AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

What kind of man shows penis cell phone pics in person?

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jupiter551 said:
LadyLuna said:
SweepTheLeg said:
So you've never sent a picture of your goods to a guy you were interested in to entice him in anyway? Fair enough. I know girls who have. people are different. ho hum.

People I'm interested in have to ask. The only time I ever sent boobie picks without the person explicitly asking for them was when I had my MFC Mailing List. In this case, when they signed up for the mailing list, the advert was "wanna know my schedule and get the occasional random sexy pic?" Meaning, they already told me they wanted the occasional random sexy pic. And I always put "NSFW" in the email subject so they'd know not to open it in front of family.

Of course, if they're one of the idiots who have their email set to open automatically, not my fault. (I do not understand why email programs have ever thought it was a good idea to open an email automatically, either upon log-in to the program, or upon deletion of the email before. it's a pet peeve of mine.)
I'd love to get on this list please :D
:text-yeahthat:
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyLuna
LadyLuna said:
SweepTheLeg said:
So you've never sent a picture of your goods to a guy you were interested in to entice him in anyway? Fair enough. I know girls who have. people are different. ho hum.

People I'm interested in have to ask. The only time I ever sent boobie picks without the person explicitly asking for them was when I had my MFC Mailing List. In this case, when they signed up for the mailing list, the advert was "wanna know my schedule and get the occasional random sexy pic?" Meaning, they already told me they wanted the occasional random sexy pic. And I always put "NSFW" in the email subject so they'd know not to open it in front of family.

Of course, if they're one of the idiots who have their email set to open automatically, not my fault. (I do not understand why email programs have ever thought it was a good idea to open an email automatically, either upon log-in to the program, or upon deletion of the email before. it's a pet peeve of mine.)
O.k., I'm an idiot, but "NSFW"? All I could come up with was, Not Safe For Woses, or, Nasty Stuff For Wanking. I don't think it's ether. :mrgreen:
 
AmberCutie said:
I made my last post to argue that it isn't really hypocritical for camgirls to talk shit about guys sending unsolicited dick pics. Unsolicited being the key word, there.

If a guy is already in a sexual relationship with a woman, it could still be considered unsolicited, but less of a WTF than sending one to a stranger.

Most dick pics I receive, as a cam girl, are from people I've never even talked to before.
Okay, up to the point that I made my post, I saw maybe one instance of the problem being about whether a picture was solicited or unsolicited. My post was referring to the fact that most everyone was saying the very act- taking a picture of your cock to share- was "retarded," "immature," "gross," etc. That's what I was taking issue with and that's what I was calling hypocritical.

The reason I quoted Rose was that she was making a very similar point to what I was trying to convey- that the act, itself, all depends on context. Where she got the idea I was suggesting it's perfectly okay to assault some random stranger's eyes with your anatomy I have no idea. Maybe I wrote something wrong, maybe she read something differently- we're human, shit happens.

But yes, if someone is sending a photo of this nature without some established relationship beforehand, at least, implying this is accepted behavior, it's a foul. However, from the "Dear Abby" letter (as if anyone really writes Dear Abby), it seems to me this guy thought it was okay to proceed; a bit of "I'll show you mine if you show me yours." From what I remember (I can't read it right now) she seemed more concerned with the fact that he had a picture of his penis on his phone. Almost as if she's wondering if he's sent this same photo to other women, and if so, how many. Or maybe she thought this was just simple flirting, and when she saw his penis a popular internet meme popped into her head: Shit just got real.
 
lordmagellan said:
From what I remember (I can't read it right now) she seemed more concerned with the fact that he had a picture of his penis on his phone. Almost as if she's wondering if he's sent this same photo to other women, and if so, how many. Or maybe she thought this was just simple flirting, and when she saw his penis a popular internet meme popped into her head: Shit just got real.

yep....pretty much the point of my first post too.....:thumbleft:
 
lordmagellan said:
Almost as if she's wondering if he's sent this same photo to other women, and if so, how many.
Lol I suspect that would be exactly what many women would wonder if you had a ready-to-go dick pic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyLuna and Rose
lordmagellan said:
The reason I quoted Rose was that she was making a very similar point to what I was trying to convey- that the act, itself, all depends on context. Where she got the idea I was suggesting it's perfectly okay to assault some random stranger's eyes with your anatomy I have no idea. Maybe I wrote something wrong, maybe she read something differently- we're human, shit happens.
I had to go back and have BJ reread everything to me. My post was probably, ok WAY, more hormonally driven than it should have been.

Now that I've reread your post again, I do agree with most of what you said though I did get the feeling that for some reason you thought camgirls weren't allowed to dissent to random genital pictures (that could be the hormones talking.) That's why I flipped out a bit.

My apologies and yes, situations like this depend entirely on context.
 
blackxrose said:
lordmagellan said:
The reason I quoted Rose was that she was making a very similar point to what I was trying to convey- that the act, itself, all depends on context. Where she got the idea I was suggesting it's perfectly okay to assault some random stranger's eyes with your anatomy I have no idea. Maybe I wrote something wrong, maybe she read something differently- we're human, shit happens.
I had to go back and have BJ reread everything to me. My post was probably, ok WAY, more hormonally driven than it should have been.

Now that I've reread your post again, I do agree with most of what you said though I did get the feeling that for some reason you thought camgirls weren't allowed to dissent to random genital pictures (that could be the hormones talking.) That's why I flipped out a bit.

My apologies and yes, situations like this depend entirely on context.
It's all good. When two or more people have a similar misunderstanding of something I wrote, I take it as I wasn't clear enough in my writing. But really, who among us hasn't misinterpreted something on a forum or chat and reacted with pure emotion?


And now, unsolicited cocks:
 

Attachments

  • cocks.jpg
    cocks.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 24
Lol considering I just had an unsolicited NASTY dick picture sent to me on twitter, those cocks made me laugh. :lol:
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyLuna
Status
Not open for further replies.