Well bless you, you're here too. Came back to meet the author, (he makes me employ that word,, Says, "Every Possible Opportunity"), when he logged back in. Says, there's some things I need to clear up.
First off, yes my character is maybe a tad macho, tho them who haven't lost all their Brotherly love, family values, to some mixed up belief system BS, being propagated by the socialist liberals, would tell you it's just being a man. And since we're on the subject, I'm not lost in the dark ages as some have put it. The author, (hey, what can I do?), is one of these good attentioned ppl caught up in this liberal propagateing. Even so there's plenty we agree on, like that, it's a bad thing, that men don't give woman proper respect any more. Like, sometimes getting the door for a lady, or helping her with her bags from shopping should be nice, and not just awkward. (I got to say on that last one,,, Well, I mean, when they ask you to hold, or even carry their hand bag, well it's no wonder men shy away.)
I digress, or just got away from what I'm sposta be telling you. I was going on about my character bc, the author, (I think I'll have a stamp made), says, I'm an egotistical, arrogant, greedy, macho, bastard, sometimes when he's mad, he throws in "capitalist cock sucker" at the end. Which I only half understand.... I mean I understand the sucker part, cuz as someone who has had so many rumors made up about them, he knows I'm a little sensitive on that sort of BS, and I learned something in the anger management class before I quit, that ppl will say stuff when their mad just to make you mad. Well I knew that, but mostly if I can see that happening, I don't punch no one anymore, just break things, if that.
Oh, but the other part makes no sense. Everyone knows capitalism is a good, well great thing. Without the competition provided by a capitalist economy, everything comes to a stop, talk about being stuck in the dark ages!
Well anyway, , I supposedly called the injun Red coat, cuz one, it was my macho arrogance, or two, my plan, "Idiotic Macho Attitude". Says, ether I started with such a pre conception of the junk in the article that I didn't even pay enough attention to get his name right, or I'm such an asshole, that I called him that to be a bastard. I'm betting on the second, but anyhoo, says, that was part of the sarcasm.
I'm not done explaining the macho thing yet, but the other thing to clear up is, saying that the early Americans had to, if you want to be exact, was forced to, kill injins like old Red. Well when the, (apply stamp here,,, Oh, alright), author, said that, but it would appear that the injun lived to be 72,or78, I knew he didn't mean we killed old Red himself, just others like him. That makes all the sense in the world. He was already an old man of 47,or 53, and what you might call a pacifist when he wrote that. (Odd word, pacifist, comes from passive, but someone swapped out the s's for a c, and sneaked, fist, on to the end as a little joke :whistle: )
So being old and whimppy, we prolly just reservationed his ass pretty deep. Gave him a seat so to speak, somewhere he couldn't start much. Then we continued our policies of provoking his ppl when ever we could, (unofficially of course), and at the same time fixing some of that turmoil, and claiming it all had to do with their crazy savage ideas of equality of everything including plants and such. Hell, can you imagine how many tree huggers we would have. :lol:
So, yea we were able to convince a lot of the heathens to get right. And it was policies like that and the systematic starvation by killing off their food supply, by shooting it or poisoning and cutting off their water, that among others, helped us tame this country.
So, we didn't have to kill them all, which got increasingly tough as they started to fight back and hide better, but also prolly would have been wrong. Tho there's a bunch in Reno, Las Vegas, and Atlantic City, that would beg to differ.
Now to the macho/man thing. We are not talking about the hard line Mexican kind of macho, or machismo. That is irrelevant, cuz it's an alien concept. It has nothing to do with the America kind of macho. It seems pointless to bring up what you might call an immigration issue in this discussion of Americans and America Indians.
But anyway, I asked how my dealings with a man injun could be called macho? Well I guess macho, just means, supremacists, that basses his supremacy on his maleness, and in my case also cuz I'm white and America, so he says, whatever that means. I mean what's his point. Has he been drinking again?
Victor Verbose.
PS. I'll tell ya how I know those liberal socialist are trying to divide good Americans, from our morals, and God himself, by propagating all that liberal commy crap. It's right there in the word. They PROPA-GATE, Or, Proper-Gate their dogma out there to Proper Gate us away from good God fearing ideas. If you look at words, sometimes that's all the answers you need.
