mynameisbob84 said:HERE BE SPOILERS
I was so disappointed by it. I'm a huge Alien/Aliens fan and while I never expected it to be as good as those films, I still had high hopes for it. You let me down, Ridley. You let me down.
Sure, it looked beautiful (like, really, stunningly beautiful) and Michael Fassbender was awesome (Oscar nomination worthy, maybe) but everything else about it sucked balls.
The plot just didn't make sense. It was more concerned with quasi-religious allegories and metatextuality and allusions to intellectualism and extistentialism than it was with forming a coherent and cohesive narrative - in short, it tried to be smarter than it was and wound up looking remarkably dumb.
There were so many plot holes I wouldn't know where to start if I was to list them for prosperity - how did the "punk rock" geologist (haha he's a rocker and he studies rocks for a living olololol :?) get lost in a cave that was established as being essentually circular and not remotely labyrinthine (and this is to say nothing of the super advanced mapping and tracking equipment they were carrying)? how was Shaw able to run and jump around unhindered mere moments after having a caesarean? why was the machine she used for that caesarean not set up for females to begin with when it was in a female's quarters (Vickers')? why weren't the crew informed of Weyland's presence? was Weyland's plan really to seek out his "maker" in the hopes of being granted eternal life ('cos that's just stupid)? why were the crew only meeting for the first time when they were already in space? why did they agree to the mission not knowing what it was? why were the Engineers trying to kill that which they created (humankind)? why did the Engineer head explode? why didn't the crew bring an arsenal (or an army for that matter)? what killed the Engineers? how did the alien that Shaw birthed get so big so quick? why did the last Engineer go after Shaw instead of completing its mission? why did the "punk rock" geologist return as a super zombie? what were the actual properties of the black goo (besides being a lazy narrative device that could conveniently do anything the plot called for it to do)? why did about half the crew just disappear an hour or so in to the film with no further explanation of their whereabouts? - I could go on, but I'm becoming depressed (I really wanted to like this movie, yo).
The other major problem with it was the characters. They were so fucking stupid! The bit where the scientists (moments after running like bitches at the sight of the fossilised remains of an Engineer) played with the serpent alien like it was a cuddly puppy was utterly fucking moronic. As was the scene where the scientist removed his helmet for no apparent reason on an uncharted alien planet. As was Vicker's insistence on running in line with the ship as it was about to roll over her instead of simply stepping to the left or right to evade it. In addition to being stupid, the majority of the characters were paper-thin, lacking any depth whatsoever and completely defined by plot, rather than character. They didn't react to events like real people would, they did things because that's what the plot called for them to do (even if it meant them behaving like no person ever would).
The dialogue was pretty agonising at times too.
I also didn't care for the pacing. And nothing truly exciting happened. At all.
Okay, I think I'm done bitching.
Actually, ya know what? I thought the Engineers looked like something out of a computer game (and not in a good way).
Okay. Done.
:?
SophiaLocke said:Thanks for saying pretty much how i felt about the movie (in a better way than i could). i saw the midnight screening in a packed theater full of excited people. When it ended, instead of applause, it was perfectly silent except for one guy who just said "Boooo." Although it looked cool, that pretty much summed it up for me. M is a big film buff and loved the Alien movies (okay, the first two) and was pretty disappointed. We were both really looking forward to this movie and it was so frustrating to watch the characters act like idiots within a plot that made little sense.
mynameisbob84 said:SophiaLocke said:Thanks for saying pretty much how i felt about the movie (in a better way than i could). i saw the midnight screening in a packed theater full of excited people. When it ended, instead of applause, it was perfectly silent except for one guy who just said "Boooo." Although it looked cool, that pretty much summed it up for me. M is a big film buff and loved the Alien movies (okay, the first two) and was pretty disappointed. We were both really looking forward to this movie and it was so frustrating to watch the characters act like idiots within a plot that made little sense.
That's exactly how it was for me. I went to see it with a few friends and usually when we come out of a picture, we'll talk about it on the way back to the car park. Even if the film was bad. In fact, especially if the film was bad. But after this we barely spoke outside of all agreeing it was shit.
