AmberCutie's Forum
An adult community for cam models and members to discuss all the things!

RANT! Our message is NOT a contradiction.

  • ** WARNING - ACF CONTAINS ADULT CONTENT **
    Only persons aged 18 or over may read or post to the forums, without regard to whether an adult actually owns the registration or parental/guardian permission. AmberCutie's Forum (ACF) is for use by adults only and contains adult content. By continuing to use this site you are confirming that you are at least 18 years of age.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Nicki should be allowed to to behave sexy and talk about sex and sexualize herself, but that gives no one a right to actually objectify her as nothing more ever.

So, it's okay for one to turn oneself into an object of sex. But, if that is all the viewer has ever seen them as, it's not okay? Control of another person's thoughts. Got it.

About Trump. Is he deserving of respect? That depends. respect is not automatically given. People earn it IMHO. He has not earned my respect so he does not have it from me. For some that of course would be different. They enjoy what he's doing so he may have earned it from them. This isn't a woman vs men thing. I simply reserve who I respect for those who have actually earned it in my eyes. I do not objectify him though because no one should be degraded still. The same though applies to Nicki and everyone else on this planet. You have to decide that stuff for yourself so it's not a yes or no clear cut answer for everyone.

You took this completely out of context. My question was not about objectification. It was in response to Luna's statement of "you can do whatever you want, and still deserve respect". Nothing more, nothing less. My response was specifically about this statement in its entirety. The question of "does this only apply to women" was a tongue-in-cheek comment about how a special group is disgusted when others do something, yet it's okay for them to do it.

For the singer/actor question there's got to be context involved. How are they degrading themselves and why? Are they bringing light to a subject matter for instance? That's not hypocritical to me at all.

You are reading too far into my comments. It is not about a specific topic, issue, etc. It is simply a question regarding if an entertainer is vocally against objectification, yet uses said tactics to promote themselves, a product, etc, it that not hypocritical? Put another way, if a person compromises their standards by degrading themselves to make a pitch/sale/statement/etc, is that not hypocritical?

On the gangster rappers it's not like they pop out of the womb the way they are. They are writing about their own experiences about the brutality, violence, drugs, profiling, etc. It's how they grew up. Should they ignore that and rap about rainbows and ignore those issues? I don't think so. It brings light to injustices and their life. Their very real life. Why should anyone have to hide that? They are also taking advantage of a system they didn't create by glorifying a lot of things such as sex. It sells and gets them out of that life. Why not do that if you could? Who wouldn't? (I'm gonna get stereotypical here but I mean no offense obviously.) Say your options are living in those projects around violence, drugs, gangs only, or you can write and rap about it all and get out for the safety of you and your family. Who is seriously going to say no to that? No one. It's not contradictory to take advantage of a system and a box people put you in long before you were born I don't feel. For may it's an only option because of that profiling and self fulfilling prophecy. There's nothing hypocritical about wanting to better your life.

Again, so it's okay to glorify sex, drugs, violence, killing of "honkies" and "pigs" as well as the objectification of women all in the name of money and to escape a bad environment? Yet, it's not okay when people objectify you?

Also, the emboldened areas, who put them in the box they popped out of the womb into and why is it that most simply lack the motivation to escape and are content to live said lives? Are we all products of the environment we are exposed to when we grow up, and are doomed to repeat the same issues our parents did with previous generations? Why is it socially acceptable, and more applauded, when one "escapes" a bad environment by glorifying many of the negatives people are disgusted with than it is to see someone study and work hard to improve themselves without resorting to illicit resources of income?
 
To be fair, that's how they market her. Blame the Pop industry.
Most people don't care for hidden depths, that requires effort and why do that when you can dance along/fap. Anything that gets in the way of consumption(such as political opinions) hurts the product.
My point is that it's silly to say "Nicki sends a message?" if you don't know anything about her. I wouldn't say "NASA has no mission statement" just because I don't know it. There's a difference between being ignorant about something and admitting you don't know, and saying "I don't know and thus it's a bad example". Of course most people aren't going to know more about a pop star than what is marketed, but then don't say it's a bad example. I think Nicki is a great example for the point OP is trying to make because she has an overtly sexual image and also does a lot of good work that most people don't acknowledge. Basically just disagreeing with AmberTroll's statement that she's a bad example for this topic.
 
