The South was opposed to states' rights, specifically to the northern states unwillingness to abide by the federal Fugitive Slave Act, which required them to return fugitive slaves to their owners in the South.It seems to me like a symbol of hate and any reasonable person should be happy with abolishing it considering slavery was such a important part of the civil war (regardless of if it was for economic or moral reasons). I appreciate the idea of state rights, but isn't there a more positive icon to represent that with?
I feel like there's an argument I'm missing, because it seems pretty cut and dry to me. I've tried listening to the other side of the argument and haven't heard anything convincing.
Having lived my entire life north of the Mason-Dixon line, I don't feel that I know enough about the culture behind the continued showing of the flag to have an educated opinion on the matter. It's funny to watch everyone else freak out over it though.
1. States having Confederate elements incorporated into their flag: silly considering they were re-admitted into the union over 100 years ago.
2. Monuments, museums, Civil War reenactors, etc: Displaying the flag in those settings is appropriate. Being a Confederate Civil War reenactor doesn't make you a racist.
They elected their representatives. The representatives voted. That's pretty much how it works. If SC citizens want moar battle flags, they can vote their representatives out next term.I agree with this. The main problem I have with the flag being banned on government property is where will the banning stop? Will the monuments, street names and city names be next? Will they start banning anything that offends some other group of people? I think the citizens of South Carolina should have been able to vote on it.
Just to be clear, nobody banned the Dukes of Hazzard.Banning Dukes of Hazzard and Apple banning wargames having the Confederate flag are both really stupid moves.
Though I'm not surprised coming from Apple
Being a Confederate Civil War reenactor doesn't make you a racist.
Just makes you more likely to be a 40-year-old virgin.
So, of course we're talking about Mississippi now, but what about Georgia?
I just listened to Jimmy Carter expressing pride on PBS that Georgia had done away with the confederate symbols in their state flag. I guess he was referring to the unofficial 1879 flag, since every flag since then has been based on the First National Flag of the Confederacy (1879-1902, 2003-present), the Battle Flag (1956-2001), or incorporated both in a little "Georgia's History" nod (2001-2003).
(??-1879, 1879-1902, 1902-1906, 1906-1920, 1920-1956, 1956-2001, 2001-2003, 2003-present)
Kind of like the Ukrainians pulling down statues of Stalin, don't you think?Well, it has started like I thought it would. The Atlanta Ga NAACP wants to have Stone Mountain sand blasted to remove the faces of the Confederate Generals.
http://atlanta.cbslocal.com/2015/07...-jefferson-and-jackson-off-of-stone-mountain/
Well, it has started like I thought it would. The Atlanta Ga NAACP wants to have Stone Mountain sand blasted to remove the faces of the Confederate Generals.
http://atlanta.cbslocal.com/2015/07...-jefferson-and-jackson-off-of-stone-mountain/