PRISM said:If I'm a creep then what do you call the people that may be stalking you? :lol:
We call them PRISM's.
PRISM said:If I'm a creep then what do you call the people that may be stalking you? :lol:
PRISM said:If I'm a creep then what do you call the people that may be stalking you? :lol:
Stalkers...PRISM said:If I'm a creep then what do you call the people that may be stalking you? :lol:
JerryBoBerry said:PRISM said:If I'm a creep then what do you call the people that may be stalking you? :lol:
We call them PRISM's.
Fay_Galore said:This could have been such an interesting thread, I would have loved to dive into the difference in cultural backgrounds for this issue to be bigger in the states than for instance europe. can we go back?
I_Am_Iris said:Too late to edit. Noticed he was banned. Oh well. Maybe future Rogers will still benefit?
noahthesquid said:what about Jessie125? she was doing library shows almost every day last month..
noahthesquid said:what about Jessie125? she was doing library shows almost every day last month..
JimsX said:Too late to edit. The one model I thought this new (or newly enforced) rule would impact most is OrientNatsu who only ever did public shows. But the last few days even she has adapted and begun camming from home. A relief for me, as I absolutely hated public shows and she is a lovely lady :-D
I wonder if this would affect delivery shows as well? Will MFC crack down on the "no men on cam" rule?
That's going to make it really tough for her. She's pretty much relied on them exclusively. There's only so much conversation can be had through google translate.WickedTouch said:JimsX said:Too late to edit. The one model I thought this new (or newly enforced) rule would impact most is OrientNatsu who only ever did public shows. But the last few days even she has adapted and begun camming from home. A relief for me, as I absolutely hated public shows and she is a lovely lady :-D
I wonder if this would affect delivery shows as well? Will MFC crack down on the "no men on cam" rule?
What! No more outdoor shows for Natsu... :shock: :shock: :shock:
JerryBoBerry said:That's going to make it really tough for her. She's pretty much relied on them exclusively. There's only so much conversation can be had through google translate.
Nordling said:Why is succumbing to puritanical attitudes a good thing? Certainly outdoor shows isn't for everyone, and some care needs to be taken but to crack down on it entirely is a bad idea.
I'd say I agree, if the person is recognizable...but blurry crowd images or someone in the distant background, or with their back turned? Meh.SexyStephXS said:Nordling said:Why is succumbing to puritanical attitudes a good thing? Certainly outdoor shows isn't for everyone, and some care needs to be taken but to crack down on it entirely is a bad idea.
I definitely think MFCs new rules shouldn't extend to like "privacy of your own back yard" or "middle of nowhere" kind of situations but I definitely think that they should be cracking down on public shows in general. At the very least banning the moment a random person shows up in the background.
Nordling said:Why is succumbing to puritanical attitudes a good thing? Certainly outdoor shows isn't for everyone, and some care needs to be taken but to crack down on it entirely is a bad idea.
SomeRandomDude said:It's always the same, 'think of the children!', yada yada yada. If children didn't exist, I wonder what reason they'd find to enforce their prejudice?
SomeRandomDude said:There's a reason that library shows garnered 2-3 x the viewers of any other type of show on MFC; they offered something that you can't find anywhere else. To watch a girl finger herself live or on video at her home are pretty much the same, unless you like to socialize; whereas when she does it in public where she might get caught, the thrill is much greater if it's happening in real time. Pretty much the same reason why people prefer to watch sports live even if it's on TV -- to 'live in the moment' with the team and the players. I know my heart beat as fast or faster than that of most models when sudden footsteps started sounding out mid-climax. And the show where lilsecrett got caught was the best thing ever; I tip my hat to you if you read this lil, as I can no longer tip tokens.
With the moral brigade of the fun police having their brand of angry fix, there's one less great way to fill an empty afternoon, and the world's the poorer for it. It's always the same, 'think of the children!', yada yada yada. If children didn't exist, I wonder what reason they'd find to enforce their prejudice? Probably that bodily fluids will contaminate the place... Excuses are the one resource that we'll never run out of. Otoh I guess I shouldn't complain because it is the very prudes who do these crack-downs that make the stunts exciting in the first place. I just hope the heat dies down so the girls can get back to business (so to speak).
