nzhere said:That looks like a and a fairly big name model too
:naughty:
Yea they are pretty big models, idk why they'd risk that..
nzhere said:That looks like a and a fairly big name model too
:naughty:
LexieBlair said:nzhere said:That looks like a and a fairly big name model too
:naughty:
Yea they are pretty big models, idk why they'd risk that..
siteraider said:They risk it for the money.
I ask a model once why she do that (man on cam )
she said for the money
I ask again was worth the risk.
She said no , she make 2000 tokens and after she paid a fine of 10000 tokens and account suspended for a week.
the few I've actually found and been in the room, they are all well informed of the rule and what will happen by folks in the chat. 2 of them also said outright "Fuck MFC and their stupid rules. We don't care.".... :confusion-shrug:Jupiter551 said:Because being on that side of the screen, and not reading forums like this, they're probably unaware how quickly and brutally MFC cracks down on it.
SoTxBob said:the few I've actually found and been in the room, they are all well informed of the rule and what will happen by folks in the chat. 2 of them also said outright "Fuck MFC and their stupid rules. We don't care.".... :confusion-shrug:Jupiter551 said:Because being on that side of the screen, and not reading forums like this, they're probably unaware how quickly and brutally MFC cracks down on it.
dunderwood201 said:While I've been a lurker on here, I was just reading this forum yesterday and spotted my first man-on-cam today. Most of the discussion is "Hey, why's there a man on cam" and then they claim that they were approved by MFC. I think they gave up and moved to a group show, but I'm not going to pay to see what's happening.
sorrowfool said:dunderwood201 said:While I've been a lurker on here, I was just reading this forum yesterday and spotted my first man-on-cam today. Most of the discussion is "Hey, why's there a man on cam" and then they claim that they were approved by MFC. I think they gave up and moved to a group show, but I'm not going to pay to see what's happening.
I saw this one as well. She said they had approved her having a man on cam, and that she had an e-mail stating so. She also, said something about the people who hired her or something, so maybe she works for a studio or something? I don't know, but I doubt the e-mail was form MFC. They were in group for a while probably 30-40mins at least. Another user said that her profile was gone, meaning she had been suspended, but I saw her on the next day.
I don't think they'd do that without some warning considering how zero tolerance they are about it. Perhaps the studio snafu'd the email to the couple and meant to say they were approved to do couple shows on <insert other site> not on MFC, but got a bit mixed up. If it was an honest mistake and the studio are a large client of MFC (I imagine ones with dozens of models are important clients) maybe MFC let it go. I bet she's not on doing couple shows again though.LilyMarie said:sorrowfool said:dunderwood201 said:While I've been a lurker on here, I was just reading this forum yesterday and spotted my first man-on-cam today. Most of the discussion is "Hey, why's there a man on cam" and then they claim that they were approved by MFC. I think they gave up and moved to a group show, but I'm not going to pay to see what's happening.
I saw this one as well. She said they had approved her having a man on cam, and that she had an e-mail stating so. She also, said something about the people who hired her or something, so maybe she works for a studio or something? I don't know, but I doubt the e-mail was form MFC. They were in group for a while probably 30-40mins at least. Another user said that her profile was gone, meaning she had been suspended, but I saw her on the next day.
Her profile still exists.
You guys don't think MFC might be experimenting with couples on the site all of a sudden?... And that that model was part of some sort of beta-test thing? Just a crazy idea.
LilyMarie said:sorrowfool said:dunderwood201 said:While I've been a lurker on here, I was just reading this forum yesterday and spotted my first man-on-cam today. Most of the discussion is "Hey, why's there a man on cam" and then they claim that they were approved by MFC. I think they gave up and moved to a group show, but I'm not going to pay to see what's happening.
I saw this one as well. She said they had approved her having a man on cam, and that she had an e-mail stating so. She also, said something about the people who hired her or something, so maybe she works for a studio or something? I don't know, but I doubt the e-mail was form MFC. They were in group for a while probably 30-40mins at least. Another user said that her profile was gone, meaning she had been suspended, but I saw her on the next day.
Her profile still exists.
You guys don't think MFC might be experimenting with couples on the site all of a sudden?... And that that model was part of some sort of beta-test thing? Just a crazy idea.
nzhere said:I see some familiar models on today named "thetwinxx"
:roll:
LexieBlair said:nzhere said:I see some familiar models on today named "thetwinxx"
:roll:
Ya famous models only get a warning never a ban..lol MFC makes too much off them to risk banning them for good.