@CatSmith If you believe people are being trafficked and being forced to cam, gather enough evidence and report it.
I did. I reported it to the site for a week, over and over. They did nothing. I reported it to a few agencies as well. I'm guessing they just got a slap on the wrist because all of the sudden a few of the younger looking rooms were cleaned up of toys, and the girls had fake tattoos put on them and were dressed up to make them look older. Still the same girls broadcasting though. They also changed the wording their pre-broadcast splash page to specify "age of jurisdiction" instead of the "must be 18 years of age".@CatSmith If you believe people are being trafficked and being forced to cam, gather enough evidence and report it.
They still say 18 is the minimum, though.I did. I reported it to the site for a week, over and over. They did nothing. I reported it to a few agencies as well. I'm guessing they just got a slap on the wrist because all of the sudden a few of the younger looking rooms were cleaned up of toys, and the girls had fake tattoos put on them and were dressed up to make them look older. Still the same girls broadcasting though. They also changed the wording their pre-broadcast splash page to specify "age of jurisdiction" instead of the "must be 18 years of age".
Age of majority by country - Wiki Page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_majority
I saw a Twitter thread of people complaining that "blue ticks aren't REAL amateur content" and that they think if someone is verified at all they're "fake" and "playing it up" as if the unverified amateurs weren't also playing it up when filming. All but explicitly admitting that it has to be stolen for them to get off on it.The amount of bitching from members about their playlists/etc being gone is just beyond comprehension. The entitlement is real.
"OMG my free porn is gone!"
I'm sorry but... boo fucking hoo. Go pay for some.
It has to be stolen, or if posted by the actual creator, needs to be "not for the money".I saw a Twitter thread of people complaining that "blue ticks aren't REAL amateur content" and that they think if someone is verified at all they're "fake" and "playing it up" as if the unverified amateurs weren't also playing it up when filming. All but explicitly admitting that it has to be stolen for them to get off on it.
Punker Barbie, we know each other in real life from years of conventions. I was a boy then and am now transitioning. Don't want to put my boy name on here. But Mohawk Steve.. BP4L Juicy, Aric, Baddog, Jenny Darling, Dirty D, Maja MikMunki, should all be names you know well. I was building up followers being unverified as my ID expired and I couldn't verify. I understand if it is impossible, but it will be mid Jan or Feb till I can resolve this issue as I'm waiting on a passport renewal, and didn't have a state ID. I have copies of my Passport ID but it expired 2017. I like.. really could use some help on this one if possible. Naked Dodge ball. Phx Forums, etc. I think you'll remember me. But it's been years. If not I'll do my best to try to get my state ID, but it's an uphill battle with the hoops I have to jump through. I got all dressed to go on tonight, and was used to the community and all my followers as an outlet. On hormones right now, and this is like REALLY messing me up tonight. I'm certainly well over 24. We attended shows together from 2006 to 2009 or so. I was just going to wait, but not being able to be on at all is killing me right now. Around 1565 followers on there after only camming for 2 or 3 weeks. I really could use the income as I'm trying to move to get away from family that doesn't know so I can be me. I could message you on GFY if that helps as well (if pms on there still exist, haven't looked for awhile). Still mostly a secret and not out yet to everyone. Kind of desperate, I hate to even ask, and if not possible, I understand. And I'll just try to hustle to get the state ID. I did like 7 hour days for a solid 18 out of 19 days on there for free just to get myself into the habit of it, and now I feel like I lost a leg or something not being able to go on. Thanks for the consideration. Roe Dawn Oneal.Chaturbate has always had a zero-tolerance policy for any underage use of the Chaturbate platform. Chaturbate has never been one for making public announcements regarding how stringent our age verification requirements are; however, with recent events surrounding PornHub, we wanted to address our age verification protocols.
Chaturbate not only requires all independent broadcasters to be age verified but also requires that users of the Chaturbate platform never engage in underage role play. In fact, we are proud of the fact that we are often criticized on public forums for our strict policy of terminating people from the CB platform for simply looking underage (despite having provided age verification).
Chaturbate enthusiastically (and overtly) cooperates with law enforcement whenever there is any alleged or suspected underage activity. When appropriate, Chaturbate also reports matters of concern to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
Although no one can receive tokens on Chaturbate without first providing current government-issued photo age verification, we previously allowed individuals who appeared to be at least 24 years of age to broadcast as “Exhibitionists.” “Exhibitionists” did not have to submit age verification; however, were subject to review by hundreds of compliance review persons around the world (who work on a 24 hour/7 days per week basis) as well as by the incredible Chaturbate community, which has always been very proactive in reporting any suspected underage violations.
Unrelated to the PornHub events, over two months ago we took the step to restrict new “Exhibitionist” accounts from broadcasting without first providing age verification after receiving complaints online. Our intent was to allow long-time exhibitionists, who had been repeatedly vetted not only by our worldwide team of reviewers but also by the CB community, to continue to broadcast. However, we have determined, at the request of several Chaturbate broadcasters, to require age verification for all “Exhibitionists.” Although we are making these changes at their request, it is important to understand that this verification change is not due to any underage person streaming on the Chaturbate platform (as we have numerous safeguards and policies in place). Rather, this change is being made out of respect for the concerns expressed by Chaturbate broadcasters. We owe it to all members of the Chaturbate community to listen to everyone's concerns and continuously create a platform where they feel safe, accepted, and heard.