Having typed that, I am wary of the fact I might benefit from not treating films like srs bsns :?
mynameisbob84 said:There were so many plot holes I wouldn't know where to start if I was to list them for prosperity - how did the "punk rock" geologist (haha he's a rocker and he studies rocks for a living olololol :?) get lost in a cave that was established as being essentually circular and not remotely labyrinthine (and this is to say nothing of the super advanced mapping and tracking equipment they were carrying)? how was Shaw able to run and jump around unhindered mere moments after having a caesarean? why was the machine she used for that caesarean not set up for females to begin with when it was in a female's quarters (Vickers')? why weren't the crew informed of Weyland's presence? was Weyland's plan really to seek out his "maker" in the hopes of being granted eternal life ('cos that's just stupid)? why were the crew only meeting for the first time when they were already in space? why did they agree to the mission not knowing what it was? why were the Engineers trying to kill that which they created (humankind)? why did the Engineer head explode? why didn't the crew bring an arsenal (or an army for that matter)? what killed the Engineers? how did the alien that Shaw birthed get so big so quick? why did the last Engineer go after Shaw instead of completing its mission? why did the "punk rock" geologist return as a super zombie? what were the actual properties of the black goo (besides being a lazy narrative device that could conveniently do anything the plot called for it to do)? why did about half the crew just disappear an hour or so in to the film with no further explanation of their whereabouts? - I could go on, but I'm becoming depressed (I really wanted to like this movie, yo).
why was the machine she used for that caesarean not set up for females to begin with when it was in a female's quarters (Vickers')?
why weren't the crew informed of Weyland's presence? was Weyland's plan really to seek out his "maker" in the hopes of being granted eternal life ('cos that's just stupid)? why were the crew only meeting for the first time when they were already in space? why did they agree to the mission not knowing what it was?
why didn't the crew bring an arsenal (or an army for that matter)?
how did the alien that Shaw birthed get so big so quick?
what were the actual properties of the black goo (besides being a lazy narrative device that could conveniently do anything the plot called for it to do)?
JoeEmGee said:The autodoc machine was clearly intended for Weyland's use only. The man funded the expedition purely out of his own interest. He wanted to ensure he'd survive it. Even though Vickers (his daughter) is in charge of protecting that module of the ship, its not her quarters.
The crew were all hired on a need to know basis. Clearly Weyland wasnt interested in sharing his plan with anyone else except David and Vickers. We're talking about a very rich and powerful man here. Obviously he's interested in finding some way of cheating death. I dont see how thats stupid at all. Most of the crew, while having some scientific background, didnt seem like strictly scientific types to me. They were quite obviously rogue-types and adventurers. After all, the geologist rigs up his suit to be a bong. What kind of scientist does that?
This wasnt a mission of conquest. You remember the briefing scene, right? The team wasnt even supposed to attempt any type of contact with who or whatever they found. Seems like only David was supposed to do that. Then, going back to the types they hired for this venture, the crew did whatever they wanted, then all hell breaks loose.
You've seen the other Alien flicks, right? Didn't they all have an accelerated growth rate? Why would this be any different?
I thought they did a good job explaining that the black goo was a weapon with mutagenic properties. When it came into contact with the worms in the cannister chamber, it turned them into the snake like creatures. When David slipped the black goo into Holloway's drink, it mutated his sperm and caused Shaw to become pregnant with a mutant sperm like creature. When the engineer in the opening sequence ingested the black goo, it began to break down his DNA, then when he fell into the water, it seeded Earth with life. That seemed to me to be support for the fact there are 2 different types of the black goo and engineers.
The opening sequence to me seemed to suggest a religious ceremony. Also, the engineer and his ship seemed different than the ones we see on the planet, which we know was a military installation. Obviously this movie was meant to spark questions about creation, evolution, and other matters of faith and religion. Otherwise why make mention of how the engineers seemed to have changed their mind about life on Earth 2000 years ago? What happened 2000 years ago? And why the Christ like imagery with the opening creation scene?
