Cordoba855 said:Can I ask why, exactly? Considering how ambitious some prosecutors can be, I'm legitimately concerned here.Bocefish said:Cordoba855 said:if A99 is arrested and prosecuted on child pornography charges, which you seem to be suggesting is in the works, wouldn't every single person who viewed her room, at least during the incidents in question, be guilty of viewing child pornography, from the viewpoint of the FBI or whoever it is you're in contact with?
At the very least, wouldn't the tippers be in trouble, and at most, couldn't MFC itself be in very serious trouble here?
:roll:
In a word, NO.
Crustyz said:Why don't the other models that break the rules get banned? That would help a lot. :confusion-scratchheadyellow:
Cordoba855 said:Can I ask why, exactly? Considering how ambitious some prosecutors can be, I'm legitimately concerned here.Bocefish said:Cordoba855 said:if A99 is arrested and prosecuted on child pornography charges, which you seem to be suggesting is in the works, wouldn't every single person who viewed her room, at least during the incidents in question, be guilty of viewing child pornography, from the viewpoint of the FBI or whoever it is you're in contact with?
At the very least, wouldn't the tippers be in trouble, and at most, couldn't MFC itself be in very serious trouble here?
:roll:
In a word, NO.
Bocefish said:If you dared somebody to rob a bank and even gave him 5 dollars incentive, would you be responsible for their actions? No, because if they did rob the bank it was of their own free will, nobody forced them.
Cordoba855 said:Can I ask why, exactly? Considering how ambitious some prosecutors can be, I'm legitimately concerned here.Bocefish said:Cordoba855 said:if A99 is arrested and prosecuted on child pornography charges, which you seem to be suggesting is in the works, wouldn't every single person who viewed her room, at least during the incidents in question, be guilty of viewing child pornography, from the viewpoint of the FBI or whoever it is you're in contact with?
At the very least, wouldn't the tippers be in trouble, and at most, couldn't MFC itself be in very serious trouble here?
:roll:
In a word, NO.
Zoomer said:Bocefish said:If you dared somebody to rob a bank and even gave him 5 dollars incentive, would you be responsible for their actions? No, because if they did rob the bank it was of their own free will, nobody forced them.
:?
It's called conspiracy isn't it? If I dared someone $5 to shoot you, I'd be guilty of conspiracy surely - and if they did it, I'd be guilty of murder... wouldn't I?
Bocefish said:@Cordoba... Why do think anybody in 99's room could be guilty of child pornography charges? Explain your reasoning because that makes absolutely no sense unless you saw something specific.
Cordoba855 said:Bocefish said:@Cordoba... Why do think anybody in 99's room could be guilty of child pornography charges? Explain your reasoning because that makes absolutely no sense unless you saw something specific.
AngelAndrea implied that whoever she had been talking to had said that "the children do not have to be in any sort of undress [or] even be aware of her actions to be considered a... possible pornography charge."
As far as I know the incidents involved kids incidentally entering the background of her shows, so this seems to be almost absurd, but I was going off of what she said, since she's the one who apparently reported A99 to a whole bunch of different agencies. If she's correct and those are charges pursued by authorities, then by the logic being used by those authorities I would assume the show itself would be considered underage pornography.
zxtx26 said:If the rules were properly enforced, i.e no public masturbation, how much traffic would they loose? Also kids are probably watching but what is to stop them same as on any porn site or youtube for that matter. Anyway Leo does annoy me with his antics of ban the little guys, makes me thing there is something going on there...
maryland said:fuck you retard stand by that and my so called bad english. keep that in mine while you get your welfare check and live in your trailer!! try keeping your nose/comments to your self then. if you don't care about agent99. losser dickhead :lol: ow and you stop leaving messages about my comments. if you can't take it then stop dishing it out!! i firer shit bags like you all the time trying to make yourself feel better by reaching at straws and trying to make something out of nothing :lol:
maryland said:fuck you retard stand by that and my so called bad english. keep that in mine while you get your welfare check and live in your trailer!! try keeping your nose/comments to your self then. if you don't care about agent99. losser dickhead :lol: ow and you stop leaving messages about my comments. if you can't take it then stop dishing it out!! i firer shit bags like you all the time trying to make yourself feel better by reaching at straws and trying to make something out of nothing :lol:
nzhere said:Agent_99 still has her mfc account , just her profile is turned off
If you go in send pm and try to send one to Agent_99 that username is still found...
Well she's (presumably) been banned, not deleted.nzhere said:I'm referring to "Send Private message" which is at the bottom of the Online Friends list.
If you enter "agent_99" it says username found
Jupiter551 said:So....completely hypothetical for a minute here, and I'm not suggesting any of this is necessarily likely the case or whatever.
a) If someone had allegedly committed a crime whilst using MFC as a model, and if the crime(s) charged perhaps spanned both their actions in real life and the transmission of those actions via webcam and/or making money from said crime; would anything that may be used as evidence of that crime, and any proceeds thereof - ie the person's bank account, and in this case possibly archives and other information from MFC - be requested via a warrant or subpoena?
b) If that were to occur, the logical step for a company like MFC to take (assuming they disavow any knowledge or responsibility for the alleged crime) would be to suspend the person in question and freeze any due assets until the investigation/case is complete, and then ban or reinstate accordingly. In fact it might be a condition of the warrant etc that any and all pertaining to the MFC account be frozen so it cannot be altered or removed.
AmeliaTwist said:I had one of 99's regulars in my room last night who claimed that she had not been banned, but had voluntarily left MFC. And that he got this information by emailing MFC and asking what happened to her.
Those emails are the ones that MFC is spending time replying to? Inquiries about Agent_99's disappearance? Yeah, right.
And in his world, do pigs sprout wings and fly?AmeliaTwist said:I had one of 99's regulars in my room last night who claimed that she had not been banned, but had voluntarily left MFC. And that he got this information by emailing MFC and asking what happened to her.
Those emails are the ones that MFC is spending time replying to? Inquiries about Agent_99's disappearance? Yeah, right.
Keithy said:AmeliaTwist said:I had one of 99's regulars in my room last night who claimed that she had not been banned, but had voluntarily left MFC. And that he got this information by emailing MFC and asking what happened to her.
Those emails are the ones that MFC is spending time replying to? Inquiries about Agent_99's disappearance? Yeah, right.
Yeah, MFC replying to e-mail about internal matters that don't involve anyone but MFC and a99? I doubt it. Then again, since a99 claims she's married to "that Leo" who knows. In her world it all makes sense.
camstory said:Keithy said:AmeliaTwist said:I had one of 99's regulars in my room last night who claimed that she had not been banned, but had voluntarily left MFC. And that he got this information by emailing MFC and asking what happened to her.
Those emails are the ones that MFC is spending time replying to? Inquiries about Agent_99's disappearance? Yeah, right.
Yeah, MFC replying to e-mail about internal matters that don't involve anyone but MFC and a99? I doubt it. Then again, since a99 claims she's married to "that Leo" who knows. In her world it all makes sense.
Is this claim of marriage in jest, or does she say it seriously. I have been doing some research on Leo and I have found nothing one way or the other on his marital status.