I forgot all the annoying faces :? 
:roll: :whistle:
Now my post is fully annoying to suite what it is a response to.
:roll: :whistle: Now my post is fully annoying to suite what it is a response to.
AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!
MFC Agent ??banned?
- Thread starter nzhere
- Start date
-
** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
- Status
- Nov 3, 2010
- 10,895
- 65,722
- 1,793
- 37
- Twitter Username
- @jolene_brody
- Tumblr Username
- jolenebrody
- MFC Username
- jolenebrody
- ManyVids URL
- https://www.manyvids.com/Profile/303895/JoleneBrody/
KittyWilde said:
I'm with kitty. Agent 99's antics don't actually hurt me directly so I try not to pay attention. However, crazy upside down sybian hitachi anal fuck shows in public chat likely do. If it wasn't for my regulars I'm not sure I would ever get privates. I don't mind too much because I know them and we have fun, but when none of them want, or can, fuck me I don't hit my goals AND I'm crabby because I didn't cum.
The pick and choose rule breaking enforcement is the only thing that bothers me.
KittyWilde said:
Except, she fucks herself in public chat with men on cam, kids on cam, whatever on cam. The more outrageous shit she pulls the more money she makes...just cos she wasn't publicly fucking herself last night - she does it at least every other day so :dontknow:
Jupiter551 said:
And the more people who sit in her room just because it's edgy and raw and wrong. If you think it doesn't affect you, you don't EXACTLY know what affect means. (of course we can't think of the children, that would be selfless, how dare we)
She's at some ford dealership, just had a dude on cam rubbing his arm, talking to them off-cam...she's flaunting rules daily now jus cos she knows she won't be punished.
"no one's tipping me so I'm going to leave" - lol, like she's doing anything worth tipping. what a greedy bitch.
She's telling Egyptbeauty that she needs to ban all her regs lol...
"no one's tipping me so I'm going to leave" - lol, like she's doing anything worth tipping. what a greedy bitch.
She's telling Egyptbeauty that she needs to ban all her regs lol...
AngelAndrea said:Zoomer said:AngelAndrea said:
Are you saying that an image on a site which features pornographic imagery gives a pornographic context to the image which doesn't feature porn simply due to it's proximity to images which are of porn?
Are you also really saying that Agent_99 intentionally targeted, and broadcast, children in the interests of her financial gain? That she was honestly broadcasting them for sexual interest of the viewers? Seriously? :shock: :?
p.s. Perhaps you should read the whole of my first post. In UK law, 1-3 do not feature. So you've just got number 4 to go on so far
Yes I (don't care to italicize) really think that if she's going to be a god damn cam whore and fuck herself for money then her income should not be increased by children who she objectifies on the same site she fucks herself (HER "FAME" IS BASED ON THESE SHOWS, I MEAN PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT). Also, I'm not a god damned lawyer NOR am I in the UK so I don't give a flying turkey on a hungry thanksgiving what I've "GOT'' because this isn't a fucking game. This is talk about children being objectified, I suggest you find a site to like "illwillpress.com" to play games. "GOT IT?"
She broadcasts children on a site that is 100% sexually oriented, or is this not Earth either?
So she is intentionally sexually objectifying the children who appear in the background of her cam? This is your claim? :shock: :? I'm not playing games young lady, I'm not the one making accusations and labelling someone as a paedophile based upon my personal perceptions and intense hatred rather than any legitimate legal standing :whistle: If what she is doing constitutes child pornography by law, then she needs to be punished. However, I am not so emotionally involved regarding her, or her shows, to start making allegations without being entirely positive that is what is happening
I trust that MFC would have taken very very very strict, and urgent, action if her actions and behaviour were in any way construable as child pornography. Especially given the volume of complaints! ( I stress the trust/hope aspect).p.s. there are images of children on this very site, which is entirely reasonable - given it's 18+ warning, and the nature of several threads which display hardcore images of penis/vagina and penetration, to give a "pornography" labelling. However, would you start to say that therefore, given the overall warning and prevalence of adult images, that posting an image is an instant sexualisation of any children appearing in said images? I wouldn't :whistle:
I really should clarify one thing. No, I don't condone what she does at all. I do think MFC should punish her for breaking the rules - at least for no other reason than to send the message that "taking the piss out of the rules is not okay". However, I am not going to start labelling, or making wild accusations about how it's going to close the site, without at least some rudimentary look into what exactly she does that constitutes a crime. Yes, she breaks some laws - but child pornography? I don't think it is either fair, nor responsible, to start labelling her as such without at least having the decency to (impartially) look at the evidence and come to a conclusion based upon what the law will define it as. Such things are always open to interpretation by different people, but at least stating what that definition is of child pornography is the first step in being responsible.
