AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!
Funny penis thread
- Thread starter bawksy
- Start date
-
** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
- Status
Nordling
V.I.P. AmberLander
Just a guess, but since Australia played a large role in the North African campaign during WWII and it's been reported that Australia sent urologists there to circumcise ALL their troops because of a problem with SAND. From that one can extrapolate that the returning [circumcised] soldiers caused it to become a trend among the rest of the populace. Of course one might ask why that same tendency wasn't apparent among UK troops, who also were in North Africa.Jupiter551 said:
Nordling
V.I.P. AmberLander
A little more on Australia--the practice appears to be waning since the mid 90s:
http://www.historyofcircumcision.ne...ent&task=category§ionid=6&id=71&Itemid=50
http://www.historyofcircumcision.ne...ent&task=category§ionid=6&id=71&Itemid=50
LadyLuna
Inactive Cam Model
- Mar 8, 2010
- 6,710
- 9,440
- 293
- Twitter Username
- @EveMatteo
- MFC Username
- LadyLuna
- Streamate Username
- Lady_Luna
- Clips4Sale URL
- http://clips4sale.com/store/42697/LadyLuna
Every day I come here looking for interesting cocks and surprise! Circumcision thread... despite the one already in the other random discussion area.
x.x
So, I'll hop on the bandwagon with- I posted most of my experiences with the only two cocks I've had in the other thread, but one thing I didn't mention was hand jobs. The cut dick, if I give it a handjob without lube, ends up very red and irritated by the end of it. In fact, it starts to feel like I gave it friction burn. After all, it's my hand rubbing it over and over. The intact one, instead of my hand sliding up and down the shaft, my hand was causing the foreskin to slide up and down the shaft. No friction burn.
x.x
So, I'll hop on the bandwagon with- I posted most of my experiences with the only two cocks I've had in the other thread, but one thing I didn't mention was hand jobs. The cut dick, if I give it a handjob without lube, ends up very red and irritated by the end of it. In fact, it starts to feel like I gave it friction burn. After all, it's my hand rubbing it over and over. The intact one, instead of my hand sliding up and down the shaft, my hand was causing the foreskin to slide up and down the shaft. No friction burn.
I recently tried one of the clone-a-willy things.
Ill post a pic of the result if I can be arsed.
Ill post a pic of the result if I can be arsed.
Keeping in line with the thread topic, this made me laugh... :lol:
I might ask Amber to merge this because agreed, we don't need two circumcision threads. Fuck, we probly don't even need one.
Just_mark__ said:
Don't suppose you'd mind detailing your experience with it to me? Perhaps in PM if not in the open? I am about to buy one, && I've heard so many things, but I wanna make sure we don't fuck it up too badly.
.- May 17, 2011
- 5,879
- 25,504
- 293
- Twitter Username
- @JessiDeer
- MFC Username
- JessiDeer
- ManyVids URL
- https://www.manyvids.com/Profile/43191/JessiDeer/
The first time I was with a circumcised guy, I was like "But...how to a jerk you off?!" foreskin=built in masturbation sleeve. :mrgreen:
LadyLuna
Inactive Cam Model
- Mar 8, 2010
- 6,710
- 9,440
- 293
- Twitter Username
- @EveMatteo
- MFC Username
- LadyLuna
- Streamate Username
- Lady_Luna
- Clips4Sale URL
- http://clips4sale.com/store/42697/LadyLuna
I'm so glad I'm not the only one, Jessi
My ex boyfriend is circumcised, we were in a relationship for a year and have been friends with benefits for almost a year, and I do not know how he masturbates. :shock: I have no idea how to give him a hand-job, so I've never even tried it.
I know he doesn't use any lube. I'm too embarrassed to ask him, which is definitely stupid.
My ex boyfriend is circumcised, we were in a relationship for a year and have been friends with benefits for almost a year, and I do not know how he masturbates. :shock: I have no idea how to give him a hand-job, so I've never even tried it.
I know he doesn't use any lube. I'm too embarrassed to ask him, which is definitely stupid.
Well obviously it's different when you're touching yourself...girls giving handjobs grip too hard and allow too much friction. I don't ever use lube but for a great handjob imo a girl needs to use lube or oil.LilyMarie said:I'm so glad I'm not the only one, Jessi
My ex boyfriend is circumcised, we were in a relationship for a year and have been friends with benefits for almost a year, and I do not know how he masturbates. :shock: I have no idea how to give him a hand-job, so I've never even tried it.
