AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

Gun Raffle Insensitive?

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I explain to the security team that I can turn their pens, badges, belts, paper, etc into a weapon and they give me a stupid look until I explain an item is just that, an item or tool. They become a "weapon" because of intent.
What's the end game on this conversation? They confiscate hair gel and toothpaste these days.

Perhaps you're forgetting about the guy in China who attacked and killed twenty people during the Beijing Olympics? Gun? Nope, did it with a knife. Ever see the wound a 2" blade from a Swiss Army knife can produce?
Not being snarky. Actually curious. I see the knife/gun comparison often, and find it hard to follow. There is a difference. If someone comes at my family with a knife, I can fight back or sacrifice myself while they get away. I could jump in between a knife and my loved ones and make a difference. It takes a lot more effort for someone to kill multiple people with a knife. Still, some knives are illegal in some states. Even brass knuckles are illegal in some states. Meanwhile, if someone entered my house with an automatic weapon, even being responsibly armed (locked gun case, unloaded gun) is probably not going to save anyone.
 
What's the end game on this conversation? They confiscate hair gel and toothpaste these days.

My conversations are not specific with TSA. I work closely with many LEO and "security" type jobs. The conversations about "weapons" come up frequently. Especially from those who have little knowledge, or are misinformed.

The "end game" as you so put it is what I have always stated: An ordinary everyday item can become a weapon. That is what most fail to realize. Again, a weapon is nothing more than an inanimate object someone uses with the intent to harm someone.


Not being snarky. Actually curious. I see the knife/gun comparison often, and find it hard to follow. There is a difference. If someone comes at my family with a knife, I can fight back or sacrifice myself while they get away. I could jump in between a knife and my loved ones and make a difference. It takes a lot more effort for someone to kill multiple people with a knife. Still, some knives are illegal in some states. Even brass knuckles are illegal in some states. Meanwhile, if someone entered my house with an automatic weapon, even being responsibly armed (locked gun case, unloaded gun) is probably not going to save anyone.

Let me break your comments up a little:

1) Knife, or other item which can stab/slash/pierce/bludgeon/crush/etc. Sure, someone could try and fight back. But, what usually winds up happening is one of two things: They panic and freeze in fear. Or, more than likely they attempt to flee. What happens if you're in a room where there's no window, or other means of escaping?

2) If someone enters your home with an "automatic weapon". I'm going to go out on a limb and guess you really have no clue about the differences in firearm types. Nor, about what "responsibly armed" means. Very, very few people own "automatic" firearms. They are heavily regulated by the Federal Gov't, and it requires multiple levels of background checks, as well as many expensive permits, etc to legally own one. The chances of a "bad person" having one illegally is extremely unlikely. But, not unheard of.
Now, about your definition of "being responsibly armed". What you describe, is but one form of it. Which, is very poor when it comes to self/home defense. If that is what you want to do for yourself in securely storing firearms, then I support you in doing so. However, it is not how I and many others legally do sp. I keep a loaded pistol near me most times, even including while in the house. Though, do not carry in places which are illegal such as Federal Buildings, Post Office, courts, etc.. I'm legally allowed to do so, and I have had a significant amount of training and continue to practice for proficiency.
Doing so is not because I am in fear of something. Rather, it is my right and is more of a "what if" situation. In your home invasion scenario, this allows me to have a good chance of stopping/slowing down anyone who breaks into my home while I am there. To me, this is equivalent to the fire extinguisher I have in my house. It allows me to take action and most likely prevent a situation from quickly escalating into something significantly worse before police/fire/medics arrive on scene minutes later.

This discussion can go back and forth almost indefinitely, and we will most likely not change either person's view. If you read my previous posts, with an open mind, you will hopefully have a more clear understanding of what I was saying. If you take away firearms from legally responsible citizens, you only hurt them and remove the means they may have of defending themselves. Laws only affect those who follow them. Criminals don't care about laws and will pick easy targets. Doesn't matter if it is with a firearm, knife, baseball bat, or a vehicle. They go after easy targets and attempt to inflict maximum damage to the most amount of people. Thus why you see shootings typically occurring in places where firearms are not allowed and will take a while for first responders to arrive on the scene.[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Haha I'm sorry but these sound like the dorkiest conversations ever.
 
