AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

What is the most annoying thing a model can do?

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.
yossarian said:
LilahMorrigan said:
Although I'm glad my post sparked and interesting and thoughtful discussion on the place of art in camming or whether or not camming can be art in itself, that really wasn't the intention of my post! I framed it in terms of artistic integrity because yossarian was annoyed with girls bandwagoning, and claimed that doing things for monetary reasons made them disappointingly mercenary (which, as we've discussed, is kind of silly to specify, being that this is a commercial site- if girls wanted to just do cool things on camera for free, they'd start a YouTube channel).

My point with the art comment was that I didn't understand what ethical code girls are betraying (the implication with the term "mercenary") by trying something that has already become popular and is clearly successful. Yes, it's one thing to offer to do something you hate just for the sake of making tokens- that displays a sad lack of creativity, in my opinion. But to evaluate the intentions of a whole slew of camgirls just because they aren't the first to do what they're doing as though they've "sold out" is annoying in its own right.

What I was trying to say is that EVEN if one DID evaluate camming and camgirls by artistic standards and held them to the same integrity as a musician (because it felt like that's what yossarian was doing), it would be ridiculous to assume that producing "art" and doing so by employing aspects of current trends in order to make money are mutually exclusive pursuits.

yossarian said:
Bob Dylan could have done a disco album in the 70s, or a rap album in the 90s, or he could start slapping models' asses and twerking with Miley tomorrow--and he might have made a shitload of money doing it--but he had the integrity not to. He does what he wants and trusts that his audience would follow. I've seen some really original models like Aella and Veronica Chaos, but they are few and far between. Most girls are trying to make a living, so I understand what you're saying about trying new ways to make money. I guess when I said bandwagoning I meant "doing things because everybody else is doing them." That's sort of the opposite of what I want a camgirl to do--I want her to be herself. If I want to watch Kickaz in the library, I'll watch Kickaz in the library.

I'm gonna try really hard to not be offended by the "Aella and VC are original but they're rare examples" line for various reasons, but I am going to point out that if you want girls to be genuinely themselves, you need to stop assuming that anything they do that's already been done by many is a deviation from that genuineness or from originality itself. It's not like the Bob Dylan thing at all- it would be like accusing all modern musicians of not being genuine or not being worth listening to because they use piano and guitars and not some new and unique instruments, or the C G Am F chord progression as opposed to something more novel. These are tools of the trade. They are industry staples. They are mechanisms that have proven highly effective and compelling in crafting unique and interesting pieces, so they've become standard.

Hell, when it comes down to it, even Aella (whom I love and admire, for the record) is doing a lot of things that are already very popular- spanks, shots, Hitachi control shows- she adds her own personality to it and does have a TON of creative and unique aspects to her performance like the gnomes and the chipmunk head, but its not like she's any less "guilty" of this "doing things because everyone else does them and they clearly work" thing.

Sorry, perhaps I'm really invested in this discussion because I feel like I'm exactly the kind of camgirl to whom you're referring, but I don't feel like I deserve the criticism. I do many things that could be considered bandwagon-y. I don't do penetrative cumshows, anal, squirting, or any of that jazz, so my room could be considered pretty vanilla, but I offer spanks and pussy spanks. I do library shows. I do hot wax and hitachi control shows. I have a whiteboard and my bed has pretty string lights above it. But my library shows don't involve me getting down and dirty in the stacks as much as they involve doing ridiculous dances and army crawling down the aisles, which I'm pretty sure is the most unique thing a camgirl has done for tokens in a library, and yet by the sheer fact that it's a library show I'm being lumped into the bandwagon category. One of the ways to win spanks in my room is by correctly guessing whether Schrodinger's Cat will be alive or dead in my neat little Schrodinger's Cat box, yet when I do the spanks I'll apparently be seen as only doing them for the money. It's just really frustrating to be held to some impossible and arbitrary standard of originality and legitimacy when I think I'm one of the most unique girls out there. I'm sure there are others who feel the same way.

There's always a saturation point with bandwagons and trends, and then aspects of those trends will be assimilated into standard operating procedure. At one point in the very beginning, I'm sure a girl figured out she didn't have to do privates all the time- she could offer to do countdowns in public chat and make more tokens there. After a while, other girls picked up on it and started incorporating it into their routine. Some people probably griped about how annoying it was to see countdowns everywhere. Now, nobody questions it because it's standard. I think it's really cool, actually, to see how social media adapts and is repurposed like an organic, ever-growing entity.