Simply being angry and hating her, and seeing her with a child in the background whilst she is clothed, does not make her a broadcaster of child pornography. At least, not until the law tells me it does. Is it wrong for her to do it? Yes. Morally I'd agree. But legally? I'd really like some factual representation...
Simply being angry and hating her, and seeing her with a child in the background whilst she is clothed, does not make her a broadcaster of child pornography. At least, not until the law tells me it does. Is it wrong for her to do it? Yes. Morally I'd agree. But legally? I'd really like some factual representation...
Jupiter551 said:
You don't have to be Sherlock Holmes to know where she lives. All it takes is someone familiar with the area to record one of her public masturbation shows then show it to the owner of the establishment where it took place. Throw in the recorded proof of children in the area and po-po WILL find and prosecute her saggy ass and possibly MFC for not shutting her down because MFC knowingly allowed her to continue said public indecencies.
She would deservingly receive sex offender status and who knows what else. People have been busted for far less.
Teagz said:
Yes, I am doing ME. I also happen to go into other models rooms to get ideas, but if I don't like a model or what they do, I simply bypass their room. I hear all this wrong doing on Agent however, I have seen HollyHanna feed her pet bunny to her snake on cam for tokens, yet no one has said anything about this. I have seen other models, some in the top 20, go to Mcdonalds, order food, and have some of the ppl there on cam. So why are you not also attacking these ppl as well.
As for me being here, not that its any of your business, but I am here to get more ideas, information and feedback on other sites, shows, bounce ideas off other models and see what works, etc.....and what I can do to make more money.
Most of ALL models, start doing this for the money. Period. They don't start camming with the idea that "hey, I want to work in a place of harmony, work with & help out other models and make the world a better place." Be for real.
I do agree that more models should be fined. I also agree that Agent SHOULDN'T have kids on cam at ANY TIME. I personally have yet to specifically see that though. I guess I don't go into her room enough, but I do go in there a few times a week. This thread is just gotten mean and vindictive.
How about the addition of something like this in MFC rules?
Outdoor Shows
Models who are doing shows outside in public places must take due care in all situations. Please use common sense. There is to be no broadcasting in locations where children are likely to be seen, example (Schools, Ice Cream parlours, Librarys etc.) or locations where people would expect to have some privacy , example (Restrooms, Restaurants, Hospitals etc).
However, the accidental or deliberate showing of men or children or other non registered people in such shows MAY result in your account being Banned, Suspended or fined.
Outdoor Shows
Models who are doing shows outside in public places must take due care in all situations. Please use common sense. There is to be no broadcasting in locations where children are likely to be seen, example (Schools, Ice Cream parlours, Librarys etc.) or locations where people would expect to have some privacy , example (Restrooms, Restaurants, Hospitals etc).
However, the accidental or deliberate showing of men or children or other non registered people in such shows MAY result in your account being Banned, Suspended or fined.
nzhere said:
Yeah, more non-enforced rules would really help deter the law breakers. :lol: Besides, that is all ready covered under the rule models cannot break any laws where they live.
Anna_Swallows said:
LURK MOAR. We bitched about HollyHanna's bunny bullshit quite a bit. So, you obviously haven't really read through the forums, and you're quite incorrect. Sure, some models do public shows every once in a while - and while I don't agree with it. They don't blatantly break the rules everyday with men and children on cam. We've discussed all of this, but Agent_99 does it on a daily basis - she shows children and has men on cam chatting it up.
Okay, you're doing that here, but you're the one that said you only worry about yourself, did you not? Hmmm.
Sure, maybe you don't think that when you start - but why be here if you don't want think that models actually wanna help each other and get along? I really don't understand you. LOL.
I linked adminleo's page - go check it out, you'll clearly see a child on cam!
ok... understand that her antics in no way, is going shut down MFC.
Why?
Motherless.com
If that site has not been shut down, then really, MFC is in no danger.