The "end game" as you so put it is what I have always stated: An ordinary everyday item can become a weapon. That is what most fail to realize. Again, a weapon is nothing more than an inanimate object someone uses with the intent to harm someone.
A pathetic line to take if you ask me. There is no comparison between having a gun pointed at you, and seeing someone standing nearby with a buttplug, or hair gel, or whatever else has come up in this done-to-death conversation.

Now a knife would have a similar psychological impact, depending on who was holding it; but at least knives have other legitimate uses. The purpose of the gun is to kill, or at the very least intimidate someone with its lethal capacity. Stop pretending.
 
There is no comparison between having a gun pointed at you, and seeing someone standing nearby with a buttplug
:hilarious: If only! All of us models could team up and form the most well-armed gang of bank robbers in history! "Give me X tokens and I'll insert a buttplug" => "Gimme all the nickles (and dollars) and I'll put this buttplug safely back in it's holster. Real money, no Paypal bullshit bb!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: SaffronBurke
:hilarious: If only! All of us models could team up and form the most well-armed gang of bank robbers in history! "Give me X tokens and I'll insert a buttplug" => "Gimme all the nickles (and dollars) and I'll put this buttplug safely back in it's holster. Real money, no Paypal bullshit bb!"


Hey, ssshhhh. Keep that on the down low will ya!?! That's my retirement plan in a nutshell right there.
 
A pathetic line to take if you ask me. There is no comparison between having a gun pointed at you, and seeing someone standing nearby with a buttplug, or hair gel, or whatever else has come up in this done-to-death conversation.

Now a knife would have a similar psychological impact, depending on who was holding it; but at least knives have other legitimate uses. The purpose of the gun is to kill, or at the very least intimidate someone with its lethal capacity. Stop pretending.

You're right, there is a significant difference between a firearm and a non-projectile "weapon". Never stated otherwise. The only point I was making with the latter is that one can use nearly any regular object as a weapon. "Intent" was the key message.

As to how you described guns, where the "purpose of the gun is to kill". What about those which are designed and manufactured specifically for target shooting such as those used in the Olympics? Is that a weapon? Sure, it could be. But, the manufactured design and intent is strictly target shooting. That same "intent" of target or sport shooting goes for most firearms owned by private individuals. While most are designed for hunting, very few are actually used as such. It's to go to the range, shooting paper targets, clay pigeons, etc. Most people who do this, use it as a social event to hang out with friends or to do leagues such as others might do with bowling leagues.

Now, I won't deny that some are purchased with the primary intent of home or self-defense. But, again, the key word is "intent". Now, if they are a responsible person, they would be at the range frequently enough to maintain proficiency and keep their skills up.

Again, I bring up "intent". Is a firearm designed/manufactured strictly for target shooting a "weapon"? Sure, it could be if a person intended for it to be used as such. Just like your comment about knives having "other legitimate uses". So do firearms.

Anyway, as I said before, no one will change another's perspectives here. Therefore, I see no reason to continue on with this thread.
 
  • Helpful!
Reactions: DFT
Doesn't matter if it is with a firearm, knife, baseball bat, or a vehicle. They go after easy targets and attempt to inflict maximum damage to the most amount of people. Thus why you see shootings typically occurring in places where firearms are not allowed and will take a while for first responders to arrive on the scene.
If someone is going to come at you with just one of these, do you not have a preference? Are they all equal in your estimation?

If someone enters your home with an "automatic weapon". I'm going to go out on a limb and guess you really have no clue about the differences in firearm types. Nor, about what "responsibly armed" means.
Not sure why you've made this large assumption. Going to guess you wouldn't have said it to any of the dudes on the forum. It's on par with thinking other humans don't understand that any object can be a weapon, though. My house is full of toddlers. I assure you that humans instinctively understand that anything can be a weapon. :giggle: I grew up in a house full of guns and drugs. My hometown is full of hunters and criminals. The first time I remember shooting a gun, I was a kid. I was never very good at it or anything. Nor did I think it was that fun minus getting to hang out with my Dad. I've seen plenty of guns, in use and not and legal and not. Like most people, I recognize that responsible gun storage means different things depending on who lives in or has access to your home. If you have children in your home, the only way to responsibly store a weapon is locked and unloaded. Standing by that. To do anything else means more risk than benefit.
 
Not sure why you've made this large assumption. Going to guess you wouldn't have said it to any of the dudes on the forum.

Incorrect assumption on your behalf.

Anyway, have a nice rest of your day.
 