TL;DR- Blah blah blah art, blah blah blah Bob Dylan, blah blah Lilah whining some more.

I really didn't think my comments would be offensive, and I wasn't trying to dismiss what anybody does...I guess I just wasn't clear enough in what I was saying. I singled out Aella and Veronica as doing things that I had never seen other models do, but I suppose I contradicted myself when I called them rare examples and then said camgirls should be themselves. It sounds like you're doing exactly what I talked about in a later post--taking the "tools" of being a camgirl and adapting them to your personality. And I think it's all kind of a performance art. I think maybe the jumping on the bandwagon thing came out wrong, and I should probably know better than to speak off the cuff like that. I was responding to Harmless' very specific criticism of models who essentially change what has worked for them because they think what everybody else is doing will be popular, but they end up putting off their regulars in doing so. Maybe a better example (if I'm going to ride this musician thing to the death) is Liz Phair. She was edgy and exciting, and then she tried something different--she ventured into slickly produced pop and basically killed her career with one album. She alienated the very people who bought her records by doing something so antithetical to her established persona that her fans left in droves. I think a camgirl who jumps on the latest trend DOES risk doing that. I can't think of much that would alienate me from the camgirls I frequent, but I know it's not the same for everyone--I've seen longtime, high-tipping members leave forever because a non-nude model started getting naked, or because a girl started doing cumshows, or taking privates, or selling B/G videos. Now, I'm not suggesting that these models did these things to "jump on the bandwagon," so to speak, but I suppose I'm saying it's worth thinking of the impact it might have when you radically change your image, for whatever reason. And if the only reason is money, then maybe it's not worth it. You know?

Ahhhhhh, gotcha. Thanks for clarifying- I like and agree with pretty much everything you have to say here! Sorry for taking it personally- sometimes it's hard not to when we put everything we've got into what we do. :thumbleft: You're swell!
 
yossarian said:
I think a camgirl who jumps on the latest trend DOES risk doing that. I can't think of much that would alienate me from the camgirls I frequent, but I know it's not the same for everyone--I've seen longtime, high-tipping members leave forever because a non-nude model started getting naked, or because a girl started doing cumshows, or taking privates, or selling B/G videos. Now, I'm not suggesting that these models did these things to "jump on the bandwagon," so to speak, but I suppose I'm saying it's worth thinking of the impact it might have when you radically change your image, for whatever reason. And if the only reason is money, then maybe it's not worth it. You know?
It's a harsh truth to being a cam girl. There are aspects of each of us that drew our regulars to us. And while we like to sit back and think that all of our regulars "love us for who we are", if we suddenly change a major aspect of our cam shows and do things very differently while we are online (which is the time they spend with us), it's understandable that they may leave.

I had a reality check not so long ago along these lines. One of my most near and dear regulars on MFC suddenly went completely quiet then offline in the middle of my cam shift. I had been toying with some other regulars and "went silent" until we hit a goal. They were all trying their best to make me speak or make noise and I was having fun with it. It wasn't a permanent thing, just for about 15 mins or so. I joked with my near and dear regular saying "hey welcome back! I thought for a second my silence scared you away!" assuming he would laugh and reply that he rebooted his computer or something innocuous like that.

Nope, he left because I wasn't talking. In the past he and I had discussed how we dislike when models whom have a busy chatroom type instead of talk. But we were agreeing about girls who basically NEVER talk, and here I was doing it for like 15 minutes. My feelings were a little hurt, because we've been pretty close on MFC for years now, and it came pretty unexpected to me.

But reality is, we are there to entertain and do things that our viewers enjoy. If it's something they don't enjoy, they have no commitment to us to have to stay and endure the parts they don't enjoy. It's simple like that.
 
Alexandra Cole said:
TicTacToe said:
Alexandra Cole said:
TicTacToe said:
Well, gay women can be virgins, but gay men can't. Men cannot be virgins. Men can be inexperienced, they can be chaste, but they cannot be virgins.

I think this is why you're confused by art.

Is that your opinion or a fact?

