Vore

[LadyLuna]

I have discovered within myself a vore fetish. I particularly love images where the woman seems to enjoy being eaten, but most all of the genre seems to turn me on.

I figured, thread for this would be nice. If Amber decides to take it down, I will not blame her.

Here's a few of the drawings that I find sexy.







There's actually four sets that I have like that last pic, all of which are willing women being eaten by various things. The others are: a frog, a plant, and a snake.

 

[Evvie]

That tentacle one is... awesome

 

[Nordling]

With a little help from Photoshop... I caught a chameleon eating Tinker Bell!

 

[Evvie]

make it eat boobs and we're good to go

 

[Jupiter551]

I've always found vore really disturbing lol. There's a bunch of clips on clips4sale things like "I turn my boyfriend into a chicken wing and then eat him" O.O

 

[jennavalentine]

i thought vore was a strange fetish related to furries where they like to eat someone the birth them out again.

 

[Red7227]

This reminds me of Tim White's artwork.

 

[Shaun__]

This picture has heels, feet, vore, slime, a snake, and it is outside. It is surprising how many things are fetishes.

 

[Red7227]

Voreville.com is quite the site for this sort of thing.

They actively make the the product they use, and you can see various aspects that going into making up the clip.

This appealed to my inner predator and gave me a hardon (might have just been the boobs though) http://www.thevoretube.com/videos/42/co ... peril.html

Plus the final product which can be as funny as all fuck http://www.thevoretube.com/videos/617/the-lure.html

Then there is the promo for the new product coming out soon http://www.voreville.com/blog/

 

[LadyLuna]

i thought vore was a strange fetish related to furries where they like to eat someone the birth them out again.

vore is the category of fetishes involving eating, or being eaten by, someone. There are many sub-categories within vore.

I have just today found out the terms "soft vore" and "hard vore". Soft vore is when the victim is eaten whole and reaches the stomach alive. Hard vore, the victim is either cooked first, or injured/killed in some way before being swallowed.

Warning: my mind is a dark and scary place.

I prefer soft vore for my own fantasies, though I've had some being cooked fantasies and a few being ripped to shreds fantasies. My favorites involve the application of some sort of magic or chemicals to turn pain into pleasure, and to keep me conscious until fully dissolved in the stomach.

The closest I have come to being the eater were fantasies in which the person crawled their way into my mouth, whereupon I pleasured them with my tongue and struggle to keep them in my mouth while they try to get to my throat. Or sex fantasies in which my partner and I eat each other... (I wonder if, as a I child, I heard the term eat in reference to a person without realizing that it referred to oral, and not actual eating... I do have such a literal mind...)

I warned you.

 

[Jupiter551]

A friend of mine sent me this and it makes me feel really ill, the original pages were taken down

http://web.archive.org/web/20020816...bes.org/perroloco/PerrosFAQsSnuffStuff-4.html

 

[Rose]

A friend of mine sent me this and it makes me feel really ill, the original pages were taken down

http://web.archive.org/web/20020816...bes.org/perroloco/PerrosFAQsSnuffStuff-4.html

I wish I hadn't clicked that.....I'm going to have nightmares for the rest of my life.

 

[Red7227]

A friend of mine sent me this and it makes me feel really ill, the original pages were taken down

http://web.archive.org/web/20020816...bes.org/perroloco/PerrosFAQsSnuffStuff-4.html

I wish I hadn't clicked that.....I'm going to have nightmares for the rest of my life.

The Arnie version of Conan the Barbarian had dressed female cadavers (no head, hands feet or entrails) in one of its scenes, which has stayed with me for about 3 decades now, so you might well be right. This stuff though, I just find silly because it is so implausible.

 

[SophiaLocke]

i had a friend back in California who did a shoot for Muki's Kitchen, which is a site that posts pictures of models being prepared to be eaten, roasted, impaled, etc., in a fake but convincing way.

i didn't grasp the full idea of the fetish until this thread, though - and i saw that site years ago!

Here's the link if anyone is interested. It's done in a clever, artistic, and consensual fashion.

http://www.mukiskitchen.com/free1.html

This isn't my fetish on any level, and i'm struggling to formulate an opinion on the more graphic idea of truly eating someone who has the desire to be eaten and actually wants to make it a reality. i feel that if two consenting adults want to do something with (or to) each other, that shouldn't be an issue and isn't for me to judge. i worry about true consent in a situation like this, though (especially with the site that Jupiter posted).

It also makes me think about the person doing the action, and what kind of person they would be. For example, i enjoy forced sex, or consensual rape play, but i know that the man i'm with isn't a horrible person who really wants to rape anyone outside of the role play (although the "act" is committed). The only difference between the two scenarios is consent.

So if a person kills someone else, but it's consensual, does that make them just two people enjoying a fetish, and they shouldn't be judged negatively for it? If you get sexual pleasure from actually impaling someone and watching them die, are you sick in the head, even if they truly wanted you to do it?

i honestly can't wrap my head around it and just wanted to hear other people's opinions. i'm absolutely fascinated and shocked by this (and i'm used to people being shocked at my fetishes!).

