AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

WARNING: You *will* be recorded now, constantly.

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think that Isabel is correct about the malicious intent behind some of these pirate posts. There was a pirate nicknamed Alyosius on the old (and notorious), "sniper forum" who was very explicit about his intent to "punish sinful cam models" by ensuring that they would never be able to escape their "video trail," once they had quit the business. "Gone but not forgotten" was his motto. So there are at least some pirates who acting as ""virtual vigilantes" policing the internet. I think this is earlier version of the "slut shaming" and "expose-a-ho" web-sites and FB threads that have sprung up over the past year or so. Needless to say, the impact of this kind of stalking behavior can be personally devastating - and has lead to several teen suicides which received a lot of media attention this Spring.
 
UncleLewis said:
There was a pirate nicknamed Alyosius on the old (and notorious), "sniper forum" who was very explicit about his intent to "punish sinful cam models" by ensuring that they would never be able to escape their "video trail," once they had quit the business. "Gone but not forgotten" was his motto. So there are at least some pirates who acting as ""virtual vigilantes" policing the internet. .

Holy plop. What a depressing existence :(
 
That site publically lists which models they are autocapping.

Therefore MFc could disrupt autocappers by opening say 5 of those models accounts and check the i.ps that are connecting to the streams. Then compare , match and autoban

oh and send them a stream with rick astley :mrgreen:
 
nzhere said:
That site publically lists which models they are autocapping.

Therefore MFc could disrupt autocappers by opening say 5 of those models accounts and check the i.ps that are connecting to the streams. Then compare , match and autoban

oh and send them a stream with rick astley :mrgreen:
That's actually the first sensible idea i've heard in here. Easy enough to automate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: emptiedglass
nzhere said:
That site publically lists which models they are autocapping.

Therefore MFc could disrupt autocappers by opening say 5 of those models accounts and check the i.ps that are connecting to the streams. Then compare , match and autoban

oh and send them a stream with rick astley :mrgreen:

Or just give me the dudes address and I'll go "advise" him to stop it. Then he'll never do it again. IP addresses can be changed much easier then missing teeth.
:whistle:




Sometimes you just have to go old school. And besides, if he is in Texas we can just go shoot his ass and never get into any trouble.
:shifty:
 
Brad said:
Or just give me the dudes address and I'll go "advise" him to stop it. Then he'll never do it again. IP addresses can be changed much easier then missing teeth.
:whistle:

Sometimes you just have to go old school. And besides, if he is in Texas we can just go shoot his ass and never get into any trouble.
:shifty:

I like you a lot. :-D

tumblr_lvn19pjbI61r2evylo1_500.jpg
 
nzhere said:
That site publically lists which models they are autocapping.

Therefore MFc could disrupt autocappers by opening say 5 of those models accounts and check the i.ps that are connecting to the streams. Then compare , match and autoban

oh and send them a stream with rick astley :mrgreen:

It would piss the cappers off even more if you found some gay porn to put in there instead. :twocents-02cents:
 
The business model of the site is that its free. to make it free they have allowed non registered users to be able to view the site from anywhere in the world.
Its the best cam site hands down in my books cos I not only go there for free but I have spent hundreds tipping also.

If you do a great show and have loads of registered users in your room, you will earn very good from the site but if you think that doing free public shows is bad, then MFC is not for you.
 
M202A1 said:
The business model of the site is that its free. to make it free they have allowed non registered users to be able to view the site from anywhere in the world.
Its the best cam site hands down in my books cos I not only go there for free but I have spent hundreds tipping also.

If you do a great show and have loads of registered users in your room, you will earn very good from the site but if you think that doing free public shows is bad, then MFC is not for you.
:lol:
What about the girls who make good $$$ without even getting naked in public, let alone doing any shows? They do well on MFC, apparently, or else they wouldn't still be there.
You sound like the kind of person who's OK with leaning back and watching all kinds of shows without tipping.
 
M202A1 said:
but if you think that doing free public shows is bad, then MFC is not for you.

I don't know if you're referring to public cum shows, or public shows period (like countdowns to naked and baby oil)? Not every model has to do the same thing, and some models have their own reasons for not doing public cum shows and do fine without them. As long as they're not badmouthing the girls who do public shows, it's all good. Also, I've seen super popular models who didn't get naked in public chat, and they were always in a private show.

I don't think you're the person to be telling experienced cam girls what's best for them. :twocents-02cents: I wish someone would tell me I'm "on the wrong site" because I don't do public cum shows. :lol:
 
emptiedglass said:
nzhere said:
That site publically lists which models they are autocapping.