As for getting caught on video against your will, give me a break. Do you even know how many cameras there are out there in any major city center? Soon there will be bee-sized drones with cameras flying all over the place (if there aren't already), and none of them will stop mid-buzz to ask for your written consent before filming you in any and all activities. Let's face it people, privacy is a 20th-century concept. Wake up, smell the madness, inhale it, learn to enjoy it, amen.
:headbang:
I agree, but I would say that . The reason I first visited MFC and bought tokens was SparkleLulu (never see her online nowadays, has she changed her camming hours or something? I'm guessing given the nature of her shows in the past she's quite sternly disapproved of too) and in recent months my token purchases have almost entirely gone to Marisol. Nice though it is, it's not what she shows of her body on cam that I'm there for, it's what can be seen in her face - I could happily watch her fully dressed just knowing she's edging and trying to keep it together while sat at her seat in a cafe. Also she has always given the impression she is massively into what she's doing, which is a huge part of the appeal of her public shows for me. But that particular delight seems to have been taken away in the current backlash.Nordling said:Why is succumbing to puritanical attitudes a good thing? Certainly outdoor shows isn't for everyone, and some care needs to be taken but to crack down on it entirely is a bad idea.
penfold_43 said:I agree, but I would say that . The reason I first visited MFC and bought tokens was SparkleLulu (never see her online nowadays, has she changed her camming hours or something? I'm guessing given the nature of her shows in the past she's quite sternly disapproved of too) and in recent months my token purchases have almost entirely gone to Marisol. Nice though it is, it's not what she shows of her body on cam that I'm there for, it's what can be seen in her face - I could happily watch her fully dressed just knowing she's edging and trying to keep it together while sat at her seat in a cafe. Also she has always given the impression she is massively into what she's doing, which is a huge part of the appeal of her public shows for me. But that particular delight seems to have been taken away in the current backlash.Nordling said:Why is succumbing to puritanical attitudes a good thing? Certainly outdoor shows isn't for everyone, and some care needs to be taken but to crack down on it entirely is a bad idea.
If they're unrecognizable, their desire to not be a prop is moot. So is capping and uploading to porn sites. If no unwilling party is recognizable, no foul.HiGirlsRHot said:Nordling said:Why is succumbing to puritanical attitudes a good thing? Certainly outdoor shows isn't for everyone, and some care needs to be taken but to crack down on it entirely is a bad idea.
Will there is a big thread discussing the problems with public shows. But I'll just state the obvious ones public nudity and especially public masturbation is pretty much illegal everywhere. You don't get a choice of which laws you obey in a society. Second, it is often not possible for cam models to prevent somebody from being recognizable, considering that most public shows are automatically capped and uploaded, and the more popular shows widely distributed on tube sites, there is a significant risk that a bystander could appear in porn video. Finally even if the person is un recognizable, I (and I am sure most folks) don't want to appear as a prop on your commercial video especially without compensation or consent.
Just because a person is "unrecognizable" to you, that does not mean that someone who knows them personally couldn't identify them by some feature you're not focusing on. While a face might not be visible, there are clothing, build and, especially, body language to provide clues. Some of us are much more observant of and sensitive to things like that than others. Unless they've been pixilated or blurred out head to toe, it's impossible to be certain that someone couldn't spot them as someone whose name they know.Nordling said:If they're unrecognizable, their desire to not be a prop is moot. So is capping and uploading to porn sites. If no unwilling party is recognizable, no foul.HiGirlsRHot said:Nordling said:Why is succumbing to puritanical attitudes a good thing? Certainly outdoor shows isn't for everyone, and some care needs to be taken but to crack down on it entirely is a bad idea.
Will there is a big thread discussing the problems with public shows. But I'll just state the obvious ones public nudity and especially public masturbation is pretty much illegal everywhere. You don't get a choice of which laws you obey in a society. Second, it is often not possible for cam models to prevent somebody from being recognizable, considering that most public shows are automatically capped and uploaded, and the more popular shows widely distributed on tube sites, there is a significant risk that a bystander could appear in porn video. Finally even if the person is un recognizable, I (and I am sure most folks) don't want to appear as a prop on your commercial video especially without compensation or consent.