As to how you described guns, where the "purpose of the gun is to kill". What about those which are designed and manufactured specifically for target shooting such as those used in the Olympics? Is that a weapon? Sure, it could be. But, the manufactured design and intent is strictly target shooting. That same "intent" of target or sport shooting goes for most firearms owned by private individuals. While most are designed for hunting, very few are actually used as such. It's to go to the range, shooting paper targets, clay pigeons, etc. Most people who do this, use it as a social event to hang out with friends or to do leagues such as others might do with bowling leagues.

Now, I won't deny that some are purchased with the primary intent of home or self-defense. But, again, the key word is "intent". Now, if they are a responsible person, they would be at the range frequently enough to maintain proficiency and keep their skills up.

Again, I bring up "intent". Is a firearm designed/manufactured strictly for target shooting a "weapon"? Sure, it could be if a person intended for it to be used as such. Just like your comment about knives having "other legitimate uses". So do firearms.
972725.jpg

This is what I usually shot at. Looks suspiciously human in shape, no?

I have done skeet shooting, target shooting with aerosol cans/milk jugs/2 liter bottles, shot mistletoe out of trees, etc...I understand where you are coming from on that. That does not change the fact that they were invented to kill other animals. That is their purpose. They represent lethal force. It just sounds absurd to hear someone try and downplay this fact.

Going to guess you wouldn't have said it to any of the dudes on the forum.
So it isn't enough to have to suffer through someone explaining how the butt of a revolver can double as a hammer, which one can use to hang pictures with; now you are going to start demonstrating how your vagina can be used as a crutch...

k_imUy.gif
 
So it isn't enough to have to suffer through someone explaining how the butt of a revolver can double as a hammer, which one can use to hang pictures with; now you are going to start demonstrating how your vagina can be used as a crutch...
It would only be a crutch if I said I don't know how to recognize, use or store a gun and then blamed boobs and menstruation. I do know how to do all of those things. They're about as difficult as discerning between weaponry and toiletries. Can hang pictures too. I imagine Forceten could give us a 10 page instruction pamphlet on that if we asked. I'm a breeder. My vag is way too busy to be a crutch for anything. :emo::whew:
 
It would only be a crutch if I said I don't know how to recognize, use or store a gun and then blamed boobs and menstruation. I do know how to do all of those things. They're about as difficult as discerning between weaponry and toiletries. Can hang pictures too. I imagine Forceten could give us a 10 page instruction pamphlet on that if we asked. I'm a breeder. My vag is way too busy to be a crutch for anything. :emo::whew:
Horse-shit, missy. You were accusing him of mansplaining.

It was pretty clear he was addressing your use of the term 'automatic weapon' as an indicator of your lack of knowledge, and not that glorious center of the known universe, a.k.a your pussy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DFT
Was the raffle insensitive?

Maybe, if you're afraid of guns.

Get over it and educate yourself.
I don't think very many people really care about this raffle in the larger scheme of things, much less think it is insensitive. The news channel you quoted in your original post also ran this...https://wgntv.com/2017/10/13/group-protests-suburban-fundraiser-that-featured-gun-raffle/ about the protest that took place at the raffle.



gun protest.JPG

Lee Goodman delivered a shrill condemnation, declaring that responsible people raffle off sweaters, pies, or a "night out on the town", NOT guns. He's been running around for several years now ruckus-ing his way into the news over all matters gun related. Pimping 58 corpses for the sake of his cause is a small price to pay for this true believer. Now guns may be the emotional equivalent of a teddy bear to some, but they are the munsters 'neath his bed...



gun protest2.JPG

Patt here has signaled her support for the Resist movement, Women's March, Rainbow equality, Dreamers, yada yada yada...doesn't seem to care for Trump very much. Apparently she wrote the signs with the names of the LV victims for whom she is now presuming to speak. Claims she was also going to write an individual memorial message on the back of each one, but it caused her to suffer a minor emotional collapse; I call bullshit on that. More likely her hand just got tired.


And how did WGN9 describe this protest? "A Friday night fundraiser got heated in Lake County as protesters gathered outside the event that featured a raffle for guns."

gun protest3.JPG

Heated. Yeah, boy...
 
  • Like
Reactions: DFT and dilligaf0
I was listening to WGN radio when I heard about this auction... The last person on the WGN TV vid said: "I FEEL this auction could have gone off just fine without auctioning off a LETHAL WEAPON that really serves no purpose other than mass destruction."

