Reporting Rule-Breakers to MFC

[BlueViolet]

I'd say bestiality is a breaking point because its abuse to an animal.

I'd actually be pretty upset if someone said they saw bestiality on camera and didn't report it.

My dog tries to hump me all the time, penis fully extended, knocking me all the way over because he's huge. If I was naked and he actually managed to push inside me, I doubt he'd be screaming and whimpering with abuse. There is a LOT worse things humans do to animals that is socially accepted that I'd consider abuse over a dog getting off.

I think there's a difference between "oh my dog landed the right way" (hugely unlikely, btw) and using animals for sexual gratification.
Much of it actually does hurt the animal as well. Bestiality isn't just a dog humping someone's leg in lots of bad porn cases.

Using any living thing for your sexual gratification that has no way of understanding the complexities of human sexual interaction is always wrong, to me, at least.
:twocents-02cents:

Clarification:hugely unlikely in cases on camera that would be reported as bestiality.

I think it is interesting that you assume that it is hugely unlikely that my dog would land the right way. In know many people haven't been around large, intact dogs, but my dog weighs almost as much as I do. His head is bigger than mine. Humping is something we've had to teach out of him.

I can't count how many times my dog has knocked me over and started humping me. He's not trying to hump my leg. If I bend over to look for something under the couch or bed, if I lean over to grab something out of the laundry basket on the floor, if I'm just standing up in the living room--he used to jump on top of me and lock his arms on my hips and start thrusting with his penis fully out. I won't give you the details, but if I was naked, it most certainly would have gone inside me.

Those aren't accidental, rare cases. He used to do it daily (several times a day when he first hit puberty) before we could break him of that habit and even now it's something he'll occasionally try to pull on us. I've had to have Quinn pull him off on me when he knocked me over on the living room floor on my knees.

If someone wanted to do it on camera, they wouldn't need to molest the dog to get him ready. You simply bend over on all fours and the dog is plenty eager, I assure you. No, dogs do not understand the complexities of human sexual nature--and why should they? They are just doing what feels good to them and I do not consider it abuse at all and never will. Because our moral code says it is wrong doesn't mean that they feel mentally abused from it, and certainly not physically abused from it. So no, I would not report it.

There is a LOT worse things humans do to animals that is socially accepted that I'd consider abuse over a dog getting off.

I heard that some people even eat them ....

Humanely killing an animal as food (survival) or protection (ie. killing a poisonous snake) is not abuse.

I was not referring to killing an animal as food or protecting ourselves from a poisonous snake.

I was referring to the socially accepted and veterinary pushed practices of tail docking, ear cropping, de-clawing, genital mutilation, extended kenneling (4+ hours daily), euthanization of healthy animals, and veterinarians pushing brands such as Purina or Hill's Science even though they are awfully unhealthy and can cause so many health problems as a sole diet simply because the vet gets kickbacks from selling or endorsing it.

Even de-vocalizing dogs is still in practice in some places. Flea medication is poison that can cause serious long-term affects, but is is suggested we administer it monthly even when there are healthier alternatives to prevent or eradicate an infestation.

These dogs certainly can't consent to these things, but they are subjected to these sorts of things on a regular basis and it's considered perfectly normal even though they can hurt or even kill our pets, but are done in the name of beauty, convenience, or greed.

 

[LaceyRoyce]

I'd say bestiality is a breaking point because its abuse to an animal.

I'd actually be pretty upset if someone said they saw bestiality on camera and didn't report it.

My dog tries to hump me all the time, penis fully extended, knocking me all the way over because he's huge. If I was naked and he actually managed to push inside me, I doubt he'd be screaming and whimpering with abuse. There is a LOT worse things humans do to animals that is socially accepted that I'd consider abuse over a dog getting off.

I think there's a difference between "oh my dog landed the right way" (hugely unlikely, btw) and using animals for sexual gratification.
Much of it actually does hurt the animal as well. Bestiality isn't just a dog humping someone's leg in lots of bad porn cases.

Using any living thing for your sexual gratification that has no way of understanding the complexities of human sexual interaction is always wrong, to me, at least.
:twocents-02cents:

Clarification:hugely unlikely in cases on camera that would be reported as bestiality.

I think it is interesting that you assume that it is hugely unlikely that my dog would land the right way. In know many people haven't been around large, intact dogs, but my dog weighs almost as much as I do. His head is bigger than mine. Humping is something we've had to teach out of him.

