my thought too. they let everyone and their mother stream without verification. which why? anytime someone whips out their dick or tit w/o it gets suspended anyway. which totes clog supports' inbox for unban requests or verification requests. idk why not have it set so only verified accounts can stream. seem it would solve lots of issues. i have this theory, it can probably be successfully argued in court cb has made it easily accessible to children to turn on their webcams (which i've seen happened before a couple of times. granted and thankfully those kids were quickly removed) idk i feel like its an adult sites due diligence to make sure anybody streaming or posting content is of age. maybe that's why the site feels they need to be careful because if young-looking ADULTS are streaming, it might be argued they are encouraging actual minors to turn on their webcams. hell, look at pornhub having to remove all unverified content.
idk i have another theory they automated their "looking too young" instead of going off user reports. they have bots matching our faces to our verified id now, there can very will be a bot that detects young-looking models to put their account on review. years ago, actual shirley promised they review every single "looking too young" ban. seems like they may have expedited the review process in a way, because there have appeared to be lots more. again theroy.
i think that's why anytime a model complains about being banned from there without any fault, me:
View attachment 91646
they are definitely the most nuanced when it comes to suspensions/bans. i used to think the same with streamate, but as of late, not so much.