Sorry If this seems like a pathetic question but I've never been sexually active and I've been thinking about this kind of stuff lately.
Last edited:
I loved what @I_Am_Iris said. Most women would agree that the first time is quite disappointing especially if you feel pain.
But I think it would be different for men. So I would like more guys on the forum to weigh in. They don't feel any pain and they are more visual than us, so it could be a totally awesome experience for them.
Actually, I believe your views on sex vary from culture to culture. In my culture; sex is just apart of life and nothing to get emotional about. You see, sex really had little emotional value in my family and it was just natural stage of human existence. Since I come from a culture in where romantic love is unthinkable; I was taught more about how to great sex is about mutual pleasure, trust, understanding each others' and respect.
No. I took band class in 8th grade and I sucked at it.I fully agree with this dude...
a man who used to be married to her...
Ever think of starting a band @Guy ?
Couldn't hurt your quest. Chicks love musicians.
What culture are you from, if you don't mind me asking? Do you have arranged marriages? I would be interested in hearing more about the process of how trust, mutual understanding/pleasure and respect develop between two people under those circumstances.
In the Western world (Europe, N and S America, Australia and NZ), which have the somewhat recent tradition of romantic love, maybe sex is seen as so important because it's how people pair off and find their life partner. No sex = no life partner (exceptions, of course). If that pressure and uncertainty aren't as much of an issue, I could see how sex would take on a different character, maybe better, idk.
I think losing one's virginity is overrated, so I guess my answer is yes. Most people's first time is a mess. Emotionally, physically, and egotistically.
I'm graysexual, so four months at a time it is, and then once every four months it's heavenly. lmao
(i'd rather just masturbate, anyway)
Why four months? Is that just the way your body's timing works?
and those most likely to say it is overrated likely haven't been having all that great of it,
I've had incredible, out-of-body-experience sex, but still think it's overrated. Why?
I can get myself off in three minutes and get on with my day.
When I have sex with other people, they get too excited about how easy it is to make me orgasm and go forever seeing how high they can get the number, or how many times/how far they can make me squirt. I've had a partner lose count after I'd had 115 orgasms in one session. I've squirted hard enough to hit the ceiling. Sure, it's impressive, but I have shit to do. Having sex gets boring after so many orgasms. Like, yes, I've gotten off numerous times, YOUR TURN, wrap it the fuck up already. Or, even worse, now I'm so wet there's no friction, and I can't tell if you're fucking me or the sheets, you might as well finish yourself off now because I need to shower and change the bedding.
It's overrated to me because my partners always go for overkill. Oh, look, I came again, big woop, who cares, I have a book I could be reading right now.
Arguably speaking, this entire situation would simply be a confirmation of my point. Namely, you're describing exactly why the sex is bad, but that doesn't make sex, conceptually overrated, it means your partners and the specific acts are shit.
I literally said it was the opposite of bad, way to read things I never said. I just happen to have better ways to spend three hours than seeing how many orgasms I can have in a row.
I think we define 'bad' differently.
Not in terms of you being wrong, mind you. I think my point may have escaped you. The point I'm making is that you're saying it is overrated because you have better things to do than that, to which my point is "well, than that would fall under 'not the right way (for you.)""
Though I suspect its also because what someone defines 'overrated' as may differ.