I presumed that it meant 'Mum I'd Like To Fuck' which originated from the movie, American Pie, right? I always get called a milf in my room, although I'm 35 and haven't had kids, so I have no idea these days...
I'm curious for the members who find MILF to have a derogatory tone or dislike the label, does it put you off when a model markets herself with it?
WHIP?Personally, I wouldn't view it as a derogatory label, but I also can't see it being very complimentary either. Each to their own and all that, but I think it's still just an opinion voiced by those stumbling through their teenage/college years. After all, do many 40+ y.o. guys use that term? It never seemed an applicable term for me to use. Maybe just a hook label to use in order to reel in the younger dudes perhaps? I recall that "mature" used to do that very efficiently in the past.
I must admit, I kinda like the term WHIP being used instead of MILF though. I does sound more appropriate IMHO.
WHIP?
For grins, I hit up Wikipedia about the term. I like the bolded part a lot.
Linguist Laurel A. Sutton states that MILF was one of nine terms for "attractive women" collected from undergraduates at a large linguistics class at Berkeley in the spring of 1992. Stereotypical users would be "college students from East Contra Costa, California".[6] The term was widely popularized by the film American Pie (1999), where John Cho's character (simply credited as 'MILF Guy No. 2') used the term to refer to Jennifer Coolidge's character Jeanine Stifler.[7][8] American Pie screenwriter Adam Herz stated that he did not invent the phrase.[9]
A 2007 article in New York magazine stated the evidence that the term had become mainstream included "25,000-plus MILF-branded mugs and tees on Café Press to a rash of hot-mama books (The Hot Mom's Handbook, Confessions of a Naughty Mommy, The MILF Anthology), television shows (Desperate Housewives, The Real Housewives of Orange County, the forthcoming contest 'Hottest Mom in America', and a pilot in development called MILF & Cookies), and, of course, a concomitant porn genre".[10]
Some media outlets found the expression offensive to women, and suggested replacing it with WHIP, which stands for "women who are hot, intelligent and in their prime".[11][12]
It kinda bothers me though that a 30 something would be considered a mature woman? I mean of course there are a lot of meanings to that word but in the sense of not-young-anymore, I just think it's a bit weird.
I'm male and mid-30s. In no way would I consider myself mature or a DILF, especially since I have no kids. In this regard I complete relate to you.It kinda bothers me though that a 30 something would be considered a mature woman? I mean of course there are a lot of meanings to that word but in the sense of not-young-anymore, I just think it's a bit weird.
i just use it because it works to be frank. Ppl search for my type of videos and body type with that tag
I'd much prefer WWAH - Women Who Are Hot - than that definition of WHIP.Yeah... it's from this earlier post....
Ehhhh that last sentence isn't entirely true. Intelligence is extremely attractive, so I've been told 9 billion times. "I just can't have a convo with these younger girls so I don't bother," ad nauseam.I'd much prefer WWAH - Women Who Are Hot - than that definition of WHIP.
'In their prime' suggests it's a transient appeal, which isn't true, and attractiveness is not dependent on intelligence.
I'd argue (ad nauseum too) that they're not dependent on each other.Ehhhh that last sentence isn't entirely true. Intelligence is extremely attractive, so I've been told 9 billion times. "I just can't have a convo with these younger girls so I don't bother," ad nauseam.
Nor me. But are you really suggesting that someone can only be attractive if they're considered to be intelligent?I'm not trying to get into a Freudian argument about this stuff. It doesn't matter what the criteria is for someone to consider someone as intelligent, merely that they find it attractive.
Well .. I am not asking for a certificate but I sure know what *I* consider intelligent, and yeah, not intelligent is not attractive (long term)I'd argue (ad nauseum too) that they're not dependent on each other.
And what is intelligence? High IQ testers can display very low day-to-day practical skills, and someone who is highly-functional can test low for IQ.
No but you sure seem to be suggesting that I think that.Nor me. But are you really suggesting that someone can only be attractive if they're considered to be intelligent?
Thank you.Well .. I am not asking for a certificate but I sure know what *I* consider intelligent, and yeah, not intelligent is not attractive (long term)
No, I said they are not dependent.No but you sure seem to be suggesting that I think that.
That's fine, I was literally giving anecdotal evidence hence the quotes. I have had guys tell me they don't like me because I am intelligent and they can't run game on me. Take that for whatever you will, I'm not the one who said, just the one who experienced the pain of being "too smart" to play with.No, I said they are not dependent.
Only to some of us. I know intelligence is defined differently by different people though. But I know I can’t get turned on by someone I see as stupid, no matter what they look like or “have”. Not everyone is like that sexually though. So it’s subjective. But there are some of us out there that just can’t get excited for dipshits whatsoever. Lol, sorry, what a way I put it haha.Nor me. But are you really suggesting that someone can only be attractive if they're considered to be intelligent?
I guess I can look at a still image of someone that I don't know and find them attractive. In that case who knows if they've got very little intelligence it's just a matter of physicality. *shrug*To me personally it's impossible to be attracted to someone I don't find intelligent. I understand that there's an objective conventional attractiveness standard but that doesn't really mean anything to most people, does it?
I just realized that maybe there's a difference here because "attracted" to someone might somehow differ from "finding someone attractive".I guess I can look at a still image of someone that I don't know and find them attractive. In that case who knows if they've got very little intelligence it's just a matter of physicality. *shrug*
I think that's it right there. I was super attracted to the first guy I had sex with until I found out he couldn't carry a conversation in a bucket. I was like peace out, I need mental stimulation that goes beyond "hey you're pretty, your pussy is hot, nice tits for your age, thanks for a great smile."I just realized that maybe there's a difference here because "attracted" to someone might somehow differ from "finding someone attractive".
Maybe?
Yeah I think "finding a person attractive" is the same as "finding their looks hot", but actually BEING attracted probably requires more than just that.The
I think that's it right there. I was super attracted to the first guy I had sex with until I found out he couldn't carry a conversation in a bucket. I was like peace out, I need mental stimulation that goes beyond "hey you're pretty, your pussy is hot, nice tits for your age, thanks for a great smile."