AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

SASHA GREY: I Will NOT Quit Reading to Schoolchildren

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Bocefish

I did bad things, privileges revoked!
In the Dog House
Mar 26, 2010
8,485
7,019
793
Usually somewhere between flippant and glib.
Yeah why isn't it appropriate? Cos she's had sex or cos she's had it on camera?

On the other hand, this seems far less acceptable if you switch Sasha Grey out for say, Nacho Vidal or Ron Jeremy, and then have them interacting with 8th graders lol. Again, there's no logical reason why they shouldn't - being porn performers doesnt make them pedophiles or sex-criminals - but many people would be concerned if their 13 year old daughter hung out with Nacho Vidal once a week.
She adds, "I am an actor. I am an artist. I am a daughter. I am a sister. I am a partner. I have a past that some people may not agree with, but it does not define who I am. I believe in the future of our children..."
I kinda thought she was gonna start singing Whitney Houston style here lol
 
First of all, good for her. Secondly, what the fuck is wrong with these parents that bitching? :? Their kids are NOT even gonna know who she is, let alone that she used to have sex on camera. To them, it's just some pretty, nice lady who read to them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrecklesXxX
This reminds me of a story from a few years back: Several strippers at a "Gentlemen's Club" got together to raise money to buy toys for underprivileged kids at Christmas. I'm not sure if it was to contribute to "Toys for Tots", or something else. The main point was the organization had a loud and public debate on whether to accept this "dirty" money. The same thing happens every year when the various Hell's Angles do their toy drives.

As far as Sasha is concerned, as long as she's not reading gang-bang stories, what's the big deal? I've seen pictures of her when she's not in her "porn persona", and she looks like a demure teenager. You have to look at the big picture, though. In the last 10 years or so, there has been a trend towards "Zero Tolerance" where ever minors are concerned. Schools, hospitals, day-cares, etc. Guns/weapons, drugs, sex-crimes are all red flags. Unfortunately, "sex-workers" are lumped in with the "sex-crime" group. This cannot be news to anybody here. Is it fair? Hell no. Recently there was an aspiring teacher who posted FB pictures of her at a keg party, drinking beer. She was denied a teaching certificate, and she believes that played a part. Then there was the elementary student suspended because he brought a Cub-Scout eating utensil to school. Similar to a Swiss-Army gadget, it had a spoon, fork, and knife. Both of these cases illustrate that when a "zero-tolerance" net is cast, innocents will sometimes snagged by the net. Again, is this fair"? Again, hell no.

From my perspective, I look at Sasha's charity work as a marketing ploy. Like the strippers for toys, like the Hell's Angels efforts, these are attempts to "rehabilitate an image" that they know is somewhat "unsavory" in the (unenlightened) public's eye. I think if Sasha really wanted to do "good works", she could have done so without any publicity. It could have been as simple as writing a check, signing up as anonymously as possible, or choosing to go in to this without her agent and TMZ following close behind her. But what do I know, I'm just a cynic.
 
I saw this a few days ago, the comment I liked was something like "If these kids know who she is and what she did, there might be a little bit of a parenting issue going on" lol

The school handled it like typical bureaucratic dumbasses - denying she was even there as TmZ pics are posted online of her reading lol
 
schlmoe said:
she looks like a demure teenager
:lol: Sasha Grey never looks like a demure teenager. Casually-dressed normal young woman sure. Demure? Hahaha!

She is a very intelligent woman and is well aware of what she's doing - I agree it's at least partly for publicity. She also likes to stir up trouble to prove a point, and if she can prove a point, stir up trouble, AND make kids happy it's a triple win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChaosBeauty
I went and read to my child's kindergarten class. Just because I am not in the adult industry does not make me any less caring and compassionate towards children. My career chouce has give me the opportunity to spend more time with my child, and being involved in his schooling.
 
