AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

Trayvon Martin

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.
People do sometimes react really weirdly to clothing, though I hadn't ever thought it about a hoodie. Reminds me a little of this skit from a few years ago where they try to make a stocking-mask a fashion trend:
 
From October-May I wear a hooded sweatshirt almost always, I don't wear a coat or if I do I wear a hooded sweatshirt underneath it. The one time I forgot to wear my hooded sweatshirt we went out and you know what happened? Rain! I am god's hackysack.
 
I'm beginning to think if today's media gets anything correct in a unbiased way, it's by pure coincidence.

It's also fucking pathetic that people have to be concerned the Supreme Court of the United States rules along political lines.

Progressive?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoTxBob
I was gonna tweet a pic of my favorite pink hoodie w/stars, but I had forgotten to take the pic before tossing it in the wash. LOL.

No, I wasn't at the Million Hoodie March, though I'm kinda jealous that one of my college buddies got to be there.
 
Bocefish said:
I'm beginning to think if today's media gets anything correct in a unbiased way, it's by pure coincidence.

It's also fucking pathetic that people have to be concerned the Supreme Court of the United States rules along political lines.

Progressive?

any and all media worry about ratings so they have to embellish their story and target their demographic may it be liberal or conservative no matter how independent people say they are. If the media just did the straight news people would be bored no one would watch. Not to mention media is owned by corporations, same corporations that are involved politically so of course there's going to be a larger agenda there in how stories are told and what stories are told.

When hasn't the supreme court ruled along political lines- especially since they are appointed by the president? I remember when some religious nutbag on the 700 club was praying and had others pray for one of the oldest judges to retire or die so they could be replaced by a much more conservative judge so they could turn over roe v wade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoTxBob
Ok I take it my opinion isn't gonna be too popular but eh here goes nothing...

In my opinion the shooting was NOT motivated by race. From the witness accounts and 911 calls here is what I THINK happened. I think Zimmerman saw a person who was looking suspicious and hadn't seen this person before, he called the cops but as usual they don't respond or do anything, followed the teen and confronted him, the teen started acting like hard-ass and hit Zimmerman and Zimmerman shot him in self defense.

Now here is what the media doesn't want you to know...

1. The "model student" was currently suspended.
2. The pictures of little trayvon you are seeing are from when he was MUCH younger, they aren't showing you the picture where his pants are down to his knees and hes giving two middle figures to the cam.
3. He was shot in the FRONT, he wasn't walking or running away.
4. Zimmerman had grass stains on the back of his shirt and was bleeding from his face and head.
5. Trayvons own father said that was NOT his son's voice yelling for help on the 911 calls.
6. An expert reviewed the 911 call and Zimmerman did not say coon or any other racial slur.
 
Just gonna leave this here.

542470_10150896167372519_508737518_12871172_1508929802_n.jpg


His past doesn't matter. What matters is exactly what was happening at the time. i don't care if all he did was sit around at home and smoke weed. He was attacked by a man much heavier than he, who thought he was some kind of cop. Mr. Zimmerman, if you wanna talk about people's pasts, has a lovely record. If I've learned anything fromw atching daytime TV court room shows about altercations, it's that if you truly do feel threatened, you stay in your car. Dude was trying to be Rambo or something, and now he's a murderer. once again, i don't care about Martin's past, because IT DOESN'T MATTER. Suspended for smoking weed doesn't mean he was tyring to pick a fight. it does, however, explain why he'd want to mix ice tea with Skittles.
 
Whether or not he was a "model student" is irrelevant though. That phrase doesn't even need to be used. Whether he was a "model student" or the school rebel doesn't change the fact that what happened to him was fucked up.

It's not like he held a mother and baby at gunpoint. He was walking outside with a hoodie on.

I hope people aren't bringing up his suspension just to make themselves feel a little bit better about the tragedy (and no, I'm not referring to you specifically, BustyJules). Whatever the reasoning behind his suspension, that's his parents' business, and that's for THEM to handle the way that they see fit. I think it's a disgrace how - IN DEATH - some people are trying to drag his name through the mud.

Some people swear they don't hear the word 'coon'...some people swear they do. Lots of different opinions.