I thought she just portrayed herself as a sex object with a brat fetish: Personally she always seemed quite insecure sexually

Not if you compare her to Lil Kim! She was so insecure that she eventually just said fuck it and became an asian lady cosplaying as Michael Jackson. I admire her ambitiousness to go from being the queen of hip hop to the king of pop. Probably shouldn't joke, sad and cautionary tale if anything. Not sure if she still looks like MJ either so not just bad jokes but dated as well. Not a good combo. Much like body dysmorphia and lots of money. Boom. Totally just redeemed myself for the bad jokes by bringing awareness to a disease.


Again, so it's okay to glorify sex, drugs, violence, killing of "honkies" and "pigs" as well as the objectification of women all in the name of money and to escape a bad environment? Yet, it's not okay when people objectify you?

Not too relevant to the argument that you are making but I'm struggling to think of songs where the killing of honkies is mentioned. Haven't even seen or heard honky used as a derogatory word in years. Was always a funny sounding word to me. Dead Prez have one line where they say cracker but in fairness to them, even as a white guy, running up on them crackers in they city hall is a feeling we can all relate to. I'm sure songs exist but I don't think that it's as prevalent as you are making it out to be.
 
Not too relevant to the argument that you are making but I'm struggling to think of songs where the killing of honkies is mentioned. Haven't even seen or heard honky used as a derogatory word in years. Was always a funny sounding word to me.
https://www.amren.com/archives/reports/rap-lyrics/
Collection of such things from a "racial realism" website. Almost all the lyrics are from the 90's

Dreadlocked bastard, gangster rapper
Raping white women is all that he’s after
You’ve fooled the rest, but I know what you’re about
Your threats will fall silent when you’re the body count.
This is the final solution
Our turn
They’ll burn.
Revolution is in the air a 9milimeter is in my hand
You can run but you can’t hide from this master plan
Muds are raping, looting, stealing, mugging, robbing, shooting, killing
Breeding more infesting cities spreading drugs with all their deals
Gonna go out on the town lock and load lets have some fun
Gonna shoot your whole brood down and send the others on the run
Vigilantes on the street, we won’t stop until we’re done.
Might makes right now it’s time to fight
It’s the law of the land and the law of the gun
Welcome to the south, and now we’re taking it back
And we’ll light you up at the drop of a hat
Dealers race traitors better not be seen
We’re taking back the south and keeping it clean

Honky is a silly word.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heybarkeep
Nicki has spoken for years about the importance of education, encouraging her fans (especially the girls) to stay in school and work hard. She recently paid a bunch of fans student loans and school fees. She has other causes she works on as well, but I know she's been talking about education since before I started university because I've always found it quite inspiring. She is a great example of people seeing one facet of her and assuming that's all there is to it.
In terms of her sexuality this supports the brat fetish well. Be successful, well educated, then expect to be taken care of by your lover at that time turning yourself into a sex object, even a doll. I find this more sexually conservative than liberating, so still see her as a bad example.
The encouraging education in women is a very good thing, her sexual expression kind of lets down furthering the liberation of women though.

I do like that she is being genuine in her expression/ opinions, that is to be respected. I don't think she is being misinterpreted or overly objectified, she expresses herself well: I guess that is why certain groups of people connect so well with her style of expression.
 
I like how faint hearted is code for sensitive white person. Hip hop has come a long way because most of those lyrics are awful. Read most of them, not one honky to be found.
I remember how unnerving some of that shit was back in the 90s.

Even more amusing to me than "faint hearted" is the use of the word "passages". I guess because I associate it with a religious upbringing, and it just seems hilariously out of place when discussing gangsta rap.

I think when people read things they don't approve of on the internet, they ought stop pointing at "comment sections and twitter". Should start calling them "internet passages" instead. This would make me laugh.

You are saying that people like Charles Manson or Torquemada deserve respect?
 


Just wanted to say that Nicki Minaj is a transcendent talent and I will defend her music with my dying breathe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: THE MOLLIE MARIE
In terms of her sexuality this supports the brat fetish well. Be successful, well educated, then expect to be taken care of by your lover at that time turning yourself into a sex object, even a doll. I find this more sexually conservative than liberating, so still see her as a bad example.
The encouraging education in women is a very good thing, her sexual expression kind of lets down furthering the liberation of women though.

I do like that she is being genuine in her expression/ opinions, that is to be respected. I don't think she is being misinterpreted or overly objectified, she expresses herself well: I guess that is why certain groups of people connect so well with her style of expression.
Okayyy...
Women don't need liberating. The ones who do, I doubt they are allowed to listen to western pop singers.
I feel it's important to point out how unlikely it is that Nicki Minaj has any creative control.
 
I like how faint hearted is code for sensitive white person. Hip hop has come a long way because most of those lyrics are awful. Read most of them, not one honky to be found.

