Wow, where to start.
Mirra said:
Holy shit this thing has moved a lot since I was at work.
This captured my feelings exactly!
I don't know the "old Tubby", but the dude who has appropriated his name is all kinds of full of fuck. He seems to be this weird amalgamation of Col. Kurtz/Col. Kilgore/Paul Kersey. I assure you that the "KKK" initials are a coincidence...or maybe not. I have known several combat vets and many policemen. None of them hold views similar to "NT" (new Tubby). It should without saying that comments like "I enjoyed killing every one of them" and "My home is open and I'm waiting with a gun" are not the thoughts of a sane individual. There is no need review his further comments to draw a conclusion, but yeah,
it got worse. I'm not sure what purpose was served by "NT" giving us his mini-bio, but if even 10% is true, it is clear to me that he has snapped under the burden of his past. Any one of those experiences could cause a person to suffer from PTSD, so I hope he gets the help he needs. Unless he has snapped in another direction and is bullshitting us all. I only offer that up because I can't believe one person is THAT fucked up. The dude should write a book. He'll make millions and be able to get his mansion, complete with red-headed midget and fuck doll.
Moving on, this little debate on whether the US is "republic" or "democracy", is pretty ridiculous. Its not going to miraculously change the form of government we have, which is a "State of the People". Yes, I meant the double meaning
The republic vs. democracy debate is also not going to change our upcoming choice. The name of the party is also irrelevant to me. It doesn't matter what they are "called". Republican, Democrat, Libertarian...hell, bring back the Whigs for all I care. What is going to drive my choice? Political rhetoric, party platforms, all the discourse...is meaningless without the element of humanism.
Is it humanistic to outsource jobs to reap a 10 cent per share increase, while knifing your country in the back? Is it humanistic to hide assets offshore to avoid taxes? Is it humanistic to allow millionaires to avoid paying their fair share? Is it humanistic to deny rights to your fellow citizens? Hey, you don't have to answer my questions, hell...make up your own. That is the key to our political process, to make our own choice.
Don't take my word for it, you can look throughout history and I bet you will find that all of the failed nations/states lacked humanism. One of the most famous (reputed) quotes from a failed state was "Let them eat cake". I am going to vote in hopes of stopping our slide towards that.
I am also keeping in mind that my vote is going to who will "represent" me. Another dual meaning. The President will represent me as the "face" of the US. But ideally, I want the President to represent
me: my views, my hopes, my dreams for the future. To be honest, neither one can represent the majority of us. The fact is, both of them are "Ivy League" millionaires, I have nothing in common with that. While I don't hold inherited wealth against anybody, I do give Obama a few extra points, coming from a somewhat humble background. Even though I have zero in common with both of them, I'm going to cast my vote to the one who I feel will best "represent" me...in both meanings. It's probably pretty obvious which direction I am leaning towards.