The child's killer gets to sleep in his own bed tonight while other people have been incarcerated for less.
 
Jaana_ said:
His past doesn't matter. What matters is exactly what was happening at the time. i don't care if all he did was sit around at home and smoke weed. He was attacked by a man much heavier than he, who thought he was some kind of cop. Mr. Zimmerman, if you wanna talk about people's pasts, has a lovely record. If I've learned anything from watching daytime TV court room shows about altercations, it's that if you truly do feel threatened, you stay in your car. Dude was trying to be Rambo or something, and now he's a murderer. once again, i don't care about Martin's past, because IT DOESN'T MATTER.



Exactly.

A 26-year old wannabe tough guy. Gunning down somebody's child after the police fucking told you to keep your ass in the car. :roll:

He's got people all over the world pissed off now. I wonder how tough he's feeling now.....
 
Seems to me like there's an awful lot of people, many of whom should know better, who are trying to make this 17 year old CHILD into some kind of street thug. Stop it before you embarrass yourselves.

Yeah, I mean you Geraldo. YOU should know better. I expect this crap from the Rushes, the O'Riley's and other people with axes to grind.
 
The_Brown_Fox said:
Jaana_ said:
His past doesn't matter. What matters is exactly what was happening at the time. i don't care if all he did was sit around at home and smoke weed. He was attacked by a man much heavier than he, who thought he was some kind of cop. Mr. Zimmerman, if you wanna talk about people's pasts, has a lovely record. If I've learned anything from watching daytime TV court room shows about altercations, it's that if you truly do feel threatened, you stay in your car. Dude was trying to be Rambo or something, and now he's a murderer. once again, i don't care about Martin's past, because IT DOESN'T MATTER.



Exactly.

A 26-year old wannabe tough guy. Gunning down somebody's child after the police fucking told you to keep your ass in the car. :roll:

He's got people all over the world pissed off now. I wonder how tough he's feeling now.....
Yesterday, on MSNBC, Lawrence O'Donnel interviewed the black guy claiming to be Zimmerman's "friend." By the time the interview was over, I was afraid O'Donnel was going to kick the guy's ass. lol First he said he was his friend, then he said "acquaintance," then "I worked with him." And yet he claims he knows all this "moral" stuff about Zimmerman. If the guy was set up...a shill...then someone or someone's are spending an AWFUL lot of money on smearing this child.
 
Nordling said:
Yesterday, on MSNBC, Lawrence O'Donnel interviewed the black guy claiming to be Zimmerman's "friend." First he said he was his friend, then he said "acquaintance," then "I worked with him."



:lol:


Even Zimmerman's "friend" is disgusted by him.

I wonder how many people watched that and said "Yeah, you see?? You see??? Even the BLACK dude said Zimmerman's a good guy!" :roll:
 
Nordling said:
The_Brown_Fox said:
Jaana_ said:
His past doesn't matter. What matters is exactly what was happening at the time. i don't care if all he did was sit around at home and smoke weed. He was attacked by a man much heavier than he, who thought he was some kind of cop. Mr. Zimmerman, if you wanna talk about people's pasts, has a lovely record. If I've learned anything from watching daytime TV court room shows about altercations, it's that if you truly do feel threatened, you stay in your car. Dude was trying to be Rambo or something, and now he's a murderer. once again, i don't care about Martin's past, because IT DOESN'T MATTER.



Exactly.

A 26-year old wannabe tough guy. Gunning down somebody's child after the police fucking told you to keep your ass in the car. :roll:

He's got people all over the world pissed off now. I wonder how tough he's feeling now.....
Yesterday, on MSNBC, Lawrence O'Donnel interviewed the black guy claiming to be Zimmerman's "friend." By the time the interview was over, I was afraid O'Donnel was going to kick the guy's ass. lol First he said he was his friend, then he said "acquaintance," then "I worked with him." And yet he claims he knows all this "moral" stuff about Zimmerman. If the guy was set up...a shill...then someone or someone's are spending an AWFUL lot of money on smearing this child.