I can't count how many times my dog has knocked me over and started humping me. He's not trying to hump my leg. If I bend over to look for something under the couch or bed, if I lean over to grab something out of the laundry basket on the floor, if I'm just standing up in the living room--he used to jump on top of me and lock his arms on my hips and start thrusting with his penis fully out. I won't give you the details, but if I was naked, it most certainly would have gone inside me.

Those aren't accidental, rare cases. He used to do it daily (several times a day when he first hit puberty) before we could break him of that habit and even now it's something he'll occasionally try to pull on us. I've had to have Quinn pull him off on me when he knocked me over on the living room floor on my knees.

If someone wanted to do it on camera, they wouldn't need to molest the dog to get him ready. You simply bend over on all fours and the dog is plenty eager, I assure you. No, dogs do not understand the complexities of human sexual nature--and why should they? They are just doing what feels good to them and I do not consider it abuse at all and never will. Because our moral code says it is wrong doesn't mean that they feel mentally abused from it, and certainly not physically abused from it. So no, I would not report it.

There is a LOT worse things humans do to animals that is socially accepted that I'd consider abuse over a dog getting off.

I heard that some people even eat them ....

Humanely killing an animal as food (survival) or protection (ie. killing a poisonous snake) is not abuse.

I was not referring to killing an animal as food or protecting ourselves from a poisonous snake.

I was referring to the socially accepted and veterinary pushed practices of tail docking, ear cropping, de-clawing, genital mutilation, extended kenneling (4+ hours daily), euthanization of healthy animals, and veterinarians pushing brands such as Purina or Hill's Science even though they are awfully unhealthy and can cause so many health problems as a sole diet simply because the vet gets kickbacks from selling or endorsing it.

Even de-vocalizing dogs is still in practice in some places. Flea medication is poison that can cause serious long-term affects, but is is suggested we administer it monthly even when there are healthier alternatives to prevent or eradicate an infestation.

These dogs certainly can't consent to these things, but they are subjected to these sorts of things on a regular basis and it's considered perfectly normal even though they can hurt or even kill our pets, but are done in the name of beauty, convenience, or greed.

I was responding to Bobby's remark, not yours. Sorry for any confusion.

 

[Deleted member 8603]

Hugely unlikely that someone would just so happen to be naked on a camera with a dog that likes to hump.

I mean, if you think its okay to fuck your dog, thats your bag.
Just don't do it on camera, and if I know its happening, I will report it.

But it is not right, because knowing consent is not able to be given.
Willingness to do something is NOT the same as knowing consent.
5 year olds also show sexual behavior, but its not okay to fuck them, either.

Animals lack the mental capacity to think about what is going on.
Your dog does not think like a human, or have sex solely for pleasure.
It is trying to reproduce with you, not have a fun consensual sexual encounter.

When you engage in sexual actions with anything that doesn't have the capacity to understand the situation, you are masturbating with a living being's body.
That is why bestiality is wrong.
Not because "oh sorry I made an animal feel good"

And the argument that you could be doing worse things is the worst argument in the world and can be used for anything.
"I only stole ONE bike, it could've been a car!"

 

[BlueViolet]

I don't fuck my dog and don't care to but I appreciate your assumptions.

The argument against it going against your moral code is worse to me, some people don't believe cutting hair.

 

[LaceyRoyce]

I don't fuck my dog and don't care to but I appreciate your assumptions.

The argument against it going against your moral code is worse to me, some people don't believe cutting hair.

I missed the part where she assumed you fucked your dog.


We ALL argue based off our moral codes to some extent.
I disagree with rape, homophobia, racism ..etc etc.. because they are absolutely 100% against my moral code, and I will fight for them. I do not think that saying that something goes against a moral code and 'heres why'' is somehow a bad argument. Especially when it contains its reasoning and justification.

For the record: I am in the camp that says it is absolutely abhorrent to allow an animal to have sexual relations with you - whether or not they are doing what feel natural or not.

When I was 3 yrs old I learned how to masturbate. As I got older, an older child staying in my household who knew better, decided that he would do this with me - and various other things. Everything he did FELT good at the time and felt natural. I think I may have even initiated the first contact... though my memory is fuzzy. However, I was not able to consent, as I was very young. He took advantage of this and looking back I can recognize the situation as abuse.

