I'm going to guess MFC. Their traffic is the highest and the top girls there make more than SM top girls. I land on the first page of SM and in recent times have only made on average what a 1500 camscore girl makes on MFC. Still, SM takes a higher percentage from incoming monies. They give more to affiliates. Yeah. I'm going with MFC.
My guess would be Streamate. They have been around a year longer than MFC and take 65% of the models earnings. And from what I understand, paying members on Streamate spend far more money on camgirls than paying members on MFC.I'm going to guess MFC. Their traffic is the highest and the top girls there make more than SM top girls. I land on the first page of SM and in recent times have only made on average what a 1500 camscore girl makes on MFC. Still, SM takes a higher percentage from incoming monies. They give more to affiliates. Yeah. I'm going with MFC.
I considered the high percentage that SM takes from models, but their affiliate program gives a high percentage to folks who get others to sign up. I think they just give less money directly to models without necessarily keeping more. If you check out SM's traffic via Alexa, they're substantially lower than MFC. The affiliate program doesn't necessarily seem to be paying off. According to Alexa, Clips4Sale has traffic more comparable to that of MFC. I wonder how the income of those 2 sites compare.My guess would be Streamate. They have been around a year longer than MFC and take 65% of the models earnings. And from what I understand, paying members on Streamate spend far more money on camgirls than paying members on MFC.
If you check out SM's traffic via Alexa, they're substantially lower than MFC.
This is incredibly hard to quantify since many people don't actually access SM directly from their site. Hell some people don't even know they're using SM at all. You might think you're using pornhublive, brazzerslive, pornproslive, etc. and never see the word Streamate anywhere on the screen. I'm pretty sure if you added up all the affiliate and white labels SM's volume would be more considerable than if you just take the numbers from going to the main site itself. My original SM account was through an affiliate it wasn't until a model said something that I knew I was using SM.
Maybe. But the actual traffic would need to be 10x what Alexa suggests it is to get close to MFC. Do you think white labels are doing that much?
And from what I understand, paying members on Streamate spend far more money on camgirls than paying members on MFC.
I don't think we can compare Pornhub and any camsite. Free porn vs public shows via MFC isn't going to be at all comparable. There's no way SM with it's pay by the minute business model is grabbing that many of Pornhub's visitors.Take pornhubs traffic cut that number in half or a 3rd and add that to the SM number and I'm pretty sure you get an example of the snowball effect.
I don't think we can compare Pornhub and any camsite. Free porn vs public shows via MFC isn't going to be at all comparable. There's no way SM with it's pay by the minute business model is grabbing that many of Pornhub's visitors.
I get it. I just think you're overestimating what the real number would be. I'm skeptical. I also think the quality of spender has declined on SM. Tons of dudes are there without credit cards, and many who have a card on file just do GOLD shows or try to be a free peeper. I'm purely anecdotal here, but I only pull in half of what I did 2 years ago and my placement stays the same. Totally guessing, but I feel that means most girls are making less as well. It's possible though that the money is becoming more skewed toward the top girls than it used to be. I would love to see the real numbers on this. This thread has me nosey as heck.I was just using this to point out how SM traffic can't be quantified by only tracking the main SM website.
I get it. I just think you're overestimating what the real number would be. I'm skeptical. I also think the quality of spender has declined on SM. Tons of dudes are there without credit cards, and many who have a card on file just do GOLD shows or try to be a free peeper. I'm purely anecdotal here, but I only pull in half of what I did 2 years ago and my placement stays the same. Totally guessing, but I feel that means most girls are making less as well. It's possible though that the money is becoming more skewed toward the top girls than it used to be. I would love to see the real numbers on this. This thread has me nosey as heck.
Dudes without credit cards? SM forces you to add a credit or debit card when you sign up for a membership. You can't complete your member account until you add the info from your card. At least that's what im seeing right now from my end.I get it. I just think you're overestimating what the real number would be. I'm skeptical. I also think the quality of spender has declined on SM. Tons of dudes are there without credit cards, and many who have a card on file just do GOLD shows or try to be a free peeper. I'm purely anecdotal here, but I only pull in half of what I did 2 years ago and my placement stays the same. Totally guessing, but I feel that means most girls are making less as well. It's possible though that the money is becoming more skewed toward the top girls than it used to be. I would love to see the real numbers on this. This thread has me nosey as heck.
I'm not sure what members see, but on my end there's a second chat area that can be left closed. It's full of non-spenders talking to themselves. I don't know if they have to fill out a CC# to be there. I don't cam that often anymore. Maybe someone else knows about that group.Dudes without credit cards? SM forces you to add a credit or debit card when you sign up for a membership. You can't complete your member account until you add the info from your card. At least that's what im seeing right now from my end.
I'm not sure what members see, but on my end there's a second chat area that can be left closed. It's full of non-spenders talking to themselves. I don't know if they have to fill out a CC# to be there. I don't cam that often anymore. Maybe someone else knows about that group.
I'm not sure what members see, but on my end there's a second chat area that can be left closed. It's full of non-spenders talking to themselves. I don't know if they have to fill out a CC# to be there. I don't cam that often anymore. Maybe someone else knows about that group.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AssetPretty sure defining "assets" would be the first step to this debate going anywhere. Is assets traffic? Money spent? Or even just software assets a website has created and owns (just as an example)? I personally have no idea what site makes more money or has more traffic. Yeah, SM has a lot of whitelabels but MFC is so well known and has such a reputation for bigger tippers than other similar sites (namely, CB). Honestly though, I have no clue and don't feel like researching it right now.
According to wikipedia, (updated Oct. 2017), the largest site is Chaturbate, followed by LiveJasmin and then BongaCams.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaturbate
Sorry. My mistake. I assumed that everyone on here would know what I meant by assets. TBH, this question and my other question that was related to clipsites came to my mind when I was reading this list: http://www.usbanklocations.com/bank-rank/total-assets.htmlThat's using alexa rank again.
This is Streamate embedded in pornhub when you on pornhubs pages you are eccentrically on SM at the same time.
https://www.pornhub.com/live
pornhub is the 21 ranks site on the internet above CB at 114. pornhub is just one of many SM affiliates so many more sites add to that number. Does that make SM the largest? We can't really say but these are things mean something.
Sometimes I think you wait till you can only post with a link on purpose.
NONE of these sites are publicly traded so we have no idea which has the most assets. Because they are websites they all probably have NO assets at all except for the physical servers that host the site and all monetary gains are pushed to umbrella companies (hence why models that get paper checks don't get them with the sites name written on them). Your question over simplifies multinational corporations.
You should expand your question to something like, 'Which site you think has the most potiential investment capital?'
Like I need no balance in my paypal account so if you asked me my assets in paypal it would be zero because it wouldn't take into account my bank or card accounts associated with it.
Not with this white label: http://girlsgonewildlive.com/signup/?That section has been empty for me for months now. On the main SM site you couldn't chat without adding a card, but there apparently were a couple of white labels that didn't require it and that's where those guys came from. It's a shock to see even a single person in there anymore, so it seems as though the loophole is mostly closed.
My guess would be Streamate. They have been around a year longer than MFC and take 65% of the models earnings. And from what I understand, paying members on Streamate spend far more money on camgirls than paying members on MFC.