Punker i'm calling out your nonsense, all those claims about underaged checking etc mean nothing. When you still have issues with certain video loops that have had dozens of accounts. I just took a screencap, theres 2 circled that have been banned under multiple names for playing out the same loops
Again i bring up the point HOW is this happening when supposedly the i.d is banned, and any new account needs a photo i.d submitted next too the models face.
Are you saying these people are underage? Do you mean they are using pre-recorded video? How do you know the model's ID was banned? How do you know they aren't just jumping between studios?
I could see the argument that if the models know what exact picture the support will require everytime it can be exploited.
I think it will be good for cam models. It will help prevent our content from being uploaded without us giving permission or being paid for it. And it will also help prevent child porn and sex trafficking porn.I just heard about that and was worried it affected cam models that verified their accounts?
Think it’s a good thing but don’t want models who use site to get left out.
I don't believe this is a bad thing for any of us. Quite the opposite. The reason they are not supporting Pornhub anymore is because they were shown proof that Pornhub was hosting child porn. It's also very good that Pornhub is now requiring all content to be verified, so it will help prevent cam girls' content from being uploaded without our permission.Hey everyone, so if you haven't heard visa and mastercard are no longer supporting any of mindgeeks companies. I feel absolutely terrified that I am going to loose my job and that they are going to start going after smaller sites. What should we do.. what can we do?
Wow, that's quite a big change! Sounds like a big win for the workers in the adult industry though.
affiliates should not be using stolen content to generate traffic in the first place. This is specifically stated in the tos of most adult affiliate programs.Aside from the fact that i very much applaud actions being taken in terms of the illegal stuff that has been going around on PH (and its network), this isnt very much promising for cammodels per se or at least peoole that arent already settled with high figures (room count, score,..)
People keep forgetting the marketeers that give traffic to sites like CB as one of them. If people think the majority are just nerds posting stolen content then oh boy!
If this trend keeps trickling down to all porn sites in general then rev share programs will change completely and and roomtraffic so many people seem to have issue with complaining will get worse
PH act of mass deleting is out of proportion and looks like an act of fear and hoping to turn things around again with payment processors (and maybe charges). This will have effect for people in need of traffic.
Dont get me wrong, action and changes were needed. Severe Illegal stuff had to go.
SMMarketeer point of view
**Note: i skimmed through most of the replies
I would assume such a requirement would probable apply to cam sites as well.
And the cost of running such a service would be passed onto cam models and the consumers.
Also, I wouldn't be surprised if sites choose to error on the side of caution. As in if they can't disprove a claim, they would take action. As in remove the video or model. At least until they could prove otherwise.
It would be interesting to see if software can even do what they're asking. I mean it's very easy to alter a file to change it's hash, or alter the audio / video itself.
I would assume such a requirement would probable apply to cam sites as well.
And the cost of running such a service would be passed onto cam models and the consumers.
Also, I wouldn't be surprised if sites choose to error on the side of caution. As in if they can't disprove a claim, they would take action. As in remove the video or model. At least until they could prove otherwise.
It would be interesting to see if software can even do what they're asking. I mean it's very easy to alter a file to change it's hash, or alter the audio / video itself.
all performers appearing in the content to submit a consented list of acts depicted in the material.
past content, so platform owners would still need to supply the information consent list.
users cannot upload adult material unless they are of the "age of consent" in the state in which the user resides.
provide your ID if you are to upload content
prevent downloading porn
Most affiliate stuff that actually is worth doing isnt even TOS approved and affiliate programs generally dont even give a damn shit as long as it converts (yes some are more strict than others). Same like PH didnt give a shit till shit hit the fan.affiliates should not be using stolen content to generate traffic in the first place. This is specifically stated in the tos of most adult affiliate programs.
It does when the roleplaying / fetish feeding is directly and BLATANTLY "underage" play. And yes, they are supposed to be verified but I've seen girls on there who are obviously no older than 14/15 years old being dressed up like little kids with toys and kid stuff all over the room. The room is FILLED with pedophiles (reading the chat is disturbing) and they continue to allow it with the excuse being "age of majority in their jurisdiction". Thing is, it is being broadcast in the USA, CB is based in the USA and the girls are not legal for USA standards.
Their verification process is laughable as well, I'm in my 40's and they declined my ID saying I wasn't of age. I had to email them directly and make them look at my ID again. CB bans models that ARE of age for "looking too young". But they will allow all of these underage models from out of the country..... SMFH
It's not just a "vibe" it's blatant. A few of them it is OBVIOUS they are being trafficked (Columbia) yet the site continues to allow it because they are the "age of majority in their jurisdiction". I'm guaranteeing their ID's are fake because developmentally these girls are NOT 18. Columbia's age of majority is 18.
I guarantee from your response you haven't seen any of these rooms. There are quite a few of them.
Most affiliate stuff that actually is worth doing isnt even TOS approved and affiliate programs generally dont even give a damn shit as long as it converts
I mean, it's also illegal. So there's that.use of stolen content isnt very nice
Got ya. Yep that’s why you don’t have a lot of freedom to make changes to your page.I do not.
That's what i meant but then again it's part of the game.I mean, it's also illegal. So there's that.