Like I mentioned before, the last thing I want is to step on anyone's toes, but it feels like I have done just that. I am the first to admit I was wrong in expecting -a lot-, but after having struck a deal, to which both sides agreed upon, doesn't that warrant an expectation for that promise to be delivered upon?
I have been nice in these posts, but I feel like you (
@supermila ) are sort of attacking me personally and maybe not the content of your post (since that makes sense) but the manner I feel is somewhat uncalled for.
Don't take this the wrong way,
@Beachie, but you get what you pay for. You made a long string of bad decisions which led to you being taken advantage of all in the name of saving a couple of bucks.
Exhibit A
When your top priority is to save a few bucks you will be dealing with the cheapest models. There are honest cheap models for sure, but some of the girls who do extreme deals are camming out of desperation, it is their last resort, and will be gone in a week.
There are tons of models who do deals - even the top (10, 20, 50 whatever) models. And yes, I do 'use' those deals as well. There is nothing wrong with going for deals, doesn't everyone like deals? Again, A LOT of models do deals, not just the 'cheapest models'. Period.
Spending on a "cheap ass guy" mindset is as bad as spending when drunk. You end up taking the worst decisions... like buying content off the bat from a model you just stumbled upon because she had "DEAL" on her topic.
Here is how to read way too much into something. It wasn't just 'cheap ass guy', but 'cheap ass Dutch guy', as a reference to Dutch people generally being known as being cheap. Just a small joke, nothing too serious, especially not to the extend you're taking it to. Yes, I was looking for deals, but not just from the 'lower tier' models so to speak. Again, even top models give deals, especially during the last week/few days of the month. If you think only the cheapest models give deals, saving me a few bucks, please, think again. I can save a fair few bucks as well on top models when they're doing deals. I don't think there is anything wrong with that.
So, you are so cheap that you had to negotiate a better deal UPON that other deal she already had going on. She probably was NOT okay with short-selling her videos like this but... (see exhibit C below)
No! Please read my message again. I did NOT negotiate on an existing deal. The deal was for a video pack, whilst I was only really interested in a few videos, so I asked if maybe she could give a separate deal on a few videos, instead of the entire pack. I don't see anything wrong with that either. If I asked her to lower the price on her package deal, sure. But I did not. Calling me out (cheap) like that, I'm sorry, but that's slightly uncalled for, especially considering I have been nice in all my posts, not attacking anyone.
Bingo! She was desperate, she promised you whatever you wanted to hear in exchange for your money, but felt like whatever you paid her was not worth her videos. Can't blame her.
I believe it's a common 'reason' the 'cheaper' (as some refer them to) models provide - they are in desperate need, so they offer these sweet deals to lure people in and -possibly- scam. Is it my fault I fell for that? Most definitely. Is she to blame for not coming through with her part of the deal? Absolutely. If both sides agree to something, that makes a deal. If one party involved does not hold up to their end, then yes, he/she is to blame.
And now, "cheap ass dutch guy" you are going through the painful process of actually having to buy more tokens to get the videos you paid for. Sure, you get to spend them on other things so "no loss there" but you wouldn't have bought these tokens otherwise. If you weren't so cheap you would have spent these 200 on top of whatever you gave her, perhaps you would have your videos. Just food for thought...
Again, that's uncalled for. Reading too much into the joke referring to what Dutch people are generally known about. It's no painful process for me, like I said; it's an easy step. And who is to say I would not have bought those tokens otherwise on my main account? Who said I did not have any more tokens on my main account? I regularly get new tokens, even if I don't spend them straight away. Period. If you're giving people looking for deals a hard time, shouldn't that also reflect on your thoughts about models who offer deals? Again, top models offer deals as well. And why, if a deal has been made, with both parties in agreement, would I spend more -for the stuff that the deal is about- (tips could still be given of course) than what has been agreed upon?