I'm in Finland, so i don't get American cable news anymore..but that sounds funny. I've been following Think Progress. They've done a good job of reporting eevrything.

I just find it absurd that I know so many who are defending this man, and who are trying to turn it into some kind of left versus right battle. I'm a moderate, and I want his ass in jail.

My favorite, though, is the people who start off their Zimmerman defense with "What the media isn't telling you..." Oh, please enlighten me with what the Tin Foil Hat Tribune wrote. :?
 
The_Brown_Fox said:
Nordling said:
Yesterday, on MSNBC, Lawrence O'Donnel interviewed the black guy claiming to be Zimmerman's "friend." First he said he was his friend, then he said "acquaintance," then "I worked with him."



:lol:


Even Zimmerman's "friend" is disgusted by him.

I wonder how many people watched that and said "Yeah, you see?? You see??? Even the BLACK dude said Zimmerman's a good guy!" :roll:
Exactly. I know people will accuse me of jumping to conclusions but tough. lol It just seems awfully CONVENIENT that the ONE "friend" who shows up to speak in behalf of a guy who's suspected of not liking young, black men is himself black... and who, under questioning shows that his actual connection is FAR from "friend." Who the hell paid him?
 
@Janna Yes, it amazes me how partisan people are. Everyone, no matter their party should be interested in justice for this dead child. I'm listening to Alan Colmes right now...he's an admitted liberal but he takes tons of calls from really nutty right wingers. Tonight is simply exhausting. lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyLuna
Nordling said:
@Janna Yes, it amazes me how partisan people are. Everyone, no matter their party should be interested in justice for this dead child. I'm listening to Alan Colmes right now...he's an admitted liberal but he takes tons of calls from really nutty right wingers. Tonight is simply exhausting. lol
I can only imagine. i really don't miss extremism. It doesn't exist here, thank God. Well, it does, but it's extreme left, and they're much quieter than the extreme American right.
 
Jaana_ said:
Nordling said:
@Janna Yes, it amazes me how partisan people are. Everyone, no matter their party should be interested in justice for this dead child. I'm listening to Alan Colmes right now...he's an admitted liberal but he takes tons of calls from really nutty right wingers. Tonight is simply exhausting. lol
I can only imagine. i really don't miss extremism. It doesn't exist here, thank God. Well, it does, but it's extreme left, and they're much quieter than the extreme American right.
Yeah, European "conservatism" is much milder. I remember way back when I was in high school, we had UK foreign exchange student visit out classroom. He was a Tory but when questioned, he said if he lived in the US, he'd probably be a Democrat. lol
 
Nordling said:
Jaana_ said:
Nordling said:
@Janna Yes, it amazes me how partisan people are. Everyone, no matter their party should be interested in justice for this dead child. I'm listening to Alan Colmes right now...he's an admitted liberal but he takes tons of calls from really nutty right wingers. Tonight is simply exhausting. lol
I can only imagine. i really don't miss extremism. It doesn't exist here, thank God. Well, it does, but it's extreme left, and they're much quieter than the extreme American right.
Yeah, European "conservatism" is much milder. I remember way back when I was in high school, we had UK foreign exchange student visit out classroom. He was a Tory but when questioned, he said if he lived in the US, he'd probably be a Democrat. lol

In the US, I'm considered a lazy liberl hippie America-hating socialist Kenyan-supporting tree hugger.

In Finland, I'm a moderate.
 
Jaana_ said:
Nordling said:
Jaana_ said:
Nordling said:
@Janna Yes, it amazes me how partisan people are. Everyone, no matter their party should be interested in justice for this dead child. I'm listening to Alan Colmes right now...he's an admitted liberal but he takes tons of calls from really nutty right wingers. Tonight is simply exhausting. lol
I can only imagine. i really don't miss extremism. It doesn't exist here, thank God. Well, it does, but it's extreme left, and they're much quieter than the extreme American right.
Yeah, European "conservatism" is much milder. I remember way back when I was in high school, we had UK foreign exchange student visit out classroom. He was a Tory but when questioned, he said if he lived in the US, he'd probably be a Democrat. lol

In the US, I'm considered a lazy liberl hippie America-hating socialist Kenyan-supporting tree hugger.