I also give her a thumbs up for the effort. I have to wonder also, who exactly recognized her to sound the alarm? Surely it wasn't one of the "holier than God" parents that are objecting.... :shhh: If it was, where is it they recognize her from? :lol:
Maybe a few wives are more concerned about the hubby having contact than what they should be.
Oh wait... :woops: We all seem to have dismissed her wardrobe... Perhaps she was going to show up to read to the kidos with the 5" heels and wearing something with less material than a bandanna. :text-lol:


....also likes to stir up trouble to prove a point, ....
:mrgreen: Not unlike more than a few members here ehh ? :think:
Too bad she doesn't post here as well.



alexa7 said:
I went and read to my child's kindergarten class. Just because I am not in the adult industry does not make me any less caring and compassionate towards children. My career chouce has give me the opportunity to spend more time with my child, and being involved in his schooling.

Maybe its a typo ... last time I heard anything on it, being a 'Cam Girl' was indeed part of the sex worker/adult industry.... except of course for the ones that say thery're "models"..... :whistle:
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChaosBeauty
SoTxBob said:
I also give her a thumbs up for the effort. I have to wonder also, who exactly recognized her to sound the alarm? Surely it wasn't one of the "holier than God" parents that are objecting.... :shhh: If it was, where is it they recognize her from? :lol:
Maybe a few wives are more concerned about the hubby having contact than what they should be.
Oh wait... :woops: We all seem to have dismissed her wardrobe... Perhaps she was going to show up to read to the kidos with the 5" heels and wearing something with less material than a bandanna. :text-lol:


....also likes to stir up trouble to prove a point, ....
:mrgreen: Not unlike more than a few members here ehh ? :think:
Too bad she doesn't post here as well.



alexa7 said:
I went and read to my child's kindergarten class. Just because I am not in the adult industry does not make me any less caring and compassionate towards children. My career chouce has give me the opportunity to spend more time with my child, and being involved in his schooling.

Maybe its a typo ... last time I heard anything on it, being a 'Cam Girl' was indeed part of the sex worker/adult industry.... except of course for the ones that say thery're "models"..... :whistle:

it was a typo. I meant to say just because i was in the adult industry. I was a little ahead of myself with all of my "not"'s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoTxBob
Jupiter551 said:
Yeah why isn't it appropriate? Cos she's had sex or cos she's had it on camera?

On the other hand, this seems far less acceptable if you switch Sasha Grey out for say, Nacho Vidal or Ron Jeremy, and then have them interacting with 8th graders lol. Again, there's no logical reason why they shouldn't - being porn performers doesnt make them pedophiles or sex-criminals - but many people would be concerned if their 13 year old daughter hung out with Nacho Vidal once a week.

I would most definitely have a problem if that sleaze Ron Jeremy got anywhere near my 13 year old daughter. Double standard? Perhaps, but that guy just makes me cringe in general.
 
Of course the little kids wont know who she is/was.....

unless the idiot parents keep bitching about it.

Then the kids will know.
:woops:
 
Bocefish said:
Jupiter551 said:
Yeah why isn't it appropriate? Cos she's had sex or cos she's had it on camera?

On the other hand, this seems far less acceptable if you switch Sasha Grey out for say, Nacho Vidal or Ron Jeremy, and then have them interacting with 8th graders lol. Again, there's no logical reason why they shouldn't - being porn performers doesnt make them pedophiles or sex-criminals - but many people would be concerned if their 13 year old daughter hung out with Nacho Vidal once a week.

I would most definitely have a problem if that sleaze Ron Jeremy got anywhere near my 13 year old daughter. Double standard? Perhaps, but that guy just makes me cringe in general.
Ron Jeremy is very handsy and VERY horny. Him I would have trouble with if he was around teenage or pubescent girls. Heck, he groped me without asking in a hallway at Chicago Exxotica. Sasha Grey around children, not a problem at all with me.
 
Heck, he groped me without asking in a hallway at Chicago Exxotica.

Hey, it's not everyone who gets groped by the hedgehog.