I see the animal humping your privates/licking your privates as the same situation.

 

[BlueViolet]

I don't fuck my dog and don't care to but I appreciate your assumptions.

The argument against it going against your moral code is worse to me, some people don't believe cutting hair.

I missed the part where she assumed you fucked your dog.


We ALL argue based off our moral codes to some extent.
I disagree with rape, homophobia, racism ..etc etc.. because they are absolutely 100% against my moral code, and I will fight for them. I do not think that saying that something goes against a moral code and 'heres why'' is somehow a bad argument. Especially when it contains its reasoning and justification.

For the record: I am in the camp that says it is absolutely abhorrent to allow an animal to have sexual relations with you - whether or not they are doing what feel natural or not.

I understand, and I agree that we all are arguing from our moral codes. I was simply responding to the fact that essentially I was being called wrong for my opinions of my own morals an how I believe those things are worse than the argument at hand.

I personally don't believe that sort of bestality is wrong so comparing it to the bike situation is invalid because it isn't comparing things I believe are all wrong, but something I believe is fine against things I believe is wrong.

I respect everyone's opinion, I'm just stating my own. I strongly believe it is absolutely abhorrent to mutilate a dog's testicles personally.

 

[Sevrin]

I see the animal humping your privates/licking your privates as the same situation.

I'm not advocating for bestiality, but I doubt a dog would suffer in the same way as a person, with respect to being able to maintain personal relationships or employment, increased likelihood substance addiction or any of the other things humans may be afflicted with.

 

[Anonymous]

I was not referring to killing an animal as food or protecting ourselves from a poisonous snake.

I'm pretty sure Miss_Lollipop was responding to BobbyB's post. In his post he said "I heard that some people even eat them," which I guess was supposed to be a joke about all of us meat-eating "animal abusers?" LOL.....

It's really easy for posts to get misinterpreted on here, especially when trying to quote several different people within one post.

 

[LilyEvans]

Well...off the topic of animals...

I would report a person on cam who wasn't supposed to be, unless I knew for a FACT that it was another registered model. Like Luna said, you can never be sure who is ACTUALLY the age that they look. I know some 14 year olds who look like 25 year olds, and some 30 year olds who look about 16.

 

[LaceyRoyce]

I see the animal humping your privates/licking your privates as the same situation.

I'm not advocating for bestiality, but I doubt a dog would suffer in the same way as a person, with respect to being able to maintain personal relationships or employment, increased likelihood substance addiction or any of the other things humans may be afflicted with.

Agreed, however lets take a severely mentally disabled person as perhaps another more workable example. They may never feel the same effects of sexual abuse as a person with their full mental capacity does. However It's still wrong.

 

[PunkInDrublic]

Have never/will probably never report anything. The sites don't really care and it just seems like a waste of time. If I spent time reporting everything I found gross(shitting,fisting,fake raffles,fake charities,dog fucking,kids on cam,hard drug use,and all the other weird shit that goes down at camsites) I'd have no time to actually enjoy the site. Can't believe people care about a model sleeping. Get a life narcs.

 

[BlueViolet]

I see the animal humping your privates/licking your privates as the same situation.

I'm not advocating for bestiality, but I doubt a dog would suffer in the same way as a person, with respect to being able to maintain personal relationships or employment, increased likelihood substance addiction or any of the other things humans may be afflicted with.

Agreed, however lets take a severely mentally disabled person as perhaps another more workable example. They may never feel the same effects of sexual abuse as a person with their full mental capacity does. However It's still wrong.

I can definitely understand the mentally disabled person argument much better than a healthy child being abused and can definitely see your argument from that, but I personally view a mentally disabled person still on the level of a human child in most cases and my views on humans and animals are much different.

 

[SaffronBurke]

Whether I would report/care about menstrual blood would really depend on the context. If the model happens to get her period during a show, or just has a leak - that's an understandable mistake, and doesn't really warrant a report. If, on the other hand, she's doing a show focused on the blood, it may get reported, especially if there is another person involved. It's less an "ew, gross, blood" thing, and more of a hygiene/safety thing.

I would see defecation/vomit shows the same way, especially vomit, as forcing yourself to throw up is actually bad for your body, and can deteriorate the lining of your esophagus, your tooth enamel, etc. Forced/repeated defecation can also have health risks, especially if laxatives are used. I can't think of any at the moment, and I'm too lazy to look them up, but I think there may be heart issues involved.