In Finland, I'm a moderate.
And in Finland, people have decent health care and no one is getting all upset about it. lol
 
Nordling said:
Jaana_ said:
Nordling said:
Jaana_ said:
Nordling said:
@Janna Yes, it amazes me how partisan people are. Everyone, no matter their party should be interested in justice for this dead child. I'm listening to Alan Colmes right now...he's an admitted liberal but he takes tons of calls from really nutty right wingers. Tonight is simply exhausting. lol
I can only imagine. i really don't miss extremism. It doesn't exist here, thank God. Well, it does, but it's extreme left, and they're much quieter than the extreme American right.
Yeah, European "conservatism" is much milder. I remember way back when I was in high school, we had UK foreign exchange student visit out classroom. He was a Tory but when questioned, he said if he lived in the US, he'd probably be a Democrat. lol

In the US, I'm considered a lazy liberl hippie America-hating socialist Kenyan-supporting tree hugger.

In Finland, I'm a moderate.
And in Finland, people have decent health care and no one is getting all upset about it. lol

heh, nope. I tell Americans I see bitching about taxes to come here, then complain. :p And no one here even minds paying them, because we understand that if we didn't, we'd be like America. Hungry, sick, and full of crime.
 
Being partisan has nothing to do with it, as far as I'm concerned. I'm trying to look at it with an open mind and going by the facts alone. It basically comes down to who the the aggressor was that initiated the physical altercation. None of the previous stuff really matters.

As far as the racial profiling goes... Allegedly, there were several recent burglaries committed by young black males. If those are indeed the facts, then seeing an unfamiliar young black male in the area would raise my suspicion too.

Now the investigation into the killing of Trayvon Martin is essentially starting from scratch, with a new special prosecutor and a team of investigators quietly re-interviewing witnesses and examining evidence related to the unarmed teen's shooting death.

TRAYVON MARTIN KILLING
Sanford cops wanted to charge Zimmerman in Trayvon Martin case

Sanford cops asked prosecutors to file charges in the Trayvon Martin case, but the Seminole County State Attorney’s office held off.

BY FRANCES ROBLES
FROBLES@MIAMIHERALD.COM
SANFORD -- Despite public claims that there wasn’t enough probable cause to make a criminal case in the Trayvon Martin killing, early in the investigation the Sanford Police Department requested an arrest warrant from the Seminole County State Attorney’s office, the special prosecutor in the case told The Miami Herald on Tuesday.

A Sanford Police incident report shows the case was categorized as “homicide/negligent manslaughter.”

The state attorney’s office held off pending further review, The Miami Herald has learned.

The Miami Gardens high school junior was killed Feb. 26 by George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer. The 28-year-old insurance underwriter and college student was never charged, triggering a nationwide crusade on the dead teen’s behalf.

Asked to confirm that the police recommended a manslaughter charge, special prosecutor Angela Corey said: “I don’t know about that, but as far as the process I can tell you that the police went to the state attorney with a capias request, meaning: ‘We’re through with our investigation and here it is for you.’ The state attorney impaneled a grand jury, but before anything else could be done, the governor stepped in and asked us to pick it up in mid-stream.”

A capias is a request for charges to be filed.

The Seminole County State Attorney’s Office declined to comment on whether its prosecutors ever recommended against filing charges.

“If you go with what was reported in the press the first night, there would have been an arrest right away, but obviously something gave investigators pause,” said a source in the Seminole State Attorney’s office who did not want to speak publicly, because the case is now assigned to a different prosecutor. “We get capias warrants all the time. That doesn’t mean we file charges right away. We investigate to see if it’s appropriate. That’s the responsible thing to do.’’

The Seminole County State Attorney’s Office was consulted the night of Trayvon’s killing, but no prosecutor ever visited the scene. As the controversy intensified, Gov. Rick Scott replaced Seminole State Attorney Norm Wolfinger with Corey, the state attorney for Duval, Nassau and Clay counties, based in Jacksonville.

“The case now has a new state attorney, and they didn’t file charges the first day they got it, either,” the Seminole prosecutor who asked to remain anonymous said.

