See my point? Refer to post #10 in this thread where I talk about the movie, and her closing statement. That is the broader picture I'm after.
Having watched that "documentary" and followed the hype of it while it was being made, and also having done my research into the people she interviewed in that movie, I don't think that it is in any way, shape or form a good representation of men's rights. In the movie they come across as just nice guys wanting to address certain issues, which is perfectly reasonable, yet if you look into it you'll see a whole load of horrific things they say about women. And when I say horrific, I mean horrific. Also certain incidences of supporting abusive men to abduct children during custody cases and generally a bunch of stuff that has no place in a men's rights conversation. I have wondered before if the whole hype about a woman making that documentary and her being "boycotted" by feminists was a publicity stunt. I think be careful about what you believe from that documentary, it is not an accurate or non biased account of the issues that are faced by men. This is unfortunately why people are often very quick to jump on white males as hate groups, because unfortunately, a bunch of the loudest anti-women hate groups pose themselves as MRA's, when really they don't actually seem that interested in solving a lot of the very genuine issues which men face.
I also did not say it's not healthy to talk about the impact on many straight, white men's feelings in today's culture where feminist, lgbtq and anti-racist issues are being vocalised so strongly and it is often coming out that straight, white men are the benefactors or even the instigators of such issues. I said that I do not think the wording you used was a healthy way to discuss the topic, which is rather than addressing the issue, jumping straight onto a "everyone hates white men". The reason I feel that's unhealthy is because it encourages an "us and them" attitude and it makes men the victims of other groups trying to discuss the issues they've faced. It's important now more than ever not only for liberal rights groups to ensure they do not place blame on all men and recognise that many of these issues are shared at least to some extent by males, sometimes with men having their own separate issues, but also for straight, white men to try and resist taking these things personally. I understand that for a male who has never sexually harassed a female, who has never felt in any way advantaged by society and has only respected and supported female friends and coworkers, that being talked to like you're automatically a sexist sex offender is extremely insulting. Especially if you have not directly seen some of the common sexual harassment and sexism which women face at the hands of the minority of dudes who take part in that behaviour, it must feel pretty targeting and uncalled for. No one likes being blamed for something they haven't done.
if it's a small local event that's attempting to be organized that isn't about hate/negative views in any way shape or form, word gets spread or it's shot down immediately.
This is unfortunately very true. It actually happened for a international men's day event at a UK uni. I don't know exactly what happened, but I think basically it was mentioned that more females were hired at the university which could make men feel disadvantaged. People then kicked off and pointed out that the majority of people in high positions at the university were men and the females were in lower paid, secretarial jobs. Anyway they took back the plans for the day. Personally I think it was ridiculous that they shut this down and that in the end it actually creates more of a division between men and women. I can understand the point if you remove individuality and look at gender as a collective, it'd be like one person playing a game and complaining that their opponent held more chips than them, even though their chips were of higher value and actually made up more as a result. But people aren't a collective, we're individuals. Just because some men are doing very well does not mean that we should ignore the problems of other men. I think it also focused on one particular point made by someone within the university and completely ignored all the other topics which should be talked about.
Personally I would like more open discussions about the statistically realities of the dangers which men might face in their lives. There are a lot of myths in terms of the disadvantages men face which many MRA's seem to focus on which a small amount of reading shows to not be true, while more dangerous realities keep getting overlooked. If no one is allowed to discuss these topics then how is anyone going to gather the correct information and know how to put the right support processes in place? And surely if more men and women recognise their issues are shared, it'd create more empathy and acceptance between sexes and maybe even reduce say domestic violence or rape for both genders.
I do think it's worrying how some liberal groups are going, and I have seen some young people more recently being particularly cliquey in lgbtq groups to the point that even many gay/bisexuals no longer feel welcome or connected to those networks. I have seen these groups being particularly distant, isolating and even rude to straight, white males. This is an issue with people getting carried away, though I will also say, I prefer the attitudes of straight white males of that generation to my own. There is a small generation gap from when I was a teenager growing up to when the 3rd wave feminist movement really kicked off, and while I can see the negatives of the over reaction which is happening right now, I also see far more positives in the way that young men and women are communicating. So I don't know, maybe in the end it will be beneficial to everyone once the adaptation period is over and people find level ground.