yossarian said:mynameisbob84 said:UncleThursday said:A good analogy that affects me, personally, is two guys at work. One of them got in good with another guy who happens to be in good with someone high up in the company. They both got some MAJOR raises in the past few weeks. The guy in good with the higher up got something like a $6/hour raise (making him the highest paid employee on the floor), and the guy who is in good with him got almost a $3/hour raise. Meanwhile, the guy I work with and myself have gotten nothing, even though for the past few weeks we've been not only doing our jobs, but the jobs of other people, as well; and we consistently outperform our normal job requirements every day. So, needless to say, there is some bitterness there, just like how Brina or Oliva would have some major bitterness if Jenna just jumps to #1 in the next week or so and stays there the rest of the month.
I'm not sure I see the parallels. The example from your workplace is nepotism, pure and simple. I can see why that would irk someone. But the thing with Jenna (at least as I understand it) is completely different.
If Jenna can make more money in 30 hours than the next highest tipped model can make in 200 hours, she deserves to be Miss MFC. It seems really reductive to say "she's only being tipped because she's famous". It completely ignores the fact that she's spent the last 20 years working hard to make a name for herself. Why shouldn't she use the celebrity that she's worked hard to attain, to make money for herself?
I can't quite put my finger on why I find it distasteful. I see how hard all these other models work, and it seems unfair, that's all. It sets off bells and whistles on my Injustice Alarm.
Clearly, it's just something to do for her--she's a dilettante, it seems. To me, it's sort of like if Wal-Mart decided to move into a small town, put a bunch of mom and pop stores out of business just because it could, and then close their store and move on. Sure, they can do it, and if the public wants to spend their money there at the expense of their neighbors, they will. But that doesn't make it any less of a douchebag thing to do. She's on MFC fucking around with other people's livelihoods just because she can, or because she's bored, as she clearly either a.) doesn't need the money or b.) could make money/get publicity in a hundred other ways that don't stomp on "little guys" (or gals) who are trying to earn a living. Maybe I'm jumping to conclusions/making unfair assumptions, but I can't deny that it sticks in my gut a little. At least taking "Miss MFC" off the table would, to my mind, even the scales a bit.
It seems nobody else thinks of it this way, and I realize it's not even necessarily a rational conclusion to arrive at. But I've seen this kind of thing happen in other jobs SO many times that it bugs me on an emotional level. Obviously, the models aren't bothered by it, so I guess my misgivings are irrelevant.
I think the biggest flaw in your parallels is that mfc is a completely free reign market. There are no 'job qualifications,' or performance quotas like in a real workplace environment. Sure, some girls may have quotas set by their studios, but on a broader level girls set their own hours and this is considered freelance work.
However, you could apply your same argument to virtually any other girl other than Jenna. You think girls who put in 4 to 6 hour days and still struggle to maintain a 2000 score clip think it's fair that any girl in the top 100 can basically make that same amount in a fraction of the time? What about the ones that barely hover at a 500 score who view girls with 2000 score in the same light?
It may be a girls looks, her personality, her reputation outside mfc (be it modeling, etc) that earns her a higher camscore than her counterpart, but that's not to say she is any less entitled to those tokens than the next lady.
Let me put it to you this way...members will spend their tokens how they like. No member is 'forced' to throw their tokens at Jenna as opposed to any other model on the site. That's called free-will. Now, if Jenna earned a particular members' tokens over a competing model based off her looks/personality/industry stardom then that is in no way her fault, and she should not be penalized whatsoever. To imply members should somehow toss their tokens towards other more 'deserving' models seems more like a sympathy gesture rather than one of genuine merit.
Figuring the rules should somehow be altered for a girl of her status is a completely moot concept. In reality, she's done more for this 'adult industry' than all the girls on mfc combined, and was doing movies back when a lot of these girls in the top 10 were still a developing fetus or not yet conceived.
One could even argue that without girls like Jenna, the 'porn industry' and such sites as MFC would not be what they are or as lucrative as they are. Heck, they might not even exist. Paved the way, as they say.