That answer is going to cost you 100 tokens.

Oh so the answer is art then..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alexandra Cole
MFC Mail from two models I've never spoken to before...

.,,,tonight is super mega show ,.,,shower show,streaptease,private on,skype on.,,miss Romania 19 years old is comming...and ?!?! i'm trying to take all your money(appreciate honesty:))) :appl :clap_1
i'm new,i'm sexy..i'm hot...


Love is like a friendship caught on fire. In the beginning a flame, very pretty, often hot and fierce, but still only light and flickering. As love grows older, our hearts mature and our love becomes as coals, deep-burning and immortal !! I wish you happiness, many kisses

Probably won't be running to their rooms any time soon :?
 
mynameisbob84 said:
MFC Mail from two models I've never spoken to before...

.,,,tonight is super mega show ,.,,shower show,streaptease,private on,skype on.,,miss Romania 19 years old is comming...and ?!?! i'm trying to take all your money(appreciate honesty:))) :appl :clap_1
i'm new,i'm sexy..i'm hot...


Love is like a friendship caught on fire. In the beginning a flame, very pretty, often hot and fierce, but still only light and flickering. As love grows older, our hearts mature and our love becomes as coals, deep-burning and immortal !! I wish you happiness, many kisses

Probably won't be running to their rooms any time soon :?
Who's that second one from? :whistle: :shifty:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nordling
AmberCutie said:
yossarian said:
I think a camgirl who jumps on the latest trend DOES risk doing that. I can't think of much that would alienate me from the camgirls I frequent, but I know it's not the same for everyone--I've seen longtime, high-tipping members leave forever because a non-nude model started getting naked, or because a girl started doing cumshows, or taking privates, or selling B/G videos. Now, I'm not suggesting that these models did these things to "jump on the bandwagon," so to speak, but I suppose I'm saying it's worth thinking of the impact it might have when you radically change your image, for whatever reason. And if the only reason is money, then maybe it's not worth it. You know?
It's a harsh truth to being a cam girl. There are aspects of each of us that drew our regulars to us. And while we like to sit back and think that all of our regulars "love us for who we are", if we suddenly change a major aspect of our cam shows and do things very differently while we are online (which is the time they spend with us), it's understandable that they may leave.

I had a reality check not so long ago along these lines. One of my most near and dear regulars on MFC suddenly went completely quiet then offline in the middle of my cam shift. I had been toying with some other regulars and "went silent" until we hit a goal. They were all trying their best to make me speak or make noise and I was having fun with it. It wasn't a permanent thing, just for about 15 mins or so. I joked with my near and dear regular saying "hey welcome back! I thought for a second my silence scared you away!" assuming he would laugh and reply that he rebooted his computer or something innocuous like that.

Nope, he left because I wasn't talking. In the past he and I had discussed how we dislike when models whom have a busy chatroom type instead of talk. But we were agreeing about girls who basically NEVER talk, and here I was doing it for like 15 minutes. My feelings were a little hurt, because we've been pretty close on MFC for years now, and it came pretty unexpected to me.

But reality is, we are there to entertain and do things that our viewers enjoy. If it's something they don't enjoy, they have no commitment to us to have to stay and endure the parts they don't enjoy. It's simple like that.

:text-yeahthat:

I had kind of the opposite experience where I started out doing crazy shows (in my car, restaurants, a limo, Starbucks, dressing rooms, sex stores, topless drive-thru's...you name it, I probably did a show there) and then I kind of settled into what I'm most comfortable with. I was going through a divorce when I began camming on MFC. I was single for the first time since I was 18 and moving into my first place by myself. My world was turned upside down and all I really had was MFC/camming and I was kind of a nut for a while. People who spent time in my room back then stop by every once in a while to reminisce about those days, and as fun as they were, I don't miss them at all.

Do those same people still hang out in my room? Probably not. I'm not the same person I was back then - almost 4 years ago. Was I doing stuff just for tokens? Absolutely! Was I being genuine about who I was? Absolutely! (About who I was back then, anyway) The point is, people change, people grow and I wouldn't expect the people who were in my chat room 4 years ago to still be there today because I've changed. I also wouldn't expect to be the same person I was 4 years ago. My life is vastly different today. I'm happier, I'm healthier and I spend my time on cam doing only the things that bring me joy in that moment. If I decide tomorrow that I no longer like anal sex then anal sex will not be offered. It isn't that I never liked it or that I pretended to enjoy it, it's just that maybe I don't want to do it anymore. And that's OK!