Urine - I don't know. It comes out sterile. I have heard that it is both ok and not ok to drink it, depending on which study you read. I would probably just skip past it.

Man-on-cam or any other people on cam - they're not authorized to be on the account, there's no proof of their age, and we therefore have no proof that they are legal to be involved in what they're involved in.

Pets/animals - Yes, some animals just follow their instincts and try to hump/fuck anything that is in the right position. Personally, I would not have an animal who is in the habit of doing that around while I was camming and nude, and would hope that no model would be in a situation in which it were possible for her dog to fuck her. No, they may not be harmed by it, but lack of harm does not make it right. If it's just the dog following instinct, I would argue that the model were the one being harmed/sexually abused, but that's just me.

Lactation itself - eh, I don't care. It's possible to induce someone to lactate without them having been pregnant, it's just a lot of work. Some people are super turned on by the act of lactation. I'll pass, but that's not harmful/unhygienic and doesn't, in my mind, warrant a report. Swap out straight lactation, and show breastfeeding - big no-no. Don't put your kid on a cam site. Just don't. I have nothing against breastfeeding, and have no problem with when or how a woman does it - unless it's in a sexual context. If it's an adult being breastfed - like in an ABDL situation - that's another situation, again. Not my cup of tea, but it's two consenting adults and they should be able to carry on with whatever they've agreed to do together.

Sleeping - Hey, if you wanna sleep on cam and tank your camscore, that's your own decision. If you're actually getting tipped for it, clearly, someone's enjoying the show. Or maybe you forgot to turn your cam off/turned it off but it stayed active for some reason. Whatever the situation here, none of my business.

Penetration with items not meant for it - Would depend on the safety of the item used. Some items can be dangerous, like glass bottles, whereas others, like bananas, are just silly.

Drugs - Would really depend. If the model is severely fucked up and barely coherent, maybe. If she uses only a little bit, like some of us have a beer or a shot before camming, and is able to function in a reasonably normal matter, I don't see the point in reporting her.

 

[southsamurai]

Animals lack the mental capacity to think about what is going on.
Your dog does not think like a human, or have sex solely for pleasure.
It is trying to reproduce with you, not have a fun consensual sexual encounter.

just about the bolded part
not true at all lol. while dogs (particularly male) are driven mostly by hormones and pheromones to breeding purposes males and females both exhibit "sexual" behaviors for many reasons other than breeding. mounting behaviors are often seen as sexual by humans but arent. that is a dominance display. females and males both will mount another animal/object to display dominance over it. (yes humans count as animals)

"humping" behavior can be either dominance display or sexual. when it is sexual there may be some debate as to whether or not the dog is feeling pleasure, or is doing it for that purpose (unless you happen to be psychic and can read the dog's mind. oh wait, thats impossible). what i will say is that an intact male dog who is allowed to will mount and hump to ejaculation. sort of like a human male fapping eh?
neutered male dogs will still "hump" things, though not as often. they too will do it if allowed until they fall over panting and delirious. post orgasmic bliss maybe?
females exhibit "humping" behaviors less often. the only time i have ever seen it personally it was a definite dominance display and involved no genital contact at all, but i have heard of it happening.

supposedly a female dog (aka bitch, but you have to be careful to define that word before you use it lol) can stimulate their genitals for pleasure. from what i understand bitches dont have orgasms as we humans understand them unless they are in heat. i have personally seen bitches in heat stimulate their genitals for prolonged periods and exhibit shaking, heavy breathing and abdominal spasms after a while. maybe not an orgasm, but it sure looks like one from the outside.

i would say from my experience that outside of heat times a bitch is unlikely to seek for or enjoy genital stimulation as a sexual act.

people like to think of dogs as little different from children, but it is not true. a mature dog might not have the reasoning ad intellect of an adult human, but they are adult being capable of desires, needs and pleasure specific to their species.
do i believe that forcing an animal into behaviors unnatural for their species to be wrong, definitely. abuse? in most cases yes, though there are many exceptions to that (training your dog to do tricks isnt inherently natural, but it sure isnt abuse)

when sex with a human is brought into the discussion the line gets blurry. i consider it wrong, but not always abusive. the animal cant give consent by our standards, hence it is wrong. so for sure starting the act is IMO abusive. but if the animal instigates the activity abuse ceases to be part of the picture for me (and yes, a male dog will instigate sexual behaviors, enjoy it and seek it out frequently). no harm occurs to the animal in that case and that is where my line for abuse is.