Therefore MFc could disrupt autocappers by opening say 5 of those models accounts and check the i.ps that are connecting to the streams. Then compare , match and autoban

oh and send them a stream with rick astley :mrgreen:

It would piss the cappers off even more if you found some gay porn to put in there instead. :twocents-02cents:

Or f--k their recordings up by sending them random streams of sub 100 camscore models. If the model isn't who it says in the autocapped file name then that RUINS their whole little setup doesn't it. :think: :lol:

:dance:
 
  • Like
Reactions: emptiedglass
nzhere said:
emptiedglass said:
nzhere said:
That site publically lists which models they are autocapping.

Therefore MFc could disrupt autocappers by opening say 5 of those models accounts and check the i.ps that are connecting to the streams. Then compare , match and autoban

oh and send them a stream with rick astley :mrgreen:

It would piss the cappers off even more if you found some gay porn to put in there instead. :twocents-02cents:

Or f--k their recordings up by sending them random streams of sub 100 camscore models. If the model isn't who it says in the autocapped file name then that RUINS their whole little setup doesn't it. :think: :lol:

:dance:

And still caps a woman who doesn't want to be capped?? what the fuck does it have to do with her camscore.
 
nzhere said:
Or f--k their recordings up by sending them random streams of sub 100 camscore models. If the model isn't who it says in the autocapped file name then that RUINS their whole little setup doesn't it. :think: :lol:

:dance:

I agree with Miss_Lollipop. That's mean...even if you are kidding. Models with low cam scores are still human beings, ya know. There's no need to be a dick to the models who are really struggling...just because you find it amusing.
 
nzhere said:
That site publically lists which models they are autocapping.

Therefore MFc could disrupt autocappers by opening say 5 of those models accounts and check the i.ps that are connecting to the streams. Then compare , match and autoban

oh and send them a stream with rick astley :mrgreen:

Funny. But didn't they blog that they use the amazon cloud? They could be on a lot of ips. Wondering if banning the amazon cloud would have any side effects.
 
yummybrownfox said:
nzhere said:
Or f--k their recordings up by sending them random streams of sub 100 camscore models. If the model isn't who it says in the autocapped file name then that RUINS their whole little setup doesn't it. :think: :lol:

:dance:

I agree with Miss_Lollipop. That's mean...even if you are kidding. Models with low cam scores are still human beings, ya know. There's no need to be a dick to the models who are really struggling...just because you find it amusing.

I agree. I long ago realized, while as a general rule, the models with higher camscore have put in a lot of work. There's also an element of luck on MFC. Just being on cam at the right time to attract the attention of some guy with money who happens to absolutely adore you and your style plays a big role in that success.
Many of the models with lower camscore I've chatted with absolutely put in the work. They have all the elements making up a successful model, they are very personable and know how to chat. But the regulars they've got in their rooms just don't have enough spending money to maintain an upwardly mobile camscore.
 
yummybrownfox said:
M202A1 said:
but if you think that doing free public shows is bad, then MFC is not for you.

I don't think you're the person to be telling experienced cam girls what's best for them. :twocents-02cents: I wish someone would tell me I'm "on the wrong site" because I don't do public cum shows. :lol:

I didn't ask to be the person who tells experienced models what to do. Someone already summed it up in a nut shell by saying that sometimes it a jackpot if you are online and so happen to have viewers who at that moment like what you do and so tip.
 
M202A1 said:
I didn't ask to be the person who tells experienced models what to do.
Did I misinterpret this comment then (see below)?
M202A1 said:
but if you think that doing free public shows is bad, then MFC is not for you.

M202A1 said:
Someone already summed it up in a nut shell by saying that sometimes it a jackpot if you are online and so happen to have viewers who at that moment like what you do and so tip.
Yes, of course. The unpredictability of MFC can be pretty cool. Still doesn't change what I said earlier...MFC can be the right site for you whether you do public cum shows or not. It's silly to tell a model "MFC isn't right for you" just because she's not a fan of doing public shows. You never did answer my question earlier, so I'll assume you're talking about cum shows.
 
yummybrownfox said:
M202A1 said:
I didn't ask to be the person who tells experienced models what to do.
Did I misinterpret this comment then (see below)?
M202A1 said:
but if you think that doing free public shows is bad, then MFC is not for you.

M202A1 said:
Someone already summed it up in a nut shell by saying that sometimes it a jackpot if you are online and so happen to have viewers who at that moment like what you do and so tip.
Yes, of course. The unpredictability of MFC can be pretty cool. Still doesn't change what I said earlier...MFC can be the right site for you whether you do public cum shows or not. It's silly to tell a model "MFC isn't right for you" just because she's not a fan of doing public shows. You never did answer my question earlier, so I'll assume you're talking about cum shows.

I'm now guessing that there is a big difference from a models perspective doing a public show and a public show where there is a count down to a performance.
Now that I get that, the models that are privileged enough (by having a high fan/viewer numbers) can choose whether to do private shows or just count down public shows.
I see some models who ONLY do public shows and say no privates cos they have extra more tokens from public viewers.