Ignorant people like her are the ones that would probably change their minds if they ever fired one and learned how useful they can be for certain home defense situations, hunters, farmers, sports shooters... yet the EVIL BLACK GUN's reputation continues to be fueled by ignorant politicians and the liberal media every chance they get. My favorite is how the media always says "high powered assault rifle."

I've argued the point ad nauseam.

ETA: IMHO, today's liberal media has been brainwashed to "create drama" instead of being true journalists on FACT finding missions.
 
Last edited:
Why ask questions if you're always annoyed when people answer with their opinion? It's always the same, magic hasn't turned everyone into a carbon copy of your views yet.

"Insensitivity" is such an opinion based thing, add on the WELL KNOWN divided opinions on guns and I really wonder if you just ask because you want to call people ignorant and get mad that day?
Why even bother starting these discussions when you do not actually have any interest in others thoughts or views?
 
Why ask questions if you're always annoyed when people answer with their opinion? It's always the same, magic hasn't turned everyone into a carbon copy of your views yet.

"Insensitivity" is such an opinion based thing, add on the WELL KNOWN divided opinions on guns and I really wonder if you just ask because you want to call people ignorant and get mad that day?
Why even bother starting these discussions when you do not actually have any interest in others thoughts or views?

Good points... why bother pointing out that people should educate themselves before spouting ignorant opinions as facts?.

OMG, I'm never swimming in the ocean again because there are sharks in there.

Irrational fears are fine, provided they don't step on other's rights.
 
Good points... why bother pointing out that people should educate themselves before spouting ignorant opinions as facts?.

OMG, I'm never swimming in the ocean again because there are sharks in there.

Irrational fears are fine, provided they don't step on other's rights.
ok
 
Good points... why bother pointing out that people should educate themselves before spouting ignorant opinions as facts?.

OMG, I'm never swimming in the ocean again because there are sharks in there.

Irrational fears are fine, provided they don't step on other's rights.

Oh hey, facts! Here's some fun facts!

FUN FACT: The average shark-related fatality rate per year in the US is 1.

FUN FACT: The annual rate of death due to gun-related injury is about 35,000, and 1/3 are homicide. 2/3 of all homicides in the US are gun-related. An additional 75,000 nonfatal gun-related injuries also happen.

I mean, if there were 100,000 shark-related injuries and deaths in the coastal US annually, I'd probably give a beach trip a second thought, and ask why nothing is being done about this out of control man-eating shark problem. I don't think noting how fucked up it is that just everyday life in the US chalks up casualty rates that lap active war zones every year is really all that irrational. However, I do think it's pretty irrational to ignore or dismiss real, actual facts of the matter because they don't align with one's agenda.

And I state all this as a big fan of the 2nd Amendment. Oddly, I don't have a hard time reconciling a defense of my right to bear arms with the knowledge that maybe things are a bit broken here in my beloved country when it comes to the arms we bear. That's how rights work. They need to be upheld through constant vigilance, and an important part of that vigilance is fixing shit when it breaks.

This "nothing's wrong" rhetoric that is repeatedly vomited up by pro-gun interests as if it was some sort of end-game gambit in the debate is simply, factually false, and it is patently absurd. As with any strategy that denies facts, it treats Americans like they are lazy and foolish. While I am a big fan of the 2nd Amendment, I'm not a big fan of being treated like a mark. So, even though I dig guns, why the fuck would I side with lying assholes, just because they say they dig guns too? If they're lying about how bad this problem is, even in the face of undeniable evidence, what the fuck else are they willing to lie about? And why are they so willing to lie in the first place?

And I do acknowledge that there are lying assholes on both sides of this issue. I also acknowledge that it's the lying assholes on both sides that are leading the debates. I think it's high time that responsible gun owners tell these lying assholes to sit the fuck down, and shut the fuck up, so we can start to have real conversations about how to maintain our rights while still drastically reducing the unconscionable number of firearm-related injuries and deaths that happen in the US every year.
 
Oh hey, facts! Here's some fun facts!

FUN FACT: The average shark-related fatality rate per year in the US is 1.

FUN FACT: The annual rate of death due to gun-related injury is about 35,000, and 1/3 are homicide. 2/3 of all homicides in the US are gun-related. An additional 75,000 nonfatal gun-related injuries also happen.

