I think I get what you're trying to say,
@monteyfromontario . Co-op businesses are much more sensible, practical, and sustainable than they're given credit for (Google it if you have time; it's fascinating!), but the relationships between the site, models, and customers are fundamentally different from the employer-employee-customer structure, so co-op
sites wouldn't really work.
Think of each cam model's chat room like a pub. We have complete control of our menu, presentation, and customer service. The customers check us out, pay for their drinks and food, and tip extra for service. Sometimes an enthusiastic patron will buy a round for everyone. The sites are like little states or provinces, and in order to take advantage of the infrastructure our country provides - sewage, transportation, etc - we need to pay our taxes which, in this case, are based on income. The key difference between Uber and cam sites is that cam sites use in-site
currency. We effectively operate like a mini economy. Customers get to
choose their models, but they can't choose their Uber drivers.
Let's also remember: 9 out of 10 restaurants close within the first year of opening. Not all cam models are successful, but that's the shitty part of capitalism. There
is a place for collective ownership of a "store" in camland. There's a number of model groups that operate like a co-op, and some that are run by an employer. Each group has its own pay structure, and that's up to them, but most of us are solo models so we don't have to consider that.
Make sense?