D
Deleted member 37064
Guest
Nicki should be allowed to to behave sexy and talk about sex and sexualize herself, but that gives no one a right to actually objectify her as nothing more ever.
So, it's okay for one to turn oneself into an object of sex. But, if that is all the viewer has ever seen them as, it's not okay? Control of another person's thoughts. Got it.
About Trump. Is he deserving of respect? That depends. respect is not automatically given. People earn it IMHO. He has not earned my respect so he does not have it from me. For some that of course would be different. They enjoy what he's doing so he may have earned it from them. This isn't a woman vs men thing. I simply reserve who I respect for those who have actually earned it in my eyes. I do not objectify him though because no one should be degraded still. The same though applies to Nicki and everyone else on this planet. You have to decide that stuff for yourself so it's not a yes or no clear cut answer for everyone.
You took this completely out of context. My question was not about objectification. It was in response to Luna's statement of "you can do whatever you want, and still deserve respect". Nothing more, nothing less. My response was specifically about this statement in its entirety. The question of "does this only apply to women" was a tongue-in-cheek comment about how a special group is disgusted when others do something, yet it's okay for them to do it.
For the singer/actor question there's got to be context involved. How are they degrading themselves and why? Are they bringing light to a subject matter for instance? That's not hypocritical to me at all.
You are reading too far into my comments. It is not about a specific topic, issue, etc. It is simply a question regarding if an entertainer is vocally against objectification, yet uses said tactics to promote themselves, a product, etc, it that not hypocritical? Put another way, if a person compromises their standards by degrading themselves to make a pitch/sale/statement/etc, is that not hypocritical?
On the gangster rappers it's not like they pop out of the womb the way they are. They are writing about their own experiences about the brutality, violence, drugs, profiling, etc. It's how they grew up. Should they ignore that and rap about rainbows and ignore those issues? I don't think so. It brings light to injustices and their life. Their very real life. Why should anyone have to hide that? They are also taking advantage of a system they didn't create by glorifying a lot of things such as sex. It sells and gets them out of that life. Why not do that if you could? Who wouldn't? (I'm gonna get stereotypical here but I mean no offense obviously.) Say your options are living in those projects around violence, drugs, gangs only, or you can write and rap about it all and get out for the safety of you and your family. Who is seriously going to say no to that? No one. It's not contradictory to take advantage of a system and a box people put you in long before you were born I don't feel. For may it's an only option because of that profiling and self fulfilling prophecy. There's nothing hypocritical about wanting to better your life.
Again, so it's okay to glorify sex, drugs, violence, killing of "honkies" and "pigs" as well as the objectification of women all in the name of money and to escape a bad environment? Yet, it's not okay when people objectify you?
Also, the emboldened areas, who put them in the box they popped out of the womb into and why is it that most simply lack the motivation to escape and are content to live said lives? Are we all products of the environment we are exposed to when we grow up, and are doomed to repeat the same issues our parents did with previous generations? Why is it socially acceptable, and more applauded, when one "escapes" a bad environment by glorifying many of the negatives people are disgusted with than it is to see someone study and work hard to improve themselves without resorting to illicit resources of income?