And thats just one of a dozen of thee types of extreme tube sites.
One can argue that a tube site is user generated content, with rules forbidding most of the crap on there and since user generated content is not the liability of the site owners, the good argument stands that MFC also, consists of user generated content and as long as they make some token attempts to make it seem like the rules are being enforced, really.... ya think anyone is going to waste time and money on this tame stuff?
Tame by internet standards, no matter what you see on cam.
They can't shut down wikileaks and thats a major national security risk.... ya think MFC would be easy?
All they need to do is move the server off shore and bada bing... untouchable. Pretty much.
Stop the panic. 99 aint gonna get mfc shut down.
What she MIGHT actually do, is aggravate the owners enough to crack down on ALL the models, to shut people up.
Oh then where will ya be, with no venue to do your free in public dildo on mirror squirting cum shows for tips?
Perhaps.... the outrage is more to stop 99 from attracting attention that will negatively impact the others income flow, rather than genuine moral outrage over what she does.
(could 99 be right? could the outrage be at the core the idea she does pretty much nothing at all and has 1500 people in the room dumping money and the 22 yr old with a rack of sex toys and a stripper pole has only 100 and has to work it like a sled dog to get a few pennies?)
The farther I stand back from it and look, the funnier it all gets.
Why?
Motherless.com
If that site has not been shut down, then really, MFC is in no danger.
And thats just one of a dozen of thee types of extreme tube sites.
One can argue that a tube site is user generated content, with rules forbidding most of the crap on there and since user generated content is not the liability of the site owners, the good argument stands that MFC also, consists of user generated content and as long as they make some token attempts to make it seem like the rules are being enforced, really.... ya think anyone is going to waste time and money on this tame stuff?
Tame by internet standards, no matter what you see on cam.
They can't shut down wikileaks and thats a major national security risk.... ya think MFC would be easy?
All they need to do is move the server off shore and bada bing... untouchable. Pretty much.
Stop the panic. 99 aint gonna get mfc shut down.
What she MIGHT actually do, is aggravate the owners enough to crack down on ALL the models, to shut people up.
Oh then where will ya be, with no venue to do your free in public dildo on mirror squirting cum shows for tips?
Perhaps.... the outrage is more to stop 99 from attracting attention that will negatively impact the others income flow, rather than genuine moral outrage over what she does.
(could 99 be right? could the outrage be at the core the idea she does pretty much nothing at all and has 1500 people in the room dumping money and the 22 yr old with a rack of sex toys and a stripper pole has only 100 and has to work it like a sled dog to get a few pennies?)
The farther I stand back from it and look, the funnier it all gets.
I left part out
However, the accidental or deliberate showing of men or children or other non registered people in such shows in SEXUAL SITUATIONS, MAY result in your account being Banned, Suspended or fined.
However, the accidental or deliberate showing of men or children or other non registered people in such shows in SEXUAL SITUATIONS, MAY result in your account being Banned, Suspended or fined.
Oh the LULZ in this thread :lol:
I for one do not think MFC will be shut down, nor do I think that anything will happen to Agent.
Being the gossip whore that I am though I love bitching about it. I think Agent is morally wrong in a lot of things she does-GET THAT STRAIGHT- but I am realist and I know she will continue unabashed.
On a funnier note I love how this thread has morphed into, which guy can impress everyone with their giant brain more :lol: :lol: :lol:
I for one do not think MFC will be shut down, nor do I think that anything will happen to Agent.
Being the gossip whore that I am though I love bitching about it. I think Agent is morally wrong in a lot of things she does-GET THAT STRAIGHT- but I am realist and I know she will continue unabashed.
On a funnier note I love how this thread has morphed into, which guy can impress everyone with their giant brain more :lol: :lol: :lol:
I agree that MFC will not get shut down over her law breaking. At worst, perhaps fined.
99 on the other hand could and would get arrested if someone really wanted to jump through the hoops to gather the necessary proof. She's pissed off enough people that it wouldn't surprise me if someone really goes out of their way to make it happen.
If 99 didn't do the law and rule breaking public shows, there would be little to no interest. She would drop off the rankings like a lead balloon, that's her bread and butter and she knows it.
99 on the other hand could and would get arrested if someone really wanted to jump through the hoops to gather the necessary proof. She's pissed off enough people that it wouldn't surprise me if someone really goes out of their way to make it happen.
