- Apr 3, 2015
- 4,743
- 16,148
- 243
- Twitter Username
- @mmmilarky_
- MFC Username
- mila_
- Chaturbate Username
- mila_
They just released the second video on the Voter Fraud saga and it is just terrible.
SCOTT FOVAL: We did it to them when we were in charge too
JOURNALIST: What did we do?
SCOTT FOVAL: We did the exact same thing. Only, we manipulated the vote with money and action, not with laws. It is a very easy thing for Republicans to say “well, they’re bussing people in” Well, you know what? We have been bussing people in to deal with you fucking assholes for fifty years and we’re not going to stop now, we’re just going to find a different way to do it. So, I mean, I grew up with that idea. They used to bus people out to Iowa. If we needed people out there, we’d bus people out to Iowa. When I do this, I think as an investigator first.
JOURNALIST: Yeah, work backwards, yes, that’s great.
SCOTT FOVAL: I used to do the investigations, a different… method. I think backwards from how they would prosecute if they could, and then try to build out the method to avoid that. They could invalidate… well, ok, let’s just say in theory if a major investigation came up, of major vote fraud that way, how would they prove it? And who would they charge? Are they going to charge each individual of voter fraud? Or are they going to go after the facilitator for conspiracy which they could prove? It’s one thing if all these people drive up in their personal cars. If there’s a bus involved? That changes the dynamic. It’s the legality because you can prove conspiracy if there is a bus. If there are cars it’s much harder to prove.
JOURNALIST: and there is enough money..
SCOTT FOVAL: If there’s enough money, you have people drive their POVs (personally owned vehicles) or you have them drive rentals.
JOURNALIST: Yeah. With Wisconsin license plates. Absolutely.
SCOTT FOVAL: Well, you can’t have them with Wisconsin license plates because rentals here… most of them don’t have Wisconsin license plates. But, there’s this thing called Used Car Auction. Used Car Auction, the titles belong to some unknown company, their company cars.
JOURNALIST: And you know these are multiple “employers”, these are not all one “employer”
SCOTT FOVAL: so you use shell companies. Cars come from one company, they paychecks come from another, there is no bus involved, so you can’t prove that it’s en masse, so it doesn’t tip people off.
JOURNALIST: there you go, there you go, yes. So you are saying shell companies, you’re saying…
SCOTT FOVAL: If the car has a Wisconsin license plate and it’s owned by a third entity then it’s much harder to prove that these people drove in from out of state. There’s no bus involved so you can’t prove conspiracy.
JOURNALIST: And they would have to be looking for them in the first place.
SCOTT FOVAL: We did it to them when we were in charge too
JOURNALIST: What did we do?
SCOTT FOVAL: We did the exact same thing. Only, we manipulated the vote with money and action, not with laws. It is a very easy thing for Republicans to say “well, they’re bussing people in” Well, you know what? We have been bussing people in to deal with you fucking assholes for fifty years and we’re not going to stop now, we’re just going to find a different way to do it. So, I mean, I grew up with that idea. They used to bus people out to Iowa. If we needed people out there, we’d bus people out to Iowa. When I do this, I think as an investigator first.
JOURNALIST: Yeah, work backwards, yes, that’s great.
SCOTT FOVAL: I used to do the investigations, a different… method. I think backwards from how they would prosecute if they could, and then try to build out the method to avoid that. They could invalidate… well, ok, let’s just say in theory if a major investigation came up, of major vote fraud that way, how would they prove it? And who would they charge? Are they going to charge each individual of voter fraud? Or are they going to go after the facilitator for conspiracy which they could prove? It’s one thing if all these people drive up in their personal cars. If there’s a bus involved? That changes the dynamic. It’s the legality because you can prove conspiracy if there is a bus. If there are cars it’s much harder to prove.
JOURNALIST: and there is enough money..
SCOTT FOVAL: If there’s enough money, you have people drive their POVs (personally owned vehicles) or you have them drive rentals.
JOURNALIST: Yeah. With Wisconsin license plates. Absolutely.
SCOTT FOVAL: Well, you can’t have them with Wisconsin license plates because rentals here… most of them don’t have Wisconsin license plates. But, there’s this thing called Used Car Auction. Used Car Auction, the titles belong to some unknown company, their company cars.
JOURNALIST: And you know these are multiple “employers”, these are not all one “employer”
SCOTT FOVAL: so you use shell companies. Cars come from one company, they paychecks come from another, there is no bus involved, so you can’t prove that it’s en masse, so it doesn’t tip people off.
JOURNALIST: there you go, there you go, yes. So you are saying shell companies, you’re saying…
SCOTT FOVAL: If the car has a Wisconsin license plate and it’s owned by a third entity then it’s much harder to prove that these people drove in from out of state. There’s no bus involved so you can’t prove conspiracy.
JOURNALIST: And they would have to be looking for them in the first place.