VeronicaChaos
Cam Model
- Nov 30, 2011
- 6,638
- 65,023
- 793
- Twitter Username
- @Veronicachaos
- Tumblr Username
- Veronicachaos
- MFC Username
- Veronicachaos
Thank you, yes, that is what I meant. And I was also talking about myself; my ventriloquism shows are successful in the context of being on an adult site. I'm looking at it from a contextual standpoint. I wasn't meaning to put down non-nude; I frequently do NN shows that are purely performance-based.curvyredhead said:I took this quote a very different way (although again, now that you have said what it sounds like to you.....I see your side of it). I looked at it as a marketing stragedy. In the sense that we ALL work off each other. Supply and demand. Plenty of girls find a way to put there own personality, touch or artistic approach to camming---it is often because its unquic compared to the rest of the girls on that is draws the attention of on lookers (now we all know keeping those on lookers around..is a totally different story).
My point was that even if a girl doesn't get naked, MFC is still an adult site. I do get naked and do sexual things on camera but my purpose is rarely to get the guys in my room off; I enjoy showcasing sexuality as a freakshow act. I find the juxtaposition interesting. But that doesn't mean I'm not creating porn just because the intent isn't to create whack-off material because I know that some people do masturbate to my shows/vids and they are hardcore in nature at times. My situation is pretty unique but I guess what I'm trying to say is that intent doesn't necessarily matter.
As for whether or not MFC is a porn site is highly debatable. I consider it to be one, even if the "official" stance is that it's not. I don't see why a porn site can't be more than just a porn site, the same way I don't see why a porn can't be more than just a porn. I think that is the beauty of MFC and it's a very clever business model.