I have learned a HUGE life lesson from camming and that is that you can't please everyone so you should focus on pleasing yourself. I always do what makes me happy at that time - whatever that may be. If people like it, great! If people don't like it, then they can move on. That's OK!
 
KittyWilde said:
AmberCutie said:
yossarian said:
I think a camgirl who jumps on the latest trend DOES risk doing that. I can't think of much that would alienate me from the camgirls I frequent, but I know it's not the same for everyone--I've seen longtime, high-tipping members leave forever because a non-nude model started getting naked, or because a girl started doing cumshows, or taking privates, or selling B/G videos. Now, I'm not suggesting that these models did these things to "jump on the bandwagon," so to speak, but I suppose I'm saying it's worth thinking of the impact it might have when you radically change your image, for whatever reason. And if the only reason is money, then maybe it's not worth it. You know?
It's a harsh truth to being a cam girl. There are aspects of each of us that drew our regulars to us. And while we like to sit back and think that all of our regulars "love us for who we are", if we suddenly change a major aspect of our cam shows and do things very differently while we are online (which is the time they spend with us), it's understandable that they may leave.

I had a reality check not so long ago along these lines. One of my most near and dear regulars on MFC suddenly went completely quiet then offline in the middle of my cam shift. I had been toying with some other regulars and "went silent" until we hit a goal. They were all trying their best to make me speak or make noise and I was having fun with it. It wasn't a permanent thing, just for about 15 mins or so. I joked with my near and dear regular saying "hey welcome back! I thought for a second my silence scared you away!" assuming he would laugh and reply that he rebooted his computer or something innocuous like that.

Nope, he left because I wasn't talking. In the past he and I had discussed how we dislike when models whom have a busy chatroom type instead of talk. But we were agreeing about girls who basically NEVER talk, and here I was doing it for like 15 minutes. My feelings were a little hurt, because we've been pretty close on MFC for years now, and it came pretty unexpected to me.

But reality is, we are there to entertain and do things that our viewers enjoy. If it's something they don't enjoy, they have no commitment to us to have to stay and endure the parts they don't enjoy. It's simple like that.

:text-yeahthat:

I had kind of the opposite experience where I started out doing crazy shows (in my car, restaurants, a limo, Starbucks, dressing rooms, sex stores, topless drive-thru's...you name it, I probably did a show there) and then I kind of settled into what I'm most comfortable with. I was going through a divorce when I began camming on MFC. I was single for the first time since I was 18 and moving into my first place by myself. My world was turned upside down and all I really had was MFC/camming and I was kind of a nut for a while. People who spent time in my room back then stop by every once in a while to reminisce about those days, and as fun as they were, I don't miss them at all.

Do those same people still hang out in my room? Probably not. I'm not the same person I was back then - almost 4 years ago. Was I doing stuff just for tokens? Absolutely! Was I being genuine about who I was? Absolutely! (About who I was back then, anyway) The point is, people change, people grow and I wouldn't expect the people who were in my chat room 4 years ago to still be there today because I've changed. I also wouldn't expect to be the same person I was 4 years ago. My life is vastly different today. I'm happier, I'm healthier and I spend my time on cam doing only the things that bring me joy in that moment. If I decide tomorrow that I no longer like anal sex then anal sex will not be offered. It isn't that I never liked it or that I pretended to enjoy it, it's just that maybe I don't want to do it anymore. And that's OK!

I have learned a HUGE life lesson from camming and that is that you can't please everyone so you should focus on pleasing yourself. I always do what makes me happy at that time - whatever that may be. If people like it, great! If people don't like it, then they can move on. That's OK!

Couldn't have said it better! Right down to the wild drive thru and starbucks shows.

I am a totally different "cam model" now than I was 5 years ago. I do what I want, when I want - regardless of what people think I should be doing. I was doing what I wanted 5 years ago too, but people evolve and change. A model who first starts out might not be comfortable with being nude and maybe not be comfortable with penetration etc, but over time she might be. Doesn't mean she is a sell out. Just means she is changing and for the 10 members who leave because they aren't interested in watching that, she will gain 10 more who are.