I know he doesn't use any lube. I'm too embarrassed to ask him, which is definitely stupid.
And number 1 rule: no need to grip it as if you're planning to yank it off! Gently
I'm sure there are plenty of circumcised guys who would happily (and I do mean happily) demonstrate, if only you would just open cam bb
Seriously though, it's not like masturbating without extra foreskin is some tragedy. Even hard, the skin around the shaft is still loose enough to stroke with a pretty tight grip (vise-style, as hornygods described it), adjusting the position and style of grip for different sensations. Or, with a lighter touch, you can "brush" up and down, more focusing on the head and where it meets the shaft (I guess sleeve-style, though I've never thought of it that way). All that without lube (or at least any artificial kind).
Does it get sore or irritated? If you don't handle it right or just keep going too long, sure, but years of practice should make that pretty unlikely.
Of course, add lube (or toys) and it's a whole different story, but what kid has access to lube (official or improvised) on a regular basis when they're growing up.
Seriously though, it's not like masturbating without extra foreskin is some tragedy. Even hard, the skin around the shaft is still loose enough to stroke with a pretty tight grip (vise-style, as hornygods described it), adjusting the position and style of grip for different sensations. Or, with a lighter touch, you can "brush" up and down, more focusing on the head and where it meets the shaft (I guess sleeve-style, though I've never thought of it that way). All that without lube (or at least any artificial kind).
Does it get sore or irritated? If you don't handle it right or just keep going too long, sure, but years of practice should make that pretty unlikely.
Of course, add lube (or toys) and it's a whole different story, but what kid has access to lube (official or improvised) on a regular basis when they're growing up.
- May 17, 2011
- 5,879
- 25,504
- 293
- Twitter Username
- @JessiDeer
- MFC Username
- JessiDeer
- ManyVids URL
- https://www.manyvids.com/Profile/43191/JessiDeer/
Another plus to uncut, its uncut guys get wetter, in my experience, so theres less onus on me to provide all the natural slickness
But no hate for circumsized guys, its not their fault and they feel just as good once they're in there I'm just happy to be receiving dick, as long as its not grossly disfigured/too big its all good in my books.
But no hate for circumsized guys, its not their fault and they feel just as good once they're in there
I'm just happy to be receiving dick, as long as its not grossly disfigured/too big its all good in my books.
- Oct 27, 2011
- 893
- 1,677
- 61
SNATCH said:
I agree with you too. I like them with foreskins. It mostly has to do with my oral fixation.
And yeah... that ones icky
SNATCH said:Just_mark__ said:
Don't suppose you'd mind detailing your experience with it to me? Perhaps in PM if not in the open? I am about to buy one, && I've heard so many things, but I wanna make sure we don't fuck it up too badly.
It went badly wrong the first time.
The stuff thats used to make the mould went all lumpy and didnt stay together.
I bought some of the stuff that dentists use to mould your teeth. It wasnt at all expensive and worked much better AND there was enough for a few tries, tho mine went well 1st time.
I also sieved it first to make sure it didnt go lumpy.
Keeping an erection! Again the first attempt was massively hampered by the unsexy task of mixing up a powder and warm water, pouring it into the tube etc.
I got hold of some viagra stylee things for the next attempt and caught a strip/dance show of Ashasnows
I've got a pretty standard NATO issue cock, length isn't an issue coz the tube is about a foot long so measure and cut to size but if you got a girthy cock then it'll start to touch the sides of the tube.
Likewise if there's any kind of curve it's difficult to keep it in the middle of the mix. I found that pulling on my balls so my dick stuck straight out at 90 degrees helped.
You also have to use the vibrator they supply as there's not really enough of the latex material to do more than about 5 inches of dick. You could use a splint of some sort to give it firmness coz frankly the vibrator supplied is pretty weak tea.
End product.....
So there it is sports fans.
It's novelty more than a good sex toy, but used it for dp on a girl so kind of double teamed a girl all by myself
She also suggested I could actually fuck myself now....I haven't tried that as yetAttachments
I have to say that I am against any kind of mutilation (yes, circumcision is mutilation) done on children, though I for obvious reasons feel more strongly about female circumcision. (I don't feel that it's right to force your religious believes down the throat of your child either - though I realise that it's a much harder thing to avoid.)