I mean, if there were 100,000 shark-related injuries and deaths in the coastal US annually, I'd probably give a beach trip a second thought, and ask why nothing is being done about this out of control man-eating shark problem. I don't think noting how fucked up it is that just everyday life in the US chalks up casualty rates that lap active war zones every year is really all that irrational. However, I do think it's pretty irrational to ignore or dismiss real, actual facts of the matter because they don't align with one's agenda.

And I state all this as a big fan of the 2nd Amendment. Oddly, I don't have a hard time reconciling a defense of my right to bear arms with the knowledge that maybe things are a bit broken here in my beloved country when it comes to the arms we bear. That's how rights work. They need to be upheld through constant vigilance, and an important part of that vigilance is fixing shit when it breaks.

This "nothing's wrong" rhetoric that is repeatedly vomited up by pro-gun interests as if it was some sort of end-game gambit in the debate is simply, factually false, and it is patently absurd. As with any strategy that denies facts, it treats Americans like they are lazy and foolish. While I am a big fan of the 2nd Amendment, I'm not a big fan of being treated like a mark. So, even though I dig guns, why the fuck would I side with lying assholes, just because they say they dig guns too? If they're lying about how bad this problem is, even in the face of undeniable evidence, what the fuck else are they willing to lie about? And why are they so willing to lie in the first place?

And I do acknowledge that there are lying assholes on both sides of this issue. I also acknowledge that it's the lying assholes on both sides that are leading the debates. I think it's high time that responsible gun owners tell these lying assholes to sit the fuck down, and shut the fuck up, so we can start to have real conversations about how to maintain our rights while still drastically reducing the unconscionable number of firearm-related injuries and deaths that happen in the US every year.
You win the Internet.
 
I think it's high time that responsible gun owners tell these lying assholes to sit the fuck down, and shut the fuck up, so we can start to have real conversations about how to maintain our rights while still drastically reducing the unconscionable number of firearm-related injuries and deaths that happen in the US every year.


Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel 312-744-3300
 
  • Helpful!
Reactions: JickyJuly
I don't think noting how fucked up it is that just everyday life in the US chalks up casualty rates that lap active war zones every year is really all that irrational. However, I do think it's pretty irrational to ignore or dismiss real, actual facts of the matter because they don't align with one's agenda.

And I state all this as a big fan of the 2nd Amendment. Oddly, I don't have a hard time reconciling a defense of my right to bear arms with the knowledge that maybe things are a bit broken here in my beloved country when it comes to the arms we bear. That's how rights work. They need to be upheld through constant vigilance, and an important part of that vigilance is fixing shit when it breaks.

This "nothing's wrong" rhetoric that is repeatedly vomited up by pro-gun interests as if it was some sort of end-game gambit in the debate is simply, factually false, and it is patently absurd. As with any strategy that denies facts, it treats Americans like they are lazy and foolish. While I am a big fan of the 2nd Amendment, I'm not a big fan of being treated like a mark. So, even though I dig guns, why the fuck would I side with lying assholes, just because they say they dig guns too? If they're lying about how bad this problem is, even in the face of undeniable evidence, what the fuck else are they willing to lie about? And why are they so willing to lie in the first place?

And I do acknowledge that there are lying assholes on both sides of this issue. I also acknowledge that it's the lying assholes on both sides that are leading the debates. I think it's high time that responsible gun owners tell these lying assholes to sit the fuck down, and shut the fuck up, so we can start to have real conversations about how to maintain our rights while still drastically reducing the unconscionable number of firearm-related injuries and deaths that happen in the US every year.

Someone once told me long ago that "bitching about something without providing suggestions for possible solutions only causes the issue to linger. Real progress comes when level-headed people work towards a solution." Therefore...

Very real, and serious question to you and others:

What do you propose as "rational and realistic fixes" then to the "gun problem in America" which most people, including strong 2A supporters, would agree to?

Again, this is a very real and serious question. I use quotes around specific words because they mean very different things to different people.

For those who decide to answer, please use rational and well thought out answers. No snide comments or off-the-cuff emotional responses as those are usually what will derail conversations quickly and do not add value to the discussion.
 
Oh hey, facts! Here's some fun facts!

FUN FACT: The average shark-related fatality rate per year in the US is 1.

FUN FACT: The annual rate of death due to gun-related injury is about 35,000, and 1/3 are homicide. 2/3 of all homicides in the US are gun-related. An additional 75,000 nonfatal gun-related injuries also happen.