For me to cam long term and not go nuts or burn out I had to just do what pleases me ..the great thing about that is you attract the best kind of members.
 
Art is hard to define, and means different things to different people. I, for instance, cannot stand Jackson Pollack's work and do not consider it art. Other people do. Like beauty, art can be in the eye of the beholder.

---

Ok, new annoyance... I'm an anti-foot guy, I just find feet unsexy and in most cases downright ugly (sorry for anyone who thinks they have cute feet). So, I am pretty sure I developed a socks/stocking fetish. And when it comes to stockings, I am also a big fan of garter belts.

So, it annoys me to no end when girls wear garters the wrong way. Yes there is a wrong way...

Ladies! It is incorrect to wear panties under your garter belt!

The whole point of the sexiness of the garter belt and stockings is that after taking off everything else, the garter and stockings are still there and didn't need to be unhooked/removed to be otherwise naked.

The garter goes on first, then the panties.

(Her and she are just being generic terms in the following... not regarding anyone specific, since it happens a lot, especially with younger women.)

Nothing can make an otherwise incredibly sexy strip down look completely awkward than having to unhook the garter from the stockings to pull her panties down and then re-hook them to the stockings. In many cases, it's almost like she forgot she was wearing a garter and still wanted to keep it on but didn't realize until her panties couldn't get below her upper thigh.

I've heard from one model that she finds it feels weird or that the garter might not look right with its straps if her panties go over top of it. Others just seem to not realize it's not the proper way to wear garters.

Obviously the panty/garter belt in one combo that get sold now make it extremely odd to someone who is a fan of garter belts and seeing a woman one finds incredibly sexy in nothing but a garter and stockings to have the combo sets.

I know a few models who do it right and their strips while in garter belts are super sexy. But more and more I'm finding the norm is a lot of girls wearing garters the wrong way... and what otherwise could be a sexy strip suddenly ends up looking awkward and forced at a pivotal time in the strip. Maybe it's an age thing. Maybe I'm at that age when garters were a bigger thing than they are now and are seen as more of a 'throwback' to an 'older look' by a lot of the younger girls out there. Maybe I'm just odd.
 
UncleThursday said:
Ladies! It is incorrect to wear panties under your garter belt!


You sure?

It's fair enough to be annoyed by the inconvenience - I am, too - but I think they're designed to be as inconvenient as possible.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-06-21 at 1.34.53 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-06-21 at 1.34.53 PM.png
    248.6 KB · Views: 511
That's probably because every image ever of a garter belt/panties combination shows the panties underneath. Obviously if you want to take off the panties first, panties on top makes more sense logistically. But I'm definitely guilty of just unhooking the garter belt first during the striptease and removing that, and then panties, leaving me just wearing some sexy thigh-highs. It's kind of hilarious imagining a girl trying to take her panties off and suddenly realizing it's impossible and awkwardly fiddling with the clasps and then redoing them afterward! :lol:
 
When a model you really like and enjoy spending time with goes on a Twitter rant that just makes them look... not good. If you've had a bad day on cam and it's frustrated you to the point where you feel like you need to bitterly vent, then the best thing you can do is probably to step away from the twitterz for a while :twocents-02cents:
 
Alexandra Cole said:
UncleThursday said:
Ladies! It is incorrect to wear panties under your garter belt!


You sure?

It's fair enough to be annoyed by the inconvenience - I am, too - but I think they're designed to be as inconvenient as possible.

Marketing is done this way so the garter is more visible with the outfit and likely to sell. When garters and stockings were an everyday combo, they were always worn under the panties, because how else would you use the bathroom? However, fashion has completely flipped this around because companies want to make more money.
 
Alexandra Cole said:
UncleThursday said:
Ladies! It is incorrect to wear panties under your garter belt!


You sure?

It's fair enough to be annoyed by the inconvenience - I am, too - but I think they're designed to be as inconvenient as possible.

He's actually right. But anymore it's hard to find properly fitting garter belts or garter belts that don't have the panties attached. Remember, back when garter belts were daily wear, women still had to go to the bathroom so panties on top made the most sense.