Or maybe they do.... I dunno.

:lol:
 
Paulie Walnuts said:
Heck, he groped me without asking in a hallway at Chicago Exxotica.

Hey, it's not everyone who gets groped by the hedgehog.

Or maybe they do.... I dunno.

:lol:
From what I heard and saw, he was going around randomly groping unsuspecting women all over Exxxotica that weekend. Ask KittyWilde why she needed to brush her teeth extra that Saturday, lol. He seems to have a hands on policy.
 
blackxrose said:
From what I heard and saw, he was going around randomly groping unsuspecting women all over Exxxotica that weekend. Ask KittyWilde why she needed to brush her teeth extra that Saturday, lol. He seems to have a hands on policy.

Woah wait what did he do in KittyWilde's mouth?? lol
SophiaLocke said he was handsy too, in her case it paid off :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: SophiaLocke
Guess I'm gonna be the voice of the minority here, so here goes.
Children and pornography should N E V E R meet. Even if you never show the kinds one second of her work, and lie to them about who she is, it's inappropriate. I think this is a sick publicity grab by Sasha Grey, and as such, it is disgusting.

This may sound very simplistic, but I think if you can't tell the kiddo's what a person does for a living, they probably shouldn't be brought in & placed in front of them to be admired.

Porn does have a place in an adult life. It may, as they say, satisfy man's "lower" appetites, but they ARE Human appetites. They are part of us & to deny them is foolish.

PS...I didn't know who Sasha Grey was, so off to xhamster I went. Watch this and keep in mind this thread's question/topic.http://xhamster.com/movies/81450/sasha_grey_tight_teen_twat.html
 
Oy vey said:
Guess I'm gonna be the voice of the minority here, so here goes.
Children and pornography should N E V E R meet. Even if you never show the kinds one second of her work, and lie to them about who she is, it's inappropriate. I think this is a sick publicity grab by Sasha Grey, and as such, it is disgusting.

This may sound very simplistic, but I think if you can't tell the kiddo's what a person does for a living, they probably shouldn't be brought in & placed in front of them to be admired.

Porn does have a place in an adult life. It may, as they say, satisfy man's "lower" appetites, but they ARE Human appetites. They are part of us & to deny them is foolish.

PS...I didn't know who Sasha Grey was, so off to xhamster I went. Watch this and keep in mind this thread's question/topic.http://xhamster.com/movies/81450/sasha_grey_tight_teen_twat.html

Yes but that raises the question - if someone does pornography/escorting/adult work are they then tainted for the rest of their lives? Soandso once blew a guy on film so 20 years later she can't be a teacher? Sasha didn't do anything illegal by making porn, isn't a known sex offender, nor (to anyone's knowledge) a danger to children. Saying she can't be around kids because of what she did for a living a few years back is bordering on discrimination.

There are women here who have had sex on webcam, made videos of themselves having sex with guys and sold them, that's porn too. Most conservatives would argue masturbation on webcam or video is pornography as well. Should they be kept away from children too?
 
Jupiter551 said:
blackxrose said:
From what I heard and saw, he was going around randomly groping unsuspecting women all over Exxxotica that weekend. Ask KittyWilde why she needed to brush her teeth extra that Saturday, lol. He seems to have a hands on policy.

Woah wait what did he do in KittyWilde's mouth?? lol
SophiaLocke said he was handsy too, in her case it paid off :p
I think SophiaLocke could give you a good idea of what his hands on policy is like too. Lol, he's just a horny man who likes to look with his hands instead of his eyeballs.
 
blackxrose said:
Lol, he's just a horny normal man who likes to look with his hands instead of his eyeballsgets away with what every other guy wants to do but can't.
fixed :p

It's kind of an embarassment though for people who support legal pornography to have to state that porn doesn't turn guys into uncontrollable sexual predators with no concept of what constitutes appropriate sexual behaviour when you have this pornstar who appears to think it's totally fine to walk around groping women off-set.