I mean, if there were 100,000 shark-related injuries and deaths in the coastal US annually, I'd probably give a beach trip a second thought, and ask why nothing is being done about this out of control man-eating shark problem. I don't think noting how fucked up it is that just everyday life in the US chalks up casualty rates that lap active war zones every year is really all that irrational. However, I do think it's pretty irrational to ignore or dismiss real, actual facts of the matter because they don't align with one's agenda.

And I state all this as a big fan of the 2nd Amendment. Oddly, I don't have a hard time reconciling a defense of my right to bear arms with the knowledge that maybe things are a bit broken here in my beloved country when it comes to the arms we bear. That's how rights work. They need to be upheld through constant vigilance, and an important part of that vigilance is fixing shit when it breaks.

This "nothing's wrong" rhetoric that is repeatedly vomited up by pro-gun interests as if it was some sort of end-game gambit in the debate is simply, factually false, and it is patently absurd. As with any strategy that denies facts, it treats Americans like they are lazy and foolish. While I am a big fan of the 2nd Amendment, I'm not a big fan of being treated like a mark. So, even though I dig guns, why the fuck would I side with lying assholes, just because they say they dig guns too? If they're lying about how bad this problem is, even in the face of undeniable evidence, what the fuck else are they willing to lie about? And why are they so willing to lie in the first place?

And I do acknowledge that there are lying assholes on both sides of this issue. I also acknowledge that it's the lying assholes on both sides that are leading the debates. I think it's high time that responsible gun owners tell these lying assholes to sit the fuck down, and shut the fuck up, so we can start to have real conversations about how to maintain our rights while still drastically reducing the unconscionable number of firearm-related injuries and deaths that happen in the US every year.
In before somebody contests your wikipedia numbers...this page lists significantly lower numbers. Which numbers are more accurate, I have no idea.
http://www.gunviolencearchive.org/past-tolls

It does not change the overall message in your post one bit though, and it is one I vehemently agree with. Your post ought to be the landing page for the NRA website in my opinion.

Someone once told me long ago that "bitching about something without providing suggestions for possible solutions only causes the issue to linger. Real progress comes when level-headed people work towards a solution." Therefore...

Very real, and serious question to you and others:

What do you propose as "rational and realistic fixes" then to the "gun problem in America" which most people, including strong 2A supporters, would agree to?

Again, this is a very real and serious question. I use quotes around specific words because they mean very different things to different people.

For those who decide to answer, please use rational and well thought out answers. No snide comments or off-the-cuff emotional responses as those are usually what will derail conversations quickly and do not add value to the discussion.
More of a PR issue here than anything. I do not suggest that this would dramatically affect the statistics (at least past statistics; the future, as always, is an open book).

You were quick to point out @JickyJuly use of the word "automatic" earlier in the thread as a sign of ignorance. You said very very few people owned them, and they were heavily regulated. Technically true, but in practical terms false.

I remember how bad the 1984 McDonald's mass shooting fucked with me (not as someone who is afraid of guns). The idea that we might need to now become accustomed to the occasional video of someone spraying a crowd with what is, for all intents and purposes, automatic gunfire strikes me as the height of lunacy.

Of course it is pretty clear something is going to be done about bump stocks at this point. I don't think it ought to be a ban on the sale or the manufacture of these things, but the possession. Bump stocks, trigger cranks, anything bought or homemade...tough shit for all the people that been paying jacked up prices trying to grab em up over the last month. Illegally modified automatic.

How did we go from this in 2006 to having bump stocks legally sold? I have shot with one, I understand it is mostly an entertaining way to waste perfectly good ammo. But like I said; a PR thing. Is this ok, or not? http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/06/parsippany_man_is_sentenced_to.html

**********************

I think the gun problem is going to get significantly worse if we don't do something about our culture problem.

https://williamsgeorgia.com/bump-stock-giveaway/
I do not see this as insensitive. I see this as deliberately antagonistic. I mean come on, even the NRA has said they need to go under regulations.

And about the NRA; I went from seeing them as a trusted organization back during LaPierre's "jack-booted thugs" era, to one that has completely repulsed me since at least 2012. Divisive.
LaPierre 2008: "Obama is going to seize the guns!"
LaPierre 2012: "It's was a trick! He's planning to seize the guns during his second term!"
LaPierre 2017: Obama's ATF didn't do their job (?)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.