now for a female dog outside of heat there is definitely a double standard. a bitch's reproductive system is not built for penetration outside of heat, and would incur damage. thus it would always be abuse in my book.

ethics and morality are vital to humans. not so much for dogs. it is morally and ethically wrong to perform bestiality not because of the act itself (which is more or less neutral on the big scale, depending on circumstances rather than the act) but because of the lack of consent. if consent can not be given, the act becomes wrong.
while that is certainly a human conceit, we are humans, they are not. just because forcible intercourse is common in the animal world does not mean that we as intellectual beings can just cast aside morality at whim.

P.S. i know my moral code is.... unusual... compared to human society as a whole, but it is very very strict when i apply it to myself, less so when i apply it to others. if a lady or gentleman decided to allow themselves to sexually interact with an animal it isnt like i would hate them or look down on them, just that i would not do so.

 

[PlayboyMegan]

I report beastiality or children on cam.

 

[Evvie]

Whether I would report/care about menstrual blood would really depend on the context. If the model happens to get her period during a show, or just has a leak - that's an understandable mistake, and doesn't really warrant a report. If, on the other hand, she's doing a show focused on the blood, it may get reported, especially if there is another person involved. It's less an "ew, gross, blood" thing, and more of a hygiene/safety thing.

I would see defecation/vomit shows the same way, especially vomit, as forcing yourself to throw up is actually bad for your body, and can deteriorate the lining of your esophagus, your tooth enamel, etc. Forced/repeated defecation can also have health risks, especially if laxatives are used. I can't think of any at the moment, and I'm too lazy to look them up, but I think there may be heart issues involved.

Penetration with items not meant for it - Would depend on the safety of the item used. Some items can be dangerous, like glass bottles, whereas others, like bananas, are just silly.

This is interesting! What I am seeing here is that you choose to report things if you think the model is doing something which may risk her own safety (for example, vomiting during a blowjob show may cause physiological damage). However, would you think that people have their own right to make these choices? If I penetrate with a glass bottle on cam (which I've done before), I feel like you are saying you may report me because my safety is at risk. But as an adult, I have already judged the risks and decided to carry on anyway. Would you say that in these kinds of situations, your judgment as the viewer trumps the model's judgment about what to do with her own body? Just carrying on this line of thinking, would you consider other unhealthy/hazardous activities to be good to report, such as smoking or excessive drinking?

I am also not familiar with the inherent risks involved with menstrual blood. Is there anything that makes it more of a hygiene issue than normal blood? I don't think I know why specifically menstrual blood would be considered a safety risk to the model herself, or why it would be any more damaging to another person than, say, female exaculate.

 

[rexcode]

It keeps telling me "You must specify an option when voting"!

 

[Nordling]

If a person is REALLY concerned with risky behavior, then their energies would be better employed trying to stop boxing and American football. Both of these sports (and others as well) frequently cause permanent brain damage and other types of permanent damage...like vision loss.

 

[SaffronBurke]

Whether I would report/care about menstrual blood would really depend on the context. If the model happens to get her period during a show, or just has a leak - that's an understandable mistake, and doesn't really warrant a report. If, on the other hand, she's doing a show focused on the blood, it may get reported, especially if there is another person involved. It's less an "ew, gross, blood" thing, and more of a hygiene/safety thing.

I would see defecation/vomit shows the same way, especially vomit, as forcing yourself to throw up is actually bad for your body, and can deteriorate the lining of your esophagus, your tooth enamel, etc. Forced/repeated defecation can also have health risks, especially if laxatives are used. I can't think of any at the moment, and I'm too lazy to look them up, but I think there may be heart issues involved.

Penetration with items not meant for it - Would depend on the safety of the item used. Some items can be dangerous, like glass bottles, whereas others, like bananas, are just silly.

This is interesting! What I am seeing here is that you choose to report things if you think the model is doing something which may risk her own safety (for example, vomiting during a blowjob show may cause physiological damage). However, would you think that people have their own right to make these choices? If I penetrate with a glass bottle on cam (which I've done before), I feel like you are saying you may report me because my safety is at risk. But as an adult, I have already judged the risks and decided to carry on anyway. Would you say that in these kinds of situations, your judgment as the viewer trumps the model's judgment about what to do with her own body? Just carrying on this line of thinking, would you consider other unhealthy/hazardous activities to be good to report, such as smoking or excessive drinking?