The reasons I am generally more inclined to accept male circumcision are mostly easy to understand - it's safer, it is practised in sterile environments (mostly), and it does not prevent the persons ability to have sex despite possibly making it less enjoyable.
Level 3 female circumcision involves cutting off all external parts of the vagina and binding her legs together for up to 8 weeks. The result is that the scar tissue closes her up, she is left with only a small hole to urinate - a hole made by sticking a twig into her raw wound and leaving it there while it "heals". Among the most common tools for this procedure are blunt and rusty razors, sharp stones and FINGERNAILS! This is usually performed outside, and on girls between the ages of a few months old up to 15 years old. The girls older than infants often struggle so much (who can blame them?) that they have to be held down so hard as to break several bones in their bodies.
Once these girls are married, they have to be cut open in order to have sex. Though they grow back together afterwards. They also have to be cut open in order to give birth, if they are not, there is a very big risk of both mother and child dying - as if the pain of child birth wasn't bad enough as it is!
They are told they need to do this to get a husband, that if they are not circumcised it's the same as being a slut and a whore - that men will assume that just because they still have an intact vagina, they are free game and always ready to have sex with anyone. They are told that being circumcised is the only way to stay virgin until you marry (or at least to have anyone believe that you are a virgin), and that no man will marry a woman who is not a virgin.
This is so much worse in my eyes - because it is so clearly a way for the male sex to dominate the female (Just as the Victorian era, when men were seen as raging sex animals unable to control any sexual urges - and the women were blamed! Even the legs of chairs had to be covered as to not bring the legs of a woman to mind - the men seeing it might just get horny, and then they might do things they were not responsible for because of the simple fact that they were horny. The quote "Close your eyes and think of England" is from this era, it was the answer Queen Victoria gave a young woman who came to her worried about her upcoming wedding night!) Whereas male circumcision did have a hygienic usefulness - though it is something that no longer matters in our modern part of the world.
Though, as I said, any mutilation of a child is wrong to me. Let the men decide when they are old enough to make the decision themselves!
Kind of off topic, though this thread was already off topic to begin with so I don't feel that bad about it
The reasons I am generally more inclined to accept male circumcision are mostly easy to understand - it's safer, it is practised in sterile environments (mostly), and it does not prevent the persons ability to have sex despite possibly making it less enjoyable.
Level 3 female circumcision involves cutting off all external parts of the vagina and binding her legs together for up to 8 weeks. The result is that the scar tissue closes her up, she is left with only a small hole to urinate - a hole made by sticking a twig into her raw wound and leaving it there while it "heals". Among the most common tools for this procedure are blunt and rusty razors, sharp stones and FINGERNAILS! This is usually performed outside, and on girls between the ages of a few months old up to 15 years old. The girls older than infants often struggle so much (who can blame them?) that they have to be held down so hard as to break several bones in their bodies.
Once these girls are married, they have to be cut open in order to have sex. Though they grow back together afterwards. They also have to be cut open in order to give birth, if they are not, there is a very big risk of both mother and child dying - as if the pain of child birth wasn't bad enough as it is!
They are told they need to do this to get a husband, that if they are not circumcised it's the same as being a slut and a whore - that men will assume that just because they still have an intact vagina, they are free game and always ready to have sex with anyone. They are told that being circumcised is the only way to stay virgin until you marry (or at least to have anyone believe that you are a virgin), and that no man will marry a woman who is not a virgin.
This is so much worse in my eyes - because it is so clearly a way for the male sex to dominate the female (Just as the Victorian era, when men were seen as raging sex animals unable to control any sexual urges - and the women were blamed! Even the legs of chairs had to be covered as to not bring the legs of a woman to mind - the men seeing it might just get horny, and then they might do things they were not responsible for because of the simple fact that they were horny. The quote "Close your eyes and think of England" is from this era, it was the answer Queen Victoria gave a young woman who came to her worried about her upcoming wedding night!) Whereas male circumcision did have a hygienic usefulness - though it is something that no longer matters in our modern part of the world.
Though, as I said, any mutilation of a child is wrong to me. Let the men decide when they are old enough to make the decision themselves!