Doesn't matter if it's honky, cracker, whitey, or other racial slur regardless of the colour of a person's skin. It still refers to same color of skin. My point is that it's about violence, regardless of if it is against white, black, cops, or whomever. Why is the promotion of violence okay when used to make money?

Why is it okay if someone objectifies one self. Yet, it is not okay if others do it?

Why is it okay for a demographic group to refer to themselves by a racial slur. Yet, if others use it in reference to said group, they take offense?

The world is full of contradictions. If people honestly does not like, nor want, said references to them, nor to be objectified, used, etc. then they need to review said actions they use when they find them offensive.
 
This is going to come off sounding pretty pedantic. But why is ok for you to tell people how to behave "you should NOT objective someone", but not ok for others to tell Nicki Minaj to behave (add me to the list of folks who are only vaguely aware of her existence)?

Either we have the right to express our opinions about others behavior or we don't.

Can you not express your opinion without degrading them or brushing them off entirely because they portray themselves as sexy? Really? Are you only capable of seeing one side of a person ever? Do you tell camgirls who speak on anything but sex to shut up and sit down? Because that's the issue I'm talking about. We should not be telling people to shut up and degrade them.

Justjoined I'm not talking about banning comments or twitter. Calm your tits trying to twist my words. It's the line of thinking that it's okay that's a problem. Billy badasses behind a computer screen. I expect the comments to be bullshit degrading shit, but that does not mean people have to accept it and not say it's wrong. And thinking it's only online just shows you have no clue who prevalent this shit is in real life. You asked a stupid question repeatedly and you go a flippant answer in reply. Deal. And yes Emma Watson got called a hypocrite and a lot more a whole lot for her photo shoot. If you didn't see it fine, but let's not pretend it didn't happen.

No Forceten it's not okay. People should be smart enough to know human beings are multifaceted. It should be common sense, but sadly some people lack that. It's not about being the thought police, it's about changing the disgusting, and often sexist, mindset of women who are comfortable sexually are only good for that.

I did not not take your Trump question out of context. You asked " What's your thoughts on Trump? Do you respect him for what he's doing? Or, does this only apply to women?" and I answered.

As far as gangster rappers NO I don't think it's okay as a whole but I have a heart and empathy and the ability to think and I can see why when in positions they are in they will do anything to get themselves out. It's like stealing bread when you are hungry and desperate. It's really not much different. I'm against stealing but I'd steal bread if I was starving and had to. Can you not grasp that and why it's different? Personally I think steps should be taken to change that environment and thus the way these kids grow up to begin with. That takes time and actual effort of the people in charge so of course it hasn't happened sadly. But it is what it is and I can see that people just trying to get out of shitty situations will do anything for it. Like people who steal bread or women who post to marry a man they've never met just to get out of their country. Desperate people will do anything. And I think you're ignoring the fact that rap does highlight a lot of issues in those environments. A lot of people wouldn't be exposed to it otherwise because it's not all sex and drugs in them. It's not all glorification. It shows a struggle of very real life. If you think it's as easy as study and work hard and boom you'll get out you have zero clue sir. Zero. And research into why that is impossible for so many would do you some good. You seem to basically be saying they're lazy and stupid and that's just racist. And if you don't get why black people can say the N word but you can't....then you need to get off here and go read about it. Seriously? I can't even.

Nicki is not objectifying herself. She's being sexual. A woman being sexual is not degrading herself. Women should not have to change or hide themselves or never be sexual out of fear of other people being sexist dickbags to them who lack common sense or the ability to look at them as a whole person because BOOBS. No. Fuck that and fuck people who honestly think women need to get back in the kitchen with their skirts only below the knee. I'm not sure what the men here can not grasp about the mindset being pretty fucked up but fuck it. It's sexist and it's degrading but keep arguing with women about why it's cool to do. Whatever. What could women possibly know about this shit right?
 
In terms of her sexuality this supports the brat fetish well. Be successful, well educated, then expect to be taken care of by your lover at that time turning yourself into a sex object, even a doll. I find this more sexually conservative than liberating, so still see her as a bad example.
The encouraging education in women is a very good thing, her sexual expression kind of lets down furthering the liberation of women though.

I do like that she is being genuine in her expression/ opinions, that is to be respected. I don't think she is being misinterpreted or overly objectified, she expresses herself well: I guess that is why certain groups of people connect so well with her style of expression.
Why...do you assume this has anything to do with a brat fetish, or any fetish? Your psychoanalysis of women is always creepy and full of projection but this one in particular is both a reach and especially offputting. "Telling girls to go to school is just part of a sexual fetish!" Shocking but not everything women do is related to, or driven by, our sexuality. Women are like onions, we have layers.
 