I am also not familiar with the inherent risks involved with menstrual blood. Is there anything that makes it more of a hygiene issue than normal blood? I don't think I know why specifically menstrual blood would be considered a safety risk to the model herself, or why it would be any more damaging to another person than, say, female exaculate.

I would agree that as an adult, models have likely accepted any risks involved with a show they do. I have never seen a show that I would consider reporting, but it would be more out of concern than whether I think it's a show that should or shouldn't happen. If the model actually looks to be in danger, or looks as if danger is quite likely to happen, I would feel bad about myself NOT doing something.

With the blood, it's the same as with any blood - if there's another person, one or both could be risking possible infection carried by blood, which is probably my only real issue with it. Otherwise, it's probably not something I would do anything about.

 

[Evvie]

Whether I would report/care about menstrual blood would really depend on the context. If the model happens to get her period during a show, or just has a leak - that's an understandable mistake, and doesn't really warrant a report. If, on the other hand, she's doing a show focused on the blood, it may get reported, especially if there is another person involved. It's less an "ew, gross, blood" thing, and more of a hygiene/safety thing.

I would see defecation/vomit shows the same way, especially vomit, as forcing yourself to throw up is actually bad for your body, and can deteriorate the lining of your esophagus, your tooth enamel, etc. Forced/repeated defecation can also have health risks, especially if laxatives are used. I can't think of any at the moment, and I'm too lazy to look them up, but I think there may be heart issues involved.

Penetration with items not meant for it - Would depend on the safety of the item used. Some items can be dangerous, like glass bottles, whereas others, like bananas, are just silly.

This is interesting! What I am seeing here is that you choose to report things if you think the model is doing something which may risk her own safety (for example, vomiting during a blowjob show may cause physiological damage). However, would you think that people have their own right to make these choices? If I penetrate with a glass bottle on cam (which I've done before), I feel like you are saying you may report me because my safety is at risk. But as an adult, I have already judged the risks and decided to carry on anyway. Would you say that in these kinds of situations, your judgment as the viewer trumps the model's judgment about what to do with her own body? Just carrying on this line of thinking, would you consider other unhealthy/hazardous activities to be good to report, such as smoking or excessive drinking?

I am also not familiar with the inherent risks involved with menstrual blood. Is there anything that makes it more of a hygiene issue than normal blood? I don't think I know why specifically menstrual blood would be considered a safety risk to the model herself, or why it would be any more damaging to another person than, say, female exaculate.

I would agree that as an adult, models have likely accepted any risks involved with a show they do. I have never seen a show that I would consider reporting, but it would be more out of concern than whether I think it's a show that should or shouldn't happen. If the model actually looks to be in danger, or looks as if danger is quite likely to happen, I would feel bad about myself NOT doing something.

With the blood, it's the same as with any blood - if there's another person, one or both could be risking possible infection carried by blood, which is probably my only real issue with it. Otherwise, it's probably not something I would do anything about.

I feel I understand where you are coming from. But wouldn't a report do nothing to protect a model? Any report would likely not be seen for several days, and obviously the model would be done with the incident by then. In addition, if a model did get hurt, having her livelihood potentially damaged just to teach her a lesson seems like overkill. The only conclusion I can see is that reporting a model out of concern for her safety is stepping back, letting her continue on with her actions with no attempt to help, and hoping she gets punished after the fact.

In the end I understand your thought process, but I am not sure that reporting a model for doing something we personally deem to be unsafe will do anything but add additional harm and stress. If it were a bizarre situation, like the model threatening to commit suicide, then I can see that. But if it is a concern like, "she might hurt her orifice if she continues on with this show so I'll report her for her own good," I couldn't say I would personally agree with that.

 

[LaceyRoyce]

Whether I would report/care about menstrual blood would really depend on the context. If the model happens to get her period during a show, or just has a leak - that's an understandable mistake, and doesn't really warrant a report. If, on the other hand, she's doing a show focused on the blood, it may get reported, especially if there is another person involved. It's less an "ew, gross, blood" thing, and more of a hygiene/safety thing.