AshaSnow said:The ridiculousness of this movie hurt. I mean seriously. How could Shaw run around so much after major surgery that cut all her ab muscles? Makes NO sense. The machine didn't even STERILIZE her.
mynameisbob84 said:AshaSnow said:The ridiculousness of this movie hurt. I mean seriously. How could Shaw run around so much after major surgery that cut all her ab muscles? Makes NO sense. The machine didn't even STERILIZE her.
Right?? Not only that but why did the scientists that she'd just escaped from not stop the machine before it could operate on her? They were about to put her into stasis before she escaped so they clearly had plans for her/her alien baby but once she escaped and ran into the next room, they just...what? forgot about her? got lost?
Neudiin said:Alice, I'm going to say something and I'm going to sound like a dick so I am sorry ahead of time. But have you watched any of the Alien movies? Because the Wetland corp just doesn't care. While I'll agree for us right now the idea of going to sleep, put on a space ship and flown to points unknown seems like a bad idea. These movies are not based in our time they are based in a time when space travel is like taking a vacation to some weird lil hole in the wall here on Earth not a big deal. As far as why would they do it? Everyone has a price. You do, I do, everyone does. Most just not sure what it is. Right now somewhere on this world someone is doing something so dumb that they could get killed at any moment for no other reason than, its their job.
The goo is a bit of a conundrum. I have no idea why they'd need more than 1 canister to kill any planet.
Clearly this movie was made to stir up controversy, make us have questions. What better to do that than religion? I mean besides politics lol.
A bit to young? to watch DVDs? lol kidding But that splains somethings. Altho the ship landed differently in Prometheus than it showed in Alien, lets assume that is the ship they find in Alien. Alien - Weyland knew what was on that planet and sent a mining ship to look at a "distress beacon". When the guy was infected Weyland instructed the "robot" they had to preserve the life form at all costs, that included the crew. Aliens - they sent a terraforming colony to the same planet and when they lost contact with them sent marines in after them, again not to really save people but get the creature that they figured could be a weapon. Alien 3 - Ripley lands on a prison planet, I forget how a face hugger got to the planet and infected a dog, Ripley was infected when she was put in stasis from Aliens and once Weyland learns this they send a bunch of people to get the weapon. Alien Resurrection - they stopped fucking around and directly started cloning Ripley so they can get the fucking weapon. So I conclude that Weyland is like most corps and don't give a fuck about humans just about profits.AliceDoe said:No, I haven't seen the Alien movies. Partly because I'm a bit young for that, and partly because I've never been much for movies that are all about a big, scary monster and the way to kill it by destroying everything (which is the impression I've gotten of the Alien movies, as well as predator and films like that). I'm all for sci-fi, but it can be made so much deeper than that.
I never said you'd get in a car and do that. I said people do dangerous things in very dangerous places for a paycheck. At the start of the movie it said the crew was 17, I am assuming crew = all people on the ship. Of those 17 I count only 5 "scientist" (I am horrible with names lol) - Shaw, the guy that fucked her, the other woman that wasn't Vickers, the rock guy and the guy that got deepthroated by a giant worm. Weyland, Vickers and David were there for their own reasons. That leaves 9 ship crew whose job was to make the ship go where their boss(es) said it needed to go( ie their jobs) And the scientist on the trip were hell bent on finding answers. Hell one of them rather than go home(to saftey) went looking for that same answers when she knew the people she'd get them from wanted her and her planet dead.AliceDoe said:I don't know about you, but I wouldn't get in a car, blindfolded and taken to an undisclosed destination either - and cars are pretty damn commonplace today. These guys are scientists with plenty of education and overall smarts, I don't think it's logical that they'd agree to this no matter the money. This movie is not set far enough in the future to remove that human instinct, I don't think so at least.
As am I but seeings how atheists are in the minority in this world I wasn't really referring to us(even tho I said us..didn't mean atheists) when I said "raise questions." But more to stir up the religious nut jobs out there. No better way to get people to go see a movie than to have the nut jobs say not to =)AliceDoe said:As for the religious stuff - it doesn't make me have questions about my existence. It just makes me take the movie less serious because they feel the need to bring it up. But then again, I'm atheist...