I feel the word respect is the wrong one to use, but I do believe people should treat one another cordially. Everyone's going to have their own preferences. I barely know anything about her, but if she annoyed me somehow I wouldn't automatically feel the need to express my hatred of her.

I've always seen the word respect as meaning close to the same as admiration. I know everyone using it is trying to imply that folks should "play nice" but I'm not about to admire someone when I know relatively nothing about them. I don't "disrespect" her such as posting hateful comments online about her, but I don't go out of my way to respect her either.

---

More on topic with the original post...

Again I know little about her. I agree that nothing harmless should be stifled, and if that's her message, than sure, all power to her (though as I previously stated, I wouldn't personally use the word "respect")

"I'm not saying she doesn't deserve respect, and I'm not saying that porn stars and such don't deserve respect. I'm just saying that if they want to send this message, they shouldn't be doing porn, and acting this way, because it contradicts their message; and it's perpetuating, if not encouraging the behavior they're speaking out against."

I'm not entirely sure by what he means by "acting this way" (what getting naked and screwing for money?) but this is reads dang close to if not the exact same thing as saying that anything that is or has been socially taboo yet harmless shouldn't deserve respect/whatever. I don't want to make this dramatic sounding, (because frankly I feel it's a ridiculous thing that people should be over by now) but when you stifle something that's harmless it breeds harmful behavior. For instance, if you have porn stars who feel they're worthless because people treat them that way (and for what? Having sex for money in a non-private fashion? Who cares if it's consensual?!) they may get screwed over financially, harassed, raped, be unwilling to go to police who they feel won't take them seriously, etc. If they are treated as more than shameful objects, less people will treat them as sub-human.

There's nothing wrong with being sexual, but often people see sexual things and assume it shameful as if the person is allowing others to take advantage of them. The irony is the same people are the ones not allowing the more sexual ones to speak. It's bigoted, since they likely think in their mind they know better without even giving the person they are inadvertently treating as an object a chance to prove themselves.

Back when I was married years ago I had a husband who would use camming against me. He spoke over me one on one and in front of others. If anyone stood up for me (usually they didn't), he would get angry and say something referring to me being a whore. Nobody argued because he told all his friends I was a camwhore. They noticeably talked to me less after that. He was always very needy, and if anyone liked me more than him, he'd criticize me. The cheap and easy shot was calling me a whore to make everything I said or did seem devaluated. This was a guy raised by parents who often spoke shit about people in order to make themselves sound better.

Sad thing is people like that often lie to themselves enough to believe it true, they preach their version of "truth" to others to prove it further to themselves (cuz if others agree, they must be correct right?) then that's how harmless things become taboo.

After my divorce, moving out of state, making new friends and such there's a distinct difference in how people act if if I tell them I cam for a living after they've known me for a long while, vs. when my ex would speak over me and immediately said my job in a degrading way when people asked. I never have seen any of them treat me differently, acted uncomfortable or like they no longer wished to be around me.
 
- "You can do whatever you want, and still deserve respect".

- If a singer, actor, etc. cries fowl of obejctification, yet uses it to make movies, songs, videos, isn't that hypocritical?

- Gangsta rappers promote sex, violence, drug use, "kill the pigs" mentality. This permeates to inner city children, young adults, etc. Yet, there's the "whoa is me" mentality about police brutality, profiling, crime and so forth. Isn't this hypocracy and contradiction?

Alright, I'm going to start here. I don't think you can do whatever you want and still deserve respect. If you steal from me, hurt someone, etc I'm not going to respect you. But as long as what you're doing does not hurt others, you got my respect. I think that was poorly worded, to begin with, but I think figuring out what she meant was pretty common sense.

What do you mean cries objectification? I like to look good. You could say that I partially use my looks to make money. But, I'm still going to be pretty pissed the fuck off if someone thinks it's ok to say "oh ignore her, she's just a cam girl" when I try to speak or anything along those lines.

"Gangsta" rappers do not do this as a whole. I listen to primarily rap. I love rap. I think rap and hip hop has come so fucking far. There is a song by YG that has a lot of violence in it. It's about gang violence and how Mexican and black people in the inner city felt a sort of comradery because they had to go through the same systematic oppression while also being torn apart by gang violence. It's not the music they make causing the violence in the inner cities. It's poverty. They rap about their experiences. There is nothing hypocritical about rapping about those things while still expecting police brutality be punished and stopped. Honestly, that entire statement seemed pretty disrespectful. The "whoa is me" comment? You realize black men are still victims of racism and police brutality at a higher percentage than their white counterparts. That's a pretty serious thing that totally justifies a so-called "whoa is me" mentality.