I would see defecation/vomit shows the same way, especially vomit, as forcing yourself to throw up is actually bad for your body, and can deteriorate the lining of your esophagus, your tooth enamel, etc. Forced/repeated defecation can also have health risks, especially if laxatives are used. I can't think of any at the moment, and I'm too lazy to look them up, but I think there may be heart issues involved.

Penetration with items not meant for it - Would depend on the safety of the item used. Some items can be dangerous, like glass bottles, whereas others, like bananas, are just silly.

This is interesting! What I am seeing here is that you choose to report things if you think the model is doing something which may risk her own safety (for example, vomiting during a blowjob show may cause physiological damage). However, would you think that people have their own right to make these choices? If I penetrate with a glass bottle on cam (which I've done before), I feel like you are saying you may report me because my safety is at risk. But as an adult, I have already judged the risks and decided to carry on anyway. Would you say that in these kinds of situations, your judgment as the viewer trumps the model's judgment about what to do with her own body? Just carrying on this line of thinking, would you consider other unhealthy/hazardous activities to be good to report, such as smoking or excessive drinking?

I am also not familiar with the inherent risks involved with menstrual blood. Is there anything that makes it more of a hygiene issue than normal blood? I don't think I know why specifically menstrual blood would be considered a safety risk to the model herself, or why it would be any more damaging to another person than, say, female exaculate.

I would agree that as an adult, models have likely accepted any risks involved with a show they do. I have never seen a show that I would consider reporting, but it would be more out of concern than whether I think it's a show that should or shouldn't happen. If the model actually looks to be in danger, or looks as if danger is quite likely to happen, I would feel bad about myself NOT doing something.

With the blood, it's the same as with any blood - if there's another person, one or both could be risking possible infection carried by blood, which is probably my only real issue with it. Otherwise, it's probably not something I would do anything about.

I feel I understand where you are coming from. But wouldn't a report do nothing to protect a model? Any report would likely not be seen for several days, and obviously the model would be done with the incident by then. In addition, if a model did get hurt, having her livelihood potentially damaged just to teach her a lesson seems like overkill. The only conclusion I can see is that reporting a model out of concern for her safety is stepping back, letting her continue on with her actions with no attempt to help, and hoping she gets punished after the fact.

In the end I understand your thought process, but I am not sure that reporting a model for doing something we personally deem to be unsafe will do anything but add additional harm and stress. If it were a bizarre situation, like the model threatening to commit suicide, then I can see that. But if it is a concern like, "she might hurt her orifice if she continues on with this show so I'll report her for her own good," I couldn't say I would personally agree with that.

Reports happen pretty quickly on mfc. When I got my first warning (for the most inane shit ever) it was within a few hrs. I remember at the camgirl mansion within an hr of SophiaLocke appearing on cam in a bane mask, 2 of the girls were suspended until they provided details of to who the 'person' was.

There's risk and risk and I know the line is sometimes fuzzy... but penetrating with an object is not likely to kill you.
Should I see someone trying to stuff razor blades into their pussy while drunk, or threatening suicide on camera, I would report it immediately. Probably to the police as well... for the suicide situation.

 

[emptiedglass]

If a person is REALLY concerned with risky behavior, then their energies would be better employed trying to stop boxing and American football. Both of these sports (and others as well) frequently cause permanent brain damage and other types of permanent damage...like vision loss.

I wonder if they also stimulate follicle growth in unusual places, such as the palms.

 

[Poker_Babe]

If I see anything other than consenting adults, I'ma report it.
Other than that, I'll just mind my own damn business.

 

[southsamurai]

another side note: things ive seen that might be harmful, but are still none of my business

breast slapping. it can cause cysts and fibroid tumors (non-cancerous of course)
food products in the genitals. the sweeter they are the more likely they are to cause infections
hot wax on the genitals... temperature is the key here, mucous membranes such as those that make up the vaginal walls themselves and the opening to such are much more sensitive to heat and cold, thus burns are more likely than in other regions of the body
ice inside the vagina.. cold damage is possible, plus the reduction of the temperature of the vaginal vault increases risk of infection
extremely vigorous use of larger than average toys can cause an air embolism, which is potentially lethal (though fairly rare)
deep throating of mechanical devices (aka fuck machines) a little misstep here could cause serious damage
showering/bathtub with electronic devices nearby... risky, even if its on battery power... a good laptop would be ruined in the best case, electricity can be unpleasant even at the comparatively low amperage from a battery discharge (though it is almost impossible to shock the person like that). plus theres the enhanced risk of slipping and falling. btw bathroom falls and slips are the highest form of injury in the home, ahead of kitchens by about 15 percent.