 

[Red7227]

i had a friend back in California who did a shoot for Muki's Kitchen, which is a site that posts pictures of models being prepared to be eaten, roasted, impaled, etc., in a fake but convincing way.

i didn't grasp the full idea of the fetish until this thread, though - and i saw that site years ago!

Here's the link if anyone is interested. It's done in a clever, artistic, and consensual fashion.

http://www.mukiskitchen.com/free1.html

Chanta Rose makes a great witch but it all still seems silly to me.

 

[SophiaLocke]

i had a friend back in California who did a shoot for Muki's Kitchen, which is a site that posts pictures of models being prepared to be eaten, roasted, impaled, etc., in a fake but convincing way.

i didn't grasp the full idea of the fetish until this thread, though - and i saw that site years ago!

Here's the link if anyone is interested. It's done in a clever, artistic, and consensual fashion.

http://www.mukiskitchen.com/free1.html

Chanta Rose makes a great witch but it all still seems silly to me.

Some of them are really goofy!

 

[lordmagellan]

i had a friend back in California who did a shoot for Muki's Kitchen, which is a site that posts pictures of models being prepared to be eaten, roasted, impaled, etc., in a fake but convincing way.

i didn't grasp the full idea of the fetish until this thread, though - and i saw that site years ago!

Here's the link if anyone is interested. It's done in a clever, artistic, and consensual fashion.

http://www.mukiskitchen.com/free1.html

Chanta Rose makes a great witch but it all still seems silly to me.

Some of them are really goofy!

I love the tongue in cheek aspect. I like the little wink and nod that says, "Of course this is staged; we're not murderers!" It keeps it fun, I think.

Warning: my mind is a dark and scary place.

I think I just discovered I have a fetish for this phrase. So Luna, exactly how many times have you seen Return of the Jedi?

Seriously, though, I do find this incredibly fascinating and have since I discovered it. I want to think I read once that some believe it can be traced back to the act of Communion, but I find that hard to believe, given it's existence in other non-Catholic cultures. Though, maybe those others practice a form of Communion, as well.

I have to admit cannibalism is something I've always been fascinated with and wanted to try. I don't necessarily want to murder someone (well at times...not that I'd eat any of them), just curious as to the taste and texture of human flesh. They say it mostly resembles pork, but I've heard it tastes a bit different. I must also admit the taboo of the whole idea is a major attraction.

 

[Jupiter551]

except...it isn't all staged is it? At some level, there are people who advertise for victims and people who answer those ads. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armin_Meiwes

 

[Red7227]

except...it isn't all staged is it? At some level, there are people who advertise for victims and people who answer those ads. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armin_Meiwes

There are people who like consensual rape play, and there are rapists. We can assume it happens somewhere whatever "it" is. Would I like to swear that never in the US south west has a living woman had a spit run through her and been dropped over a barbecue pit? Nope. I can hope that if it did happen it was consensual and that she enjoyed her last moments. I also suspect that she tasted pretty horrible with all the blood, adrenaline and the poisoning from her internal organs still being in her body when she was cooked.

Seriously, though, I do find this incredibly fascinating and have since I discovered it. I want to think I read once that some believe it can be traced back to the act of Communion, but I find that hard to believe, given it's existence in other non-Catholic cultures. Though, maybe those others practice a form of Communion, as well.

Culinary Cannibalism was an old and respected practice in a lot of ancient cultures. The Chinese Emperors of the Chin dynasty used serve a pretty concubine to impress and intimidate visiting dignitaries. The early Christian church accused Gnostics of eating babies. The Minoans had an established practice of child sacrifice which might well be the origins of the stories about the Minotaur.

 

[lordmagellan]

except...it isn't all staged is it? At some level, there are people who advertise for victims and people who answer those ads. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armin_Meiwes

I was referring to the site Sophia put up, Jup; not the others.


And, Red, I'd forgotten about the Minoans! Didn't know about the Chinese, I'll have to look into that.

 

[Red7227]

Reay Tahhahill

She is always a fun read.

Flesh & Blood: A History of the Cannibal Complex (1975)

Food in History (1973)

Sex in History (1980)

 

[Jupiter551]

The thing about a lot of those "historic" cannabalism things (and child sacrifice) is that they were almost exclusively said about cultures that were considered barbaric, or losing enemy states (like Carthage) or both. The fact is, in many of those cases what is true really can't be seperated from an effort to paint another culture as uncivilised or barbaric, and to do so with the most universally taboo things - cannabalism or child murder.

 

[LadyLuna]

First off:

while browsing, I did not get turned on by any real life pictures in which the victim looked distressed, or the ones that looked too real.

I did not get turned on by the 3-d renderings.

I *did* get turned on by real life pictures where I could believe it was faked and the woman looked like she was enjoying herself, and by the sketches/cartoons that were well drawn, but still obviously drawings.