The development is in stark contrast to the statements repeatedly made by Bill Lee, the Sanford police chief who has since stepped aside and was lambasted for his handling of the case. Lee publicly insisted that there was no probable cause to arrest Zimmerman, leading many critics to say he came across more like a defense attorney for the security buff.

“Zimmerman provided a statement claiming he acted in self defense which at the time was supported by physical evidence and testimony,” Lee wrote in a memo posted on the city’s website. “By Florida Statute, law enforcement was PROHIBITED from making an arrest based of the facts and circumstances they had at the time.”

He cited the statute number for Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law, which provides immunity to people who kill someone in self defense.

Lee’s was criticized for his explanations, because many people thought he was bending over backward to protect the shooter based on the results of a shoddy investigation.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/03/27/2 ... rylink=cpy
 
I like to keep things simple.

The 911 dispatcher told him to not chase after the suspect.
Zimmerman however, got out of his SUV, took his gun and chased him anyway.

He was not in danger, he was not a cop in a position to chase a suspect.. any suspect.

Everything he did after he picked up the gun and got out of the SUV is entirely his fault. if the kid was selling crack or just a 6 yr old running for his house, it doesn't matter. At that point in time where Zimmerman got out of his warm safe SUV, he became the direct cause of everything that happened after that.

I dont care if the kid was even armed. He was running away. Once we allow anyone to chase anyone they suspect of being up to no good, and giving them a pass on killing that person because running away = guilt, then we just become another 3rd world shithole where the law means nothing.

He got out of his car from a distant position of safety with a gun to play Judge, Jury and executioner.
When he was instructed not to, by law enforcement.

He's guilty. Everything else about the situation and the suspect has nothing to do with it. Who Treyvon was or what he was doing is a meaningless variable. What was the direct cause of the suspect's death?

Zimmerman getting out of his vehicle with a gun, when he had no reason to do so and was instructed by 911 not to.
Simple.

SYG is a good law that is very poorly written and very poorly investigated when claimed.
 
Paulie Walnuts said:
He got out of his car from a distant position of safety with a gun to play Judge, Jury and executioner.
When he was instructed not to, by law enforcement.

911 operators are not law enforcement, most agencies consider the dispatcher position as entry-level, requiring only a high school education and a clean background.

If he was playing judge, jury and executioner as you opine, how did he get his nose broken and head slammed on the concrete sidewalk several times?
 
George Zimmerman did not call 911 the night of the shooting, he called the police's non emergency number (twice). You can look at copies of the event reports for his calls to 911 and the non emergency number here. The two calls in question are the last two in the linked PDF and the way you tell the difference is the "Call Source" in the second section of each report.

That's not to say he never called 911, because he did that in the past too. I point it out merely as an example of one of those irritating actual facts vs much of the hyperbole being tossed around in the media.

Wikipedia is actually a pretty good source of real, factual information in a case like this because editors want real sources. That's not saying they always get it right either.

I agree with with Bocefish on the point that we should let the investigation proceed and try to understand the things that actually happened, before rushing to judgement on one side or the other.
 
Kradek said:
George Zimmerman did not call 911 the night of the shooting, he called the police's non emergency number (twice). You can look at copies of the event reports for his calls to 911 and the non emergency number here. The two calls in question are the last two in the linked PDF and the way you tell the difference is the "Call Source" in the second section of each report.

That's not to say he never called 911, because he did that in the past too. I point it out merely as an example of one of those irritating actual facts vs much of the hyperbole being tossed around in the media.

Wikipedia is actually a pretty good source of real, factual information in a case like this because editors want real sources. That's not saying they always get it right either.

I agree with with Bocefish on the point that we should let the investigation proceed and try to understand the things that actually happened, before rushing to judgement on one side or the other.




While this is indeed the prudent thing to to, anytime you have race, guns and death in the same story, logical calm progression aint gonna happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bocefish
http://www.myfoxtampabay.com/dpp/news/state/witness-martin-attacked-zimmerman-03232012

But one man's testimony could be key for the police.

"The guy on the bottom who had a red sweater on was yelling to me: 'help, help…and I told him to stop and I was calling 911," he said.

