Oklahoma Senator Proposes Total Ban on Porn to 'Restore Moral Sanity'
Making, distributing, or consuming pornographic material could get you 10 years in jail.
gizmodo.com
This is...wow.
AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!
Total Porn Ban + 10 Years Prison
- Thread starter Vixxen81
- Start date
-
** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
gizmodo.com
This is...wow.
MarieElise
Cam Model
- Dec 19, 2019
- 10,132
- 18,022
- 211
- Twitter Username
- @EliMarie717
- MFC Username
- EliMarie
- Streamate Username
- MarieElise
- ManyVids URL
- https://www.manyvids.com/Profile/328205/EliMarie717/
- Clips4Sale URL
- https://www.clips4sale.com/studio/92217/marie717
Shocking. Shit, ban erections too while you're at it Oklahoma lol I wonder if Viagra sales use will go up or down in Oklahoma if this goes through. That would be very interesting to see 
No need to be rude to the Victorians, they were much less prudish than their reputation... the end goal is a 'Christian' version of Afghanistan.
Oklahoma also just today approved a proposal to require parents' proof of US citizenship before they can enroll there kids in public school.
Well, you know that the U.S. government doesn't even need to have people like Deevers introduce new legislation to make our lives difficult. USC 2257 bookkeeping requirements already make it a felony to distribute porn without complying with onerous bookkeeping regulations. No one pays any attention to it and it hasn't been enforced, but it's on the books. now, and its only through the kindness of the Attorney General's little heart that it hasn't been enforced on internet images (not just porn). One reason they haven't enforced it, from what I've read, is that they want the law to stay on the books for big porn outfits but are afraid if they take artists and individuals with internet images to court for 2257 offenses, the law will be reviewed for constitutionality. They would rather not test the law for small-time offenders because it probably would be ruled unconstitutional. From what I understand Chaturbate keeps the records for us, which is exceptional, and one reason I broadcast there.
Thanks for pointing this out. I'm not too worried YET, but I'm going to be keeping a careful eye on this type of "See what can be gotten away with" legislative longshot proposals. But I suggest that any of you that have porn out there keep an eye on USC2257 searches to look for hints that it will be enforced. Our lives will be made very difficult if it ever is.
Thanks for pointing this out. I'm not too worried YET, but I'm going to be keeping a careful eye on this type of "See what can be gotten away with" legislative longshot proposals. But I suggest that any of you that have porn out there keep an eye on USC2257 searches to look for hints that it will be enforced. Our lives will be made very difficult if it ever is.
Oklahoma Senator Proposes Total Ban on Porn to 'Restore Moral Sanity'
Making, distributing, or consuming pornographic material could get you 10 years in jail.
This is...wow.
It never ceases to amaze me how the party that claims to want less government overreach, reduced spending and more freedom will enthusiastically draft proposals that defeat all three of those purposes.
Also, for a porn-hating guy, that dude sure does spend a lot of time worrying about what other people do with their boners and uteruses.