I mean, I have to wonder if that's what 30 years or whatever in the porn biz does - completely disconnects one from normal social behaviour?
 
  • Like
Reactions: camstory and Rose
Oy vey said:
Guess I'm gonna be the voice of the minority here, so here goes.
Children and pornography should N E V E R meet. Even if you never show the kinds one second of her work, and lie to them about who she is, it's inappropriate. I think this is a sick publicity grab by Sasha Grey, and as such, it is disgusting.

This may sound very simplistic, but I think if you can't tell the kiddo's what a person does for a living, they probably shouldn't be brought in & placed in front of them to be admired.

Porn does have a place in an adult life. It may, as they say, satisfy man's "lower" appetites, but they ARE Human appetites. They are part of us & to deny them is foolish.

PS...I didn't know who Sasha Grey was, so off to xhamster I went. Watch this and keep in mind this thread's question/topic.http://xhamster.com/movies/81450/sasha_grey_tight_teen_twat.html


You shouldn't watch camgirls if you don't think we're human. A lot of us are mothers, too, and they do just fine with their kids.

Hell, I think most all of the camgirl mothers I know are better than your typical mom in Wal-mart.
 
Oy vey said:
Guess I'm gonna be the voice of the minority here, so here goes.
Children and pornography should N E V E R meet. Even if you never show the kinds one second of her work, and lie to them about who she is, it's inappropriate. I think this is a sick publicity grab by Sasha Grey, and as such, it is disgusting.

This may sound very simplistic, but I think if you can't tell the kiddo's what a person does for a living, they probably shouldn't be brought in & placed in front of them to be admired.

Porn does have a place in an adult life. It may, as they say, satisfy man's "lower" appetites, but they ARE Human appetites. They are part of us & to deny them is foolish.

PS...I didn't know who Sasha Grey was, so off to xhamster I went. Watch this and keep in mind this thread's question/topic.http://xhamster.com/movies/81450/sasha_grey_tight_teen_twat.html

Why should porn and children never meet? I guess since I had my first playboy in like 1st grade and when I hit puberty, there was the internet. I don't see a problem with it. School ignored sex for the most part. Parents don't want to talk about it. What else do you expect? It's a logical thing.
 
I mean did they introduce her as "Sasha Grey,winner of the 2010 AVN award for best anal sex scene" lol?

I dont see the big deal at all, she has been out of the adult industry for over 2 years and is going mainstream. It is not like she is pushing porn in these kid's faces, she is just volunteering by reading to 1st graders..
 
If you dont tell the kiddies and she uses a different name (many out of the biz workers do in their real life) these kids aint gonna know the difference.

Apparently they are in far worse danger if you so something like.... send them to Penn state.
:lol:
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChaosBeauty
I don't see a problem with this at all, for a few reasons.

1. Pornography is NOT A CRIME. These people getting uptight are acting like she's a child molester or murderer. She's performed with her consent, in 100% legal pornographic movies. She was not tricked, drugged, or forced into doing anything in her movies against her will. While she doesn't come out front an introduce herself as "Sasha Grey, former pornstar", she isn't embarrassed or ashamed of her work ither.

2. Based on interviews and biographies I've read (TMZ being no exception), she's an extremely intelligent human being. One of the reasons she chose to get into porn is to abolish North Americans' taboos and spark casual conversation about sexual behaviour. By reading to children and getting tabloids to talk about her past - which she is NOT ashamed of - people are doing exactly that.

3. How does her past make it so that she's not able to read to schoolchildren? She's reading a children's book to them and not talking about her former career. I imagine if the kids asked her about that, she'd use her best judgment and answer the questions appropriately.

Grey was born in 1988, meaning she's only 24 years old. She has very strong opinions about sex and has a lot of time left in her life to share them. I honestly believe historians in the future will look back on her with the same fondness as Marilyn Monroe - a sex symbol who changed society's perceptions on that very topic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexLady and Keithy
Status
Not open for further replies.