needs improving. I take it on board ands see what I can do about it!markofire said:Hi there everyone, I just registered on this forum. I have just been reading through this thread. I have to say , it's good to see that some cam girls out there do actually realise how important lighting is for shows. A good cam is definately recommended, that goes without saying, but having a great cam is wasted if you have terrible lighting. ( although I have to admit the logitech pro 9000 and c910 are great for low light performance )
I have been getting cam shows for the past 2-3 years and one thing which is a pet hate , is when I go to get a pvt with a model , and then go into their room which is so poorly lit that they might as well be stood 20 feet away as I would probably see as much! ( I am not talking about mfc shows obviously as one can already see the room before getting the pvt )
Even weirder is when I have gotten a show with a model who had great lighting one day, then I get another show a few weeks later and her lighting is bad on that day for some reason, and when I ask for more/better light the model gets all touchy and takes offence like I'm criticising and being too picky, starts telling me "well, no one else complained" , lol, and I'm like wtf?? I really don't see what the mentality of some models out there who insist on doing their shows in poorly lit rooms at night or the darkest possible place in the house on a bright sunny day.
I have gotten way too many shows with great lighting to bother putting up with bad lighting now so if a model insists that her lighting is great when it clearly isn't or she starts giving me attitude then I simply wont bother getting any more shows with them. Kinda strange how some models are so helpful and accommodating and others can be so touchy and deliberately flippant about these things , like the paying customer should be happy that the model is getting naked regardless whether it's so dark in the room that all you can see is a silhouette and some funky orange skin as the cam struggles to cope with the poor light conditions and interprets natural skin tones as a tangerine!! lol
I'd like to know, do any of you girls get annoyed if someone says anything about your lighting, or makes a suggestion ?
markofire said:I'd like to know, do any of you girls get annoyed if someone says anything about your lighting, or makes a suggestion ?
bawksy said:I rudely informed this 13513.1 camscore model that she had a blurry joke of a webcam, and she rudely informed me that it was totally definitely my crappy computer that was the problem. I'll let you be the judge.
P.S. Why do dumb models feel the need to make derogatory speculations about my ability to attract women when they feel self-conscious about their webcam quality?
Well I'd certainly say the girl in question can afford it after she's been consistently in the top 20 for a bit now. Logitech pro 9000 are around $60 now. I think she makes that in around 10 minutes these days.Nordling said:I wonder why, if you "rudely" inform someone their gear is crap, you are surprised that you get a rude reply. Maybe she already knows this but can't afford to fix the problem? Or if it's a problem that can be fixed with her existing hardware, why not offer a suggestion if you have one, instead of simply trashing them?
Agree. When I was in her room, the quality of her camera was probably better than 90% of other rooms; especially the color "naturalness." ...which bugs my eyes worse (color casts) than a grainy image.AmberCutie said:Well I'd certainly say the girl in question can afford it after she's been consistently in the top 20 for a bit now. Logitech pro 9000 are around $60 now. I think she makes that in around 10 minutes these days.Nordling said:I wonder why, if you "rudely" inform someone their gear is crap, you are surprised that you get a rude reply. Maybe she already knows this but can't afford to fix the problem? Or if it's a problem that can be fixed with her existing hardware, why not offer a suggestion if you have one, instead of simply trashing them?
But as I watch her more, I see in some lights her cam looks "ok" instead of "crap" so maybe it's just her settings and lighting she needs to tinker with to get it where it should be.
LovelyLemon said:bobdontdance said:To the cam girls, I ask this, and if this has been asked here I apologize (I scanned through the topic and didn't see it): if you start chatting with a girl in a polite manner and you do tip, etc., is it bad etiquette to politely bring up the poor quality of their cams (in MFC mail, not in public)? I've come close a couple of times, but it does seem a bit rude.
Thoughts?
Not rude at all if you approach it in the right spirit. I find that kind of info VERY helpful and hard to come by! I have a stellar cam and great lighting but there's always little things to keep in mind to keep the show running smooth and looking good. For example Amber popped into my room the other day and mentioned that I had a knocky-cam, my cam mount was loose and everytime it tapped against the laptop my secondary snowflake mic picked it up, knock-knock-knock. It must have been that way for HOURS and it must have been *really* irritating for my viewers but nobody prior to her had bothered mentioning it.