Again, so it's okay to glorify sex, drugs, violence, killing of "honkies" and "pigs" as well as the objectification of women all in the name of money and to escape a bad environment? Yet, it's not okay when people objectify you?

Why is it socially acceptable, and more applauded, when one "escapes" a bad environment by glorifying many of the negatives people are disgusted with than it is to see someone study and work hard to improve themselves without resorting to illicit resources of income?

I'm starting to think you have some underlying notions about certain people. Most "gangster rap" does not talk about killing women, white people, or cops. There is rap about going to school and shit. There is rap about everything. People write music based off what they know. What causes an emotion in them. I think a lot of us would agree that having to do some shady shit is going to leave a much bigger impact than winning a scholarship.

Why is it okay for a demographic group to refer to themselves by a racial slur. Yet, if others use it in reference to said group, they take offense?

"And there it is. That moment when you’re asking another person to respect you by not using a word that you find demeaning and offensive and that person makes it all about them, suddenly focusing more on the perceived jab at their character than on how they’re making you feel." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...o-damn-exhausting_us_5910cb2de4b0d5d9049eef86

Other people have explained the argument time and time again better than I have.

Occasionally, I joke about being a whore. That's ok for me to do. If you see me playfully going, "gosh I can be such a whore" and then a few days later go like, "wow, you're being a whore right now" I'm going to be offended. It was fine for me to call myself that. It would be fine for me and one of my other sex worker friends to call each other that. It is not ok for some dude who isn't in the industry at all to call me that.

If you called yourself an idiot one day with some self deprecating humor would you be ok with me calling you an idiot as well? I mean, you called yourself one, so why can't I call you that too? Your logic isn't adding up here.
 
Are we in fuckin' kindergarten again?
Okay kids! Here are the basic rules of being good kiddos:
  1. Don't call each other mean names. If someone says something is mean then listen to them.
  2. Bobby might not look like Jackie, but Bobby and Jackie are equals.
  3. You might not like "Mary Had a Little Lamb" but Amy does so let her sing it on the playground.
  4. Jeff likes to wear shorts. Just because you all like to wear pants doesn't mean Jeff has to. Don't be mean to him because he likes his legs exposed and comfortable.
  5. Thomas, stop putting boogers in the fingerpaints.
  6. Treat others how you want to be treated. Doesn't matter how different you are or if you pull each others' hair in playground.
  7. If someone treats you badly that doesn't mean you have to treat them badly.
We're arguing over words and clothes (or lack of clothes). If someone says "please don't call me that mean word" just be a decent human and don't call them that. Some other kids dress different, but they're still your peers. It's not hard, even children can grasp these concepts. No being mean to each other during fingerpainting hour... but watch out for boogers.
 
I don't really understand why we use the word "objectification" toward women who put their bodies out there. I'm the same amount human if I am wearing nothing and shaking it in your face as I am if I'm dressed and ignoring you. It's not my job to make sure people around me respect that I'm a living breathing being equal to them. That's not something I can explain or teach someone. If they find a sexual woman to be equal to a bowl of fruit or a fleshlight, I'm not equipped to help their brain. I can't comment on Nicki Minaj past her perfumes...my interest in rap stopped after maybe 1997? But, someone who thinks she (or any other person) is less deserving of basic human respect or a voice based on clothing choices would absolutely NOT be someone I would engage in a physical relationship with. I'm way too guarded to be vulnerable with someone who can dismiss another person so easily. Just saying someone objectifies themselves is misogynist/misandrist and poorly thought out.
 
If someone thinks THAT is me trolling... oh, bless their sweet summer heart.
I know. It's just a post using humor to make a really valid point. That isn't trolling. I warned him about that shit last week, so enough is enough.
 
Can you not express your opinion without degrading them or brushing them off entirely because they portray themselves as sexy? Really? Are you only capable of seeing one side of a person ever? Do you tell camgirls who speak on anything but sex to shut up and sit down? Because that's the issue I'm talking about. We should not be telling people to shut up and degrade them.
....
Nicki is not objectifying herself. She's being sexual. A woman being sexual is not degrading herself. Women should not have to change or hide themselves or never be sexual out of fear of other people being sexist dickbags to them who lack common sense or the ability to look at them as a whole person because BOOBS. No. Fuck that and fuck people who honestly think women need to get back in the kitchen with their skirts only below the knee. I'm not sure what the men here can not grasp about the mindset being pretty fucked up but fuck it. It's sexist and it's degrading but keep arguing with women about why it's cool to do. Whatever. What could women possibly know about this shit right?