I hate wearing them wrong but if I don't they fit all screwey because the belts fit too low.
 
traditionally yes, the gartebelt was often (not always!) worn under the panties.
Girdles are impossible to wear underneath your panties, I think they had like a hook and eye technique to add a cotton 'crotch' to the girdles.
and what about pre-garterbelt when those laces were still attached to corsets? underwear was defintetly worn únderneath (or not worn at all)

however, modern day brands (or actually any brand from the 60s and up) make their garterbelts, girdles etc to wear óver underwear. personally it bugs me more when models wear their underwear óver garterbelts that are obviously designed to be worn the other way around.



D74FXAt.jpg
UyMInLT.jpg



but if you're set on avoiding the 'awkward' striptease you can wear panties that can be undone by bows on the side. or just reattach the stocking which can be super sexy when done right.

on a personal note, I've worn stockings daily for years and I álways had gartenbelt óver panties and toilet visits are really no problem that way.
 
SweetSaffron said:
Alexandra Cole said:
UncleThursday said:
Ladies! It is incorrect to wear panties under your garter belt!


You sure?

It's fair enough to be annoyed by the inconvenience - I am, too - but I think they're designed to be as inconvenient as possible.

Marketing is done this way so the garter is more visible with the outfit and likely to sell. When garters and stockings were an everyday combo, they were always worn under the panties, because how else would you use the bathroom? However, fashion has completely flipped this around because companies want to make more money.

To be clear, I'm aware that this is the correct way to wear them- I just think the misconception comes from the way they're photographed for marketing purposes! :thumbleft:

This is part of why I love watching Tesla, who wears lingerie pretty much every night. So purdy, so perfect. And wears her panties on the outside. :mrgreen:
 
SexyStephXS said:
He's actually right. But anymore it's hard to find properly fitting garter belts or garter belts that don't have the panties attached. Remember, back when garter belts were daily wear, women still had to go to the bathroom so panties on top made the most sense.

I hate wearing them wrong but if I don't they fit all screwey because the belts fit too low.

I think this is an important thing to remember, too. Since elastic in the tops of stockings has become much better (say the mid-60's onward), garter belts have become less of 'necessity' to wear with stockings and more of a fashion accessory (albeit a bedroom fashion accessory, since it's not like women wear garter belts visible in the outside world). As a result, they're often just made as an accessory that is sold separately.

Wearing just any pair of panties with any garter belt obviously can be an issue. In those cases, yes, it probably looks and feels better if the panties are worn under the garter belt. The straps aren't bunched up under the panties, etc.

Women who like garter belts and want to wear them for sex appeal need to look for lingerie sets where the garter (and sometimes the stockings) are included. The panties for those sets will actually be designed to fit over the garter belt in the correct way.

CuteHermine has an incredibly sexy and nice set, as an example, and the color schemes on the bra and panties and the garter and stockings makes me think the entire thing came together. The bra and panties are purple with an off white accent and the garter and stockings are the same off white. I thought I had a pic, but I don't. Maybe she'll post a pic of her in it.

But, because they were designed to be worn together, she wears them the correct way and everything looks fine and sexy. The straps aren't bunched up, the panties fit over the belt just right, etc.

The issue of garters not being as necessary has turned them into literally just a bedroom accessory, so much so in terms of couples, often the woman will just be in the garter and stockings right from the get go, without having to worry about taking off anything else.

Fay_Galore said:
and what about pre-garterbelt when those laces were still attached to corsets? underwear was defintetly worn únderneath (or not worn at all)

We also have to remember that EVERYONE had it bad in those days when it came to undergarments. Men often wore one piece full body underwear that was just as inconvenient as the women's undergarments when combined with the fashion of the day. Much like women, they pretty much had to almost completely disrobe just to go to the bathroom. I have a feeling quick bathroom breaks for things were never heard of, since everyone would take forever to disrobe, go to the bathroom, and then get presentable again.
 
LilahMorrigan said:
SweetSaffron said:
Alexandra Cole said:
UncleThursday said:
Ladies! It is incorrect to wear panties under your garter belt!


You sure?

It's fair enough to be annoyed by the inconvenience - I am, too - but I think they're designed to be as inconvenient as possible.