Trayvon Martin was in a hoodie; Zimmerman was in red.

The witness only wanted to be identified as "John," and didn't not want to be shown on camera.

His statements to police were instrumental, because police backed up Zimmerman's claims, saying those screams on the 911 call are those of Zimmerman.

"When I got upstairs and looked down, the guy who was on top beating up the other guy, was the one laying in the grass, and I believe he was dead at that point," John said.

Corroborates parts of Zimmerman's account of the incident.

Sanford police say Zimmerman was bl...ng a struggle took place before the shooting.

Corroborates the eye-witness account. I am leaning very heavily toward the 'He-Needed-Killing' view of the story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BustyJules
The two calls in question are the last two in the linked PDF and the way you tell the difference is the "Call Source" in the second section of each report.

Here's the portion of the PDF call record linked to. I'm still not sure what those codes mean.



Also from the same wiki link:

Lee (Police Chief) told reporters that they could not arrest Zimmerman because no evidence contradicted his story, and that to do so would leave the police open to litigation.[83] He also said that although 911 did instruct Zimmerman not to pursue Martin, those instructions are only recommendations that do not carry the force of law.[11]

Are the non-emergency PD call also taken by non law enforcement personnel? :dontknow:
 

Attachments

  • CallRecord.jpg
    CallRecord.jpg
    249.8 KB · Views: 61
Bocefish said:
Here's the portion of the PDF call record linked to. I'm still not sure what those codes mean.
The place where you tell whether it was a 911 call or a non emergency call is here:
ZimmermanLogCallSource.png


911 calls say 911, non-emergency calls say TEL.

As I understand it, both types of calls are actually received by the same operators.

Wendy Dorival said:
Part of the instruction Dorival gives new volunteers, she said, includes when to call 911 and when to call non-emergency numbers. Both lines go to the same operator, Dorival told the Daily Beast, but the different numbers allow the operator to triage calls.

“I basically tell them you call non-emergency dispatch if you come home after work and you notice somebody took a bike off your porch,” Dorival said. “A 911 call is when there is a crime in progress. If someone’s life or property is in danger, you call 911.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bocefish
Like I said, I believe you have a right to defend yourself and where you live. Here's an example of what happened with me and my fiance back a few months ago. There had been numerous car break ins at our apt/townhouse complex, We had suspicious males hanging out across the street all the time and they made it obvious they were selling drugs. We constantly called the police because we got sick of the fights, loudness, cars in and out. Anywho the cops NEVER did shit and the car break ins continued along with the drug activity. We ended up having guns on us and going outside anytime they were outside, just watching and the guns just in case.

Anyhow one night we see a young male with dark clothes, walk towards the garage across the street and next door to the crack dealers. As he gets closer to the garage *surprise* he puts his hoodie up, My fiance gets the .45, I grab the .40...Then we call 911 and say that we've had numerous break ins and there is a young either black or hispanic male with his hoodie up acting suspicious. the operator told us that the police were busy and to just call back if anything happened, less than a minute after we hung up he breaks the window of a car. We step outside with our guns and call back 911 I myself told the operator "We both have guns, If he comes over here we will fucking shoot him".

Thankfully the police came quickly when they heard we had guns and the dude ended up taking off and getting caught later. I could of easily been George Zimmerman and so could have my fiance.

Also don't look at me like I'm cold hearted, I'm really not, I've dealt with my moms murder and the lack of justice in her case. I've went to the media, newspaper and every other outlet after her killer only got 10 years. I didn't see anybody marching for my mom, my friend donovan, my friend derrek, or my friend deangelo. Maybe Black on White crime or Black on Black crime just isn't as important. I don't believe one life is more important than another life and that pisses me off the most about this case.
 
CammiStar said:
I have a question...

Why is the fact that this man had grass stains on his back and a bloody face an issue? Zimmerman was the one following Trayvon with a gun. Maybe Trayvon was trying to defend himself.

Trayvon may have felt threatened by the larger Zimmerman, who was also armed with a gun, and tried to stand his ground. I hear you are allowed to do that in Florida instead of fleeing like most other states.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.