I thought we were talking about Nicki not camgirls. I'm saying that are two sides to criticism about Nicki. I understand your side, women can be sexual, and still be human and should be treated as such.
The criticism of Nicki (and I'll admit not knowing much more than the Wiki article about her) is that hyper-sexuality of an entertainer like herself encourages girls (particularly tweens) to follow suit. Their argument is when young girls portray themselves as sex objects, this leads to bad results for society. (Including what you've just complained about).
So Nicki and other are partially responsible for the breakdown of families among the non-elite documented in books like Coming Apart

Now, I personally think their concern is overblown. Western culture didn't collapse, just because Elvis gyrated his hips in a sexual fashion, and we've survived Mick Jagger, Madonna, Lady Gaga, Brittney Spears and a host of other blatantly sexual entertainers, I'm sure we will survive Niki Manaj.

That said I don't think their concerns are unwarranted, we are seeing 7th graders do stuff that would have gotten high school seniors expelled a generation ago. If I had tween daughter that idolized Nicki, I very well might be a lot more concerned.

Sex sells, controversy sells, controversy about sex sells best of all. So I think Nicki is laughing all the way to the bank. Celebrities get tons of perks in society, they also get lots of criticism. It comes with the job.
 
I thought we were talking about Nicki not camgirls. I'm saying that are two sides to criticism about Nicki. I understand your side, women can be sexual, and still be human and should be treated as such.
The criticism of Nicki (and I'll admit not knowing much more than the Wiki article about her) is that hyper-sexuality of an entertainer like herself encourages girls (particularly tweens) to follow suit. Their argument is when young girls portray themselves as sex objects, this leads to bad results for society. (Including what you've just complained about).
So Nicki and other are partially responsible for the breakdown of families among the non-elite documented in books like Coming Apart

Now, I personally think their concern is overblown. Western culture didn't collapse, just because Elvis gyrated his hips in a sexual fashion, and we've survived Mick Jagger, Madonna, Lady Gaga, Brittney Spears and a host of other blatantly sexual entertainers, I'm sure we will survive Niki Manaj.

That said I don't think their concerns are unwarranted, we are seeing 7th graders do stuff that would have gotten high school seniors expelled a generation ago. If I had tween daughter that idolized Nicki, I very well might be a lot more concerned.

Sex sells, controversy sells, controversy about sex sells best of all. So I think Nicki is laughing all the way to the bank. Celebrities get tons of perks in society, they also get lots of criticism. It comes with the job.
When I was in middle school we had lil' Kim and I still wore scooby doo tshirts and loved Steve Irwin, because my mom didnt completely suck.
 
It's a little silly to expect grown women to curb their sexuality in order to avoid damaging children and way far out there to put it out there as a factor in the downfall of the family unit. I have girls. So many girls. The relationship that shapes their idea of a healthy romance is the one between my husband and I. The way they see me treated is what they will expect to some degree. The way I treat my husband, the way he speaks to them...all relevant to their growth as young girls. We don't have TV. We have movies and series that I've screened as acceptable. We read. We play. We talk about things in age appropriate ways. That is how you protect children. My daughters have no idea who Nicki Minaj is. The oldest does know who Donald Trump is.... that's a tough one to explain! What my children view is my responsibility. Anyway, the breakdown of the family unit and the breakdown of the public education system are responsible for letting children down. Grown women shaking their tits and enjoying sex is grown human stuff. To use children, other peoples' children, as a reason for women to watch themselves is manipulative. Are we saying the same things to men? There are plenty of things men do that tell young girls they are less than. If we want to talk about children, we need to talk about men too. A woman who is being sexual in an age appropriate crowd is not objectifying herself. If she is objectified, who is objectifying her? Let's focus on that person and correct their behavior. And, let's not pretend that a woman has to be doing anything sexual in order to be objectified. What then? It would be much better if we allowed women the right to be full humans, if we separated the creepers who see women as cum buckets from the majority of men who are decent and focused on telling them how to act instead.
 
No Forceten it's not okay. People should be smart enough to know human beings are multifaceted. It should be common sense, but sadly some people lack that. It's not about being the thought police, it's about changing the disgusting, and often sexist, mindset of women who are comfortable sexually are only good for that.

We're more or less arguing about the same thing. I don't agree with objectification, as I know people are multifaceted. My statement is about the contradiction of people willingly degrading themselves for something, then complaining about others whom refer to them as such when that is all they know them as.