If 99 didn't do the law and rule breaking public shows, there would be little to no interest. She would drop off the rankings like a lead balloon, that's her bread and butter and she knows it.
- Nov 3, 2010
- 10,895
- 65,722
- 1,793
- 37
- Twitter Username
- @jolene_brody
- Tumblr Username
- jolenebrody
- MFC Username
- jolenebrody
- ManyVids URL
- https://www.manyvids.com/Profile/303895/JoleneBrody/
Bocefish said:
One last thing, then I will shut my mouth and back away.
What about the children WATCHING models fuck themselves in public chat? I know most of us here don't agree with public fucking. Any model who fucks herself in public chat and thinks no children are watching as a guest have obviously never been a curious child before. This is one of the main reason I don't go past naked dancing in public. Even if I can't see them, I don't like the idea of kids watching me because they clicked on a popup banner and started adventuring.
If we are gonna use the "what about the children" excuse as a reason to freak out more about agent rule breaking than others, think about what I've said.
All in all rule breaking in any form will continue to happen and leo will continue to not do anything about it as long as it makes him money. Thus the reason why I have never written a complaint about the public cum shows that DO take business away from girls who follow the rules and don't do them.
Agent99 should be fined and banned, so should everyone else who breaks the rules. but no one is here insisting aspen or jaylynn get banned.
Pick and choose rule enforcement is messed up. But so is singling out only one because everyone likes the others.
Rules are rules. ALL of them.
That is all. bye bye.
P.S love you guys :-D
JoJo, that's likes comparing apples and oranges. It's entirely different than personally going to the children's section of a public bookstore and blatantly exposing yourself. The lines may be gray, but crap like that is definitely crossing it along with the other shit she's done.
Here's the deal, kids have constant access to the internet. Parents are simply not monitoring their children's access. Whether full on sexual acts are being seen in PUBLIC chat or not, at some point EVERY model has shown some part of nudity. Children coming into our chatrooms are not within our control, because we cannot know or verify everyone's ages. We can, however ban people when they say they are underage.
Now, with Agent, it is not ONLY the fact that she manages to inadvertently place kids on cam, but also the fact that she is showing people's faces that NEVER said it was okay for her to broadcast their images over any type of media, whether pornographic or otherwise. It makes no difference who they are nor how old they are, they never gave their permission to be broadcasted on the internet and therefore Agent should be punished for it.
When a model does a G/G show and they do not submit the paperwork for the girl to join, there's a high chance that she will be fined because there is no way to verify the person's age based solely on her appearance. So why doesn't this prinicple apply to what Agent does with other people? It doesn't matter if she is NUDE at the time or not. The rule CLEARLY state that you should not even be in the same room as a man.
What I don't understand is why people continue to pay her ANYTHING when she is bossy, rude, vulgar, and has no personality whatsoever. She's greedy, nasty, ugly, and bitter. :twocents-02cents:
Now, with Agent, it is not ONLY the fact that she manages to inadvertently place kids on cam, but also the fact that she is showing people's faces that NEVER said it was okay for her to broadcast their images over any type of media, whether pornographic or otherwise. It makes no difference who they are nor how old they are, they never gave their permission to be broadcasted on the internet and therefore Agent should be punished for it.
When a model does a G/G show and they do not submit the paperwork for the girl to join, there's a high chance that she will be fined because there is no way to verify the person's age based solely on her appearance. So why doesn't this prinicple apply to what Agent does with other people? It doesn't matter if she is NUDE at the time or not. The rule CLEARLY state that you should not even be in the same room as a man.
What I don't understand is why people continue to pay her ANYTHING when she is bossy, rude, vulgar, and has no personality whatsoever. She's greedy, nasty, ugly, and bitter. :twocents-02cents:
I think exposing yourself in public to small children is a hell of a lot worse than having a teenager see you on the internet of his own free will. I certainly don't want minors to view me, but it's gonna happen, kids are curious. As long as they're old enough to choose to view the material, is it going to traumatize them? They have the option to go somewhere else on the internet if they feel uncomfortable, and it's not like MFC is the only source of porn on the entire internet. These minors are deliberately searching for porn and they have parents who leave them with unrestricted access to the internet, so I see no reason for what they see on MFC to weigh on a cam girl's conscience. We're broadcasting on a porn site, which is intended for adults only.
