D
Deleted member 57885
Guest
Hi everyone,
My question I'm trying to ask: how much of camming y'all think is 'hard work' vs 'looking attractive'?
By hard work, I mean things like marketing, keeping the room entertaining, interacting with the room members/tippers, or even getting your typing up to 120+ WPM to deal with the onslaught of PMs , For purposes of the question, I'm also throwing in personality as 'hard work' with the presumption that it takes effort to show off one's personality. By looking attractive, I mean mostly the way someone naturally looks (i.e. aesthetic, maybe ideally curvy for the vast majority) but I imagine makeup/style also plays a role, so I didn't want to leave it purely as genetics or whatnot. Also, yes, I know looks are subjective, but I'm talking about looking attractive in terms of the majority, since there are popular trends/characteristics.
The reason why I ask is (not to sound disparaging or anything, but) I know hard work can be easily adjusted, but looking attractive is something that is arguably more limited. I've heard it said on the forum before that being naturally attractive gives a model a 'semi-free pass,' but I wanted to ask all of y'all how much of a 'free pass' (if any) y'all think looks really give.
As usual, I figure there is probably no truly right / wrong opinion on this. I'm just curious to hear everyone's insights on this!
Extra questions to give some food for thought:
- If someone isn't maybe naturally attractive but puts in lots of hard work, do you think they'll be able to be more successful than a very attractive person who does little in front of camera?
- Are there limitations to success simply based on how one looks? Or how one acts? (i.e. "You can never be a top model on a site if you don't have ________.")
Thanks for your responses!
My question I'm trying to ask: how much of camming y'all think is 'hard work' vs 'looking attractive'?
By hard work, I mean things like marketing, keeping the room entertaining, interacting with the room members/tippers, or even getting your typing up to 120+ WPM to deal with the onslaught of PMs , For purposes of the question, I'm also throwing in personality as 'hard work' with the presumption that it takes effort to show off one's personality. By looking attractive, I mean mostly the way someone naturally looks (i.e. aesthetic, maybe ideally curvy for the vast majority) but I imagine makeup/style also plays a role, so I didn't want to leave it purely as genetics or whatnot. Also, yes, I know looks are subjective, but I'm talking about looking attractive in terms of the majority, since there are popular trends/characteristics.
The reason why I ask is (not to sound disparaging or anything, but) I know hard work can be easily adjusted, but looking attractive is something that is arguably more limited. I've heard it said on the forum before that being naturally attractive gives a model a 'semi-free pass,' but I wanted to ask all of y'all how much of a 'free pass' (if any) y'all think looks really give.
As usual, I figure there is probably no truly right / wrong opinion on this. I'm just curious to hear everyone's insights on this!
Extra questions to give some food for thought:
- If someone isn't maybe naturally attractive but puts in lots of hard work, do you think they'll be able to be more successful than a very attractive person who does little in front of camera?
- Are there limitations to success simply based on how one looks? Or how one acts? (i.e. "You can never be a top model on a site if you don't have ________.")
Thanks for your responses!