I didn't conveniently leave anything out, you're choosing to deliberately misinterpret the TOS. My post trumps your post all day, every day, and 365 days a year. You can stomp your feet all you want but you're not going to get anywhere with it. Or I don't know, stop being a condescending jerk and ask CB support if there's a technical error. You assume malice when there probably isn't any.
Great point, this happens so often, when a little patience would often get people exactly what they wanted.
If you still have your links visible in your collection, then you can still access them. It's the ones they removed from your collection that you can't access. And, yes, even older deleted accounts had content that was accessible as long as the link appeared in your page. The request to have the links removed most likely came from the models, but CB never offered any refunds to the members for the content they PURCHASED before CB removed that content. I'm sure you are missing videos and photos from your collection of which you aren't aware...unless you only purchased a few. I purchased a lot.
Yes, you did. I just quoted the critically important part that you left out, which immediately precedes your statement and contradicts your statement. In California, nebulous and contradictory language will always move towards favoring the defrauded. Particularly when the defrauded has clear and unambiguous supporting language like "purchase", which does not mean tips or gratuities. It's not a technical error. They essentially said I am SOL and quoted that same portion of the TOS that you just did. I tried to resolve it amicably.
So you were told that my statement trumps your statement and you're still wanting to argue the point? You're better off beating your head against a brick wall my dude. But go ahead, waste your money. There isn't a lawyer on earth who would take this case, well except maybe Trump's old lawyers...better hurry up before all of them are disbarred/sanctioned.
Regardless of anything, the models didn’t fuck with your content, and openly admitting that you’re watching and refusing to pay under this guise of boycott is ridiculous. The site still collects your ad revenue while the models collect absolutely nothing. At least if you’re tipping, they’re getting 50% of the money you spend. By watching and not tipping, you’re only benefiting the website while fucking over the model.
Well, they can't claim it's "just CYA, regular TOS language" and then use that language to defraud high paying customers (or even lower paying ones) and not expect that their same language can't be used against them. It's a double-edged sword.
Actually, I had stopped watching CB. I can't get over that defrauding thing. It ruined the experience for me.
Doesn’t make sense to me why you would bring it up on my post specifically, when I said that my viewer counts aren’t different, only the tips are.
LOL! Crazy that someone would have the audacity to defy you, isn't it? Maybe it's because your opinion doesn't have merit or validity.
You seem to be missing the part that actually relates to your issue "We have the absolute right to remove any Member Content" <- Purchased content can be removed by chaturbate at any time.
LOL! Sorry if I made you become unhinged. I never said I was a god or king of anything. The ONE legit person who replied was confused about what I meant, so I clarified that for him. I just came here to offer a little insight into why things may be going downhill on CB recently. You are more than welcome to reject that. And the only person who prescribed any sort of violence or harm to me was you. Obviously, I touched a nerve. Or perhaps I am hovering a little too close to things CB people don't want to be made public.
But I do want to say one more thing...
You are not God King of Chaturbate. Your (unprovable) story does not represent all, or even a portion of the rest of the people who buy tokens on CB. It was really disingenuous of you to come here all ROAR THIS IS WHY, I SWEAR IT HAPPENED TO EVERYONE! When multiple people confirm they have their content intact and CB told you point blank to take a long walk off a short pier.
I didn't miss that point at all. That's why I blame CB, not the models. It is CB who ultimately made the conscious decision to eff me.
Oh OK, I don't think that was meant literally. Just a saying.
I don't sympathize at all, honestly. It's no different than iTunes removing songs from their library that I purchased and they suddenly decided I wasn't allowed to have any more or when they dumped an entire shitty U2 album into my archive that I didn't ask for -- that's just the way it goes with digital content.
After how he's talked to you in this thread, I don't blame you. I doubt anyone would
it might not have been chaturbates decision, if they no longer have the up to date paperwork on file they cannot continue providing access to that content, that would be one of the reasons why that specific break in the tos is there.
Listen, I'm not saying it doesn't suck that the videos disappeared, all I'm saying is using the language in their TOS against them isn't going to work, there is no double-edged sword here. There are specific legal reasons why things are written the way they are, and often times the language used doesn't make the most sense to anyone not familiar with the legal system.
I've been following the whole time.
He's obviously not dealt with a ton of East Coast women. Sugarcoating is not something we're known for, quite the opposite in fact. It's cool, though. If he knew anything about Chaturbate at all, he'd know that not a single representative would be allowed to speak the way I did or with as much disclosure. It's standard operations answers, nothing more and nothing less.
I love you. My whole family is East Coast; New England on one side, and I know exactly what you mean.