However, in the case of someone exposing themselves in public, you have a reasonable expectation when you go out in public that you will not see someone masturbating. You expect to be able to bring your children in public without them being exposed to sexual acts. They are not choosing to view that material and they may not even be old enough to know about sex yet, let alone porn and masturbation. They have to learn sometime, but I don't think anyone wants their kids to learn about that from seeing A99 in a bookstore. In public, there is no expectation of everyone being 18. I think that's the fundamental difference here.
However, in the case of someone exposing themselves in public, you have a reasonable expectation when you go out in public that you will not see someone masturbating. You expect to be able to bring your children in public without them being exposed to sexual acts. They are not choosing to view that material and they may not even be old enough to know about sex yet, let alone porn and masturbation. They have to learn sometime, but I don't think anyone wants their kids to learn about that from seeing A99 in a bookstore. In public, there is no expectation of everyone being 18. I think that's the fundamental difference here.
- Mar 28, 2011
- 490
- 396
- 61
I just posted something to Leo's profile. Now, let me make clear before you read the comment that I have to go on a token hiatus for at least the rest of this month and maybe into early August. I will be buying tokens again in late August since it's Amber's camiversary. But after that??? Well, I truly don't know. But that's mostly because I don't plan my token spending that far in advance.
And yes, the comment sort of rambles but 99's antics is just part of the overall lack of rule enforcement issue on MFC.
And yes, the comment sort of rambles but 99's antics is just part of the overall lack of rule enforcement issue on MFC.
Mikeythegeek on Leo's profile said:
I just checked Leo's profile and all the comments about 99 have been deleted, including mine.
Yet, I see she is on cam right now. So much for the damn rules and the law.
Yet, I see she is on cam right now. So much for the damn rules and the law.
She LITERALLY turned her cam to this woman and pulled her tits out when the lady walked in the room (aka she's not sexy unless there someone in the background? I get it now.). My ex who does death metal vox and lyrics was shocked to see that. He didn't believe someone could be so damned low.
Oh an to whomever would like to make this a "cum show, all about all rule breakers, things kids shouldn't see" thread, start a new one and then I will go ahead and tell you ALL ABOUT what I don't think kids should see or be a part of, but maybe you could be mistaken and think that I would want a child to see some fuck machine show? I don't really know what the hell some of the comments are coming from... It's like being pissed about one thing and having a reason for it makes you the source of the knowledge of good and bad. Please just do that for yourselves.
To be clear:
1) Violence
2) Sexual acts
3) Drugs
4) Verbal Attacks
5) Bigoted opinions
^^^ All things I hope children never see, so please don't be all "omg what about cum shows, if you care SOOO much"
:dontknow: I dunno how descriptive people need to get until common sense can flow through collectively. I'm ashamed that someone would even feel to say that.
Oh an to whomever would like to make this a "cum show, all about all rule breakers, things kids shouldn't see" thread, start a new one and then I will go ahead and tell you ALL ABOUT what I don't think kids should see or be a part of, but maybe you could be mistaken and think that I would want a child to see some fuck machine show? I don't really know what the hell some of the comments are coming from... It's like being pissed about one thing and having a reason for it makes you the source of the knowledge of good and bad. Please just do that for yourselves.
To be clear:
1) Violence
2) Sexual acts
3) Drugs
4) Verbal Attacks
5) Bigoted opinions
^^^ All things I hope children never see, so please don't be all "omg what about cum shows, if you care SOOO much"
:dontknow: I dunno how descriptive people need to get until common sense can flow through collectively. I'm ashamed that someone would even feel to say that.
Mikeythegeek said:
SHE IS LEOOOOOO!
Omg jkjk, but when right around when she logged on those comments went poof.
A99's antics may not affect girls incomes as much as girls doing public show, and I understand that. Having CHILDREN on cam is a huge deal. If one of the parents found out or police or the FBI or something found out and they knew that Leo knew with the multiple emails, screenshots, complaints, and comments stating this is what she does for MONTHS now, dont you think that something bad would happen? I am not saying what but there are a number of possibilities.
But, this right here shows that Leo does not care about anything but money. End of story.
But, this right here shows that Leo does not care about anything but money. End of story.
- Status
Similar threads
