AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

Humor me; what does MILF mean to you?

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I presumed that it meant 'Mum I'd Like To Fuck' which originated from the movie, American Pie, right? I always get called a milf in my room, although I'm 35 and haven't had kids, so I have no idea these days...
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarieElise
I'm curious for the members who find MILF to have a derogatory tone or dislike the label, does it put you off when a model markets herself with it?

Personally, I wouldn't view it as a derogatory label, but I also can't see it being very complimentary either. Each to their own and all that, but I think it's still just an opinion voiced by those stumbling through their teenage/college years. After all, do many 40+ y.o. guys use that term? It never seemed an applicable term for me to use. Maybe just a hook label to use in order to reel in the younger dudes perhaps? I recall that "mature" used to do that very efficiently in the past.

I must admit, I kinda like the term WHIP being used instead of MILF though. :happy: I does sound more appropriate IMHO.

:wondering:
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarieElise
Personally, I wouldn't view it as a derogatory label, but I also can't see it being very complimentary either. Each to their own and all that, but I think it's still just an opinion voiced by those stumbling through their teenage/college years. After all, do many 40+ y.o. guys use that term? It never seemed an applicable term for me to use. Maybe just a hook label to use in order to reel in the younger dudes perhaps? I recall that "mature" used to do that very efficiently in the past.

I must admit, I kinda like the term WHIP being used instead of MILF though. :happy: I does sound more appropriate IMHO.

:wondering:
WHIP?
 


Yeah... it's from this earlier post....

For grins, I hit up Wikipedia about the term. I like the bolded part a lot.

Linguist Laurel A. Sutton states that MILF was one of nine terms for "attractive women" collected from undergraduates at a large linguistics class at Berkeley in the spring of 1992. Stereotypical users would be "college students from East Contra Costa, California".[6] The term was widely popularized by the film American Pie (1999), where John Cho's character (simply credited as 'MILF Guy No. 2') used the term to refer to Jennifer Coolidge's character Jeanine Stifler.[7][8] American Pie screenwriter Adam Herz stated that he did not invent the phrase.[9]

A 2007 article in New York magazine stated the evidence that the term had become mainstream included "25,000-plus MILF-branded mugs and tees on Café Press to a rash of hot-mama books (The Hot Mom's Handbook, Confessions of a Naughty Mommy, The MILF Anthology), television shows (Desperate Housewives, The Real Housewives of Orange County, the forthcoming contest 'Hottest Mom in America', and a pilot in development called MILF & Cookies), and, of course, a concomitant porn genre".[10]

Some media outlets found the expression offensive to women, and suggested replacing it with WHIP, which stands for "women who are hot, intelligent and in their prime".[11][12]

:nod:
 
  • Like
Reactions: mira_leo
For me, although I know what it means, I don't go to women expecting them to be a mother, but I just associate it mainly with 30+. I think most guys just assume that if you're over 30, you "should" have kids, which is a dumb assumption. I never actually call anyone a MILF, either. When I was younger I used to, but now as a 30+ myself, I associate 30+ as 30+, although I do associate 40+ with "mature" (I never say old, cougar or anything else).

But for me, it's also as other's have stated, from the American Pie movies when I was a kid, so that's how it stuck and I think of it in my mind "a mother who is hot" - like the term "soccer mom" or "mom next door" type of thing.

Edit:
Oh and to add, it would never bother me if a model uses the "milf" tag, or literally any other for that matter. It won't put me off, I know either 1) it's a fetish she offers, or 2) she is just doing it to try and get more viewers/traffic. 1 tag won't define her, if I like an enjoy time with her, then that's what I count on, not tags
 
It kinda bothers me though that a 30 something would be considered a mature woman? I mean of course there are a lot of meanings to that word but in the sense of not-young-anymore, I just think it's a bit weird.
 
It kinda bothers me though that a 30 something would be considered a mature woman? I mean of course there are a lot of meanings to that word but in the sense of not-young-anymore, I just think it's a bit weird.


This all depends on the person thinking it though.
I mean, someone younger, such as an 18-year-old would probably consider 30+ as being "mature", whereas a 25 or 30-year-old most likely won't.
 
It kinda bothers me though that a 30 something would be considered a mature woman? I mean of course there are a lot of meanings to that word but in the sense of not-young-anymore, I just think it's a bit weird.
I'm male and mid-30s. In no way would I consider myself mature or a DILF, especially since I have no kids. In this regard I complete relate to you.
 
Also not completely related but I'm 34 but because I'm small I advertise as teen and often I'll have guys who are like 36 say "when you're older you'll understand"... And I'm like... Yeah.. ok sure I'll wait 😂
 
i just use it because it works to be frank. Ppl search for my type of videos and body type with that tag

Same here. When I’m trying to find different terms to use as hash tags for myself, I include “milf.” 🤷‍♀️
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarieElise
Yeah... it's from this earlier post....
:nod:
I'd much prefer WWAH - Women Who Are Hot - than that definition of WHIP.
'In their prime' suggests it's a transient appeal, which isn't true, and attractiveness is not dependent on intelligence.
But then WWAH would/could cover every stage of adulthood, so I guess I'm back to the original question :rofl:
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarieElise
I'd much prefer WWAH - Women Who Are Hot - than that definition of WHIP.
'In their prime' suggests it's a transient appeal, which isn't true, and attractiveness is not dependent on intelligence.
Ehhhh that last sentence isn't entirely true. Intelligence is extremely attractive, so I've been told 9 billion times. "I just can't have a convo with these younger girls so I don't bother," ad nauseam.
 
