AmberCutie said:
Why are there 2 columns for Miss ACF as well as ACF Score?
yep, that was confusing, I have renamed the columns, removed the "Thanks Send" information, reordered the columns, maybe it's a little bit simpler now, please see the link below:
ACF Score 2.0 & Miss ACF
Ok, let me explain above page a bit more:
MFC has 2 ways to present a models performance as a number, very simplified those 2 ways are:
MFC CamScore = Number, based on average tokens received for every hour online.
Miss MFC = Ranking, based on total tokens received in a period (current month)
The idea is to translate both to ACF, using below rules:
- MFC tokens = ACF thanks.
- MFC hours online = ACF postings.
Then we get:
ACF Score = Based on the average thanks received for a posting
Miss ACF = Based on the total thanks received.
AmberCutie said:
And I'm probably just being picky because I enjoy how simple the current (actual) ACF score and display is. Obviously I am biased.
The current ACF Score is indeed presented much simpler and better looking then this table with to much information. No need to change that page.
IMHO he calculation of the current ACF Score is more complex (with weighting factors and so) and is more like Miss MFC then like MFC CamScore. In fact, the ranking of the current "ACF Score" is almost equal to the ranking of "Miss ACF" in that table.