Suggestions for models from members?
- Don't listen to anything I have to say... ever! :tongue5:
- Don't listen to anything I have to say... ever! :tongue5:
AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!
Suggestions for models from members
- Thread starter Malek
- Start date
-
** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
- Status
A
Anonymous
Guest
Wait a second...I thought the Pro 9000 IS considered HD. It's not? I've seen tons of camming-related posts where the most recommended webcams for models seemed to be the C910 (that's what I have), the C920, and the Pro 9000. So I just assumed all 3 of them are HD webcams.
LadyLuna
Inactive Cam Model
- Mar 8, 2010
- 6,710
- 9,440
- 293
- Twitter Username
- @EveMatteo
- MFC Username
- LadyLuna
- Streamate Username
- Lady_Luna
- Clips4Sale URL
- http://clips4sale.com/store/42697/LadyLuna
yummybrownfox said:
Pro 9000 is... camsite HD compatible. But it's not actually HD.
Camsite normal is the 360x240. HD is 480x360 or even 640x480. The Logitech Pro 9000 is perfectly capable of going that high. But actual HD is bigger than what the Logitech Pro 9000 can do, and is more crisp and clear than the Logitech Pro 9000. If you go to my clips store, any clip before this past November was shot with the Logitech Pro 9000. Any clip after was shot with the Logitech c920. You can see a huge difference in quality. yet the Pro 9000 is perfectly capable of doing camsite HD.
- Nov 3, 2010
- 10,895
- 65,722
- 1,793
- 37
- Twitter Username
- @jolene_brody
- Tumblr Username
- jolenebrody
- MFC Username
- jolenebrody
- ManyVids URL
- https://www.manyvids.com/Profile/303895/JoleneBrody/
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
-
- Locked