Then, there are some who have a hard time getting up to speed and never do public shows and their rooms always have low numbers.

I don't know what (lol) i am even discussing this cos there are a lot of grey area factors that flip this on its head.

Back to OTP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyLuna
M202A1 said:
I don't know what (lol) i am even discussing this cos there are a lot of grey area factors that flip this on its head.

I don't know why either, since this is supposed to be a thread about cappers...not about 'Yay or Nay to public shows'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brad and Nordling
Kinda random and has probably been talked about but isn't not caring the best thing that can be done in the whole recording situation. You can be mad and hateful and it will still happen or you could not care and it will still happen. You can waste your time and energy and even money trying to prevent it and it will still happen. By trying to prevent it you can create a bigger market for it. Pretty high and might not be looking at the big picture properly but it kinda seems just dealing with it is the most logical solution.
 
PunkInDrublic said:
Kinda random and has probably been talked about but isn't not caring the best thing that can be done in the whole recording situation. You can be mad and hateful and it will still happen or you could not care and it will still happen. You can waste your time and energy and even money trying to prevent it and it will still happen. By trying to prevent it you can create a bigger market for it. Pretty high and might not be looking at the big picture properly but it kinda seems just dealing with it is the most logical solution.

"All that's necessary for the forces of evil to win in the world is for enough good men to do nothing.” -Edmund Burke.
 
JerryBoBerry said:
PunkInDrublic said:
Kinda random and has probably been talked about but isn't not caring the best thing that can be done in the whole recording situation. You can be mad and hateful and it will still happen or you could not care and it will still happen. You can waste your time and energy and even money trying to prevent it and it will still happen. By trying to prevent it you can create a bigger market for it. Pretty high and might not be looking at the big picture properly but it kinda seems just dealing with it is the most logical solution.

"All that's necessary for the forces of evil to win in the world is for enough good men to do nothing.” -Edmund Burke.
Quoting dead poets is pretty much indistinguishable from doing nothing.
 
Terrible use of an awesome quote. So the forces of evil are a bunch of betas recording camgirls and the good men are the white knight goofs protecting and saving the camgirls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyLuna
PunkInDrublic said:
Terrible use of an awesome quote. So the forces of evil are a bunch of betas recording camgirls and the good men are the white knight goofs protecting and saving the camgirls.
You're using the same expression they do. That's not cool.
I would hardly call someone who sends me a download link so that I can send it to MFC a "white knight". He's doing the right thing.
 
Sevrin said:
JerryBoBerry said:
PunkInDrublic said:
Kinda random and has probably been talked about but isn't not caring the best thing that can be done in the whole recording situation. You can be mad and hateful and it will still happen or you could not care and it will still happen. You can waste your time and energy and even money trying to prevent it and it will still happen. By trying to prevent it you can create a bigger market for it. Pretty high and might not be looking at the big picture properly but it kinda seems just dealing with it is the most logical solution.

"All that's necessary for the forces of evil to win in the world is for enough good men to do nothing.” -Edmund Burke.
Quoting dead poets is pretty much indistinguishable from doing nothing.
That's two threads you've commented negatively against me using quotes to get a point across rather eloquently. Do you not like quotes or just not understand them? :think:
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyLuna
LilyMarie said:
You're using the same expression they do. That's not cool.
I would hardly call someone who sends me a download link so that I can send it to MFC a "white knight". He's doing the right thing.
They? I see models using white knight but you seem to suggest that cappers use it also. He's doing the right thing if the model cares enough to waste her time caring about cappers. Some give zero shits since they know its insane to try to stop file sharing on the internet and find the white knights annoying.
 
PunkInDrublic said:
Terrible use of an awesome quote. So the forces of evil are a bunch of betas recording camgirls and the good men are the white knight goofs protecting and saving the camgirls.

Since this needs spelling out in simple words. The forces of evil are the putzes who are doing the illegal capping and posting to web pages with compensation to the original artists in any way. And the good men (i never said white knight) are the people who don't approve of that illegal activity.

Directly responding to your post would mean if people just stand by and do nothing because they are under the impression the evil guys are going to win anyway then they have indeed already won, since all they need to actually win is for people opposed to them to do nothing.

Now all that typing was rather nicely summed up in a simple quote from a poet but I was under the mistaken impression most people would understand simple words and be able to relate them to a current topic being discussed. My mistake, I'll be sure to use little words and not quote anyone for your benefit in the future.
.
.
.
.
.
"You had to learn at a certain age what sarcasm is, you know?" - Penny Marshall
 
yummybrownfox said:
Yeah, it's a little sad
Also sad that these guys probably download all the videos and then go and try to help the model remove them. Why they even there to begin with?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.