i could go on. point being that my paranoid head has trouble not wincing when i see some things on cam lol. i learned a looong time ago to keep my mouth shut about it in a lady's chat room though lol. i thought i was completely nuts until i read a section of pahlaniuk's choke where the main character is at a strip club and the first thing he notices is a strange mole on the dancer and all he can think of is cancer.
wait
does that make me even more nuts?
i think it does.
oh well

 

[PearlSparkles]

I'd definitely report animal abuse....seriously....itsdigustingandsad........


everything else is none of my business...

 

[LaceyRoyce]

another side note: things ive seen that might be harmful, but are still none of my business

breast slapping. it can cause cysts and fibroid tumors (non-cancerous of course)
food products in the genitals. the sweeter they are the more likely they are to cause infections
hot wax on the genitals... temperature is the key here, mucous membranes such as those that make up the vaginal walls themselves and the opening to such are much more sensitive to heat and cold, thus burns are more likely than in other regions of the body
ice inside the vagina.. cold damage is possible, plus the reduction of the temperature of the vaginal vault increases risk of infection
extremely vigorous use of larger than average toys can cause an air embolism, which is potentially lethal (though fairly rare)
deep throating of mechanical devices (aka fuck machines) a little misstep here could cause serious damage
showering/bathtub with electronic devices nearby... risky, even if its on battery power... a good laptop would be ruined in the best case, electricity can be unpleasant even at the comparatively low amperage from a battery discharge (though it is almost impossible to shock the person like that). plus theres the enhanced risk of slipping and falling. btw bathroom falls and slips are the highest form of injury in the home, ahead of kitchens by about 15 percent.

i could go on. point being that my paranoid head has trouble not wincing when i see some things on cam lol. i learned a looong time ago to keep my mouth shut about it in a lady's chat room though lol. i thought i was completely nuts until i read a section of pahlaniuk's choke where the main character is at a strip club and the first thing he notices is a strange mole on the dancer and all he can think of is cancer.
wait
does that make me even more nuts?
i think it does.
oh well

LOL YOU MUST HATE MY ROOM!!! I do everything you mentioned here.. *blush*

 

[Kittycatpurr]

I've got a very strict line when it comes to kids and would report anyone who had a child on cam - camsites are no place for children, just wrong wrong wrong. Oh, and whilst allowing your pets to wander around in the background on cam is fine in my book (my dog likes being near people and if I'm the only person in the house she has a thing for curling up near my feet regardless of whether i'm working or not, and will barge her way through closed doors to do just that), Bestiality is a complete no no. Just wrong on every level, and it still never ceases to amaze me how many sick idiots out there ask for it. Every camgirl I know has been asked the dreaded 'k9?' question at some point and had to go on a banning spree. Blarghhhhh. So, yeah, these two things would have me reporting to admin. Other than that, the next model button is everyone's friend.

 

[southsamurai]

LOL YOU MUST HATE MY ROOM!!! I do everything you mentioned here.. *blush*[/quote]

miss lolli, you are so damn awesome that even my weird over analytical mind shuts down and just enjoys your magnificent, amazing, gorgeous and brilliant self

 

[JoleneBrody]

Aside from a few small discrepancies, I would report most of what's on the forbidden list, and here is why.
Despite personal moral qualms, it all comes down to the reputation of my site and what I KNOW they do not want out there. Some of these things could be incredibly damaging to my workplace if they became frequent. MFC is VERY likely to get shut down if children, bestiality and incest became common. Not only is it highly frowned upon in our society as sick and immoral, it's against the law. A judge is more likely to just shut us straight down if such things are happening. The most that standard, public cum shows would likely bring is MFC being forced to add an age verification button. Their reluctance to do so is the only reason public cum shows are technically against the non ban-able rules now, IMO.

Basically, I base my reporting on whether or not I think that shows existence is dangerous to the longevity of my work place.

 

[Bocefish]

All the bestiality talk made me curious as to where it's legal... kinda shocked to see it's legal in so many places including certain states in the USA. Not sure if bestiality is the same as zoophilia or if there's some distinction, but either way I don't agree with any of it being legal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoosexuali ... ional_laws