I did not not take your Trump question out of context. You asked " What's your thoughts on Trump? Do you respect him for what he's doing? Or, does this only apply to women?" and I answered.
In a sense, you did. But, my question was directed at Luna for her statement of "You can do whatever you want, and still deserve respect." This is a point of contention here, with many. Some even questioned her statement, as did I. I used the Trump question specifically because many people disrespect him. For the record, this was a topic of debate in another thread.

Personally I think steps should be taken to change that environment and thus the way these kids grow up to begin with. That takes time and actual effort of the people in charge so of course it hasn't happened sadly.
I agree that things need to change, and that people need to step up. However, it isn't solely the responsibility of the people in charge. It also has to be a purposeful, willing and legitimate desire to change from within for those whom are living in the situation. Nowhere, and I mean nowhere, did I say they were lazy. I was implying that people are creatures of habit, and many of the problems are seen generation after generation with little or no improvement. Have you seen when cities will spend millions of dollars to "revitalize" sections of their city to try and improve lives of those less fortunate? Have you gone back a few years after it was done? What was the conditions? Typically a little nicer home but people still doing the same thing, and the condition of the property was not as nice as newer buildings the same age elsewhere. If people don't change their habits, it's an endless cycle.


As to racist, bigotted, etc which it seems you and others may want to label me as. Let me just stop you there before you might make a fool of yourself further. I work day in and day out with people from all walks of life. I spend my daytime hours in a corporate office at a desk job working for very rich executives whom keep piling the work on without hiring additional staff. Then, I turn around and give up much of my free time to help those in need. I don't care about the colour of a person's skin, their religion, their sexual preferences, or other demographics such as being very low income people. They are all human beings.
When they need help, I do my best to give it. I've gone days on end with little or no sleep because I get a call of someone overdosing, being stabbed, domestic abuse or a multitude of other things. Many times over, repeated calls to the same residence or low income complex for much of the same thing.
Regardless of what impression you have of me, I really do care about these people. But, it is also very difficult to see them time and time again with little or no improvement to get out of their situation. Is it as simple as going to school? No, fuck no. But, they are a repeated product of their environment. There are some whom struggle to get out, and I have respect for those whom do it without the hypocracy which I've identified in my previous posts. I speak from hands on experience, of seeing and working first hand with many people day in and day out from those less fortunate than I. I generally don't like talking about this, because I don't do it for recognition nor do I think I'm some kind of hero. But, when someone says, or eludes to, shit like you are I'm going to bring it out.



Fuck that and fuck people who honestly think women need to get back in the kitchen with their skirts only below the knee. I'm not sure what the men here can not grasp about the mindset being pretty fucked up but fuck it. It's sexist and it's degrading but keep arguing with women about why it's cool to do. Whatever. What could women possibly know about this shit right?

Whom here on ACF is arguing about women staying barefoot, pregnant and covered up like a Puritan? I haven't seen a post about that. I think everyone here is in support of women openly expressing themselves.

Alright, I'm going to start here. I don't think you can do whatever you want and still deserve respect. If you steal from me, hurt someone, etc I'm not going to respect you. But as long as what you're doing does not hurt others, you got my respect. I think that was poorly worded, to begin with, but I think figuring out what she meant was pretty common sense.

You misquoted me. The line you quoted me as saying was originally stated by LunaHelsing. I was using the Trump question as a counterpoint to her to show that people will not always give you respect

What do you mean cries objectification? I like to look good. You could say that I partially use my looks to make money. But, I'm still going to be pretty pissed the fuck off if someone thinks it's ok to say "oh ignore her, she's just a cam girl" when I try to speak or anything along those lines.
Who's saying you're "just a camgirl" here?

I'm starting to think you have some underlying notions about certain people.
Not even going to address beyond saying see my response above to Teegan.

If you called yourself an idiot one day with some self deprecating humor would you be ok with me calling you an idiot as well? I mean, you called yourself one, so why can't I call you that too? Your logic isn't adding up here.

Sure, I do self-depricating humour quite frequently. But, I don't resort to calling myself a derogatory name. Nor do I want to call someone a derogatory name. Here's a quote of something I said in a different thread along these lines:

People need to understand that if you want equality, and I mean true equality, it's not okay to give a free pass to some while demonizing others. Hold everyone accountable for the shit they say and do, regardless of affiliations.

Does that help clarify things?


Also, let me point out that this is the VERY FIRST sentence of my initial post in this thread, which some people obviously overlooked...