Neudiin said:A bit to young? to watch DVDs? lol kidding But that splains somethings. Altho the ship landed differently in Prometheus than it showed in Alien, lets assume that is the ship they find in Alien. Alien - Weyland knew what was on that planet and sent a mining ship to look at a "distress beacon". When the guy was infected Weyland instructed the "robot" they had to preserve the life form at all costs, that included the crew. Aliens - they sent a terraforming colony to the same planet and when they lost contact with them sent marines in after them, again not to really save people but get the creature that they figured could be a weapon. Alien 3 - Ripley lands on a prison planet, I forget how a face hugger got to the planet and infected a dog, Ripley was infected when she was put in stasis from Aliens and once Weyland learns this they send a bunch of people to get the weapon. Alien Resurrection - they stopped fucking around and directly started cloning Ripley so they can get the fucking weapon. So I conclude that Weyland is like most corps and don't give a fuck about humans just about profits.AliceDoe said:No, I haven't seen the Alien movies. Partly because I'm a bit young for that, and partly because I've never been much for movies that are all about a big, scary monster and the way to kill it by destroying everything (which is the impression I've gotten of the Alien movies, as well as predator and films like that). I'm all for sci-fi, but it can be made so much deeper than that.
Neudiin said:I never said you'd get in a car and do that. I said people do dangerous things in very dangerous places for a paycheck. At the start of the movie it said the crew was 17, I am assuming crew = all people on the ship. Of those 17 I count only 5 "scientist" (I am horrible with names lol) - Shaw, the guy that fucked her, the other woman that wasn't Vickers, the rock guy and the guy that got deepthroated by a giant worm. Weyland, Vickers and David were there for their own reasons. That leaves 9 ship crew whose job was to make the ship go where their boss(es) said it needed to go( ie their jobs) And the scientist on the trip were hell bent on finding answers. Hell one of them rather than go home(to saftey) went looking for that same answers when she knew the people she'd get them from wanted her and her planet dead.AliceDoe said:I don't know about you, but I wouldn't get in a car, blindfolded and taken to an undisclosed destination either - and cars are pretty damn commonplace today. These guys are scientists with plenty of education and overall smarts, I don't think it's logical that they'd agree to this no matter the money. This movie is not set far enough in the future to remove that human instinct, I don't think so at least.
Neudiin said:As am I but seeings how atheists are in the minority in this world I wasn't really referring to us(even tho I said us..didn't mean atheists) when I said "raise questions." But more to stir up the religious nut jobs out there. No better way to get people to go see a movie than to have the nut jobs say not to =)AliceDoe said:As for the religious stuff - it doesn't make me have questions about my existence. It just makes me take the movie less serious because they feel the need to bring it up. But then again, I'm atheist...
Neudiin said:The thing about it is....no matter what the mission scientist by pure nature of what they do are curious. So if a geologist that had been to say 5 or 6 planets. I came to them and said hey I have an expedition to this that is going to go to a planet that will take almost 3 years to get to..you wanna go? I'll pay you X amount for the trip. Yeah they might ask some questions, the answers to which I really wouldn't have because no one has been there. Chances are, they'd go even with the unknown. Because that is what drives scientists...discovery of the unknown.
Speaking from a US view - our navy takes marines over to places all the time without knowing the marines mission. All the navy is to the marines is a ride. So the ship crew of the Prometheus knew to take the ship to point B and bring it back to point A. Which to me is totally logical. They don't need to know why, just how to drive err fly..whatever lol
And yeah...you tend to be around like minded people if you can be. I am the lone atheist in my family, I started questioning religion when I was 8 by 11 I was agnostic and by 16 or so figured there was no god. Many of my friends hate religion but still think there is creator or something akin to god. And I live in the south eastern US, the buckle of the bible belt so I run into religious nut jobs all the time.
Anyway....you should watch the other Alien movies, altho I gave the huge plot points away sorry. Alien is very good because of its isolation theme. Aliens is good because of the marines. The 3rd one is good...really good cept right at the end. The mercs in the 4th make that movie...lol I hate Alien vs Predator. I may have liked it had it taken place on another planet but it didn't. All dressed in parkas and shit then the final fight takes place outside, in Antarctica, in a wife beater
lol did we derail this or what? Mwahahaha....my job is done.