I also really appreciate it when members remind me to watch the reflection of one of my lamps in the mirror behind me because it skews the cam feed from the flare and makes it look like a small universe is being birthed behind me lol. Comments that help us improve our performances are always appreciated as long as they're practical recommendations and not, "i think u would make more tips if u had pussy open bb"
On this note: Is anyone friendly enough with GinnyPotter to sweetly mention to her that her cam/cam settings are whack? I know bawksy made an attempt before, but we all know he didn't approach it in a very nice way. I'd really hate to see Miss MFC June 2011 continue to have such mediocre cam quality.AedanRayne said:LovelyLemon said:bobdontdance said:To the cam girls, I ask this, and if this has been asked here I apologize (I scanned through the topic and didn't see it): if you start chatting with a girl in a polite manner and you do tip, etc., is it bad etiquette to politely bring up the poor quality of their cams (in MFC mail, not in public)? I've come close a couple of times, but it does seem a bit rude.
Thoughts?
Not rude at all if you approach it in the right spirit. I find that kind of info VERY helpful and hard to come by! I have a stellar cam and great lighting but there's always little things to keep in mind to keep the show running smooth and looking good. For example Amber popped into my room the other day and mentioned that I had a knocky-cam, my cam mount was loose and everytime it tapped against the laptop my secondary snowflake mic picked it up, knock-knock-knock. It must have been that way for HOURS and it must have been *really* irritating for my viewers but nobody prior to her had bothered mentioning it.
I also really appreciate it when members remind me to watch the reflection of one of my lamps in the mirror behind me because it skews the cam feed from the flare and makes it look like a small universe is being birthed behind me lol. Comments that help us improve our performances are always appreciated as long as they're practical recommendations and not, "i think u would make more tips if u had pussy open bb"
^^This! I wish more people would tell me if my video / audio / lighting is crappy or if it's working well.
AmberCutie said:In reference to my earlier post, I think we found the reason Ginny's cam isn't as clear as it could be. Someone send her a Logitech 9000 asap!
Not the best one for MFC models, that's all that matters!AedanRayne said:AmberCutie said:In reference to my earlier post, I think we found the reason Ginny's cam isn't as clear as it could be. Someone send her a Logitech 9000 asap!
:? What kind of cam is that?
AmberCutie said:Not the best one for MFC models, that's all that matters!AedanRayne said:AmberCutie said:In reference to my earlier post, I think we found the reason Ginny's cam isn't as clear as it could be. Someone send her a Logitech 9000 asap!
:? What kind of cam is that?
I think it's the Microsoft LifeCam Cinema 720p HD Webcam. Ladies, just cuz it says HD on it doesn't make it better than the basic Logitech pro 9000. People are so quick to jump to that conclusion.
AmberCutie said:Not the best one for MFC models, that's all that matters!AedanRayne said:AmberCutie said:In reference to my earlier post, I think we found the reason Ginny's cam isn't as clear as it could be. Someone send her a Logitech 9000 asap!
:? What kind of cam is that?
I think it's the Microsoft LifeCam Cinema 720p HD Webcam. Ladies, just cuz it says HD on it doesn't make it better than the basic Logitech pro 9000. People are so quick to jump to that conclusion.
But if you were making a living off of being in front of that webcam for 6-8 hours a day, I bet you'd want better. Note my bolded emphasis. When you're striving to be the #1 model on a website, I think putting a bit of extra effort into simple cam quality isn't too much to ask. Am I wrong? Do people disagree with that?Zoomer said:AmberCutie said:Not the best one for MFC models, that's all that matters!
I think it's the Microsoft LifeCam Cinema 720p HD Webcam. Ladies, just cuz it says HD on it doesn't make it better than the basic Logitech pro 9000. People are so quick to jump to that conclusion.
Hey, I've got the same cam - it's a good cam, well, pretty good
Chews up CPU though...