Kind of off topic, though this thread was already off topic to begin with so I don't feel that bad about it
This isn't specifically directed at you, Alice, I just quoted you since you used the phrase.AliceDoe said:
I think the struggle to end female genital mutilation would be helped greatly by not calling it female circumcision. At minimum, the terminology (latin for "cut around") doesn't appropriately describe what actually takes place. More importantly, while there is controversy surrounding male circumcision, I would argue that the majority of people don't view it as mutilation, much less barbaric or torturous. As such, calling it female circumcision softens and obscures the reality of what the "procedures" actually involve for the girls and women who are forced (mostly) to undergo it. A penis that was mutilated in analogous ways to female genital mutilation would be a very different site from those that are merely circumcised (hmm, maybe there's an ad campaign idea there).
inkydoo said:
I agree. Though I think that what we call it is largely irrelevant - mutilation is mutilation. Also, I think the term circumcision is used because there are also level 1, 2 and 4 of female circumcision - all of which are more similar to male circumcision than level 3 is (level 4 actually covers things like piercings, a needle prick, etc.)
But yes, you are right - the procedures are so vastly different that they should not fall under the same name.
As the males who read this forum include a number of survivors of this "mutilation" maybe it's mildly inappropriate for members of the opposite sex to be commenting on preference and aesthetics at all, since it basically boils down to something many of us had no say in anyway :twocents-02cents:
Not to be overly sensitive (pun intended) but some of the comments are kinda starting to make me feel like girls think there's something wrong with me cos I was circumcised as an infant
Not to be overly sensitive (pun intended) but some of the comments are kinda starting to make me feel like girls think there's something wrong with me cos I was circumcised as an infant
- Aug 21, 2011
- 1,301
- 3,546
- 81
Jupiter551 said:As the males who read this forum include a number of survivors of this "mutilation" maybe it's mildly inappropriate for members of the opposite sex to be commenting on preference and aesthetics at all, since it basically boils down to something many of us had no say in anyway :twocents-02cents:
Not to be overly sensitive (pun intended) but some of the comments are kinda starting to make me feel like girls think there's something wrong with me cos I was circumcised as an infant
Personally, I like both. I just don't like the concept of hurting a baby but I don't think there is anything wrong with a cut penis especially considering the person 95% of the time had no choice in the matter. I may even just prefer uncut because of the pure concept of it as opposed to any aesthetics because I think they both look just fine to me.
I don't think there is anything at all wrong with cut guys, I just wish they would have have a choice in it. Maybe I'm the weird one, but I think messing with a baby's penis is kind of... creepy?
BluexDakota said:
Did you know there's actually a thing in the traditional Jewish circumcision where the rabbi sucks the blood from the wound with his mouth? THAT, my friend, is creepy deluxe!
It's actually not that uncommon that infants die from herpes contracted through this....
- Aug 21, 2011
- 1,301
- 3,546
- 81
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of ... rcumcision
Circumcision did not start off as some sort of health or hygiene benefit. For the most part, it was purely ritual. At one point it was considered a taboo and the domain of Jews and Muslims. It was even used as a preventative against the "evils of masturbation". Then at some point in our recent history, some made a claim that it was a preventative health measure, and it started becoming popular even among Christians. Eventually, when it was revealed that there really wasn't any health benefit from the procedure, many countries and some states started removing it from the covered health benefits. The medical societies in the USA, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand do not recommend the procedure unless for therapeutic reasons. Despite this, it is still a commonly done elective procedure.
Circumcision did not start off as some sort of health or hygiene benefit. For the most part, it was purely ritual. At one point it was considered a taboo and the domain of Jews and Muslims. It was even used as a preventative against the "evils of masturbation". Then at some point in our recent history, some made a claim that it was a preventative health measure, and it started becoming popular even among Christians. Eventually, when it was revealed that there really wasn't any health benefit from the procedure, many countries and some states started removing it from the covered health benefits. The medical societies in the USA, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand do not recommend the procedure unless for therapeutic reasons. Despite this, it is still a commonly done elective procedure.
Nordling
V.I.P. AmberLander
Yes, when uncovered, that practice was banned in New York. As far as I know, it was only done, at least in the US, among SOME Orthodox and not by Conservative or Reform Jews. In fact, for a time, in the 19th century Reform Jews had abandoned circumcision altogether but re-adopted it after the fake "masturbation prevention" crappola...which as I recall was started by the founder of Kellog's Cereal Company. lolAliceDoe said:
Ok fine, I can take a hint. Stay on topic Miss Bohica Jane, heh? :lol: Y'all are having serious discussions on circumcision and I post a penus chandelier. I suppose I should add something useful to this conversation.
:whistle:
Ok, I feel better now...
:whistle:
Ok, I feel better now...
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