So we can be pretty sure that my fetish is for the fantasy aspect of it, and not for the reality of it.

I think it would be a sick and twisted mind that enjoyed doing this to people who did not want it. Would it be a sick and twisted mind who enjoyed doing it with willing people? I don't know. Consider that it's not considered sick and twisted to enjoy hurting someone who wishes to be hurt. Is the difference the fact that the hurt is not permanent, while death most certainly is? Obviously.

Reading a lot of the Dolcett comics got me thinking: would it be more ethical to use a willing victim that never had and never wants kids, or a willing victim that already has kids but doesn't really need to be there for them? In the first case, you eliminate a viable breeding member of the population. In the second case, there may be trauma to the offspring (we'll assume at least teenage...). I've seen a lot of them where the man was roasting both wife and daughter... who is then left to carry on his genes? Seems counter-biological imperative to me. Then again, if a man is willing to do this, do we really *want* his genes to go on?

I don't like the morally ambiguous things. I hate the idea of killing a worthwhile member of society just for a day of fun. Part of me has played around with the idea of there being clones available for this, and even for there to be a way for someone who wished to experience this being able to link in to a clone (thank you to the show Eureka for giving me those ideas). Part of me has also played with the idea of letting those who want to do this to people do it to people who "deserve to die". But then we get into the problem of proving that the people really did something very bad, and aren't innocent... And round and round we go!

Suffice it to say that in my case, my mind is very very scary, but I don't *actually* want to do this, or watch it, mostly because while I think I'd enjoy the experience, I wouldn't last past it and I don't want to die. Even when I do feel like I want to die, I still can't bring myself to end it, because I know that's the coward's way out. Besides, I have it on very good authority that I'm not allowed to die until 2020.

 

[Red7227]

Reading a lot of the Dolcett comics got me thinking: would it be more ethical to use a willing victim that never had and never wants kids, or a willing victim that already has kids but doesn't really need to be there for them? In the first case, you eliminate a viable breeding member of the population. In the second case, there may be trauma to the offspring (we'll assume at least teenage...). I've seen a lot of them where the man was roasting both wife and daughter... who is then left to carry on his genes? Seems counter-biological imperative to me. Then again, if a man is willing to do this, do we really *want* his genes to go on?

I doubt any of these fetishists have thought that far ahead. If people want to do this then let them, if people want to do this to a non-consenting partner, then lock them up as nutbags.

I don't like the morally ambiguous things. I hate the idea of killing a worthwhile member of society just for a day of fun. Part of me has played around with the idea of there being clones available for this, and even for there to be a way for someone who wished to experience this being able to link in to a clone (thank you to the show Eureka for giving me those ideas). Part of me has also played with the idea of letting those who want to do this to people do it to people who "deserve to die". But then we get into the problem of proving that the people really did something very bad, and aren't innocent... And round and round we go!
.

How do you define worthwhile, and why do you care anyway? 99% of the population will die when the next ice age kicks in, and the majority of those survivors will not in first world countries anyway.

Clones were explored previously by Joe Haldeman in Forever War, where the humans evolve into a clone race with a collective consciousness. Members of that race kill themselves in fascinating ways for the edification of the survivors. The movie Strange Days covers a rapist recording his memories of rapes and selling them for other people to watch.

As for me, I only get off on the most violent non-consensual acts, but it is a fantasy, and that is where it will stay. I know I have issues, and I even know where they come from, but that does not mean I would ever act on any of them.

 

[LilyMarie]

(I wonder if, as a I child, I heard the term eat in reference to a person without realizing that it referred to oral, and not actual eating... I do have such a literal mind...)

Can I just say that the whole 'eating' thing was something very disturbing for me to learn as a second-language English speaker. :lol: I read 'eating pussy' for the first time when I was 15 or so, and boy was I confused. In German, we just use the word for 'lick', and basically nothing else, to describe cunnilingus.

And this is all I have to contribute to this thread. :|

 

[ConnerJay]

This thread scares the shit out of me...

and I like it.
Carry on. :whistle:

 

[Jupiter551]

Saw this...pretty gross. For some reason I feel worse for the kittens this sick fuck murdered though...okay maybe not *worse*, his lover didn't deserve what happened either but kittens are so trusting and innocent ugh
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...orn-star-video-eating-parts-lover-murder.html

 

[LadyLuna]

As this thread is in sexy stuff, please let's stick to the fantasy, and not make it devolve into a cannibalism thread.

Vore pics = yes! vore fantasies - yes! Real vore news= no thanks.

 

[Red7227]

http://vyxes.com/hm.htm

The sort of picture your average mutant torturer sends home


This is clearly not going to end well for the girl


Future clone soldiers


Angelina looking gorgeous


Ambushed while passing a tentacle

 

[LaceyRoyce]

@Sophia ... you make a good point. It seems more like a question of assisted suicide combined with fetish....

As a result of this thread I had a discussion at a regular munch i go to and found out an aquaintence makes their living off vore porn. They have an entire website dedicated to it.