Thanks for posting that again Jerry. That was my first thought, - that if a model had completed reassignment, (hope that is still PC, if not sub the correct term), then just go with female model, and avoid the history.JerryBoBerry said:AmberCutie said:If a woman is legally FEMALE and promotes herself as a woman on the cam site she works on, she's absolutely good to go. If the site she's working on verified her as female and she presents herself that way, I go based off of that. I think MFC was referred to before as an easy means to judge this due to them only accepting female models. If they can be approved on MFC, they're all set here! There are very likely already cam girls whom have been given model status here whom are actually trans, but were approved because they simply verified themselves with me and their cam site as a female.
Just posting this as a reminder for anyone still wanting to get riled up about all this. Amber has already said she'd allow them in. That criteria is simply based on other sites recognizing them as female.
Don't like that they can't get in to the MO section here? Start a letter writing campaign to all the camsites. Cause it's on them now.
But you do understand that to do so, can feel like hiding who you were, and therefore who you are. It's passing! But such is life - things are not always perfect, and we all have choices that come along that we may not think are ideal, but we make those choices. If we are wise, we understand the imperfection of the world without spending to much of our own happiness trying to change things we can not, and we don't cause undo grief to those who are compromising to make things better.
And, I must say when I read Lyli's retort my first thought was that I did not think the Model who was pointing out the banner was being critical. The way it starts with, 'except for' I can see how it might be interpreted as being critical, but I did not read it that way.
Edit: the below youtube is not aimed at Lyli, or that situation but at the body of my post.