Ehhhh that last sentence isn't entirely true. Intelligence is extremely attractive, so I've been told 9 billion times. "I just can't have a convo with these younger girls so I don't bother," ad nauseam.
I'd argue (ad nauseum too) that they're not dependent on each other.
And what is intelligence? High IQ testers can display very low day-to-day practical skills, and someone who is highly-functional can test low for IQ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mira_leo
I'm not trying to get into a Freudian argument about this stuff. It doesn't matter what the criteria is for someone to consider someone as intelligent, merely that they find it attractive.
 
I'm not trying to get into a Freudian argument about this stuff. It doesn't matter what the criteria is for someone to consider someone as intelligent, merely that they find it attractive.
Nor me. But are you really suggesting that someone can only be attractive if they're considered to be intelligent?
 
I'd argue (ad nauseum too) that they're not dependent on each other.
And what is intelligence? High IQ testers can display very low day-to-day practical skills, and someone who is highly-functional can test low for IQ.
Well .. I am not asking for a certificate but I sure know what *I* consider intelligent, and yeah, not intelligent is not attractive (long term)
😉
 
Nor me. But are you really suggesting that someone can only be attractive if they're considered to be intelligent?
No but you sure seem to be suggesting that I think that.
 
Well .. I am not asking for a certificate but I sure know what *I* consider intelligent, and yeah, not intelligent is not attractive (long term)
😉
Thank you.
 
No, I said they are not dependent.
That's fine, I was literally giving anecdotal evidence hence the quotes. I have had guys tell me they don't like me because I am intelligent and they can't run game on me. Take that for whatever you will, I'm not the one who said, just the one who experienced the pain of being "too smart" to play with.

It's pretty much the same as, "you're so nice to me I can't tip you to get naked, it would feel weird." (After they've tipped me to get naked, mind you.)
 
I’m gonna split the difference on this one:

I personally consider intelligence to be a very attractive trait. But I agree with Rod that it’s possible to be attractive (to a point) without being all that intelligent. I bet we’ve all seen people in our lives that turned our heads with their looks, but maybe weren’t all that intelligent once we spoke to them (or that didn’t project intelligence, anyway).
 
Anyway, this all circles back to the WHI[ntelligent]P acronym. Would a MILF not have more experience and thus be more intelligent than a 19 year old man?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarieElise
To me personally it's impossible to be attracted to someone I don't find intelligent. I understand that there's an objective conventional attractiveness standard but that doesn't really mean anything to most people, does it?
 
Nor me. But are you really suggesting that someone can only be attractive if they're considered to be intelligent?
Only to some of us. I know intelligence is defined differently by different people though. But I know I can’t get turned on by someone I see as stupid, no matter what they look like or “have”. Not everyone is like that sexually though. So it’s subjective. But there are some of us out there that just can’t get excited for dipshits whatsoever. Lol, sorry, what a way I put it haha.

ETA; Not even to a certain point. The only way it happens for me is if they don’t talk and I’m not aware that they are stupid yet. I project intelligence onto others until shown otherwise. But as soon as the bubbles burst it’s burst.
 
Last edited:
To me personally it's impossible to be attracted to someone I don't find intelligent. I understand that there's an objective conventional attractiveness standard but that doesn't really mean anything to most people, does it?
I guess I can look at a still image of someone that I don't know and find them attractive. In that case who knows if they've got very little intelligence it's just a matter of physicality. *shrug*
 
I guess I can look at a still image of someone that I don't know and find them attractive. In that case who knows if they've got very little intelligence it's just a matter of physicality. *shrug*
I just realized that maybe there's a difference here because "attracted" to someone might somehow differ from "finding someone attractive".

Maybe?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lilly_____
The
I just realized that maybe there's a difference here because "attracted" to someone might somehow differ from "finding someone attractive".

Maybe?
I think that's it right there. I was super attracted to the first guy I had sex with until I found out he couldn't carry a conversation in a bucket. I was like peace out, I need mental stimulation that goes beyond "hey you're pretty, your pussy is hot, nice tits for your age, thanks for a great smile."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lilly_____
The

I think that's it right there. I was super attracted to the first guy I had sex with until I found out he couldn't carry a conversation in a bucket. I was like peace out, I need mental stimulation that goes beyond "hey you're pretty, your pussy is hot, nice tits for your age, thanks for a great smile."
Yeah I think "finding a person attractive" is the same as "finding their looks hot", but actually BEING attracted probably requires more than just that.
 
There's a difference between short-term and long-term attraction.
You may be initially attracted to someone because of their looks, their personality, their intelligence, their wealth, material possessions etc.
And attraction can develop and grow both because of, or despite, those same things; same way, it can fade and disappear too.
Maintaining that initial attraction is something else altogether, since all those aspects of our appearance, characteristics and peripheral stuff can change as we move through life.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.