Treating camgirls like they were Thrifty Town is not the best idea. You often end up paying more than you would have, and not receiving what you wanted anyway.
And thank you once again for the stab. I am definitely not treating models that way. If someone has a deal in their topic and you pay for that, should you not get what the deal was about? If you ask about prices regarding videos and ask if maybe they could turn that into a deal as well, unrelated to the existing deal and they agree, should you not get what the deal was about? In no way can I be blamed for that. A deal is a deal.
Also keep in mind that many models/members have similar or even identical names. Defaming a guilty model could potentially hurt the business for an innocent model. Imagine if the guilty model decides to change her name, then another model who doesn't know her thinks of picking that name for her own...yeah not great. My first camming name was a name that sounded like quite a few models out there, and I often had members get the name confused with others.
Aye. I think the 'scamming model/member list' thing has been well addressed now
- and I am leaving that part for what it is. I do understand every and all reasons you lot gave me. I merely hope that my point came across and that it's not me being an asshole, but just someone looking for 'justice'. That justice is impossible to achieve, as pointed out by many others already, which is why I'm giving this a rest
. But thanks for your added reply (no sarcasm, sincerely thanks for your reply!).
Yeah and members will sometimes "steal" models names to look like them or steal another members name. A capitol i to look like a lower case L and such. (One of my fav youtubers just had someone do that and was commenting bad things to people and it looked like her!) Some sites allow members to have the same name but give them #s to keep them separate but models don't see that part, just a name. So a girl may put BigDaddy on a list however there are 40 other guys with the name who didnt do a thing wrong. Some people are just good at being bad when they wanna do shitty things and a list of bad or good people just could not work in a world of screen names and VPNs.
Yeah, I've seen a few where members or models use similar names to existing ones, or for example famous people.
Beachie: Yeah I think everything's been said already. If you do a deal with a non-"popular" cam girl without research etc. your chance of being scammed is higher. And as already stated, in the best of cases you could get her suspended, but since she can come back the day after with another nickname and repeat the procedure.
It truly sucks but it's unfortunately a risk you have to take.
There's not always logic to how people behave
Are you serious? She agreed to do the deal so what difference does it make if he's "cheap" or not? Is it suddenly ok to steal someones money because you consider them cheap, even though you have agreed to the deal?
Agreed - chances of being scammed or not exactly getting what I was hoping with even an honest model are higher. And that is completely my mistake, which I admitted to right from the start. But that does not make it right. Thankfully, many of you agreed to that. Also agree upon your response to supermila - if a deal has been agreed upon, that does NOT warrant her not holding up their end of the deal, for whatever reason. I could go to a top model who has an active deal and pay for the deal, which happens a lot (end of the month 'racing' between models to get top position, or just some extra cash before the end of the month). Does that make me a cheap ass? Perhaps, but not in the bad way you (supermila) made it sound like.
I think
@supermila actually meant after being told he was a liar by a model who wouldn't even check chat archives...he was obviously scammed, but went back hoping to get a cheaper deal. That part is his fault. Best thing he can hope for is mfc refunding him. If they know about the 1st offsite payment though, I doubt it. I get wanting a good deal, and wanting justice, but walking into fire hoping not to get burned is another matter entirely.(especially the 2nd time)
I didn't go back for a cheaper deal? I'm afraid you misunderstood that part and I really don't think that's what supermila meant. I was called a liar and went back to her. Not to get a better or another deal, no, to hopefully get her end of the deal already made in the past. So I would like to think that is not my fault. Plus, MFC will not refund me as the transaction was done through PayPal. My fault? Totally! Does the fact it went through a -personal- PayPal account add to the scam-part? I think so.There was no second payment to her. The 200 tokens were to achieve premium status on the second account, on which I tried to contact her. The 200 tokens I sent to my main account.
I agree with you
@Ann_Sulu, but that's not how I interpret what
@supermila says, perhaps I'm misunderstanding.
Agreed.