Marketing is done this way so the garter is more visible with the outfit and likely to sell. When garters and stockings were an everyday combo, they were always worn under the panties, because how else would you use the bathroom? However, fashion has completely flipped this around because companies want to make more money.

To be clear, I'm aware that this is the correct way to wear them- I just think the misconception comes from the way they're photographed for marketing purposes! :thumbleft:

This is part of why I love watching Tesla, who wears lingerie pretty much every night. So purdy, so perfect. And wears her panties on the outside. :mrgreen:


I love lingeries and all that jazz but I never knew that i am suppose to wear the garter belt inside the panties :O

Hm...this makes things a lot easier hahaha

Too bad i have some designs that are like skirts, so its kind impossible to wear panties over then. Well, gotta try the right way for...science.

:thumbleft:
 
Gween said:
Too bad i have some designs that are like skirts, so its kind impossible to wear panties over then. Well, gotta try the right way for...science.

:thumbleft:

As I said, they've become bedroom accessories more than anything else. Designed to look sexy on the otherwise naked body. So frilly or skirt-like garters aren't meant for everyday wear. They're meant to arouse your lover when you show up wearing nothing but the stockings and that garter.
 
OK, I was wrong about the color on that... it's the garter that is more purple and purple is the accent on the bra and panties. I got lucky and in her 24th birthday reward video and she's wearing the bra and panties. Because she goes from that to an oil show, I guess it was easier to not have the garter and stockings on (no point in getting them oily). But, when she wears the two together, with the off white stockings, it is incredibly good looking.

Bonus, since this was recorded in 1080p for a video, it looks better than a MFC screenshot. ;)




Without the garter it's harder to tell, but the panties come up high enough on the sides to be on the belt, but not the straps. I've grown rather fond of this particular set of lingerie, personally. ;)
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-06-21 at 9.18.41 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-06-21 at 9.18.41 PM.png
    263.2 KB · Views: 358
  • Screen Shot 2014-06-21 at 9.17.47 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-06-21 at 9.17.47 PM.png
    277.4 KB · Views: 358
Gween said:
Too bad i have some designs that are like skirts, so its kind impossible to wear panties over then. Well, gotta try the right way for...science.

:thumbleft:

HOLY SHIT IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE!
 

Attachments

  • Picture 76.jpg
    Picture 76.jpg
    34.4 KB · Views: 354
Gween said:
HOLY SHIT IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE!

And how does it feel? From the looks, the belt is just long enough and those panties just high enough to make sure the straps (at least in the front) aren't affected or bunching up on you.

You'll probably have to test with different garters and panties to find ones that work well together, both aesthetically and comfort wise.
 
That there is no profile for a model called Buttercup. I mean, really, there are times you just want to be able to go into a room and start singing Build Me Up Buttercup by the Foundations. Because the song is awesome and always will be. And if you don't agree, you can GTFO of here you Godless commie!



At least we have StacysMom... and every single time I see her name, I get that song stuck in my head...

:p
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldenaye666
UncleThursday said:
That there is no profile for a model called Buttercup. I mean, really, there are times you just want to be able to go into a room and start singing Build Me Up Buttercup by the Foundations. Because the song is awesome and always will be. And if you don't agree, you can GTFO of here you Godless commie!



At least we have StacysMom... and every single time I see her name, I get that song stuck in my head...

:p


Somebody should write a song called "Dream of Anal..."
 
Given that i'm sympathetic toward models enduring prolonged cam sessions with little earnings to show for, I've come across a couple of rather popular models implementing short time limits to complete countdowns the moment they log on [i.e. 2000tkns in 20min or i'm leaving]. I understand models would like their time well spent, but short time limits right off the bat gives that vibe of "i'm super impatient." Some of us with vanilla jobs can only dream of averaging $100 in 20 minute time frames.
 
mutantdonut said:
Given that i'm sympathetic toward models enduring prolonged cam sessions with little earnings to show for, I've come across a couple of rather popular models implementing short time limits to complete countdowns the moment they log on [i.e. 2000tkns in 20min or i'm leaving]. I understand models would like their time well spent, but short time limits right off the bat gives that vibe of "i'm super impatient." Some of us with vanilla jobs can only dream of averaging $100 in 20 minute time frames.

I would like to add "wtf! nobody has tipped for the last 15 mins!" to the list of things that make me leave a model's room.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.