- Oct 31, 2010
- 3,179
- 5,959
- 213
- Twitter Username
- @Poker_Babe69
- Tumblr Username
- Pokerbabe69
- MFC Username
- A_Poker_Babe
- Streamate Username
- PokerCutie
- Chaturbate Username
- Poker_Babe
So I'm a huge "true crime" buff, and I watch a lot of Investigation Discovery and read a lot of true crime books. Right now I'm almost finished with Jose Baez's book "Presumed Guilty, Casey Anthony: The Inside Story". Anyways, in the book it talks about how the forensic software said that C.A. made a search for chloroform 85 times, only later to turn out that the software was faulty, and that there was only one search for that word. But I started thinking... so what? I know that if I was accused of crime, and police got a warrant to investigate my search history on google, I'm positive that they could pull something up to bolster their case against me (especially with me being the true crime nut that I am). So it got me thinking, should we really be looking to people's search history as evidence of a crime? God forbid I should ever get falsely accused of a sex crime... My porn search history alone would make me look like a sexual deviant.
So I went through my search history for just the past few days and sure enough, I found some searches that I made that could totally look suspicious if I were being charged with a serious crime.
Just curious if anyone would like to share some of their searches or have any opinions on the subject?
If you were on a jury and these searches where shown to you as evidence, how much weight do you think it would hold?
So I went through my search history for just the past few days and sure enough, I found some searches that I made that could totally look suspicious if I were being charged with a serious crime.
Just curious if anyone would like to share some of their searches or have any opinions on the subject?
If you were on a jury and these searches where shown to you as evidence, how much weight do you think it would hold?