I respect women, heck people, even when they really don't deserve it. So, the point is moot to me.
To clarify this statement, I'm courteous to people and respect their individuality and as a human being. This may help to explain how I view respect:
http://talkingtreebooks.com/definition/what-is-respect.html
 
  • Like
Reactions: HiGirlsRHot
Are we in fuckin' kindergarten again?
Okay kids! Here are the basic rules of being good kiddos:
  1. Don't call each other mean names. If someone says something is mean then listen to them.
  2. Bobby might not look like Jackie, but Bobby and Jackie are equals.
  3. You might not like "Mary Had a Little Lamb" but Amy does so let her sing it on the playground.
  4. Jeff likes to wear shorts. Just because you all like to wear pants doesn't mean Jeff has to. Don't be mean to him because he likes his legs exposed and comfortable.
  5. Thomas, stop putting boogers in the fingerpaints.
  6. Treat others how you want to be treated. Doesn't matter how different you are or if you pull each others' hair in playground.
  7. If someone treats you badly that doesn't mean you have to treat them badly.
We're arguing over words and clothes (or lack of clothes). If someone says "please don't call me that mean word" just be a decent human and don't call them that. Some other kids dress different, but they're still your peers. It's not hard, even children can grasp these concepts. No being mean to each other during fingerpainting hour... but watch out for boogers.


Is JJTP Thomas? :hilarious:
 
You misquoted me. The line you quoted me as saying was originally stated by LunaHelsing. I was using the Trump question as a counterpoint to her to show that people will not always give you respect


Who's saying you're "just a camgirl" here?


Not even going to address beyond saying see my response above to Teegan.



Sure, I do self-depricating humour quite frequently. But, I don't resort to calling myself a derogatory name. Nor do I want to call someone a derogatory name. Here's a quote of something I said in a different thread along these lines:



Does that help clarify things?


Also, let me point out that this is the VERY FIRST sentence of my initial post in this thread, which some people obviously overlooked...


To clarify this statement, I'm courteous to people and respect their individuality and as a human being. This may help to explain how I view respect:
http://talkingtreebooks.com/definition/what-is-respect.html

First, I didn't misquote you. I know the original statement was from Luna. I said that any person with the slightest bit of common sense would know you can't do anything and that's not what she meant. Obviously. I was saying your argument with her about that was frivolous.

Second, do you know how examples work? Cause that was an example to explain my point. Starting to really question the common sense of the individual I'm dealing with here.

Third point, ya, no, that sounded a lot like "I have a black friend" except you made your minority friends all sound like helpless drug addicts and shit.

Fourth. No. That's not how this works. Just no. You can't call a jew a kike, but as a jew, I can say it and so can Lil Dicky in his songs cause ya know, we had family go through the Holocaust. Same for black people saying the n-word. They went through systematic oppression. You didn't. They can claim the word, you can't. Simple as fucking that.

Finally, if you respect women so much, why are you being so argumentative about dumb shit. Why did you bring gangster rap, and to just call out the elephant in the room, PoC into the conversation?
 
My statement is about the contradiction of people willingly degrading themselves for something

Human sexuality is not inherently degrading, nor is it disconnected from the rest of the multi facets of our humanity!

for the love of glob
 
So many issues with this here... Even though I feel I could more properly demonstrate my ability to have insightful and thought out words that are strung together so very eloquently and intelligently... Because of the knowledge I have based on experience and now the absolute ridiculous things I've read right here, I will refrain realizing it will have zero bearing or be given any value by most who I feel should actually pay attention. However, one thing that really grinds my gears...is the ones saying "they choose to degrade themselves by acting/dressing a certain way, then get upset that someone else degrades them". Think about it. Repeat it to yourself. Does anything here strike you as odd ? I'll say it again. They choose to DEGRADE THEMSELVES by acting or dressing a certain way..... Ummm. Now....I'm simply baffled at the fact that someone's choice THEIR OWN choice to wear or act a certain way is inherently referred to as degrading themselves. That's purely an opinion, and a very ignorant and narcissistic one at that. You are, again, applying your own judgement to their actions or clothing choice and basically telling them(and everyone else for that matter) that they also feel or "know" it's somehow less than but choose to do it anyway. Which is FAR from the case and/or point here. The other aspect i see in all of this is the topic of consent and the FACT that no one owns your body/words/actions except YOU and if YOU use that ownership and control over yourself in a certain way, that does not mean it's a free for all to anyone else to also assume they can do so about/to you. How is that so hard to understand. Just because you masturbate, and admit to it, does that give free consent to everyone else to also jack you off? Didn't think so. Because YOU dictate anything and everything having to do with your body/mind/words. Of course people can and will see things differently, but it still does not make it ok or somehow their right to force it on you. I said I wasn't going to go on and on but I suppose I'm a liar hahaha
 
Status
Not open for further replies.